scholarly journals Late Paleogene emergence of a North American loess plateau

Geology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majie Fan ◽  
Ran Feng ◽  
John W. Geissman ◽  
Christopher J. Poulsen

Abstract The relative roles of tectonics and global climate in forming the hydroclimate for widespread eolian deposition remain controversial. Oligocene loess has been previously documented in the interior of western United States, but its spatiotemporal pattern and causes remain undetermined. Through new stratigraphic record documentation and data compilation, we reveal the time transgressive occurrence of loess beginning in the latest Eocene in the central Rocky Mountains, that expands eastward to the Great Plains across the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT). Our climate simulations show that moderate uplift of the southern North America Cordillera initiated drying in the Cordilleran hinterland and immediate foreland, forming a potential dust source and sink, and global cooling at the EOT expanded the drying and eolian deposition eastward by causing retreat of the North American Monsoon. Therefore, the eolian deposition reflects continental aridification induced both by regional tectonism and global climate change during the late Paleogene.

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 6707-6728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa S. Bukovsky ◽  
Carlos M. Carrillo ◽  
David J. Gochis ◽  
Dorit M. Hammerling ◽  
Rachel R. McCrary ◽  
...  

Abstract This study presents climate change results from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) suite of dynamically downscaled simulations for the North American monsoon system in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. The focus is on changes in precipitation and the processes driving the projected changes from the regional climate simulations and their driving coupled atmosphere–ocean global climate models. The effect of known biases on the projections is also examined. Overall, there is strong ensemble agreement for a large decrease in precipitation during the monsoon season; however, this agreement and the magnitude of the ensemble-mean change is likely deceiving, as the greatest decreases are produced by the simulations that are the most biased in the baseline/current climate. Furthermore, some of the greatest decreases in precipitation are being driven by changes in processes/phenomena that are less credible (e.g., changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation, when it is initially not simulated well). In other simulations, the processes driving the precipitation change may be plausible, but other biases (e.g., biases in low-level moisture or precipitation intensity) appear to be affecting the magnitude of the projected changes. The most and least credible simulations are clearly identified, while the other simulations are mixed in their abilities to produce projections of value.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 4566-4580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Torres-Alavez ◽  
Tereza Cavazos ◽  
Cuauhtemoc Turrent

Abstract The hypothesis that global warming during the twenty-first century will increase the land–sea thermal contrast (LSTC) and therefore the intensity of early season precipitation of the North American monsoon (NAM) is examined. To test this hypothesis, future changes (2075–99 minus 1979–2004 means) in LSTC, moisture flux convergence (MFC), vertical velocity, and precipitation in the region are analyzed using six global climate models (GCMs) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) under the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) emission scenario. A surface LSTC index shows that the continent becomes warmer than the ocean in May in the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) and ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim) and in June in the mean ensemble of the GCMs (ens_GCMs), and the magnitude of the positive LSTC is greater in the reanalyses than in the ens_GCMs during the historic period. However, the reanalyses underestimate July–August precipitation in the NAM region, while the ens_GCMs reproduces the peak season surprisingly well but overestimates it the rest of the year. The future ens_GCMs projects a doubling of the magnitude of the positive surface LSTC and an earlier start of the continental summer warming in mid-May. Contrary to the stated hypothesis, however, the mean projection suggests a slight decrease of monsoon coastal precipitation during June–August (JJA), which is attributed to increased midtropospheric subsidence, a reduced midtropospheric LSTC, and reduced MFC in the NAM coastal region. In contrast, the future ens_GCMs produces increased MFC and precipitation over the adjacent mountains during JJA and significantly more rainfall over the entire NAM region during September–October, weakening the monsoon retreat.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 8802-8826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa S. Bukovsky ◽  
David J. Gochis ◽  
Linda O. Mearns

Abstract The authors examine 17 dynamically downscaled simulations produced as part of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) for their skill in reproducing the North American monsoon system. The focus is on precipitation and the drivers behind the precipitation biases seen in the simulations of the current climate. Thus, a process-based approach to the question of model fidelity is taken in order to help assess confidence in this suite of simulations. The results show that the regional climate models (RCMs) forced with a reanalysis product and atmosphere-only global climate model (AGCM) time-slice simulations perform reasonably well over the core Mexican and southwest United States regions. Some of the dynamically downscaled simulations do, however, have strong dry biases in Arizona that are related to their inability to develop credible monsoon flow structure over the Gulf of California. When forced with different atmosphere–ocean coupled global climate models (AOGCMs) for the current period, the skill of the RCMs subdivides largely by the skill of the forcing or “parent” AOGCM. How the inherited biases affect the RCM simulations is investigated. While it is clear that the AOGCMs have a large influence on the RCMs, the authors also demonstrate where the regional models add value to the simulations and discuss the differential credibility of the six RCMs (17 total simulations), two AGCM time slices, and four AOGCMs examined herein. It is found that in-depth analysis of parent GCM and RCM scenarios can identify a meaningful subset of models that can produce credible simulations of the North American monsoon precipitation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Boos ◽  
Salvatore Pascale

Abstract The core of the North American monsoon consists of a band of intense rainfall along the west coast of Mexico[1, 2] and is commonly thought to be caused by thermal forcing from both land and the elevated terrain of that region[3-5]. Here we use observations, a global climate model, and stationary wave solutions to show that this rainfall maximum is instead generated when Mexico's Sierra Madre mountains mechanically force an adiabatic stationary wave by diverting extratropical eastward winds toward the equator; eastward, upslope flow in that wave lifts warm and moist air to produce convective rainfall. Land surface heat fluxes do precondition the atmosphere for convection, particularly in summer afternoons, but even if amplified are insufficient for producing the observed rainfall maximum. These results, together with dynamical structures in observations and models, indicate that the core monsoon should be understood as convectively enhanced orographic rainfall in a mechanically forced stationary wave, not as a classic, thermally forced tropical monsoon. This has implications for the response of the North American monsoon to past and future global climate change, making trends in jet stream interactions with orography of central importance.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livia Manser ◽  
Tyler Kukla ◽  
Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein

<p>The North American Great Plains are characterized by a sharp aridity gradient at around the 100<sup>th</sup> meridian with a more humid climate to the east and a more arid climate to the west. This aridity gradient shapes the region's agriculture and economy, and recent work suggests that arid conditions on the Great Plains may expand eastward with global warming. The abundant Neogene sediments of the Ogallala Formation in the Great Plains present an opportunity to reconstruct regional hydroclimate conditions at a time when <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> and global temperatures were much higher than today, providing insight into the aridity and ecosystem response to warming. We present new paleosol carbonate δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O data (n=366) across 37 sites spanning the Great Plains and compile previously published measurements (n=381) to evaluate the long-term hydroclimatic and ecosystem changes in the region during the late Neogene. This study combines a spatial and temporal analysis of carbon and oxygen isotope data with reactive-transport modeling of oxygen isotopes constrained by climate model output, providing critical constraints on the paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatological evolution of the Neogene Great Plains. Carbonate δ<sup>18</sup>O demonstrate remarkable similarity between the spatial pattern of paleo-precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O and modern precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O. Today, modern precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O over the Great Plains is set by the mixing between moist, high-δ<sup>18</sup>O moisture delivered by the Great Plains Low-Level Jet and drier, low-δ<sup>18</sup>O westerly air masses. Thus, in the absence of countervailing processes, we interpret this similarity between paleo and modern δ<sup>18</sup>O to indicate that the proportional mixing between these two air masses has been minimally influenced by changes in global climate and that any changes in the position of the 100<sup>th</sup> meridian aridity gradient has not been forced by dynamical changes in these two synoptic systems. In contrast, prior to the widespread appearance of C<sub>4</sub> plants in the landscape of the Great Plains, paleosol carbonate δ<sup>13</sup>C show a robust east-to-west gradient, with higher values to the west. We interpret this gradient as reflective of lower primary productivity and hence soil respiration to the west. Close comparison with modern primary productivity data indicates that primary productivity has declined and shifted eastward since the late Neogene, likely reflecting declining precipitation and/or a reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization during the late Neogene. Finally, δ<sup>13</sup>C increases across the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, which, consistent with previous studies, we interpret as a shift from a C<sub>3</sub> to a C<sub>4</sub> dominated landscape. We conclude that, to first order, the modern aridity gradient and the hydrologic processes that drive it are not strongly sensitive to changes in global climate and any shifts in this aridity gradient in response to rising CO<sub>2</sub> will be towards the west, rather than towards the east.</p>


Ecohydrology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique R. Vivoni ◽  
Alex J. Rinehart ◽  
Luis A. Méndez-Barroso ◽  
Carlos A. Aragón ◽  
Gautam Bisht ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document