The Effect of the Taste Receptor Protein T1R3 on the Development of Islet Tissue of the Murine Pancreas

2019 ◽  
Vol 484 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
V. O. Murovets ◽  
E. A. Sozontov ◽  
T. G. Zachepilo
2019 ◽  
Vol 484 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-120
Author(s):  
V. O. Murovets ◽  
E. A. Sozontov ◽  
T. G. Zachepilo

Protein T1R3, the main subunit of sweet, as well as amino acid, taste receptor, is expressed in the epithelium of the tongue and gastro intestinal tract, in β–cells of the pancreas, hypothalamus, and numerous other organs. Recently, convincing witnesses of T1R3 involvement in control of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and control of production of incretines and insulin, have been determined. In the study on Tas1r3-gene knockout mouse strain and parent strain C57Bl/6J as control, priority data concerning the effect of T1R3 on the morphological characteristics of Langerhans islets in the pancreas, are obtained. In Tas1r3 knockout animals, it is found that the size of the islets and their density in pancreatic tissue are reduced, as compared to the parent strain. Additionally, a decrease of expression of active caspase-3 in islets of gene-knockouts is demonstrated. The obtained data show that the lack of a functional, gene encoding sweet-taste receptor protein causes a dystrophy of the islet tissue and associates to the development of pathological changes in the pancreas specific to type-2 diabetes and obesity in humans.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 1337-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Lyall ◽  
Tam-Hao T. Phan ◽  
ZuoJun Ren ◽  
Shobha Mummalaneni ◽  
Pamela Melone ◽  
...  

Regulation of the putative amiloride and benzamil (Bz)-insensitive TRPV1t salt taste receptor by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) was studied by monitoring chorda tympani (CT) taste nerve responses to 0.1 M NaCl solutions containing Bz (5 × 10−6 M; a specific ENaC blocker) and resiniferatoxin (RTX; 0–10 × 10−6 M; a specific TRPV1 agonist) in Sprague-Dawley rats and in wildtype (WT) and TRPV1 knockout (KO) mice. In rats and WT mice, RTX elicited a biphasic effect on the NaCl + Bz CT response, increasing the CT response between 0.25 × 10−6 and 1 × 10−6 M. At concentrations >1 × 10−6 M, RTX inhibited the CT response. An increase in PIP2 by topical lingual application of U73122 (a phospholipase C blocker) or diC8-PIP2 (a short chain synthetic PIP2) inhibited the control NaCl + Bz CT response and decreased its sensitivity to RTX. A decrease in PIP2 by topical lingual application of phenylarsine oxide (a phosphoinositide 4 kinase blocker) enhanced the control NaCl + Bz CT response, increased its sensitivity to RTX stimulation, and inhibited the desensitization of the CT response at RTX concentrations >1 × 10−6 M. The ENaC-dependent NaCl CT responses were not altered by changes in PIP2. An increase in PIP2 enhanced CT responses to sweet (0.3 M sucrose) and bitter (0.01 M quinine) stimuli. RTX produced the same increase in the Bz-insensitive Na+response when present in salt solutions containing 0.1 M NaCl + Bz, 0.1 M monosodium glutamate + Bz, 0.1 M NaCl + Bz + 0.005 M SC45647, or 0.1 M NaCl + Bz + 0.01 M quinine. No effect of RTX was observed on CT responses in WT mice and rats in the presence of the TRPV1 blocker N-(3-methoxyphenyl)-4-chlorocinnamide (1 × 10−6 M) or in TRPV1 KO mice. We conclude that PIP2 is a common intracellular effector for sweet, bitter, umami, and TRPV1t-dependent salt taste, although in the last case, PIP2 seems to directly regulate the taste receptor protein itself, i.e., the TRPV1 ion channel or its taste receptor variant, TRPV1t.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huazhong He

More than thirty years ago, I proposed a theory about sweet and bitter molecules’ recognition by protein helical structures. Unfortunately the papers could not go to public platform until now. Inspired by the sweet taste theory<sup>1,2</sup>, this bitter taste theory conveys that bitter molecules are recognized by receptor protein helical structures. The recognition process is a dynamic action, in which the receptor protein helices have a torsion-spring-like oscillation between helical structures of 3.6 and 4 amino acids per turn. Based on the characteristics of the bitter receptor protein helix oscillation, it perfectly explains why in bitter molecules, only one unit of hydrogen donor (DH) or hydrogen acceptor (B) is enough in helping molecules to elicit bitter taste. The potential DH and B in bitter receptor are any NH or O of receptor’s peptide NHs and Os, which are the ones forming intramolecular H-bonds responsible for the formation of receptor protein helical structures. Furthermore, only one unit of DH or B is allowed for structurally simple ligands. As recognition sites are only associated with a small fraction – helix structure of whole bitter receptor, multiple binding sites or multiple receptors are well expected. As the oscillation may have different extent, it translates to bitterness intensity. According to ligand-receptor binding motion, bitter receptor could be divided into two kinds of spaces, which are similar to the situation in sweet taste receptor: main and side grooves. These have been discussed in context and especially great details in paper titled deciphering aspartyl peptide sweeteners <sup>2</sup>.


2009 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. S152
Author(s):  
Hyun Seok Song ◽  
Tae Hyun Kim ◽  
Sang Hun Lee ◽  
Un-Kyung Kim ◽  
Seunghun Hong ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Yoshida ◽  
Norihisa Yasui ◽  
Yuko Kusakabe ◽  
Chiaki Ito ◽  
Miki Akamatsu ◽  
...  

AbstractTaste receptor type 1 (T1r) is responsible for the perception of essential nutrients, such as sugars and amino acids, and evoking sweet and umami (savory) taste sensations. T1r receptors recognize many of the taste substances at their extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs). In order to detect a wide array of taste substances in the environment, T1r receptors often possess broad ligand specificities. However, the entire ranges of chemical spaces and their binding characteristics to any T1rLBDs have not been extensively analyzed. In this study, we exploited the differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) to medaka T1r2a/T1r3LBD, a current sole T1rLBD heterodimer amenable for recombinant preparation, and analyzed their thermal stabilization by adding various amino acids. The assay showed that the agonist amino acids induced thermal stabilization and shifted the melting temperatures (Tm) of the protein. An agreement between the DSF results and the previous biophysical assay was observed, suggesting that DSF can detect ligand binding at the orthosteric-binding site in T1r2a/T1r3LBD. The assay further demonstrated that most of the tested L-amino acids, but no D-amino acid, induced Tm shifts of T1r2a/T1r3LBD, indicating the broad L-amino acid specificities of the proteins probably with several different manners of recognition. The Tm shifts by each amino acid also showed a fair correlation with the responses exhibited by the full-length receptor, verifying the broad amino-acid binding profiles at the orthosteric site in LBD observed by DSF.


2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Brasser ◽  
Meghan B. Norman ◽  
Christian H. Lemon

Elevated alcohol consumption is associated with enhanced preference for sweet substances across species and may be mediated by oral alcohol-induced activation of neurobiological substrates for sweet taste. Here, we directly examined the contribution of the T1r3 receptor protein, important for sweet taste detection in mammals, to ethanol intake and preference and the neural processing of ethanol taste by measuring behavioral and central neurophysiological responses to oral alcohol in T1r3 receptor-deficient mice and their C57BL/6J background strain. T1r3 knockout and wild-type mice were tested in behavioral preference assays for long-term voluntary intake of a broad concentration range of ethanol, sucrose, and quinine. For neurophysiological experiments, separate groups of mice of each genotype were anesthetized, and taste responses to ethanol and stimuli of different taste qualities were electrophysiologically recorded from gustatory neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. Mice lacking the T1r3 receptor were behaviorally indifferent to alcohol (i.e., ∼50% preference values) at concentrations typically preferred by wild-type mice (5–15%). Central neural taste responses to ethanol in T1r3-deficient mice were significantly lower compared with C57BL/6J controls, a strain for which oral ethanol stimulation produced a concentration-dependent activation of sweet-responsive NTS gustatory neurons. An attenuated difference in ethanol preference between knockouts and controls at concentrations >15% indicated that other sensory and/or postingestive effects of ethanol compete with sweet taste input at high concentrations. As expected, T1r3 knockouts exhibited strongly suppressed behavioral and neural taste responses to sweeteners but did not differ from wild-type mice in responses to prototypic salt, acid, or bitter stimuli. These data implicate the T1r3 receptor in the sensory detection and transduction of ethanol taste.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huazhong He

More than thirty years ago, I proposed a theory about sweet and bitter molecules’ recognition by protein helical structures. Unfortunately the papers could not go to public platform until now. Inspired by the sweet taste theory<sup>1,2</sup>, this bitter taste theory conveys that bitter molecules are recognized by receptor protein helical structures. The recognition process is a dynamic action, in which the receptor protein helices have a torsion-spring-like oscillation between helical structures of 3.6 and 4 amino acids per turn. Based on the characteristics of the bitter receptor protein helix oscillation, it perfectly explains why in bitter molecules, only one unit of hydrogen donor (DH) or hydrogen acceptor (B) is enough in helping molecules to elicit bitter taste. The potential DH and B in bitter receptor are any NH or O of receptor’s peptide NHs and Os, which are the ones forming intramolecular H-bonds responsible for the formation of receptor protein helical structures. Furthermore, only one unit of DH or B is allowed for structurally simple ligands. As recognition sites are only associated with a small fraction – helix structure of whole bitter receptor, multiple binding sites or multiple receptors are well expected. As the oscillation may have different extent, it translates to bitterness intensity. According to ligand-receptor binding motion, bitter receptor could be divided into two kinds of spaces, which are similar to the situation in sweet taste receptor: main and side grooves. These have been discussed in context and especially great details in paper titled deciphering aspartyl peptide sweeteners <sup>2</sup>.


Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariba Assadi-Porter ◽  
James Radek ◽  
Hongyu Rao ◽  
Marco Tonelli

Taste signaling is a complex process that is linked to obesity and its associated metabolic syndromes. The sweet taste is mediated through a heterodimeric G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) in a species-specific manner and at multi-tissue specific levels. The sweet receptor recognizes a large number of ligands with structural and functional diversities to modulate different amplitudes of downstream signaling pathway(s). The human sweet-taste receptor has been extremely difficult to study by biophysical methods due to the difficulty in producing large homogeneous quantities of the taste-receptor protein and the lack of reliable in vitro assays to precisely measure productive ligand binding modes that lead to activation of the receptor protein. We report here a multimodal high throughput assay to monitor ligand binding, receptor stability and conformational changes to model the molecular ligand-receptor interactions. We applied saturation transfer difference nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (STD-NMR) complemented by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy (IF) to characterize binding interactions. Our method using complementary NMR and biophysical analysis is advantageous to study the mechanism of ligand binding and signaling processes in other GPCRs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document