Trends in prescription of biological agents and outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of the Dutch national Arthritis and Biologics in Children Register

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1379-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke H Otten ◽  
Janneke Anink ◽  
Femke H M Prince ◽  
Marinka Twilt ◽  
S J Vastert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Biological Agents ◽  
Biological Agent ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Early Introduction ◽  
Systemic Jia ◽  
First Choice

BackgroundTreatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has changed dramatically since the introduction of biological agents in 1999.ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in prescription patterns of biological agents and the subsequent outcome of JIA.MethodsThe Arthritis and Biologics in Children register (multicentre prospective observational study) aimed to include all consecutive patients with JIA in the Netherlands who had started biological agents since 1999. Patients were divided according to year of introduction of first biological agent. Patient characteristics at introduction of the first biological agent and its effectiveness were analysed over 12 years.Results335 patients with non-systemic JIA and 86 patients with systemic JIA started a biological agent between 1999 and 2010. Etanercept remained the most often prescribed biological agent for non-systemic JIA; anakinra became first choice for systemic JIA. The use of systemic glucocorticoids and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs before biological agents decreased. During these 12 years of observation, biological agents were prescribed earlier in the disease course and to patients with lower baseline JADAS (Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score) disease activity. All baseline disease activity parameters were lowered in patients with non-systemic JIA. In systemic JIA, prescription patterns changed towards very early introduction of biological agents (median 0.4 years of disease duration) in patients with a low number of joints with active arthritis and high erythrocyte sedimentation rates. These changes for both systemic and non-systemic JIA resulted in more patients with inactive disease after 3 and 15 months of treatment.ConclusionsBiological agents are increasingly prescribed, earlier in the disease and in patients with JIA with lower disease activity. These changes are accompanied by better short-term disease outcomes.

Tumor Necrosis Factor-blocking Agents for Children with Enthesitis-related Arthritis — Data from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children Register, 1999–2010

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2258-2263 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIEKE H. OTTEN ◽  
FEMKE H.M. PRINCE ◽  
MARINKA TWILT ◽  
REBECCA ten CATE ◽  
WINEKE ARMBRUST ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Biological Agents ◽  
Biological Agent ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Enthesitis Related Arthritis ◽  
Blocking Agents ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biological agents in children with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA).Methods.All patients with ERA in whom a biological agent was initiated between 1999 and 2010 were selected from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children (ABC) register. In this ongoing multicenter observational register, data on the course of the disease and medication use are retrieved prospectively at the start of the biological agent, after 3 months, and yearly thereafter. Inactive disease was assessed in accordance with the Wallace criteria.Results.Twenty-two patients with ERA started taking 1 or more biological agents: 20 took etanercept, 2 took adalimumab (1 switched from etanercept to adalimumab), and 2 took infliximab (1 switched from etanercept to infliximab). Characteristics: 77% were male, 77% had enthesitis, 68% were HLA-B27-positive. The median age of onset was 10.4 (IQR 9.4–12.0) years; median followup from the start of the biological agent was 1.2 (IQR 0.5–2.4) years. Intention-to-treat analysis shows that inactive disease was achieved in 7 of 22 patients (32%) after 3 months, 5 of 13 patients (38%) after 15 months, and 5 of 8 patients (63%) after 27 months of treatment. Two patients discontinued etanercept because of ineffectiveness, and switched to adalimumab (inactive disease achieved) or infliximab (decline in joints with arthritis after 3 months of treatment). One patient discontinued etanercept because of remission, but had flare and restarted treatment, with good clinical response. No serious adverse events occurred.Conclusion.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents seem effective and safe for patients with ERA that was previously unresponsive to 1 or more DMARD. However, a sustained disease-free state could not be achieved, and none discontinued TNF-blocking agents successfully.

scholarly journals P05 A national survey of clinical practice of corticosteroid use in newly diagnosed or flaring cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis across the UK

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Jones ◽  
Dannii Clayton ◽  
Gloria Nkhoma ◽  
Frances Sherratt ◽  
Matthew Peak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rapid Induction ◽  
Systemic Jia ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Background Corticosteroids (CS) are widely used for rapid-action or induction treatment in children and young people (CYP) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Given a lack of evidence base on CS induction regimen for CYP with JIA, and since criteria for choosing CS are based on healthcare professional (HCP) preference, further research is needed (1). Methods A national electronic survey was undertaken among HCPs across the UK as part of the Steroid Induction Regimen for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SIRJIA) study. We aimed to establish the opinions of HCPs current practice regarding the clinical criteria for commencing CS treatment Results A total of 39 (24%) responses were received from 162 HCPs. These included 22 (56%) NHS consultants, five (13%) grid trainees, eight (21%) clinical nurse specialists and four other HCPs (10%). The most common treatments newly diagnosed JIA or a disease flare were intra-articular IACS or a combination of DMARDs and IAS (except for systemic JIA and oligoarticular JIA). The majority of HCPs 17 would treat new and flaring CYP the same with 53% choosing a different regime or not answering. The key criteria HCPs used for commencing CS and choosing route of administration were rapid induction of remission (31 (89%)), high disease activity (31 (89%)), severity of systemic JIA (30 (86%)) and level of inflammation (28 (80%)), see Table 1. The main determinants of route of administration was disease severity disease subtype. The majority of HCPs (52-72%) would consider entering CYP with JIA into a trial randomising to modes of administration. P14 Table 1 Reasons of CS Choice Number N = 39 Percentage % High Disease Activity 35 89.7 Rapid induction of remission 34 87.18 Severity of Systemic JIA 34 87.18 Level of inflammation 32 82.5 Severe Uveitis 30 76.92 JIA subtype 27 68.21 Targeting Specific Joints 26 66.67 Level of Disability 18 46.15 Level of pain 16 41.03 Long-standing Disease 11 28.1 Patient reluctance to take DMARDS 8 20.5 Conclusion The results from this national survey of clinical practice showed varying practices in the management of new CYP with JIA and those that are flaring. The majority of HCPs who completed this survey, indicated that they would be prepared to consider entering CYP into a trial that randomised to the four CS delivery methods. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Outcome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a population-based study from Sweden

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabet Berthold ◽  
Bengt Månsson ◽  
Robin Kahn
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Annual Incidence ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
Systemic Jia ◽  
Record Review

Abstract Background As the treatment arsenal for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has expanded during the last decades, follow-up studies are needed on children diagnosed in the era of biological treatment to evaluate if this has improved the outcome. Our aim was to study the epidemiology and outcome of JIA in southern Sweden using a population-based cohort of children with a validated diagnosis of JIA collected over 9 years. Methods Potential cases of JIA between 2002 and 2010 were collected after a database search, using the ICD codes M08-M09. The study area was Skåne, the southernmost county of Sweden (population 1.24 million; 17.6% aged < 16 years). The JIA diagnosis was validated and subcategorized through medical record review based on the criteria defined by the International League of Associations for Rheumatism (ILAR). Parameters on disease activity and pharmacologic treatment were recorded annually until the end of the study period (December 31, 2015). Results In total, 251 cases of JIA were confirmed. The mean annual incidence rate for JIA was estimated to be 12.8/100,000 children < 16 years, with the highest age-specific annual incidence at the age of 2 years (36/100,000). Oligoarthritis was the largest subgroup (44.7%), and systemic JIA was the smallest subgroup (2.8%). Methotrexate was the most common disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug prescribed (60.6%). Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors were used as treatment for 23.9% of the children. Only 40.0% of the follow-up years, with a median follow-up time of 8 years, were free of arthritis or uveitis. Uveitis occurred in 10.8% of the children (8.0% chronic uveitis), and the need for joint corrective orthopedic surgery was 9.2%. Conclusions The incidence of JIA in this well-defined, population-based cohort is slightly lower than in previously published studies from Scandinavia. The need for orthopedic surgery and the presence of uveitis are diminished compared to studies with patients diagnosed more than 20 years ago. Children with JIA however still experience disease activity more than 50% of the time. In conclusion, we still have long-term challenges in the care for children with JIA, in spite of state-of-the-art treatment.

scholarly journals Long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept in JIA: an 18-year experience from the BIKER registry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Armaroli ◽  
Ariane Klein ◽  
Gerd Ganser ◽  
Michael J. Ruehlmann ◽  
Frank Dressler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Minimal Disease

Abstract Background: At present, etanercept represents the most commonly prescribed biologic agent for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment. Children and adolescents with JIA are often treated with etanercept over long periods, sometimes even into adulthood. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the long-term safety of etanercept compared to a biologic-naïve cohort, and to assess the long-term treatment response upon continuous etanercept exposure using data from the German biologics registry (BiKeR). Methods: JIA patients newly exposed to etanercept were documented in the BiKeR registry from January 2001 till March 2019, and baseline characteristics, effectiveness, as well as safety parameters were analysed. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), JADAS-defined minimal disease activity and remission, JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, as well as ACR-inactive disease definition. Safety assessments were based on adverse events (AE) reports. Results: 2725 new etanercept users with a diagnosis of JIA were registered. Of these, etanercept was received as a first-line biologic by 95.8% and as monotherapy without concomitant methotrexate by 31.5%. After nine years on continuous treatment, 68.1% of patients presented minimal disease activity, 43.1% JADAS-defined remission on drug and 36.6% ACR-inactive disease. JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates were still 82/79/71/54% after 9 years of treatment. Overall, 2053 AEs (34.3/100PY), including 226 serious AEs (SAE, 3.8/100PY), were observed upon etanercept, compared to 1345 AEs [35.6/100PY; p=0.3] and 52 SAEs (1.4/100PY; p=0.0001) in the biologic-naïve cohort. Respective exposure-adjusted rates for etanercept and biologic-naïve patients were 0.9/100PY and 0.2/100PY (p=0.0001) for serious infections, 0.4/100PY and 0.1/100PY (p=0.01) for zoster reactivation, 0.3/100PY and 0.03/100PY (p=0.015) for inflammatory bowel disease, 1.9/100PY and 1.4/100PY (p=0.09) for uveitis. Three and two malignancies were documented in the etanercept and biologic-naïve groups, as well as three and one deaths, respectively. Conclusions: No new safety signal was observed, especially no increased risk for malignancies or autoimmune disorders other than inflammatory bowel disease. However, SAEs and serious infections, though infrequent, were more often reported on etanercept than in biologic-naïve patients. In addition, etanercept demonstrated a long-term maintenance of clinical benefits up to nine years of continuous treatment. Keywords: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, JIA-treatment, etanercept, TNF-inhibitors, biologics registry, drug surveillance

scholarly journals Serum Calprotectin (S100A8/A9): A Promising Biomarker in Diagnosis and Follow-up in Different Subgroups of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline La ◽  
Phu Quoc Lê ◽  
Alina Ferster ◽  
Laurence Goffin ◽  
Delphine Spruyt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Minimal Disease ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract IntroductionIn the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), there is a lack of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This study assesses the use of serum calprotectin (sCal) as a marker to monitor disease activity, and as a classification and prognosis tool of response to treatment or risk of flares in patients with JIA. MethodsEighty-one patients with JIA from the CAP48 multicentric cohort were included in this study, as well as 11 non-pediatric healthy controls. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was used to quantify sCal with a commercial kit.ResultsPatients with an active disease compared to healthy controls and to patients with inactive disease showed an 8-fold and a 2-fold increased level of sCal respectively. sCal was found to be correlated with the CRP and even more strongly with the ESR. Evolution of DAS28 scores correlated well with evolution of sCal, as opposed to evolution of CRP. With regard to CRP, sCal could differentiate forms with active oligoarthritis from polyarthritis and systemic forms. However, sCal brought an added value compared to the CRP as a prognosis marker. Indeed, patients with active disease and reaching minimal disease activity (according to JADAS) at 6 months following the test had higher sCal levels, while patients with inactive disease had higher sCal levels if a flare was observed up to 3 to 9 months following the test.ConclusionsThis study confirms the potential uses of serum calprotectin as a biomarker in the diagnosis and follow-up of JIA.

Proposed Core Set of Items for Measuring Disease Activity in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Limenis ◽  
Brian M. Feldman ◽  
Camille Achonu ◽  
Michelle Batthish ◽  
Bianca Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Core Set ◽  
Activity Measures ◽  
International Experts ◽  
Disease Activity Measures ◽  
Active Joints

Objective.To date, there are no standardized disease activity tools for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). We developed a core set of disease activity measures for sJIA.Methods.We conducted a validation study in patients with sJIA recruited from 3 Canadian institutions. Disease activity scores were based on questionnaires, clinical factors, and laboratory measures. The physician’s global assessment was our criterion standard. We determined the strength of association of each item with the criterion standard. We then surveyed international experts to determine the top 10 items. Finally, we used the experts’ responses to generate a proposed core set of disease activity measures.Results.We enrolled 57 subjects — 26 with moderately or severely active disease, and 31 with mildly active or inactive disease. Items that most strongly correlated with the criterion standard were number of active joints (r = 0.79), parent’s global assessment of disease activity (r = 0.53), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; r = 0.62), and C-reactive protein (CRP; r = 0.61). The response rate from international experts was 82% (154/187). Items with the most votes, in descending order, were number of active joints, number of days with fever in the preceding 2 weeks, patient’s and parent’s global assessments of disease activity, sJIA rash, ESR, CRP, and hemoglobin level.Conclusion.We propose a core set of items for measuring disease activity in sJIA. Future research should be aimed at further validation of this core set in the international context.

scholarly journals The risk and nature of flares in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1092-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Guzman ◽  
Kiem Oen ◽  
Adam M Huber ◽  
Karen Watanabe Duffy ◽  
Gilles Boire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Active Joint ◽  
Systemic Jia ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveTo describe probabilities and characteristics of disease flares in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to identify clinical features associated with an increased risk of flare.MethodsWe studied children in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) prospective inception cohort. A flare was defined as a recurrence of disease manifestations after attaining inactive disease and was called significant if it required intensification of treatment. Probability of first flare was calculated with Kaplan–Meier methods, and associated features were identified using Cox regression.Results1146 children were followed up a median of 24 months after attaining inactive disease. We observed 627 first flares (54.7% of patients) with median active joint count of 1, physician global assessment (PGA) of 12 mm and duration of 27 weeks. Within a year after attaining inactive disease, the probability of flare was 42.5% (95% CI 39% to 46%) for any flare and 26.6% (24% to 30%) for a significant flare. Within a year after stopping treatment, it was 31.7% (28% to 36%) and 25.0% (21% to 29%), respectively. A maximum PGA >30 mm, maximum active joint count >4, rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive polyarthritis, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biological agents before attaining inactive disease were associated with increased risk of flare. Systemic JIA was associated with the lowest risk of flare.ConclusionsIn this real-practice JIA cohort, flares were frequent, usually involved a few swollen joints for an average of 6 months and 60% led to treatment intensification. Children with a severe disease course had an increased risk of flare.

scholarly journals Validating 10-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score cut-offs for disease activity levels in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Backström ◽  
Pirjo Tynjälä ◽  
Kristiina Aalto ◽  
Minna-Maija Grönlund ◽  
Heikki Ylijoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Juvenile Arthritis ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Polyarticular Disease

ObjectivesTo validate cut-offs of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (JADAS10) and clinical JADAS10 (cJADAS10) and to compare them with other patient cohorts.MethodsIn a national multicentre study, cross-sectional data on recent visits of 337 non-systemic patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) were collected from nine paediatric outpatient units. The cut-offs were tested with receiver operating characteristic curve-based methods, and too high, too low and correct classification rates (CCRs) were calculated.ResultsOur earlier presented JADAS10 cut-offs seemed feasible based on the CCRs, but the cut-off values between low disease activity (LDA) and moderate disease activity (MDA) were adjusted. When JADAS10 cut-offs for clinically inactive disease (CID) were increased to 1.5 for patients with oligoarticular disease and 2.7 for patients with polyarticular disease, as recently suggested in a large multinational register study, altogether 11 patients classified as CID by the cut-off had one active joint. We suggest JADAS10 cut-off values for oligoarticular/polyarticular disease to be in CID: 0.0–0.5/0.0–0.7, LDA: 0.6–3.8/0.8–5.1 and MDA: >3.8/5.1. Suitable cJADAS10 cut-offs are the same as JADAS10 cut-offs in oligoarticular disease. In polyarticular disease, cJADAS10 cut-offs are 0–0.7 for CID, 0.8–5.0 for LDA and >5.0 for MDA.ConclusionInternational consensus on JADAS cut-off values is needed, and such a cut-off for CID should preferably exclude patients with active joints in the CID group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document