OP0260 Lower Intestinal Perforations Are More Frequent and Present Untypically in Patients Treated with Tocilizumab Compared To Other Biologic or Conventional Synthetic DMARDS

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 156.3-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Strangfeld ◽  
A. Richter ◽  
B. Siegmund ◽  
P. Herzer ◽  
K. Rockwitz ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 504-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Strangfeld ◽  
A Richter ◽  
B Siegmund ◽  
P Herzer ◽  
K Rockwitz ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate the risk of developing lower intestinal perforations (LIPs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ).MethodsIn 13 310 patients with RA observed in the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observation of Biologic Therapy, 141 serious gastrointestinal events possibly associated with perforations were reported until 31 October 2015. All events were validated independently by two physicians, blinded for treatment exposure.Results37 LIPs (32 in the colon/sigma) were observed in 53 972 patient years (PYs). Only two patients had a history of diverticulitis (one in TCZ). Age, current/cumulative glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were significantly associated with the risk of LIP. The crude incidence rate of LIP was significantly increased in TCZ (2.7/1000 PYs) as compared with all other treatments (0.2−0.6/1000 PYs). The adjusted HR (ref: conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) in TCZ was 4.48 (95% CI 2.0 to 10.0), in tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) 1.04 (0.5 to 2.3) and in other biologic DMARDs 0.33 (0.1 to 1.4). 4/11 patients treated with TCZ presented without typical symptoms of LIP (acute abdomen, severe pain). Only one patient had highly elevated C reactive protein (CRP). One quarter of patients died within 30 days after LIP (9/37), 5/11 under TCZ, 2/13 under TNFi and 2/11 under csDMARD treatment.ConclusionsThe incidence rates of LIP under TCZ found in this real world study are in line with those seen in randomised controlled trials of TCZ and higher than in all other DMARD treatments. To ensure safe use of TCZ in daily practice, physicians and patients should be aware that, under TCZ, LIP may occur with mild symptoms only and without CRP elevation.


1972 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Orda ◽  
Theodor Wiznitzer ◽  
Hilel Nathan

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1613.1-1613
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  

Background:For decades, NSAID have been used as the first-line drugs to treat axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). However, the NSAID prescription strategy is not clearly detailed and it varies from one clinician to another.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the NSAID prescription modalities adopted in ax-SpA and the differences between these modalities.Methods:This is a descriptive study including 200 cases of ax-SpA fulfilling the ASAS 2009 criteria and diagnosed between January 2000 and October 2019. The demographic and clinical features of the ax-SpA were collected and the modalities of prescription of NSAID were retrospectively assessed.Results:Our population consists of 138 men and 62 women with a mean age of 43,3 ± 11,2 years. The HLA B-27 antigen was present in 50,8% of cases. The ax-SpA was a pure axial form in 67% of patients, associated with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in 19%, 21,5% and 1,5% respectively.One hundred eighty patients (90%) had been treated with NSAIDs. The NSAIDs used were: the Diclofenac (57.5%), Indomethacin (37.5%), Piroxicam (36%), clecoxib (34%), Naproxen (29.5%) and ketoprofen (13%). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) had used at least 3 NSAIDs.Among the 180 patients treated with NSAID, 88 patients (48,8%) were treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in association with NSAID: Salazopyrine (43,3%) and Methotrexate (13,3%). Seventy-one patients (39,4%) had necessitated the use of anti-TNF alpha.NSAIDs were used continuously in 115 patients (63.8%) and the maximum dose of NSAIDs was used in 78 patients (43.3%). By comparing patients who used maximum doses of NSAIDs and those who used NSAID continuously with other patients, we noticed that the use of biological treatments was more frequent in those groups (p = 0,01 and p=0,004 respectively).In addition, while comparing the group of patients co-treated with csDMARDs with other patients treated with NSAID on monotherapy, we noted that this group of patients had more arthritis (p<0,0001), enthesitis (p=0,02), psoriasis (p=0,04) and necessitated more biological treatments (p=0,01).Conclusion:Our results suggest that maximal doses and/or continuous prescription of NSAID were mainly used if there was no response to that treatment. The csDMARDs were more prescribed if there were peripheral manifestations or psoriatic arthritis and those forms were also more candidates to biological treatments.References:[1]Wang R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2019;Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
J T Attridge ◽  
A C Herman ◽  
M J Gurka ◽  
M P Griffin ◽  
E D McGahren ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Klotsche ◽  
Ariane Klein ◽  
Martina Niewerth ◽  
Paula Hoff ◽  
Daniel Windschall ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To determine (i) correlates for etanercept (ETA) discontinuation after achieving an inactive disease and for the subsequent risk of flare and (ii) to analyze the effectiveness of ETA in the re-treatment after a disease flare. Methods Data from two ongoing prospective registries, BiKeR and JuMBO, were used for the analysis. Both registries provide individual trajectories of clinical data and outcomes from childhood to adulthood in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Results A total of 1724 patients were treated first with ETA treatment course (338 with second, 54 with third ETA course). Similar rates of discontinuation due to ineffectiveness and adverse events could be observed for the first (19.4%/6.2%), second (18.6%/5.9%), and third (14.8%/5.6%) ETA course. A total of 332 patients (+/−methotrexate, 19.3%) discontinued ETA after achieving remission with the first ETA course. Younger age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, p < 0.001), persistent oligoarthritis (HR 1.89, p = 0.004), and shorter duration between JIA onset and ETA start (HR 1.10, p < 0.001), as well as good response to therapy within the first 6 months of treatment (HR 1.11, p < 0.001) significantly correlated to discontinuation with inactive disease. Reoccurrence of active disease was reported for 77% of patients with mean time to flare of 12.1 months. We could not identify any factor correlating to flare risk. The majority of patients were re-treated with ETA (n = 117 of 161; 72.7%) after the flare. One in five patients (n = 23, 19.7%) discontinued ETA again after achieving an inactive disease and about 70% of the patients achieved an inactive disease 12 months after restarting ETA. Conclusion The study confirms the effectiveness of ETA even for re-treatment of patients with JIA. Our data highlight the association of an early bDMARD treatment with a higher rate of inactive disease indicating a window of opportunity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1613.3-1614
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  

Background:Tumour necrosis factor blockers (anti-TNFs) are typically used in axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) when the disease has not responded adequately to conventional therapy. However, the effects of the comedication conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with anti-TNFs are inconclusive.Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of comedication csDMARD and anti-TNF compared with anti-TNFs on monotherapy.Methods:A descriptive retrospective study including 85 patients with ax-SpA according to the criteria of the group ASAS on 2009 and having received anti-TNFs between January 2000 and October 2019.The patients were divided on two groups, those who had received combined therapy with cs-DMARDs and those who had received anti-TNFs on monotherapy.The response to treatment was assessed with the ASAS 40 response and partial remission at 3 and 6 months of treatment and was compared between the two groups.Results:Our populations consists of 67 men and 18 women with a mean age of 44,4 ± 10,9 years. The mean period of evolution was 12,3 ± 9,1 years and 52,2% of patients were HLA-B27 positive. The ax-SpA was associated with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in 17,6%, 17,6% and 1,2% respectively.Fifty-nine patients (69,4%) were treated with anti-TNF alpha on monotherapy and 26 patients (30,6%) had combined therapy. The ASAS 40 response was achieved in 45,6% of patients at 3 months and 64,1 % of them at 6 months of anti-TNFs treatment. Among them, 7,4% had obtained partial remission at 3 months and 20,3% at 6 months of treatment.There was statically significant difference between the two groups on the ASAS 40 response or the partial remission at 3 and 6 months of treatments.Conclusion:The comedication therapy with csDMARDs does not influence the efficacy of anti-TNFs in ax-SpA patients suggesting no benefit in the concomitant use of these drugs in clinical practice.References:[1]Simone Det al. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2015;93:65–9.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2018 ◽  
pp. bcr-2017-222746
Author(s):  
Francesc Simo Alari ◽  
Israel Gutierrez

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 754-761
Author(s):  
Remi Kondo ◽  
Norihiro Yuasa ◽  
Eiji Takeuchi ◽  
Yasutomo Goto ◽  
Hideo Miyake ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document