scholarly journals AB0635 HOW ARE NON STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAID) PRESCRIBED IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1613.1-1613
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
First Line ◽  
Peripheral Arthritis ◽  
Biological Treatments ◽  
Synthetic Dmards ◽  
Nsaid Prescription ◽  
Axial Form ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs

Background:For decades, NSAID have been used as the first-line drugs to treat axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). However, the NSAID prescription strategy is not clearly detailed and it varies from one clinician to another.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the NSAID prescription modalities adopted in ax-SpA and the differences between these modalities.Methods:This is a descriptive study including 200 cases of ax-SpA fulfilling the ASAS 2009 criteria and diagnosed between January 2000 and October 2019. The demographic and clinical features of the ax-SpA were collected and the modalities of prescription of NSAID were retrospectively assessed.Results:Our population consists of 138 men and 62 women with a mean age of 43,3 ± 11,2 years. The HLA B-27 antigen was present in 50,8% of cases. The ax-SpA was a pure axial form in 67% of patients, associated with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in 19%, 21,5% and 1,5% respectively.One hundred eighty patients (90%) had been treated with NSAIDs. The NSAIDs used were: the Diclofenac (57.5%), Indomethacin (37.5%), Piroxicam (36%), clecoxib (34%), Naproxen (29.5%) and ketoprofen (13%). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) had used at least 3 NSAIDs.Among the 180 patients treated with NSAID, 88 patients (48,8%) were treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in association with NSAID: Salazopyrine (43,3%) and Methotrexate (13,3%). Seventy-one patients (39,4%) had necessitated the use of anti-TNF alpha.NSAIDs were used continuously in 115 patients (63.8%) and the maximum dose of NSAIDs was used in 78 patients (43.3%). By comparing patients who used maximum doses of NSAIDs and those who used NSAID continuously with other patients, we noticed that the use of biological treatments was more frequent in those groups (p = 0,01 and p=0,004 respectively).In addition, while comparing the group of patients co-treated with csDMARDs with other patients treated with NSAID on monotherapy, we noted that this group of patients had more arthritis (p<0,0001), enthesitis (p=0,02), psoriasis (p=0,04) and necessitated more biological treatments (p=0,01).Conclusion:Our results suggest that maximal doses and/or continuous prescription of NSAID were mainly used if there was no response to that treatment. The csDMARDs were more prescribed if there were peripheral manifestations or psoriatic arthritis and those forms were also more candidates to biological treatments.References:[1]Wang R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2019;Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0637 EFFICACY OF COMEDICATION OF CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DMARDS WITH TNF BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1613.3-1614
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Remission ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Synthetic Dmards ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Background:Tumour necrosis factor blockers (anti-TNFs) are typically used in axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) when the disease has not responded adequately to conventional therapy. However, the effects of the comedication conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with anti-TNFs are inconclusive.Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of comedication csDMARD and anti-TNF compared with anti-TNFs on monotherapy.Methods:A descriptive retrospective study including 85 patients with ax-SpA according to the criteria of the group ASAS on 2009 and having received anti-TNFs between January 2000 and October 2019.The patients were divided on two groups, those who had received combined therapy with cs-DMARDs and those who had received anti-TNFs on monotherapy.The response to treatment was assessed with the ASAS 40 response and partial remission at 3 and 6 months of treatment and was compared between the two groups.Results:Our populations consists of 67 men and 18 women with a mean age of 44,4 ± 10,9 years. The mean period of evolution was 12,3 ± 9,1 years and 52,2% of patients were HLA-B27 positive. The ax-SpA was associated with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in 17,6%, 17,6% and 1,2% respectively.Fifty-nine patients (69,4%) were treated with anti-TNF alpha on monotherapy and 26 patients (30,6%) had combined therapy. The ASAS 40 response was achieved in 45,6% of patients at 3 months and 64,1 % of them at 6 months of anti-TNFs treatment. Among them, 7,4% had obtained partial remission at 3 months and 20,3% at 6 months of treatment.There was statically significant difference between the two groups on the ASAS 40 response or the partial remission at 3 and 6 months of treatments.Conclusion:The comedication therapy with csDMARDs does not influence the efficacy of anti-TNFs in ax-SpA patients suggesting no benefit in the concomitant use of these drugs in clinical practice.References:[1]Simone Det al. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2015;93:65–9.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Recent advances in managing axial spondyloarthritis

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 697
Author(s):  
Priyanka Agrawal ◽  
Pedro M. Machado
Keyword(s):  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Axial Skeleton ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biologic Drugs ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Line Drug

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease that predominantly affects the axial skeleton. The advent of biologic drugs has transformed the management of patients with axSpA. However, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain the first-line drug treatment for axSpA. The optimal management of patients with axSpA requires a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities, namely exercise and physical therapy. This review looks at novel therapeutic options in patients with axSpA. It also summarises current evidence regarding radiographic progression and treat-to-target in axSpA.

THU0230 Anti-TNF Alpha Drugs Retention Rate at Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: HUR-BIO Real Life Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 279.2-280
Author(s):  
U. Kalyoncu ◽  
H. Babaoglu ◽  
A. Erden ◽  
L. Kilic ◽  
M. Torgutalp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Tnf Alpha

Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis: Effect on Peripheral Arthritis and Differential Features With Axial Spondyloarthritis in South America

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201627
Author(s):  
Rodrigo García Salinas ◽  
Einer Sanchez Prado ◽  
Santiago Ruta
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
South America ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Hla B27 ◽  
Skin Involvement ◽  
Peripheral Arthritis ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Axial Involvement

Reported data of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are variable (25–70%). This variability is mainly linked to different ways of defining this feature. Gladman1 established that the prevalence of axial involvement in PsA was close to 50% and that it is associated with HLA-B27. Likewise, psoriasis (PsO) spondylitis, unlike ankylosing spondylitis (AS), is characterized by not having a greater preponderance of the male sex, greater skin involvement, and a less severe course.2

Axial spondyloarthritis

2013 ◽  
pp. 879-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
Joachim Sieper
Keyword(s):  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Axial Skeleton ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Hla B27 ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Active Inflammation

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease predominantly of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the spine. It starts normally in the second decade of life and has a slight male predominance. The prevalence is between 0.2% and 0.8% and is strongly dependent on the prevalence of HLA-B27 in a given population. AxSpA can be split in patients with radiographic axSpA (also termed ankylosing spondylitis (AS)) and in patients with non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). For the diagnosis of AS, the presence of radiographic sacroiliitis is mandatory. However, radiographs do not detect active inflammation but only structural bony damage. Most recently new classification criteria for axSpA have been developed by the Assessment of Spondylo-Arthritis International Society (ASAS) which cover AS but also the earlier form of nr-axSpA. MRI has become an important new tool for the detection of subchondral bone marrow inflammation in SIJ and spine and has become increasingly important for an early diagnosis. HLA-B27 plays a central role in the pathogenesis but its exact interaction with the immune system has not yet been clarified. Besides pain and stiffness in the axial skeleton patients suffer also from periods of peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, and uveitis. New bone formation as a reaction to inflammation and subsequent ankylosis of the spine determine long-term outcome in a subgroup of patients. Currently only non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers have been proven to be effective in the medical treatment of axial SpA, and international ASAS recommendations for the structured management of axial SpA have been published based on these two types of drugs. Conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate are not effective.

Nonopioid, Multimodal Analgesia as First-line Therapy After Otolaryngology Operations: Primer on Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982094701
Author(s):  
John D. Cramer ◽  
Michael L. Barnett ◽  
Samantha Anne ◽  
Brian T. Bateman ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Objective To offer pragmatic, evidence-informed advice on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-line therapy after surgery. This companion to the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) clinical practice guideline (CPG), “Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations,” presents data on potency, bleeding risk, and adverse effects for ibuprofen, naproxen, ketorolac, meloxicam, and celecoxib. Data Sources National Guidelines Clearinghouse, CMA Infobase, National Library of Guidelines, NICE, SIGN, New Zealand Guidelines Group, Australian National Health and Medical, Research Council, TRIP database, PubMed, Guidelines International Network, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, BIOSIS Previews, ISI Web of Science, AHRQ, and HSTAT. Review Methods AAO-HNS opioid CPG literature search strategy, supplemented by PubMed/MEDLINE searches on NSAIDs, emphasizing systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Conclusion NSAIDs provide highly effective analgesia for postoperative pain, particularly when combined with acetaminophen. Inconsistent use of nonopioid regimens arises from common misconceptions that NSAIDs are less potent analgesics than opioids and have an unacceptable risk of bleeding. To the contrary, multimodal analgesia (combining 500 mg acetaminophen and 200 mg ibuprofen) is significantly more effective analgesia than opioid regimens (15 mg oxycodone with acetaminophen). Furthermore, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition reliably circumvents antiplatelet effects. Implications for Practice The combination of NSAIDs and acetaminophen provides more effective postoperative pain control with greater safety than opioid-based regimens. The AAO-HNS opioid prescribing CPG therefore prioritizes multimodal, nonopioid analgesia as first-line therapy, recommending that opioids be reserved for severe or refractory pain. This state-of-the-art review provides strategies for safely incorporating NSAIDs into acute postoperative pain regimens.

scholarly journals P55 Carcinoid syndrome on etanercept and subsequent treatment with secukinumab in a patient with psoriatic arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali S. F Sheikh ◽  
Sagar G Srivastva ◽  
Fiona Wood
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Carcinoid Syndrome ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumour ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Carcinoid Tumour ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
First Line ◽  
Alpha Blockers

Abstract Background Psoriatic arthritis requires early recognition and treatment for prevention of disease progression. Conventional disease modifying drugs are first-line agents followed by biologic DMARDs for patients with active disease. TNF-alpha blockers are first line biologic agents in the UK. Th17 inhibitors are used since the elucidation of Th17 pathway. Safety and efficacy profiles of biologic agents inhibiting the Th17 pathway, including secukinumab (IL-17A) and ustekinumab (IL-12/23p40) have been studied. Methods We report a case of carcinoid syndrome in a lady on etanercept for psoriatic arthritis, carcinoid as a potential TNF alpha side effect. We also report safety of Th17 (secukinumab) inhibitors in the patient to date (&gt;1 year). Results A female with a history of acne rosacea, was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis in 2000 age 32. Initial sulphasalazine failed, then received methotrexate until 2011, when her arthritis flared. She was commenced on etanercept which proved effective. After 4 years of etanercept and methotrexate, her liver profile became deranged. Investigations off treatment included ultrasound abdomen demonstrating a liver mass, which resembled focal nodular hyperplasia on magnetic resonance imaging. Further screening revealed high urinary 5HIAA (527 umol/24h) and raised chromogranin A & B levels (1574 pmol/L and 373 pmol/L respectively). She had no symptoms suggestive of carcinoid, although facial flushing could have been camouflaged by her rosacea. Octreotide scan was positive, CT enterogram showed a distal ileal neuroendocrine tumour with adjacent lymphadenopathy. She underwent right hemihepatectomy and hemicolectomy. Her liver profile deteriorated again on methotrexate, leflunomide was ineffective. In November 2017 she was started on ustekinumab, which was ineffective and was withdrawn after 8 months. There was no alteration in carcinoid blood markers and no CT changes. In July 2018, she was commenced on secukinumab, which has allowed reduction in steroids. The patient is aware of lack of safety data in her circumstances. Regular surveillance has shown no recurrence of carcinoid with serial negative 5HIAA and chromogranin levels. There are no progressive CT changes at 1 year. Conclusion This is a case of carcinoid tumour occurring on TNF-alpha blockers and may represent a rare complication. Screening biomarkers including 5HIAA and chromogranin levels can be useful if disease is suspected. We could not find other similar case reports to guide further management. Within time limited data available - ustekinumab had no effect on the carcinoid. Th17 inhibitors can be safe options for treating psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis with highly sustained efficacy and favourable safety profile seen in large clinical trials. In this case, after &gt; one year of secukinumab treatment - there is no adverse effect on carcinoid syndrome. Disclosures A.S.F. Sheikh None. S.G. Srivastva None. F. Wood None.

scholarly journals Identifying patients with axial spondyloarthritis in primary care: how useful are items indicative of inflammatory back pain?

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 1782-1787 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Braun ◽  
E Saracbasi ◽  
J Grifka ◽  
J Schnitker ◽  
J Braun
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Back Pain ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Inflammatory Back Pain ◽  
Single Item ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Waking Up ◽  
Key Questions

BackgroundThe value of clinical items defining inflammatory back pain to identify patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) in primary care is unclear.ObjectiveTo identify predictive clinical parameters for a diagnosis of axial SpA in patients with chronic back pain presenting in primary care.MethodsConsecutive patients aged <45 years (n=950) with back pain for >2 months who presented to orthopaedic surgeons (n=143) were randomised based on four key questions for referral to rheumatologists (n=36) for diagnosis.ResultsThe rheumatologists saw 322 representative patients (mean age 36 years, 50% female, median duration of back pain 30 months). 113 patients (35%) were diagnosed as axial SpA (62% HLA B27+), 47 (15%) as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 66 (21%) as axial non-radiographic SpA (nrSpA). Age at onset ≤35 years, improvement by exercise, improvement with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, waking up in the second half of the night and alternating buttock pain were identified as most relevant for diagnosing axial SpA by multiple regression analysis. Differences between AS and nrSpA were detected. No single item was predictive, but ≥3 items proved useful for good sensitivity and specificity by receiver operating characteristic modelling.ConclusionThis study shows that a preselection in primary care of patients with back pain based on a combination of clinical items is useful to facilitate the diagnosis of axial SpA.

Treatment: NSAIDs

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Chan ◽  
Nigil Haroon
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Control ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Safety Concerns ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Equivalent Effect ◽  
Inhibit Prostaglandin Synthesis ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Disease Modifying

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute a diverse group of medications that inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. NSAIDs form the first-line pharmacological therapy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the efficacy of NSAIDs in reducing pain and improving patient function. Head-to-head comparisons have demonstrated equivalent effect of different NSAIDs in symptom control. The proposed disease-modifying potential of regular NSAID therapy is debatable and recent literature provides evidence to the contrary. Several safety concerns have been raised regarding long-term use of NSAIDs, especially an increase in cardiovascular risk. This chapter discusses the pharmacology, efficacy in treatment of AS, disease-modifying potential, and safety concerns of NSAIDs.

Guidelines

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiya Zhang ◽  
Michael Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Total Joint Replacement ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
First Line ◽  
Complementary Medicines ◽  
Stratified Care ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Number Of Treatment ◽  
Surgical Treatments

A number of treatment guidelines have been developed to optimize the treatment of osteoarthritis, some of which were recently updated. Fifty-one non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical treatments are addressed in these guidelines but only two (oral opioid and intra-articular steroid injection) reach the minimal clinically important difference above placebo. Recommendations for these treatments vary depending on joint sites, risk:benefit ratio, and population. Exercise, self-management, and weight reduction if obese are universally recommended. While topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain a safe first-line drug option, the safety of paracetamol, the universally recommended first-line oral analgesic is increasingly questioned. Other analgesics such as oral NSAIDs (including selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors), opioids, and antidepressants should be used according to patient characteristics and comorbidities. Nutraceuticals and complementary medicines remain controversial. While lavage is not recommended, total joint replacement is still considered as an effective treatment for the later stage of the disease irrespective of lack of placebo (sham) controlled trials. Stratified care has been attempted for recommendation according to joint affected and comorbidities but there is no evidence to support whether this can improve treatment outcomes. Guideline development groups differ in their composition and methodology. While the overall quality of guidelines has been improved, their applicability remains poor. Of the various factors that may influence implementation, suboptimal publishing and the efficacy paradox need to be recognized as important barriers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document