scholarly journals Development and psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess fears in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: the Fear Assessment in Inflammatory Rheumatic diseases (FAIR) questionnaire

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure Gossec ◽  
Pierre Chauvin ◽  
Alain Saraux ◽  
Christophe Hudry ◽  
Gabrielle Cukierman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo develop and validate an outcome measure for assessing fears in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).MethodsFears were identified in a qualitative study, and reformulated as assertions with which participants could rate their agreement (on a 0–10 numeric rating scale). A cross-sectional validation study was performed including patients diagnosed with RA or axSpA. Redundant items (correlation >0.65) were excluded. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) and factorial structure (principal component analysis) were assessed. Patients were classified into fear levels (cluster analysis). Associations between patient variables and fear levels were evaluated using multiple logistic regression.Results672 patients were included in the validation study (432 RA, 240 axSpA); most had moderate disease activity and were prescribed biologics. The final questionnaire included 10 questions with high internal consistency (α: 0.89) and a single dimension. Mean scores (±SD) were 51.2 (±25.4) in RA and 60.5 (±22.9) in axSpA. Groups of patients with high (17.2%), moderate (41.1%) and low (41.7%) fear scores were identified. High fear scores were associated with high Arthritis Helplessness Index scores (OR 6.85, 95% CI (3.95 to 11.87)); high Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety (OR 5.80, 95% CI (1.19 to 4.22)) and depression (OR 2.37, 95% CI (1.29 to 4.37)) scores; low education level (OR 3.48, 95% CI (1.37 to 8.83)); and high perceived disease activity (OR 2.36, 95% CI (1.10 to 5.04)).ConclusionsOverall, 17.2% of patients had high fear scores, although disease was often well controlled. High fear scores were associated with psychological distress. This questionnaire could be useful both in routine practice and clinical trials.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the disease course of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Ciurea ◽  
Eleftherios Papagiannoulis ◽  
Kristina Bürki ◽  
Isabell von Loga ◽  
Raphael Micheroli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Quality Management ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Clinical Quality ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo investigate whether the transient reduction in rheumatology services imposed by virus containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with disease worsening in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsPatient-reported disease activity assessed during face-to-face visits and/or via a smartphone application were compared between three periods of each 2 months duration (before, during and after the COVID-19-wave) from January to June 2020 in 666 patients with axSpA, RA and PsA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort.ResultsThe number of consultations dropped by 52%, whereas the number of remote assessments increased by 129%. The proportion of patients with drug non-compliance slightly increased during the pandemic, the difference reaching statistical significance in axSpA (19.9% vs 13.2% before the pandemic, p=0.003). The proportion of patients with disease flares remained stable (<15%). There was no increase in mean values of the Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 and the Patient Global Assessment in patients with axSpA, RA and PsA, respectively.ConclusionA short interruption of in-person patient–rheumatologist interactions had no major detrimental impact on the disease course of axSpA, RA and PsA as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals AB0711 FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS UNDER BIOLOGICS IN THE ERA OF LOCKDOWN

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1387.2-1387
Author(s):  
V. F. Boussougou ◽  
K. Nassar ◽  
S. Janani
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
French Study ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Background:The management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases under biologics has raised many questions about the global management of patients in the time of COVID-19 pandemic. This period could have been particularly painful for the patients due to the virus itself, and to the difficulty to access to healthcare facilities due to the lockdown.Objectives:To assess the impact of the lockdown in patients under biologics.Methods:This is a descriptive study, conducted between 03/01/2021 and 07/31/2021 in the Department of Rheumatology of the University Hospital of Ibn Rochd in Casablanca. Inclusion criteria were all patients on biologics during the lockdown period. The number of painful, swollen joints, pain visual analogue scale, and disease activity were collected before and during the lockdown.Results:Thirty-one patients under biologics were included. The average age was 43.4 years. There were 17 males and 14 females (sex ratio M/F 1,21). Cormibidities were hypertension and type 2 diabetes (9.7%), hypertension and dyslipidemia (6.5%), arrhythmia (6.5%), smoking (9.7%), hypertension and dysthyroidism (3.2%). All the patients were under biologics with an average duration of 2 years distributed as follows: 3 patients on etanercept (9.67%), 8 patients on tocilizumab (28.8%), 10 patients on infliximab (32.25%), 5 patients on adalimumab (16.12%)), 4 patients under golimumab (12.90%), 1 under secukinumab (3.22%). Biologics were associated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in 38.7% (methotrexate 12.9%, salosopyrine25, 8%), corticosteroids in 25.7%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 16.1%. The disease activity before COVID-19 of the patients was: 48.39% weak activity, 35.4% remission, 16.13% moderate activity. No patient reported a flare of the disease. During lockdown, 5 patients reported a flare of their disease (16.12%) They were followed for: 2 spondyloarthritis, 1 rheumatoid arthritis, 1 psoriatic arthritis, 1 adult onset Still’s disease. All the patients have temporarily stopped their drugs because they couldn’t come to their appointments because of the lockdown.Conclusion:Our study notes that the patients who kept their follow-up during lockdown have maintained a control of their disease activity. Our results are consistent with the observations of a French study on the impact of lockdown on the activity of rheumatoid arthritis. However, those who couldn’t come to their control appointment due to the lockdown had a flare of their disease. This study remains limited due to the monocentric nature and the small size of our sample.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals SAT0611-HPR LOW ADHERENCE TO RECOMMENDED PHYSICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: A MIXED-METHOD CONTENT AND UTILIZATION ANALYSIS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1266.2-1266
Author(s):  
E. Vanautgaerden ◽  
M. Kaerts ◽  
W. Dankaerts ◽  
K. De Vlam ◽  
T. Swinnen
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Global Disease Activity ◽  
Therapy Sessions

Background:Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) encounter limitations during daily activities and societal participation which seriously impart health-related quality of life. Optimal management of axSpA consists of combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities, including the encouragement of exercise and the consideration of physical therapy given the latter’s superior efficacy1. Few studies investigated the use of physical therapy and the alignment of treatment content with practice recommendations among patients with axSpA.Objectives:1) To estimate physical therapy use in patients with axSpA in a real life cohort; 2) to quantitatively and qualitatively describe the content of these physical therapy sessions; 3) explore possible determinants of physical therapy use and content.Methods:This cross-sectional study included 197 patients diagnosed with axSpA (Males/Females: 62.4/37.6%; mean±SD, age 42.6±12.0, BASDAI 3.7±2.1, BASFI 3.6±2.4, BASMI 3.1±1.8) and recruited during their routine consultation. The mixed-method approach included questionnaires (physical therapy use and content, medication, depression/anxiety (HADS), fear (TSK), physician global disease activity (PGDA)) and an in-depth qualitative interview (content of physical therapy). Interviews were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven by two physical therapists. Spearman’s Rho correlations guided the exploration of determinants of physical therapy use and content.Results:Less than half (42.6%, n=84) of the axSpA of patients were in treatment with a physiotherapist. Most patients (40.0%) reported a physical therapy frequency of 1x/week. Session duration was typically 30 minutes (51.7% of the sample) and longer in fewer cases (30.0%). Exercise was in only 31.7% the cornerstone of their sessions. The majority of subjects (53.3%) were classified as receiving ‘passive therapy only’, with 10% of cases in the ‘exercise only’ and 36.7% in the ‘combination therapy’ groups. Interviews also revealed a lack of clear patient-centered treatment goals. We found moderate associations between physical therapy use/content parameters and medication, spinal mobility, fear, anxiety, depression, physician’s global disease activity versus (p<.05), but no relationship with patient-reported pain or disease activity.Conclusion:Despite the importance of exercise and the added value of physical therapy in axSpA, few patients engaged in physical therapy sessions that include exercise training of adequate dosage. Remarkably, physical therapy utilization seems to be predominantly guided by psychological factors. Professional education for physical therapists should therefore include skills training in the management of complex clinical presentations2. Last, future research should prepare the evidence-based implementation of state-of-the-art physical therapy guidelines in axSpA.References:[1]van der Heijde D, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991.[2]Swinnen TW, et al. Widespread pain in axial spondyloarthritis: clinical importance and gender differences. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jul 27;20(1):156.Disclosure of Interests:Evelyne Vanautgaerden: None declared, Marlies Kaerts: None declared, Wim Dankaerts: None declared, Kurt de Vlam Grant/research support from: Celgene, Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Thijs Swinnen: None declared

scholarly journals AB0330 HIGH REMISSION RATES IN RA – REAL LIFE DATA FROM BARITICINIB

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1463.2-1464
Author(s):  
S. Bayat ◽  
K. Tascilar ◽  
V. Kaufmann ◽  
A. Kleyer ◽  
D. Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Das 28 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
One Year

Background:Recent developments of targeted treatments such as targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) increase the chances of a sustained low disease activity (LDA) or remission state for patients suffering rheumatoid arthritis (RA). tsDMARDs such as baricitinib, an oral inhibitor of the Janus Kinases (JAK1/JAK2) was recently approved for the treatment of RA with an inadequate response to conventional (cDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) therapy. (1, 2).Objectives:Aim of this study is to analyze the effect of baricitinb on disease activity (DAS28, LDA) in patients with RA in real life, to analyze drug persistance and associate these effects with various baseline characteristics.Methods:All RA patients were seen in our outpatient clinic. If a patient was switched to a baricitinib due to medical reasons, these patients were included in our prospective, observational study which started in April 2017. Clinical scores (SJC/TJC 76/78), composite scores (DAS28), PROs (HAQ-DI; RAID; FACIT), safety parameters (not reported in this abstract) as well as laboratory biomarkers were collected at each visit every three months. Linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements were used to analyze the time course of disease activity, patient reported outcomes and laboratory results. We estimated the probabilities of continued baricitinib treatment and the probabilities of LDA and remission by DAS-28 as well as Boolean remission up to one year using survival analysis and explored their association with disease characteristics using multivariable Cox regression. All patients gave informed consent. The study is approved by the local ethics.Results:95 patients were included and 85 analyzed with available follow-up data until November 2019. Demographics are shown in table 1. Mean follow-up duration after starting baricitinib was 49.3 (28.9) weeks. 51 patients (60%) were on monotherapy. Baricitinib survival (95%CI) was 82% (73% to 91%) at one year. Cumulative number (%probability, 95%CI) of patients that attained DAS-28 LDA at least once up to one year was 67 (92%, 80% to 97%) and the number of patients attaining DAS-28 and Boolean remission were 31 (50%, 34% to 61%) and 12(20%, 9% to 30%) respectively. Median time to DAS-28 LDA was 16 weeks (Figure 1). Cox regression analyses did not show any sufficiently precise association of remission or LDA with age, gender, seropositivity, disease duration, concomitant DMARD use and number of previous bDMARDs. Increasing number of previous bDMARDs was associated with poor baricitinib survival (HR=1.5, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.2) while this association was not robust to adjustment for baseline disease activity. Favorable changes were observed in tender and swollen joint counts, pain-VAS, patient and physician disease assessment scores, RAID, FACIT and the acute phase response.Conclusion:In this prospective observational study, we observed high rates of LDA and DAS-28 remission and significant improvements in disease activity and patient reported outcome measurements over time.References:[1]Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Drescher E, Schlichting DE, Beattie SD, Berclaz PY, et al. Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2015 Feb;74(2):333-40.[2]Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis. The New England journal of medicine. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1243-52.Figure 1.Cumulative probability of low disease activity or remission under treatment with baricitinib.Disclosure of Interests:Sara Bayat Speakers bureau: Novartis, Koray Tascilar: None declared, Veronica Kaufmann: None declared, Arnd Kleyer Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Novartis,Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, David Simon Grant/research support from: Else Kröner-Memorial Scholarship, Novartis, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Johannes Knitza Grant/research support from: Research Grant: Novartis, Fabian Hartmann: None declared, Susanne Adam: None declared, Axel Hueber Grant/research support from: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, EIT Health, EU-IMI, DFG, Universität Erlangen (EFI), Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Speakers bureau: GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB

scholarly journals POS0583 ENGINEERED GLOVE TO EVALUATE THE SPEED OF THE HANDS’ MOVEMENTS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 524.3-525
Author(s):  
M. Patanè ◽  
L. Carmisciano ◽  
E. Hysa ◽  
E. Gotelli ◽  
A. Signori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Test System ◽  
Movement Speed ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Activity Class ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Opposition Movements

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long-term, progressive, and disabling autoimmune disease1. The disease activity can be quantified by the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count – C reactive protein (DAS28crp)2; the evaluation of disability function (DF) is actually mainly performed only by subjective Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) like Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)3; to investigate the functional aspects of RA hands it is usually used the grip strength (GS)4. However, in the scientific literature no tool, which objectively evaluates movement speed, has been reported. The Hand Test System (HTS, ETT) is an engineered glove (RAGLOVE), nowadays applied for neuroscience studies to evaluate hand motility5Objectives:To objectively evaluate the RA hand’s speed of the fine movements, through the HTS and to compared with a group of age and sex matched healthy controls. To verify the correspondence with the HAQ, DAS28, GS.Methods:55 consecutives RA patients (pts) (6 males, age 61 ± 16 years, mean duration of disease 12 ± 8 years), classified according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria6, and 50 matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. After consent, all participants undergone HTS test that recognizes the touches between the finger tips during the opposition movements of the hands in standard sequences of movements, after dressed the glove. A multiple finger evaluation (MFE) and a single finger evaluation (SFE) were performed using a dedicated software that provided the physician the following quantitative parameters: Touch Duration (TD), Inter Tapping Interval (ITI) and Movement Rate (MR). Average time for hand 2 minutes. RA pts compiled the HAQ, performed the GS and a DAS28cpr was performed.The student’s t-test was used to compare the glove’s parameters between the groups whereas the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to verify potential differences between the populations. In order to evaluate the single correlations, the r and p values of Pearson were employed.Results:For MFE, glove parameters TD and ITI were significantly higher in RA pts than HCs, whereas; MR was significantly lower in RA pts compared to HCs (all p <0.001).For SFE non-affected fingers (not swollen and not tender) of RA pts performed better than a clinically affected fingers, but in any case significantly worse than average HCs fingers (p < 0.001).There is a statistically significant correlation between the GS and MR (r= 0.39 p=0.003) and TD (r=-0.33 p=0.015).TD, ITI e MR of RA pts showed a significant correlation with the total score of the HAQ (r = 0.56, r = 0.39, r = -0.56, all p < 0.001;). DAS28, considered as a continuous variable, proved to be significantly correlated with the TD (r = 0.36, p = 0.009). When the RA patients were grouped according to the disease activity by DAS28cpr7, there was an increase of one third of the TD’s logarithm for each increase in the activity class (linear regression with ordinal predictors, beta = 0.33; 95%CI 0.03, 0.63,p < 0.0297). Finally, even RA pts in remission showed a TD significantly higher compared with HCs (p= 0.034).Conclusion:The RAGLOVE is shown as a new safe and fast tool to evaluate a new objective parameter in the hand’s functionality: the speed of finger movements. In RA pts, an inversely proportional correlation emerges between the speed of movement and disease activity.The significant correlation found with HAQ, highlights the loss of motility of the hands as one of the main determinant of disability. The RAGLOVE is now tested in RA patients undergoing treatment.References:[1]Hakkinen et al Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;[2]Van Der Heijde et al J of Rheum. 1993;[3]Fries et al Arthritis Rheum. 1980;[4]Mathiowetz et al J Hand Surg Am. 1984;[5]Carmisciano et al Eur J Neurol. 2020;[6]Aletaha et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;[7]Aletaha et al Arthritis Rheum 2005.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals OP0076 HOW TO SELF-EXAMINE FOR TENDER AND SWOLLEN JOINTS: CO-DEVELOPMENT OF A TRAINING VIDEO FOR PEOPLE WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 41.1-41
Author(s):  
C. Sharp ◽  
K. Staniland ◽  
T. Cornell ◽  
W. Dixon
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
British Society ◽  
Patient Report Outcome Measure ◽  
Nurse Consultant ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Self Examination ◽  
Remote Consultations

Background:COVID-19 has catalysed the transformation of healthcare services, with outpatient services increasingly dependent upon remote models of care. Healthcare professionals now have to make clinical assessments based on remote patient examinations. The number of tender and swollen joints a patient has drives decision-making in RA, making it particularly important that people with RA and HCPs have a shared understanding of these examinations.Even before remote consultations became widespread, long gaps between clinic visits create challenges in enabling HCPs to form an accurate picture of disease activity over time. The REMORA (REmote MOnitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis) app aims to address this issue by asking people with RA to track disease activity, including counting the number of tender or swollen joints, weekly(1). Data are integrated into the electronic patient record for clinicians to access with patients during clinical consultations. As part of the supporting materials for the REMORA app, we planned to develop a video to train people with RA how to examine their own joints. This video may now help meet the need created by the recent expansion in remote consultations.Objectives:To describe the co-production, implementation and evaluation of a video to train patients how to examine their own joints.Methods:The need for the video to fill a current gap in patient education was identified by the REMORA patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group. A core working group comprising the PPIE lead, a nurse consultant, rheumatology clinicians, project and communications managers was formed. A storyboard was drafted and feedback gained from the PPIE group and wider REMORA team. Images were sourced from licenced suppliers, or co-developed with the PPIE group where necessary. No ethical approval was required as the PPIE group lead was acting as an equal member of the research term. Written informed consent was gained from video participants. Filming took place between two national lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing a challenge to ensure social distancing and requiring the use of masks.Results:A 15 minute video to train people with RA to self-examine for tender and swollen joints was developed. An introduction outlining the rationale behind self-examination is followed by a nurse consultant coaching an RA patient in individual joint self-examination. Shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints and knees are included, all of which are counted in disease activity scores.Early feedback from stakeholders has been overwhelmingly positive. The video will be publicly available on YouTube from February 2021. A survey of patients and HCPs aims to obtain more formal feedback on the video, with a view to a further iteration, if required. Leading national organisations in rheumatology will promote the video, as it supports national programmes including the British Society for Rheumatology national early inflammatory arthritis audit and ePROMS (electronic patient report outcome measure) platform, both of which include entry of patient reported tender and swollen joint counts.Conclusion:This video was co-designed by people with RA, aiming to support self-examination of tender and swollen joint counts. Hits on YouTube and survey responses will help assess its impact. Evaluation to assess whether the video affects patients’ ability to self-examine for tender and swollen joints before and after watching is planned. We hope the video will support remote consultations and help people with arthritis to better understand and self-manage their arthritis, and to have shared decision making conversations with their clinicians.References:[1]Austin L, Sharp CA, van der Veer SN, Machin M, Humphreys J, Mellor P, et al. Providing ‘the bigger picture’: benefits and feasibility of integrating remote monitoring from smartphones into the electronic health record: findings from the Remote Monitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis (REMORA) study. Rheumatology. 2020;59(2):367-78.Disclosure of Interests:Charlotte Sharp: None declared, Karen Staniland: None declared, Trish Cornell Shareholder of: shares in Abbvie, Employee of: Abbvie, working as a Rheumatology Nurse Consultant, Will Dixon Consultant of: Google and Abbvie, unrelated to this work.

scholarly journals AB0302 USE OF TNF-INHIBITORS BEFORE, DURING AND THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PREGNANCY AMONG WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1450.2-1450
Author(s):  
H. Bjørngaard ◽  
H. Koksvik ◽  
B. Jakobsen ◽  
M. Wallenius
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Rheumatic Arthritis ◽  
Quality Register ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background:Treat to target is a goal, also in pregnant women with Rheumatoid arthritis (1). There is increasing evidence on safe use with TNF inhibitors during pregnancy. Adjusted use of TNF inhibitors preconception and throughout pregnancy may stabilize disease activity and prevent flares (2). Low disease activity is also beneficial for the fetus.Objectives:To study the use of TNF-inhibitors among women with Rheumatic arthritis during and after pregnancy.Methods:RevNatus is a Norwegian, nationwide quality register that monitors treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases before, during and after pregnancy. Data from RevNatus in the period October 2017 to October 2019 was used to map the use of all types of TNF inhibitors among 208 women with rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosed by the ACR/EULAR criteria. The use of medication was reported at the time of visit in outpatient clinic. The frequency of use of TNF inhibitors registered at seven timepoints from pre-pregnancy to twelve months after delivery.Results:The use of medication was reported at each visit for all the women with rheumatoid arthritis. Most of the women were not using TNF inhibitors before and beyond conception. Most of the women continuing TNF inhibitors beyond conception used certolizumab or etanercept. Adalimumab and infliximab were used in pregnancy (tabell 1).Tabell 1.certoliz-umabetane-rceptadalim-umabgolim-umabinflixi-mabNo TNF-inhibitorBefore pregnancyn=10521% (22)9% (10)3% (3)1% (1)66% (69)1.trimestern=8119% (15)10% (8)71% (58)2.trimestern=8810% (9)10% (9)80% (70)3.trimestern=9111% (10)5% (5)83% (76)6 weeks post partum n=9622% (21)13% (13)1% (1)1% (1)63% (60)6 months post partum n=8824% (21)18% (16)4% (4)1% (1)53% (46)12 months post partum n=8421% (18)17% (15)7% (6)2% (2)53% (43)Conclusion:Most of the women with rheumatic arthritis were not treated with TNF inhibitors before or in pregnancy. Women with rheumatic arthritis that continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors through pregnancy were using certilozumab and etanercept.References:[1]Gotestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, Fischer-Betz R, Elefant E, Chambers C, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. 2016;75(5):795-810.[2]van den Brandt S, Zbinden A, Baeten D, Villiger PM, Ostensen M, Forger F. Risk factors for flare and treatment of disease flares during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Determinants Associated with Work Participation in Patients with Established Rheumatoid Arthritis Taking Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1263-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie H.M. Manders ◽  
Wietske Kievit ◽  
Annemarie L.M.A. Braakman-Jansen ◽  
Herman L.M. Brus ◽  
Lidy Hendriks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Work Participation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Retirement Pension ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.Reduced work participation (WP) is a common problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and generates high costs for society. Therefore, it is important to explore determinants of WP at the start of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, and for changes in WP after 2 years of TNFi treatment.Methods.Within the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) biologic register, WP data were available from 508 patients with RA younger than 65 years and without an (early) retirement pension. WP was registered at start of TNFi treatment and after 2 years of followup and was measured by single patient-reported binary questions whether they had work, paid or voluntary, or had a disability allowance or a retirement pension. Determinants measured at baseline were age, sex, disease duration, functional status [through Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), rheumatoid factor, presence of erosions, number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and number of comorbidities. During the 2 years of followup, HAQ-DI response and European League Against Rheumatism response were measured. Univariate analyses (excluded if p value was > 0.2) and multivariate (excluded if p value was > 0.1) logistic regression analyses were used.Results.Determinants associated with WP at baseline were having a better HAQ-DI (OR 0.32, p = 0.000) and male sex (OR 0.65, p = 0.065). After 2 years of TNFi therapy, 11.8% (n = 60) started to work and 13.6% (n = 69) stopped working. Determinants associated with starting to work were better baseline HAQ-DI (OR 0.58), positive RF (OR 2.73), and young age (OR 0.96); and for stopping work, worse baseline HAQ-DI (OR 2.74), low HAQ-DI response (OR 0.31), and comorbidity (OR 2.67), all with p < 0.1.Conclusion.Young patients with RA and a high functional status without any comorbidity will have a better chance of working. This supports the main goal in the management of RA: to suppress disease activity as soon and as completely as possible to prevent irreversible destruction of the joints, and thus maintain a good functional status of the patient. Because of the low proportion of variance explained by the models in this study, other factors besides the ones studied are associated with WP.

scholarly journals FRI0020 CLINICAL TREATMENT RESPONSE STILL DOES NOT MATCH PATIENT REPORTED IMPROVEMENT, EVEN IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 582.1-582
Author(s):  
S. Pazmino ◽  
A. Lovik ◽  
A. Boonen ◽  
D. De Cock ◽  
V. Stouten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Over Time

Background:Commonly used disease activity scores in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include one patient reported outcome (PRO) -the patient’s global health assessment (PGA). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data from the 2 year Care in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CareRA) trial to explain the evolution of disease burden extracting 3 factors.1Objectives:To assess the evolution and relative responsiveness over time of clinical, laboratory and patient assessments included in composite scores, together with other PROs like pain, fatigue and functionality in patients with early RA (≤1 year) treated to target (T2T) within the CareRA trial.Methods:DMARD naïve patients with early RA (n=379) were included, randomized to remission induction with COBRA-like treatment schemes (n=332) or MTX monotherapy (n=47) and T2T.Components of disease activity scores (swollen/tender joint count (S/TJC), C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and physician (PhGH) or patient (PGA) global health assessment), pain and fatigue (both on 0-100 scale) and HAQ were recorded at every visit.Missing data was handled with multiple imputation (n=15). Clustering was removed with multiple outputation (n=1000), then each of the 15 000 datasets was analyzed by EFA with principal component extraction and oblimin rotation. The analyses were combined after re-ordering the factors by maximizing factor congruence. The 3 extracted factors and their individual components (with their loadings) were: 1. Patient containing PGA (0.87), pain (0.86), fatigue (0.90) and HAQ (0.5) 2.Clinical with SJC (0.92), TJC (0.89) and PhGH (0.76) and 3.Laboratory with CRP(0.87) and ESR (0.78).1(Pazmino, ACR 2019 abstract, Table 3)Afterwards, variables were first normalized to a 0-1 scale, then multiplied -weighted- by the factor loadings previously obtained.1For each Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity score, the weighted variables belonging to each score were summed together and then re-scaled to 0-1 (higher values suggest more burden).The percentage (%) improvement from baseline to week 104 and the area under the curve (AUC) across time points were calculated per factor.Differences in % improvement and AUC were compared between patients not achieving and achieving early and sustained (week 16 to 104) disease activity score remission (DAS28CRP <2.6) with ANOVA. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing.Results:Severity scores of Patient, Clinical and Laboratory factors improved rapidly over time (Figure 1). In patients achieving sustained remission (n=122), Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores improved 56%, 90% and 27% respectively. In patients not achieving sustained remission (n=257) the improvement was 32%, 78% and 9% respectively (p<0.001 only for clinical improvement).Patients in CareRA who achieved sustained remission had an AUC of 15.1, 3.4 and 4.7 in Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores respectively, compared to 32.3, 10.0, and 7.2 in participants not achieving sustained remission (p<0.001 for all comparisons).Conclusion:Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity scores improved rapidly over time in patients achieving rapid and sustained disease control. However, overall, Patient burden seemed not to improve to the same extent as Clinical burden. Patient’s unmet needs in terms of pain, fatigue, functionality and overall well-being should thus be given more attention, even in patients in sustained remission.References:[1]Pazmino S,et al.Including Pain, Fatigue and Functionality Regularly in the Assessment of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Separately Adds to the Evaluation of Disease Status [abstract]. ACR. 2019.Disclosure of Interests:Sofia Pazmino: None declared, Anikó Lovik: None declared, Annelies Boonen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: Galapagos, Lilly (all paid to the department), Diederik De Cock: None declared, Veerle Stouten: None declared, Johan Joly: None declared, Delphine Bertrand: None declared, Rene Westhovens Grant/research support from: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Speakers bureau: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Patrick Verschueren Grant/research support from: Pfizer unrestricted chair of early RA research, Speakers bureau: various companies

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document