scholarly journals AB0510 Improving knowledge of sle disease flares and treatment options among rheumatologists and primary care providers: effect of an online educational intervention

Author(s):  
E. Jackson ◽  
D. Blatherwick ◽  
K. Badal
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Beirão ◽  
Helena Monte ◽  
Marta Amaral ◽  
Alice Longras ◽  
Carla Matos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Depression is a common mental health disease, especially in mid to late adolescence that, due to its particularities, is a challenge and requires an effective diagnosis. Primary care providers are often the first line of contact for adolescents, being crucial in identifying and managing this pathology. Besides, several entities also recommend screening for depression on this period. Thus, the main purpose of this article is to review the scientific data regarding screening, diagnosis and management of depression in adolescence, mainly on primary care settings. Main body Comprehension of the pathogenesis of depression in adolescents is a challenging task, with both environmental and genetic factors being associated to its development. Although there are some screening tests and diagnostic criteria, its clinical manifestations are wide, making its diagnosis a huge challenge. Besides, it can be mistakenly diagnosed with other psychiatric disorders, making necessary to roll-out several differential diagnoses. Treatment options can include psychotherapy (cognitive behavioural therapy and interpersonal therapy) and/or pharmacotherapy (mainly fluoxetine), depending on severity, associated risk factors and available resources. In any case, treatment must include psychoeducation, supportive approach and family involvement. Preventive programs play an important role not only in reducing the prevalence of this condition but also in improving the health of populations. Conclusion Depression in adolescence is a relevant condition to the medical community, due to its uncertain clinical course and underdiagnosis worldwide. General practitioners can provide early identification, treatment initiation and referral to mental health specialists when necessary.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
KhalidAbdulrazzak Alsaleh ◽  
AbdullahSaleh Alluhaidan ◽  
YazeedKhalid Alsaran ◽  
HeshamSaad Alrefayi ◽  
NizarAbdullah Algarni ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sanjeev Sirpal ◽  
Natasha Chandok

Notwithstanding the groundbreaking achievement of hepatitis C curative treatment with direct acting antiviral therapies, Canada faces an uphill battle in reaching the 2030 goal of viral elimination set forth the by the World Health Organization, a goal made more difficult by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited understanding of the diagnostic and treatment barriers, and challenges in linkage to care in Canada, especially as it pertains to primary care providers in a community context. Therefore, in this article, the authors conducted a survey study to evaluate the following factors: primary care providers’ knowledge of specialist treatment options and the importance of screening and treatment; and patient factors, including transportation, linguistic barriers, and other socio-economic status indicators that impact the screening and management of hepatitis C. The results suggest that public health campaigns that protocolize and/or incentivize screening and referrals may provide solutions to addressing such barriers.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 787A
Author(s):  
NIMISH MEHTA ◽  
EDWARD JACKSON ◽  
PIYALI CHATTERJEE ◽  
KAREN BADAL ◽  
JAMES DONOHUE

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S402-S403
Author(s):  
Allison Gardner ◽  
David Evans ◽  
Alan McCord ◽  
Douglas Krakower

Abstract Background Primary care providers’ (PCPs’) lack of knowledge about and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) represent important barriers to its effective implementation on a national scale. To address these barriers, a collaboration of infectious diseases clinicians, patient advocates, and continuing medical education (CME) specialists developed and tested an educational intervention for PCPs to increase their knowledge about best practices for providing PrEP-related care. Methods An interactive, online CME-accredited simulation prompted PCPs to make clinical decisions about a hypothetical case of a 44-year-old African-American man seeking treatment for rectal gonorrhea who thus had indications for PrEP. The intervention included real-time educational feedback on clinical decisions and an opportunity to revisit suboptimal care decisions after feedback. PCPs were recruited via email and links on CME/patient advocacy websites and public health listservs. Outcomes included proportions of learners selecting correct answers prior to and after receiving feedback on their decisions. Results During October 2017–April 2018, 234 PCPs (88% physicians, 7% NP, 5% PA) completed the simulation for a total of 4,701 unique clinical decisions. Less than half (45%) of PCPs elicited a comprehensive sexual health history to begin the visit, which improved to 83% after feedback. Two-thirds (67%) of PCPs sought permission before asking about sexual behaviors, which increased to 82% after feedback. Nearly one-quarter of PCPs (24%) needed corrective action to nonjudgmentally ask about condom use. Almost all PCPs (91%) identified that PrEP was appropriate for the case patient on their first attempt. However, only 54% of PCPs initially selected all recommended baseline laboratory tests for PrEP; 75% did so after feedback. Of providers recommending PrEP, 29% selected regimens not FDA approved for this indication. Conclusion Many PCPs participating in an online simulation enacted clinical decisions that were inconsistent with best practices for providing PrEP-related care, but hypothetical care decisions improved after real-time educational feedback. Future studies to test the impact of this educational intervention on clinical practices are warranted. Disclosures D. Evans, Project Inform: Employee, Educational grant. A. McCord, Project Inform: Employee, Educational grant. D. Krakower, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Research grant.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e046068
Author(s):  
Michelle D Smekal ◽  
Aminu K Bello ◽  
Maoliosa Donald ◽  
Deenaz Zaidi ◽  
Kerry McBrien ◽  
...  

BackgroundGaps in identification, medical management and appropriate referral for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are evident.ObjectiveWe designed and implemented an interactive educational intervention (accredited workshop) to improve primary care providers’ awareness of tools to support guideline-concordant CKD management.DesignWe used the Kern method to design the educational intervention and targeted the accredited workshops to primary care team members (physicians, nurses and allied health) in Alberta, Canada. We conducted anonymous pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys to identify practice-specific barriers to care, identify potential solutions, and evaluate provider confidence pre-intervention and post-intervention. We used non-parametric statistics to analyse Likert-type survey data and descriptive content analysis to categorise responses to open-ended survey questions.ResultsWe delivered 12 workshops to 114 providers from September 2017 through March 2019. Significant improvements (p<0.001) in confidence to appropriately identify, manage and refer patients with CKD were observed. Participants identified several patient-level, provider-level, and system-level barriers and potential solutions to care for patients with CKD; the majority of these barriers were addressed in the interactive workshop.ConclusionsThe Kern model was an effective methodology to design and implement an educational intervention to improve providers’ confidence in managing patients with CKD in primary care. Future research is needed to determine if these perceived knowledge and confidence improvements affect patient outcomes and whether improvements are sustained long term.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document