scholarly journals EULAR recommendations for intra-articular therapies

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-220266
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Uson ◽  
Sebastián Cruz Rodriguez-García ◽  
Raul Castellanos-Moreira ◽  
Terence W O'Neill ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Final Agreement

ObjectivesTo establish evidence-based recommendations to guide health professionals using intra-articular therapies (IAT) in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies.MethodsA multidisciplinary international task force established the objectives, users and scope and the need for background information, including systematic literature reviews) and two surveys addressed to healthcare providers and patients throughout Europe. The evidence was discussed in a face-to-face meeting, recommendations were formulated and subsequently voted for anonymously in a three-round Delphi process to obtain the final agreement. The level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation with the Oxford levels of evidence.ResultsRecommendations focus on practical aspects to guide health professionals before, during and after IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Five overarching principles and 11 recommendations were established, addressing issues related to patient information, procedure and setting, accuracy, routine and special aseptic care, safety issues and precautions to be addressed in special populations, efficacy and safety of repeated joint injections, use of local anaesthetics and aftercare.ConclusionWe have developed the first evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT. We hope that these recommendations will be included in different educational programmes, used by patient associations and put into practice via scientific societies to help improve uniformity and quality of care when performing IAT in peripheral adult joints.

scholarly journals 2019 EULAR recommendations for the generic core competences of health professionals in rheumatology

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Edelaar ◽  
Elena Nikiphorou ◽  
George E Fragoulis ◽  
Annamaria Iagnocco ◽  
Catherine Haines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Task Force ◽  
National Level ◽  
Postgraduate Education ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Core Competences

Background/objectivesTo maintain and optimise the quality of care provided by health professionals in rheumatology (HPRs), adequate educational offerings are needed. This task force (TF) aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the generic core competences of HPRs, with specific reference to nurses, physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) to serve as a basis for their postgraduate education.MethodsThe EULAR standardised operating procedures for the development of recommendations were followed. A TF including rheumatologists, nurses, PTs, OTs, patient-representatives, an educationalist, methodologists and researchers from 12 countries met twice. In the first TF meeting, 13 research questions were defined to support a systematic literature review (SLR). In the second meeting, the SLR evidence was discussed and recommendations formulated. Subsequently, level of evidence and strength of recommendation were assigned and level of agreement (LoA) determined (0–10 rating scale).ResultsThree overarching principles were identified and 10 recommendations were developed for the generic core competences of HPRs. The SLR included 79 full-text papers, 20 of which addressed the competences, knowledge, skills, attitudes and/or educational needs of HPRs from multiple professions. The average LoA for each recommendation ranged from 9.42 to 9.79. Consensus was reached both on a research and educational agenda.ConclusionEvidence and expert opinion informed a set of recommendations providing guidance on the generic core competences of HPRs. Implementation of these recommendations in the postgraduate education of HPRs at the international and national level is advised, considering variation in healthcare systems and professional roles.

scholarly journals FRI0427 EULAR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTRA-ARTICULAR TREATMENTS FOR ARTHROPATHIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 812.2-812
Author(s):  
J. Uson Jaeger ◽  
E. Naredo ◽  
S. C. Rodriguez-García ◽  
R. Castellanos-Moreira ◽  
T. O’neill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Delphi Round

Background:Intra-articular therapies (IAT) are widely used in clinical practice to treat patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Many factors influence their efficacy and safety. There is a wide variation in the way IATs are delivered by health professionals. In an attempt to standardise these procedures, evidence-based recommendations are the right way forward.Objectives:To establish evidence-based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies.Methods:At a first face-to-face meeting, the results of an overview of systematic reviews were presented to the multidisciplinary task force of members from 8 countries. The aim, scope and outline of the taskforce were also established at this meeting. Thirty-two clinical questions ranked for priority (relevance for practice plus feasibility) drove the systematic reviews performed by two fellows. In addition, two surveys addressed to physicians, health professionals and patients throughout Europe were agreed to acquire more background information. At the second face-to-face meeting, the evidence for each research question was discussed, and each recommendation shaped and voted in a first Delphi round. Level of agreement was numerically scored 0 to 10 (0 completely disagree, 10 completely agree). All panellists voted anonymously using a sli.do app. Agreement needed to be greater than 80% to be included in a second Delphi round, which also allowed reformulation of statements. Finally, a third Delphi round was sent to the taskforce. The level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation according to the EULAR SOP for establishing recommendations.Results:Recommendations focus on practical aspects for daily practice to guide health professionals before, during and after IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Five overarching principles were established, together with 11 recommendations that address the following issues: (1) patient information; (2) procedure and setting; (3) accuracy issues; (3) routine and special antiseptic care; (4) safety issues and precautions to be addressed in special populations; (5) efficacy and safety of repeated joint injections; (6) the usage of local anaesthetics; and (7) aftercare. The document includes the supporting evidence and results from the surveys, level of evidence and agreement.Conclusion:We have developed the first evidence and expert opinion based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT.Acknowledgments:Eular Taskforce grant CL109Disclosure of Interests:Jacqueline Uson Jaeger: None declared, Esperanza Naredo: None declared, Sebastian C Rodriguez-García Speakers bureau: Novartis Farmaceutica, S.A., Merck Sharp & Dohme España, S.A., Sanofi Aventis, UCB Pharma, Raul Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, Terence O’Neill: None declared, Hemant Pandit Grant/research support from: Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) for work on Diclofenac Gel, Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb for teaching their employees about hip and knee replacement, Michael Doherty Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca funded the Nottingham Sons of Gout study, Consultant of: Advisory borads on gout for Grunenthal and Mallinckrodt, Mikael Boesen Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: IAG, Image Analysis Group, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (scientific advisor)., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Esaote, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Ingrid Möller: None declared, Valentina Vardanyan: None declared, Jenny de la Torre-Aboki: None declared, Lene Terslev: None declared, Francis Berenbaum Grant/research support from: TRB Chemedica (through institution), MSD (through institution), Pfizer (through institution), Consultant of: Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Abbvie, Roche, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Flexion Therapeutics, Expanscience, GSK, Biogen, Nordic, Sandoz, Regeneron, Gilead, Bone Therapeutics, Regulaxis, Peptinov, 4P Pharma, Paid instructor for: Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Abbvie, Roche, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Flexion Therapeutics, Expanscience, GSK, Biogen, Nordic, Sandoz, Regeneron, Gilead, Sandoz, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, and Roche, Willm Uwe Kampen: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, IRENE Pitsillidou: None declared, Loreto Carmona Grant/research support from: Novartis Farmaceutica, SA, Pfizer, S.L.U., Merck Sharp & Dohme España, S.A., Roche Farma, S.A, Sanofi Aventis, AbbVie Spain, S.L.U., and Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, SA (All trhough institution)

scholarly journals 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Bech ◽  
Jette Primdahl ◽  
Astrid van Tubergen ◽  
Marieke Voshaar ◽  
Heidi A Zangi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Level Of Agreement

To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) using the most up to date evidence. The EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A task force of rheumatologists, health professionals and patients, representing 17 European countries updated the recommendations, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Higher level of evidence and new insights into nursing care for patients with CIA were added to the recommendation. Level of agreement was obtained by email voting. The search identified 2609 records, of which 51 (41 papers, 10 abstracts), mostly on rheumatoid arthritis, were included. Based on consensus, the task force formulated three overarching principles and eight recommendations. One recommendation remained unchanged, six were reworded, two were merged and one was reformulated as an overarching principle. Two additional overarching principles were formulated. The overarching principles emphasise the nurse’s role as part of a healthcare team, describe the importance of providing evidence-based care and endorse shared decision-making in the nursing consultation with the patient. The recommendations cover the contribution of rheumatology nursing in needs-based patient education, satisfaction with care, timely access to care, disease management, efficiency of care, psychosocial support and the promotion of self-management. The level of agreement among task force members was high (mean 9.7, range 9.6-10.0). The updated recommendations encompass three overarching principles and eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of CIA.

scholarly journals 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
Féline PB Kroon ◽  
Francisco J Blanco ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
Krysia S Dziedzic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Information Provision ◽  
Hand Osteoarthritis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Systemic Treatments

Since publication of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for management of hand osteoarthritis (OA) in 2007 new evidence has emerged. The aim was to update these recommendations. EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A systematic literature review was performed, collecting the evidence regarding all non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical treatment options for hand OA published to date. Based on the evidence and expert opinion from an international task force of 19 physicians, healthcare professionals and patients from 10 European countries formulated overarching principles and recommendations. Level of evidence, grade of recommendation and level of agreement were allocated to each statement. Five overarching principles and 10 recommendations were agreed on. The overarching principles cover treatment goals, information provision, individualisation of treatment, shared decision-making and the need to consider multidisciplinary and multimodal (non-pharmacological, pharmacological, surgical) treatment approaches. Recommendations 1–3 cover different non-pharmacological treatment options (education, assistive devices, exercises and orthoses). Recommendations 4–8 describe the role of different pharmacological treatments, including topical treatments (preferred over systemic treatments, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) being first-line choice), oral analgesics (particularly NSAIDs to be considered for symptom relief for a limited duration), chondroitin sulfate (for symptom relief), intra-articular glucocorticoids (generally not recommended, consider for painful interphalangeal OA) and conventional/biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (discouraged). Considerations for surgery are described in recommendation 9. The last recommendation relates to follow-up. The presented EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance on the management of hand OA, based on expert opinion and research evidence.

scholarly journals EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 954-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi A Zangi ◽  
Mwidimi Ndosi ◽  
Jo Adams ◽  
Lena Andersen ◽  
Christina Bode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
High Level ◽  
Educational Agenda

ObjectivesThe task force aimed to: (1) develop evidence-based recommendations for patient education (PE) for people with inflammatory arthritis, (2) identify the need for further research on PE and (3) determine health professionals’ educational needs in order to provide evidence-based PE.MethodsA multidisciplinary task force, representing 10 European countries, formulated a definition for PE and 10 research questions that guided a systematic literature review (SLR). The results from the SLR were discussed and used as a basis for developing the recommendations, a research agenda and an educational agenda. The recommendations were categorised according to level and strength of evidence graded from A (highest) to D (lowest). Task force members rated their agreement with each recommendation from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement).ResultsBased on the SLR and expert opinions, eight recommendations were developed, four with strength A evidence. The recommendations addressed when and by whom PE should be offered, modes and methods of delivery, theoretical framework, outcomes and evaluation. A high level of agreement was achieved for all recommendations (mean range 9.4–9.8). The task force proposed a research agenda and an educational agenda.ConclusionsThe eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for PE for people with inflammatory arthritis are intended to provide a core framework for the delivery of PE and training for health professionals in delivering PE across Europe.

scholarly journals EULAR recommendations for vaccination in paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 1704-1712 ◽  
Author(s):  
M W Heijstek ◽  
L M Ott de Bruin ◽  
M Bijl ◽  
R Borrow ◽  
F van der Klis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Prevention Of Infections

Evidence-based recommendations for vaccination of paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases (PaedRD) were developed by following the EULAR standardised procedures for guideline development. The EULAR task force consisted of (paediatric) rheumatologists/immunologists, one expert in vaccine evaluation, one expert in public health and infectious disease control, and one epidemiologist. A systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and abstracts of the EULAR and American College of Rheumatology meetings of 2008/9. The level of evidence and strength of recommendation were based on customary scoring systems. Delphi voting was applied to assess the level of agreement between task force members. 107 papers and eight abstracts were used. The majority of papers considered seasonal influenza (41) or pneumococcal (23) vaccination. 26 studies were performed specifically in paediatric patients, and the majority in adult rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Fifteen recommendations were developed with an overall agreement of 91.7%. More research is needed on the safety and immunogenicity of (live-attenuated) vaccination in PaedRD, particularly in those using biologicals, and the effect of vaccination on prevention of infections.

scholarly journals 2019 EULAR points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Adams ◽  
Nicky Wilson ◽  
Emalie Hurkmans ◽  
Margot Bakkers ◽  
Petra Balážová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Nutritional Interventions ◽  
Physician Health ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Of Agreement

ObjectiveTo establish European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older.MethodsPoints to consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standard operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations, led by an international multidisciplinary task force, including patient research partners and different health professionals from 10 European countries. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were determined for each point to consider, and the mean level of agreement among the task force members was calculated.ResultsTwo overarching principles and seven points to consider were formulated based on scientific evidence and the expert opinion of the task force. The two overarching principles focus on shared decisions between patients and non-physician health professionals and involvement of different non-physician health professionals in prevention and management of fragility fractures. Four points to consider relate to prevention: identification of patients at risk of fracture, fall risk evaluation, multicomponent interventions to prevent primary fracture and discouragement of smoking and overuse of alcohol. The remaining three focus on management of fragility fractures: exercise and nutritional interventions, the organisation and coordination of multidisciplinary services for post-fracture models of care and adherence to anti-osteoporosis medicines. The mean level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and the points to consider ranged between 8.4 and 9.6.ConclusionThese first EULAR points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older serve to guide healthcare practice and education.

Triage and resource allocation during crisis medical surge conditions (pandemics and mass casualty situations)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
Paul Hoehner ◽  
David H. Beyda ◽  
William P. Cheshire ◽  
Robert E. Cranston ◽  
John T. Dunlop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Direct Response ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
A Current

The Christian Medical and Dental Associations (CMDA) was founded in 1931 and is made up of the Christian Medical Association (CMA) and the Christian Dental Association (CDA). CMDA has a current membership of over 19,000 physicians, dentists, and other allied health professionals. During and in direct response to the pressing urgencies of the COVID-19 universal pandemic of 2020 the President of CMDA commissioned a special task force to provide current and future Christian reflection and guidance on triage and resource allocation policies during pandemics and other forms of crisis surge medical conditions (e.g., mass casualty situations). This is a condensed version of the CMDA special task force position statement. 

scholarly journals Evaluation of Self-Reported Agricultural Tasks, Safety Concerns, and Health and Safety Behaviors of Young Adults in U.S. Collegiate Agricultural Programs

Safety ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
J. L. Gibbs ◽  
K. Walls ◽  
C. Sheridan ◽  
D. Sullivan ◽  
M. Cheyney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Safety Behaviors ◽  
Medical Provider ◽  
Near Misses ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Agricultural Health ◽  
Safety Concerns ◽  
Agricultural Programs

Young adults enrolled in collegiate agricultural programs are a critical audience for agricultural health and safety training. Understanding the farm tasks that young adults engage in is necessary for tailoring health and safety education. The project analyzed evaluation survey responses from the Gear Up for Ag Health and Safety™ program, including reported agricultural tasks, safety concerns, frequency of discussing health and safety concerns with healthcare providers, safety behaviors, and future career plans. The most common tasks reported included operation of machinery and grain-handling. Most participants intended to work on a family-owned agricultural operation or for an agribusiness/cooperative following graduation. Reported safety behaviors (hearing protection, eye protection, and sunscreen use when performing outdoor tasks) differed by gender and education type. Male community college and university participants reported higher rates of “near-misses” and crashes when operating equipment on the roadway. One-third of participants reported discussing agricultural health and safety issues with their medical provider, while 72% were concerned about the health and safety of their family and co-workers in agriculture. These findings provide guidance for better development of agricultural health and safety programs addressing this population—future trainings should be uniquely tailored, accounting for gender and educational differences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document