scholarly journals OP0189 MACROPHAGE PET/CT IMAGING OF THE FEET CAN CONTRIBUTE TO EARLY PREDICTION OF THERAPY OUTCOME IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 114.1-114
Author(s):  
N. J. F. Verweij ◽  
M. Ter Wee ◽  
J. De Jongh ◽  
G. C. J. Zwezerijnen ◽  
M. Yaqub ◽  
...  

Background:Treat-to-target strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have shown significant improvements in therapy outcomes. Nevertheless, it usually takes a minimum of 12 weeks before clinical assessment of treatment response can be made. Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) has shown potential to predict clinical response at a very early stage in the treatment in RA patients.(1) In particular, macrophage imaging by [11C]-(R)-PK11195 PET allows for highly sensitive and specific imaging of RA disease activity.(2,3)Objectives:To determine whether quantitative assessment using [11C]-(R)-PK11195 PET/CT imaging at 0-2 weeks is associated with subsequent clinical response to therapy with methotrexate and step-down prednisolone (COBRA-light) therapy in therapy-naive RA patients.Methods:Whole body [11C]-(R)-PK11195 PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and after two weeks of treatment in thirty-five clinically active and therapy-naive RA patients and at least two clinically inflamed joints. All patients were DMARD-naïve and received medication according to the COBRA-light schedule. (4) Clinical follow up with DAS44 assessment was performed at 0, 2 and 13 weeks of treatment. PET/CT scans were visually assessed by two experienced readers blinded to clinical data and quantitatively analyzed using in-house software. Regions of interest (ROIs) with a fixed size per joint (on both visual PET positive and negative joints) were placed on shoulders, elbows, hips, knees and hand and feet joints, with the CT-scan as anatomical reference. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) normalized for body weight were calculated in these ROIs to determine the amount of tracer uptake per joint. SPSS version 22.0 was used to perform regression analyses. The sum of visually positive joints and the average SUV in hand joints, feet joints and all joints in the body were compared with DAS44 scores.Results:Included patients were mostly male (51%) and aged 54 ± 12. Baseline DAS44 was 3.2 ± 1.0; all but one of the thirty-five patients demonstrated visually enhanced tracer uptake in one or more joints on PET/CT. A total of 171 (out of 1470) joints (12%) were visually PET positive at baseline. Over 90% of PET positive sites were located either in the wrists (15%), small hand joints (37%), or small feet joints (40%; Figure 1A). After 2 weeks, the number of PET positive joints had decreased to 100, with the highest decrease in quantitative uptake in feet joints (Figure 1B). Notably, both visual and quantitative PET data at baseline and differences between baseline and 2 weeks did not correlate with DAS44 at 13 weeks (DAS44-13wks). However, at 2 weeks, the average SUV in the feet (SUVfeet-2wks) – but not average SUVhands-2wks or average SUVtotalbody-2wks – was significantly correlated with DAS44-13wks (R2 = 0.14, p = 0.04). DAS44-2wks and SUVfeet-2wks both contributed independent information to the prediction DAS44-13wks (combined R2 = 0.297, p < 0.01).Figure 1.Changes in [11C]-(R)-PK11195 uptake in MTP joints of a RA patient, before (A) and 2 weeks after initiation of COBRA light treatment (B).Conclusion:Quantitative macrophage PET assessment in feet joints after 2 weeks of COBRA light treatment in early RA patients correlates with clinical response after 3 months of treatment. This correlation further increases when combined with the DAS44 score at 2 weeks. Therefore, quantitative, non-invasive macrophage PET/CT, especially when combined with early clinical assessment, may be useful for early assessment of response to treatment. Further studies will help optimize timing and focus of the PET examination in prediction of treatment response.References:[1]Elzinga EH, et al. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(1):77-80.[2]Van der Laken CJ et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov;58(11):3350-5.[3]Gent YY, et al. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41: 2145-52[4]Den Uyl D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):1071-8.Disclosure of Interests:Nicki J.F. Verweij: None declared, Marieke ter Wee: None declared, Jerney de Jongh: None declared, Gerben C.J. Zwezerijnen: None declared, Maqsood Yaqub: None declared, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg: None declared, Alexandre Voskuyl: None declared, WIllem Lems Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Amgen, UCB, Curaphar, Consultant of: Pfizer, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Amgen, UCB, Curaphar, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Adriaan A. Lammertsma Consultant of: Roche, Maarten Boers Consultant of: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Conny J. van der Laken Consultant of: Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, UCB, BMS, GSK, Galapagos, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, UCB, BMS, GSK, Galapagos

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 54.1-54
Author(s):  
S. Benamar ◽  
C. Lukas ◽  
C. Daien ◽  
C. Gaujoux-Viala ◽  
L. Gossec ◽  
...  

Background:Polypharmacy is steadily increasing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They may interfere with treatment response and the occurrence of serious adverse events. Medications taken by a patient may reflect active comorbidities, whereas comorbidity indices usually used include past or current diseases.Objectives:To evaluate whether polypharmarcy is associated with treatment response and adverse events in an early RA cohort and to establish whether polypharmacy could represent a substitute of comorbidities.Methods:We used data from the French cohort ESPOIR, including 813 patients with early onset arthritis. Patients included the current study had to start their first disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) within 24 months of inclusion in the cohort. Disease activity data were collected at one, five and ten years from the initiation of the first DMARD. For each patient, treatments were collected at baseline and at five years. Medications count included all specialties other than background RA therapy, analgesics/NSAIDs and topicals. Polypharmacy was defined as a categorical variable based on the median and tertiles of distribution in the cohort. Treatment response was assessed by achieving DAS28 ESR remission (REM) at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years from the initiation of the first DMARD. The occurrence of severe adverse events (SAE) was measured by the occurrence of severe infection, hospitalization, or death during the 10-year follow-up. The association between patient’s characteristics and achievement of REM and occurrence of SAE were tested in univariate analysis. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate associations between polypharmacy and REM at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years (we used baseline polypharmacy for the 1-year analysis and five years polypharmacy for the 5- and 10-years analyses). Multivariate adjustment was made for age, sex, BMI, duration of disease, initial DAS28 ESR, initial HAQ, smoking status, rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI).Results:The proportion of patients who achieved REM one year after the initiation of the first DMARD was 32.1% in the polypharmacy according to the median group (patients taken ≥2 medication) versus 67.9% in the non-polypharmacy group (p=0.07). At 5 years after the first DMARD, the proportion of patients with REM was 45.0% in the polypharmacy group versus 56.3% in the non-polypharmacy group (p=0.03). At 10 years the proportion of patients with REM was 32.5% in the polypharmacy group versus 67.5% (p=0.06). Patients who take greater or equal to 2 medications had a 40% lower probability of achieving REM (OR = 0.60 [0.38-0.94] p = 0.03) at 5 years from the first DMARD (if RDCI index was not included in the model). At 10 years, patients receiving multiple medications had a 43% lower probability of achieving REM (OR = 0.57 [0.34-0.94] p = 0.02). SAE incidence was 61 per 1000 patient-years. For patients who developed SAE all causes 71.4% where in the polypharmacy group versus 57.8% were in the non-polypharmacy group (p = 0.03; univariate analysis). These results are no longer significant after adjustment for comorbidities indices.Conclusion:In this early RA cohort, polypharmacy is associated with a poorer treatment response and increased risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy may represent a good substitute of comorbidities for epidemiological studies.Acknowledgements:We are grateful to Nathalie Rincheval (Montpellier) who did expert monitoring and data management and all theinvestigators who recruited and followed the patients (F. Berenbaum, Paris-Saint Antoine; MC. Boissier, Paris-Bobigny; A. Cantagrel, Toulouse; B. Combe, Montpellier; M. Dougados, Paris-Cochin; P. Fardellone and P. Boumier, Amiens; B. Fautrel, Paris-La Pitié; RM. Flipo, Lille; Ph. Goupille, Tours; F. Liote, Paris- Lariboisière; O. Vittecoq, Rouen; X. Mariette, Paris-Bicêtre; P. Dieude, Paris Bichat; A. Saraux, Brest; T. Schaeverbeke, Bordeaux; and J. Sibilia, Strasbourg).The work reported on in the manuscript did not benefit from any financial support. The ESPOIR cohort is sponsored by the French Society for Rheumatology. An unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) was allocated for the first 5 years. Two additional grants from INSERM were obtained to support part of the biological database. Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly and more recently Fresenius and Biogen also supported the ESPOIR cohort.Disclosure of Interests:Soraya Benamar: None declared, Cédric Lukas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis and Roche-Chugai, Claire Daien Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Abivax, BMS, MSD, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly, Consultant of: AbbVie, Abivax, BMS, MSD, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly, Cécile Gaujoux-Viala Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Laure Gossec Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis et UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis et UCB, Anne-Christine Rat Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Consultant of: Pfizer, Lilly, Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi;, Consultant of: AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi;, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai., Jacques Morel Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Médac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Médac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1832.2-1833
Author(s):  
J. De Jongh ◽  
R. Hemke ◽  
G. C. J. Zwezerijnen ◽  
M. Yaqub ◽  
I. Van der Horst-Bruinsma ◽  
...  

Background:Bone formation in spondyloarthritis (SpA) is presumably related to local enthesitis/peri-articular inflammation and ultimately may lead to functional limitation (1,2). X-rays only allow long-term monitoring of bone formation (≥2 years) (3). Imaging techniques that can visualize bone formation at an early stage would therefore be valuable. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using [18F]Fluoride can visualize and quantify (early changes in) bone formation at molecular level (4).Objectives:To investigate the feasibility of [18F]Fluoride to assess new bone formation at axial and peripheral enthesial sites in SpA patients.Methods:Thus far, 5 of the total of 15 patients with clinically active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (according to modified New York criteria and BASDAI ≥4) and 8 of the 25 patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (according to CASPAR criteria and ≥1 clinically active enthesitis) were included. Of each patient, a whole body [18F]Fluoride PET-CT scan was performed. All scans were visually judged and scored dichotomously by one reader (blinded for clinical data) for PET-positive lesions in the spine, peripheral enthesis sites and joints. Low dose CT was used for anatomical reference.Results:The study is ongoing, with whole body [18F]Fluoride PET-CT scans available in five AS patients and eight PsA patients. In 4/5 AS scans, at least (≥1) PET positive lesions were found in the cervical, thoracic and/or lumbar vertebrae. These were mainly found in anterior corners of vertebrae and bridging syndesmophytes (Fig. 1A). In all eight PsA patients, at least 1 PET positive lesion was visualized, projected either at the site of a tendon attachment (fascia plantaris, achilles- and patella tendon (Fig 1B)) or peri-articularly (in the ankle or wrist).Fig 1.[18F]Fluoride uptake in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine in a clinically active AS patient (A) and in the patella tendon of the right knee in a clinically active PsA patient (B)Conclusion:[18F]Fluoride PET uptake, reflecting new bone formation, can be visualized at heterogeneously distributed enthesis and (peri-)articular sites in AS- and PsA patients. The technique therefore is sensitive to visualize new bone formation and may reflect local disease activity. Additional scans will be collected and analyzed quantitatively, also after anti-TNF or Secukinumab treatment, to further investigate the applicability of [18F]Fluoride PET for monitoring of therapeutic effects on bone formation in SpA.References: :[1]Maksymowych WP, Mallon C, Morrow S, Shojania K, Olszynski WP, Wong RL, et al. Development and validation of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):948-53.[2]Rezvani A, Bodur H, Ataman S, Kaya T, Bugdayci DS, Demir SE, et al. Correlations among enthesitis, clinical, radiographic and quality of life parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(4):651-6.[3]Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Sieper J. The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1000-8..[4]Bruijnen ST, Verweij NJF, van Duivenvoorde L, Bravenboer N, Baeten D, van Denderen JC, et al. [18F]Fluoride PET-CT imaging of bone formation in ankylosing spondylitis before and after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. 2017.Acknowledgments:We thank EULAR Foreum, Pfizer and Novartis for financial support of this investigator initiated study.Disclosure of Interests:Jerney de Jongh: None declared, Robert Hemke: None declared, Gerben C.J. Zwezerijnen: None declared, Maqsood Yaqub: None declared, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Marleen G.H. van de Sande Grant/research support from: Novartis, Eli lily, UCB, Jansen, Consultant of: Abbvie, Novartis, Eli lily, MSD, Arno Van Kuijk: None declared, Irene Bultink: None declared, Lot Burgemeister: None declared, Nancy M.A. van Dillen: None declared, Alexandre Voskuyl: None declared, Conny J. van der Laken: None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis R. Beckford-Vera ◽  
Alba Gonzalez-Junca ◽  
Jessica S. Janneck ◽  
Tony L. Huynh ◽  
Joseph E. Blecha ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Jin Lee ◽  
Chae Moon Hong ◽  
Il Cho ◽  
Byeong-Cheol Ahn ◽  
Jung Su Eun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We aimed to compare the reliability of bone scintigraphy (BS) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)–derived parameters in the detection of active arthritis in 28-joint areas and evaluate the reliability of joint counts between BS and clinical assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: We enrolled 106 patients (67 in the development group and 39 in the validation groups) with active RA who underwent BS, 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT), and clinical evaluation of disease activity. We compared the results of BS-derived joint assessment with those of PET-derived and clinical joint assessments. Subsequently we developed a disease activity score (DAS) using BS-positive joints and validated it in an independent group.Results: The number of BS-positive joints in 28-joint areas significantly correlated with the swollen /tender joint counts (SJC/TJC) and PET-derived joint counts. A BS uptake score of 2 (strong positive) was significantly more sensitive compared with a BS uptake score of 1 (weak positive) in detecting a PET-positive joint among the 28-joints. After conducting multivariate analyses including erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) and patient global assessment (PGA) in addition to BS-derived parameters, BS/DAS was obtained as follows: 0.056 × number of BS-positive joints in 28 joints + 0.012 × ESR + 0.030 × PGA. A significant correlation between BS/DAS and DAS28-ESR was confirmed in the validation group. Conclusion: Strong positive uptake of BS is sensitive and reproducible for the detection of active joints, and can complement the clinical assessment of disease activity in RA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Judi N.A. van Diessen ◽  
Matthew La Fontaine ◽  
Michel M. van den Heuvel ◽  
Erik van Werkhoven ◽  
Iris Walraven ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Witkowska-Patena ◽  
Anna Budzyńska ◽  
Agnieszka Giżewska ◽  
Mirosław Dziuk ◽  
Agata Walęcka-Mazur

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to compare widely used ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm with a new Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) Q.Clear algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Methods We retrospectively assessed 25 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans with both OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructions available. Each scan was independently reported by two physicians both in OSEM and Q.Clear. SUVmax, SUVmean and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) of each lesion were measured. Reports were also compared for their final conclusions and the number and localisation of lesions. Results In both reconstructions the same 87 lesions were reported. Mean SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR were higher for Q.Clear than OSEM (7.01 vs 6.53 [p = 0.052], 4.16 vs 3.84 [p = 0.036] and 20.2 vs 16.8 [p < 0.00001], respectively). Small lesions (< 10 mm) had statistically significant higher SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR in Q.Clear than OSEM (5.37 vs 4.79 [p = 0.032], 3.08 vs 2.70 [p = 0.04] and 15.5 vs 12.5 [p = 0.00214], respectively). For lesions ≥ 10 mm, no significant differences were observed. Findings with higher tracer avidity (SUVmax ≥ 5) tended to have higher SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR values in Q.Clear (11.6 vs 10.3 [p = 0.00278], 7.0 vs 6.7 [p = 0.077] and 33.9 vs 26.7 [p < 0.00001, respectively). Mean background uptake did not differ significantly between Q.Clear and OSEM (0.42 vs 0.39, p = 0.07). Conclusions In 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, Q.Clear SUVs and TBR tend to be higher (regardless of lesion localisation), especially for small and highly avid lesions. Increase in SUVs is also higher for lesions with high tracer uptake. Still, Q.Clear does not affect 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT specificity and sensitivity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7557-7557
Author(s):  
Prioty Islam ◽  
Jordan Goldstein ◽  
Ila Sethi ◽  
Daniel Lee ◽  
Christopher Flowers

7557 Background: DLBCL is a heterogeneous disease with varied clinical outcomes following treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) – positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging is ubiquitously used in monitoring of DLBCL. PET-derived metrics for analysis of tumor FDG uptake include: tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUV); metabolically active tumor volume (MTV); and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), calculated from the intensity of FDG uptake in tumor volume. We evaluated the predictive value of interim SUV, MTV and TLG for patients (pts) with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. Methods: Pts with DLBCL treated at Emory University 2005-2016 were eligible. Cases were included if there was a diagnosis of DLBCL confirmed by record review, available information on date of diagnosis, date of last contact or date of death. Analyses were restricted to patients who received R-CHOP and had PET/CT scans available at baseline, Cycle 2 or 4 and end of treatment. Maximum SUV, MTV, and TLG were calculated using MIM software for tumor with an SUV threshold of > 4. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the predictive value of interim PET/CT metrics on end of treatment response. Results: Pre-treatment PET/CT scans for 42 patients were identified, along with 28 interim and 31 post-treatment scans. The mean pre-treatment MTV was 303ml (range 4 – 1,327) and mean TLG was 3188 (range 28 – 16,176). MTV and TLG were undetectable in 79% of interim scans and 74% of the post-treatment scans. A Deauville score of 3 or less was observed in 71% of the interim PET/CT scans and 56% of the post-treatment scans. A positive interim MTV was correlated with a positive post-treatment MTV and post-treatment Deauville score at 0.58 and 0.66, respectively, and a positive interim MTV result was a significant predictor of a positive post-treatment MTV result (p = 0.02). Conclusions: PET-derived metrics of assessing interim tumor response to therapy offer significant predictive value for end of treatment response, and can guide a response-adapted treatment approach for DLBCL pts that builds on the R-CHOP backbone.


2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (3pt2) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Diepenbrock ◽  
S. Hermann ◽  
M. Schäfers ◽  
M. Kuhlmann ◽  
K. Hinrichs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document