scholarly journals Weak association between subjective symptoms of and objective testing for dry eyes and dry mouth: results from a population based study

1998 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M Hay ◽  
E Thomas ◽  
B Pal ◽  
A. Hajeer ◽  
H Chambers ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dongxue Pan ◽  
Simao Fu ◽  
Xiaoqing Li ◽  
Tingting Yu ◽  
Sizhe Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives In this study, we evaluated the concordance between the ultrasonographic stage of breast (US B) and Tanner stage of breast (TS B) for overweight and obese girls based on a school population study. Methods We conducted multistage, stratified cluster, and random-proportional sampling and ultimately included 221 girls (aged 6–10 years). Results This study revealed that the concordance was poor (accuracy=0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.14, 0.25)) between US B and TS B among the 221 participants. When our subjects were stratified by weight, we observed a weak association between US B and TS B in the thin/normal weight group (r=0.34, p=0.001) but not in the overweight (r=0.097, p=0.38) or obese groups (r=–0.19, p=0.206), and as the body mass index (BMI) z-score increased, the overestimation ratio of TS B increased. US B manifested a positive correlation with breast bud diameter (BD) (r=0.885, p<0.001), follicle-stimulating hormone (r=0.235, p=0.009), and luteinizing hormone (r=0.192, p=0.037), but this was not the case with TS B. Conclusions As the BMI z-score increased, the correlation between the two methods declined, and the overestimation ratio of TS B increased. US B is an objective and quantitative method used to evaluate breast development, and whether BD might replace US B as a routine diagnostic method to evaluate breast development in clinical practice needs to be confirmed in larger-sample studies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A628-A628
Author(s):  
E LOFTUSJR ◽  
C CROWSON ◽  
W SANDBORN ◽  
W TREAMINE ◽  
W OFALLON ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 73-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Barocas ◽  
Farhang Rabbani ◽  
Douglas S. Scherr ◽  
E. Darracott Vaughan

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 401-401
Author(s):  
Javier Hernandez ◽  
Jacques Baillargeon ◽  
Brad Pollock ◽  
Alan R. Kristal ◽  
Patrick Bradshaw ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-356
Author(s):  
Katarina Wide ◽  
Birger Winbladh ◽  
Torbjörn Tomson ◽  
Kerstin Sars-Zimmer ◽  
Eva Berggren

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Larsson ◽  
Hans Wijkström ◽  
Andreas Thorstenson ◽  
Jan Adolfsson ◽  
Ulf Norming ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumia Taimour ◽  
Moncef Zarrouk ◽  
Jan Holst ◽  
Olle Melander ◽  
Gunar Engström ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Biomarkers reflecting diverse pathophysiological pathways may play an important role in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA), levels of many biomarkers are elevated and correlated to aortic diameter among 65-year-old men undergoing ultrasound (US) screening for AAA. Probands and methods: To evaluate potential relationships between biomarkers and aortic dilatation after long-term follow-up, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), proneurotensin (PNT), copeptin (CPT), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase 2 (Lp-PLA2), cystatin C (Cyst C), midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) were measured in 117 subjects (114 [97 %] men) aged 47–49 in a prospective population-based cohort study, and related to aortic diameter at US examination of the aorta after 14–19 years of follow-up. Results: Biomarker levels at baseline did not correlate with aortic diameter after 14–19 years of follow up (CRP [r = 0.153], PNT [r = 0.070], CPT [r = –.156], Lp-PLA2 [r = .024], Cyst C [r = –.015], MR-proANP [r = 0.014], MR-proADM [r = –.117]). Adjusting for age and smoking at baseline in a linear regression model did not reveal any significant correlations. Conclusions: Tested biomarker levels at age 47–49 were not associated with aortic diameter at ultrasound examination after 14–19 years of follow-up. If there are relationships between these biomarkers and aortic dilatation, they are not relevant until closer to AAA diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document