scholarly journals Atherothrombotic non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in a 42-year-old white female with no known cardiovascular risk factors

2016 ◽  
pp. bcr2016216190
Author(s):  
William Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
White Female ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

scholarly journals Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Medication Use and Procedural Variables on Remote Ischemic Conditioning Efficacy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Pryds ◽  
Marie Vognstoft Hjortbak ◽  
Michael Rahbek Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Remote Ischemic Conditioning ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Ischemic Conditioning ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) confers cardioprotection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite intense research, the translation of RIC into clinical practice remains a challenge. This may, at least partly, be due to confounding factors that may modify the efficacy of RIC. The present review focuses on cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, medication use and procedural variables which may modify the efficacy of RIC in patients with STEMI. Findings of such efficacy modifiers are based on subgroup and post-hoc analyses and thus hold risk of type I and II errors. Although findings from studies evaluating influencing factors are often ambiguous, some but not all studies suggest that smoking, non-statin use, infarct location, area-at-risk of infarction, pre-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, ischemia duration and coronary collateral blood flow to the infarct-related artery may influence on the cardioprotective efficacy of RIC. Results from the on-going CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI trial will determine any clinical implications of RIC in the treatment of patients with STEMI and predefined subgroup analyses will give further insight into influencing factors on the efficacy of RIC.

Documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2007 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Roe ◽  
Abdul R. Halabi ◽  
Rajendra H. Mehta ◽  
Anita Y. Chen ◽  
L. Kristin Newby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

scholarly journals Assessing the Risk Factors of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2080-2086
Author(s):  
Veronica Gheorman ◽  
Venera Cristina Dinescu ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Denise Ramona Malin ◽  
Mioara Desdemona Stepan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Management ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Full Profile

Cardiovascular risk management decisions are based on the full profile of cardiovascular risk factors.It is important not only the number of cardiovascular risk factors accumulated by a patient but the magnitude of each factor, both being proportional to cardiovascular risk.

scholarly journals Patients with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Require Strict Control of All Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Results from the Polish Local Population Medical Records

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2704
Author(s):  
Jarosław Hiczkiewicz ◽  
Paweł Burchardt ◽  
Jan Budzianowski ◽  
Konrad Pieszko ◽  
Dariusz Hiczkiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Coronary Angioplasty ◽  
Significant Stenosis ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
The Past ◽  
St Segment

The aim of the project was to compare patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), who also had undergone PTCA in the past, with a group of people who had had no angiographic stenosis in the lumen of the coronary arteries in the past, and who also required PTCA during index hospitalization. The secondary aim was to compare the obtained data with the characteristics of a group of people who had undergone angiography twice and for whom no significant stenosis had been found in their coronary arteries. The study used registry data concerning 3085 people who had undergone at least two invasive procedures. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly more often observed (Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) OR 2.76 [1.91–3.99] and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) OR 2.35 [1.85–2.99]) in patients with no significant coronary stenosis in the past (who required coronary angioplasty at the time of the study), compared to patients who had already had PTCA. They also demonstrated more frequent occurrence of ‘multivessel disease’. This was probably most likely caused by inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors, as determined by higher total cholesterol levels ([mg/dL] 193.7 ± 44.4 vs. 178.2 ± 43.7) and LDL (123.4 ± 36.2 vs. 117.7 ± 36.2). On the other hand, patients in whom no significant stenosis was found in two consecutive angiographies were more likely to be burdened with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease.

scholarly journals Analysis of risk factors for different subtypes of acute coronary syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110083
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Juledezi Hailati ◽  
Xiaoyun Ma ◽  
Jiangping Liu ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

Aims To investigate the different risk factors among different subtypes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods A total of 296 patients who had ACS were retrospectively enrolled. Blood and echocardiographic indices were assessed within 24 hours after admission. Differences in risk factors and Gensini scores of coronary lesions among three groups were analyzed. Results Univariate analysis of risk factors for ACS subtypes showed that age, and levels of fasting plasma glucose, amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and creatine kinase isoenzyme were significantly higher in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than in those with unstable angina pectoris (UAP). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were related to ACS subtypes. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was an independent risk factor for UAP and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) subtypes. The severity of coronary stenosis was significantly higher in NSTEMI and STEMI than in UAP. Gensini scores in the STEMI group were positively correlated with D-dimer levels (r = 0.429) and negatively correlated with the LVEF (r = −0.602). Conclusion Different subtypes of ACS have different risk factors. Our findings may have important guiding significance for ACS subtype risk assessment and clinical treatment.

scholarly journals Good Practices in the Clinical Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Retrospective Analysis in a Third-Level Hospital in Mexico

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Héctor E. Flores-Salinas ◽  
Fidel Casillas-Muñoz ◽  
Yeminia Valle ◽  
Cesar M. Guzmán-Sánchez ◽  
Jorge Ramon Padilla-Gutiérrez
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Introduction and Objective. In Mexico, there has been an increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease due to rising life expectancy, westernized lifestyle, lack of prevention, and industrialized exposure. This article describes the pharmacological treatment, surgical interventions, and associated clinical complications in patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and their impact on in-hospital mortality frequency in a Cardiology Unit in Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Methods. This is a retrospective study including male and female patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with ACS. The collected data included demographic characteristics, risk factors, medications, electrocardiograms, surgical procedures, and in-hospital deaths. Results. There are at least 20% more diagnoses of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in this hospital compared to the latest national reports in Mexico. The most common risk factors were type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidaemia. Diabetic patients with a clinical history of percutaneous coronary intervention had a higher risk of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than nondiabetics (OR: 2.34; p=0.013), also smoking patients with previous heart surgery than nonsmokers (OR: 7.73; p=0.0007). The average in-hospital mortality was 3.6% for ACS. Conclusions. There is a higher percentage of coronary interventionism and improvement in pharmacological treatment, which is reflected in lower mortality. The substantial burden of T2DM could be related to a higher number of cases of STEMI. Diabetics with precedent percutaneous coronary intervention and smokers with previous heart surgery have an increased risk of subsequent infarction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document