scholarly journals Isolated growth hormone deficiency presenting with recurrent hypoglycaemia in a toddler

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e231056
Author(s):  
Hiya Boro ◽  
Alpesh Goyal ◽  
Rajesh Khadgawat

Hypoglycaemia in infants and children is caused by a number of endocrine and metabolic defects, some of which are unique to this age group. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been rarely reported as a cause of recurrent fasting hypoglycaemia in children. An 18-month-old male child presented to us for evaluation of neuroglycopenic symptoms caused by recurrent episodes of fasting hypoglycaemia. Laboratory evaluation revealed ketotic hypoinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. The child was diagnosed to have GHD on the basis of two failed stimulation tests. A detailed work-up for metabolic and other hormonal causes of hypoglycaemia was negative. We present the case for its rarity and to highlight the importance of a detailed metabolic and hormonal assessment in evaluation of childhood hypoglycaemia.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 929-937
Author(s):  
S. Douglas Frasier

No suggested screening test meets all of the criteria set for such a procedure. The minimum incidence of a positive response in normal children detected in a single blood sample after diethylstilbestrol, sleep or exercise is approximately 70%. This is higher than that observed when a single sample is obtained following oral glucose. While both sleep and exercise are physiologic stimuli, the former may be quite inconvenient unless an outpatient facility staffed with appropriate personnel is available. An exercise test employed in the office may well be the best screening procedure for the practicing physician. The optimal criteria for a definitive test of growth hormone function are also not met by any single stimulus. Insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine infusion, intramuscular glucagon and oral 1-DOPA are all useful procedures. None alone discriminate completely between the normal and the growth hormone-deficient child. Despite potential hazards, insulin-induced hypoglycemia remains the standard against which other stimuli are judged. Arginine and 1-DOPA appear to be equally effective. The literature contains insufficient data to allow adequate evaluation of intramuscular glucagon alone, and the results of combined propranolol-glucagon stimulation, while promising, require confirmation. Because of an inconstant and/or small magnitude of response leading to results which are difficult to interpret, the use of glucose, pyrogen, vasopressin and ACTH are not adequate tests of growth hormone function. Bovril® is a satisfactory stimulus for those children who will take it. Those factors which modify the growth hormone response must be considered in evaluating the results of stimulation tests. Blunted responses should be interpreted with extreme caution in the obese child. A fasting growth hormone concentration ≥ 7 ng/ml is presumptive evidence of intact growth hormone function regardless of the subsequent response to stimulation. It is essential that patients be euthyroid in order to interpret the results of growth hormone function tests. Physiologic glucocorticoid replacement therapy should not confuse the interpretation of results. Whether or not pretreatment with sex steroids is worthwhile in the routine evaluation of children for suspected growth hormone deficiency is an open question. Although it is agreed that the definitive diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency depends on the demonstration of failure to respond to two stimuli, which two are most satisfactory is not settled. The sequential administration of arginine and insulin on the same day appears to limit significantly the incidence of false-positive laboratory diagnoses of growth hormone deficiency. The significance of intermediate values in response to stimulation remains unclear. Caution should be exercised in assigning a child to the category of partial growth hormone deficiency. This question must be answered ultimately by the response to HGH therapy in the individual patient. Finally, several points should be kept in mind. All of the tests described depend on the detection and quantitation of immunologically active HGH and biological activity is not necessarily associated with the material(s) being measured. Since many of the stimuli used in the evaluation of growth hormone function are clearly pharmacologic, the physiological significance of the response to such stimuli must be interpreted with caution. The best current evidence suggests that all of the stimuli described act through an intact hypothalamus and pituitary. Differentiation between hypothalamic and pituitary sites of defective growth hormone function awaits the availability of growth hormone-releasing factor(s).


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1191-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. J. Yuen ◽  
Beverly M. K. Biller ◽  
Sally Radovick ◽  
John D. Carmichael ◽  
Sina Jasim ◽  
...  

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH–stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document. LAY ABSTRACT This updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH–stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH–stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH–stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone–releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor–binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test


2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
P G Murray ◽  
M T Dattani ◽  
P E Clayton

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare but important cause of short stature in childhood with a prevalence of 1 in 4000. The diagnosis is currently based on an assessment of auxology along with supporting evidence from biochemical and neuroradiological studies. There are significant controversies in the diagnosis and management of GHD. Growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests continue to play a key role in GHD diagnosis but the measured GH concentration can vary significantly with stimulation test and GH assay used, creating difficulties for diagnostic accuracy. Such issues along with the use of adjunct biochemical markers such as IGF-I and IGFBP-3 for the diagnosis of GHD, will be discussed in this review. Additionally, the treatment of GHD remains a source of much debate; there is no consensus on the best mechanism for determining the starting dose of GH in patients with GHD. Weight and prediction based models will be discussed along with different mechanisms for dose adjustment during treatment (auxology or IGF-I targeting approaches). At the end of growth and childhood treatment, many subjects diagnosed with isolated GHD re-test normal. It is not clear if this represents a form of transient GHD or a false positive diagnosis during childhood. Given the difficulties inherent in the diagnosis of GHD, an early reassessment of the diagnosis in those who respond poorly to GH is to be recommended.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Peinkhofer ◽  
Benedetta Bossini ◽  
Arturo Penco ◽  
Manuela Giangreco ◽  
Maria Chiara Pellegrin ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: The study aimed to evaluate differences in pediatric endocrine stimulation tests after the advent of COVID-19 pandemics.Methods: Retrospective study with data collection for pediatric endocrine stimulation tests performed in 2019 e 2020 in a tertiary center.Results: Overall, 251 tests were performed on 190 patients in 2020, compared to 278 tests on 206 patients in 2019 (-10% tests; -8% children evaluated). A significant reduction was found in tests to diagnose growth hormone deficiency (GHD) (-35%), while LHRH tests increased (+22%). A reduction of 30% in GHD diagnosis was observed. Diagnosis of central precocious puberty (CPP) increased by 38% compared to 2019, mainly in females. Conclusion: This study found a significant reduction of tests investigating GHD during COVID-19 pandemics. It also showed a clinically meaningful increase in cases of CPP in girls. These results suggest the need for families and pediatricians to monitor children's growth during isolation and enlighten new perspectives towards conditions associated with lockdown restrictions as increased screen time, social isolation, and children's anxiety as possible triggers of CPP.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Hemlin Thomas C. ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
Bisto A. A.

Background: Growth Hormone Deficiency is conventionally diagnosed by low peak Growth Hormone levels to provocative testing. Serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 are under the influence of GH and reflect the endogenous GH secretion. Owing to the absence of a circadian rhythm, it is possible to take individual measurements of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 at any time of the day for evaluation of GH status instead of subjecting the individual to cumbersome provocative tests. Objectives of this study were to compare IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 assays with clonidine stimulation test in children of different age group with short stature.Methods: 90 children with short stature were included in the study. Samples for basal GH, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were obtained and afterwards all children were subjected to clonidine stimulation test. The diagnostic value of the tests were analysed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy in younger and older age groups.Results: 40% of the study population was diagnosed to have GHD. IGF-1 had high sensitivity in both age groups. But in the younger age group IGFBP-3 was more specific. Both the tests had same specificity in the older age group. Combining the two tests helped to improve diagnostic value in all the age groups.Conclusions: Measurements of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 have shown comparable diagnostic performance with growth hormone stimulation tests and are valuable for patient`s convenience and ease of performance and can be useful in the workup of growth hormone deficiency.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Diana-Alexandra Ertl ◽  
Jiajia Chen ◽  
Andreas Gleiss ◽  
Dominik Janu ◽  
Susanne Sagmeister ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The acid-labile subunit (ALS) is a crucial factor in the tertiary complex. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are routinely measured during the diagnostic work-up for growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The aim of the study is to evaluate the relevance of serum ALS as an additional biomarker in the diagnosis of GHD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ninety-one children undergoing standard diagnostic work-up for GHD were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were evidence-based auxological cutoffs, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 &#x3c;−2 SDS at first presentation, at least 1 growth hormone (GH) stimulation test, and IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and ALS measurements on the same day. Statistical analysis was performed by ROC as well as by odds ratio calculations. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-seven of 90 participants presented with peak GH values under the cutoff of 7 ng/mL. AUC from a model containing only IGF-I was 0.76 and 0.68 when using only ALS. A model containing IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and ALS (AUC = 0.77) did not improve the result compared to the combination of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 (0.77) or IGF-I/ALS (0.76). Furthermore, the variation in the outcome (GH peak &#x3c;/≥7) explained by IGF-I only amounts to 20.4%, while that explained by IGFBP-3 and ALS is only 10.6 and 7.8%, respectively. The sensitivity to diagnose GHD at respective concentrations of −2.0 SDS was 48% for IGF-I, 38% for IGFBP-3, and only 8% for ALS. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Determination of serum ALS alone or in combination with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 did not improve definition of biochemical GHD in a cohort of short children and adolescents with suspected growth disorder. However, performance of IGFBP-3 in this context was not statistically superior to ALS.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Zvi Zadik ◽  
Stuart A. Chalew ◽  
Salvatore Raiti ◽  
A. Avinoam Kowarski

The 24-hour integrated concentration of growth hormone from 46 children of normal stature was compared with that of 90 short children. Nineteen of the short children had classic growth hormone deficiency by standard pharmacologic growth hormone stimulation tests. Seventy-one children had normal growth hormone responses to stimulation. The mean integrated concentration of growth hormone for children with normal stature (6.6 ± 1.9 ng/mL) was greater than the mean value for those with normal stimulated growth hormone (3.8 ± 2.3 ng/mL) and greater than the mean value for those with growth hormone deficiency (1.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL); differences between groups were all statistically significant (P &lt; .0001). Forty-five percent of children with normal stimulated growth hormone responses had integrated concentration of growth hormone within the range of values for the group with growth hormone deficiency; this finding may provide the explanation for their poor growth. Thus, patients with normal growth hormone responses have a spectrum of spontaneous growth hormone secretion ranging from normal to impaired. Recent reports indicate that children with normal growth hormone responses who have very low integrated concentration of growth hormone may have the potential to improve their growth with growth hormone therapy. Therefore, use of the integrated concentration of growth hormone may be a more effective method than standard pharmacologic stimulation tests for determining which short children are potentially able to respond to growth hormone therapy.


2021 ◽  
pp. 609-626
Author(s):  
Helena Gleeson

This chapter covers endocrine concerns in the age group 10-24 years. It starts with an overview of transitional endocrinology and biopsychosocial development, aspects of developmentally appropriate healthcare, and how to perform a consultation for adolescents and young adults. It covers common clinical endocrine presentations of young people during adolescence, and how to approach a young person with an endocrine condition undergoing transition into adult care. The management of young people with hypopituitarism and growth hormone deficiency is outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document