scholarly journals Survival and risk of adverse events in older patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stages II-IIIA lung cancer: observational cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 343 (jul14 1) ◽  
pp. d4013-d4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Wisnivesky ◽  
C. B. Smith ◽  
S. Packer ◽  
G. M. Strauss ◽  
L. Lurslurchachai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Observational Cohort

Functional status in older patients with lung cancer: an observational cohort study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Laure Couderc ◽  
Pascale Tomasini ◽  
Laurent Greillier ◽  
Emilie Nouguerède ◽  
Dominique Rey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Observational Cohort

scholarly journals Effect of Renamezin upon attenuation of renal function decline in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: 24-week prospective observational cohort study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252186
Author(s):  
Hayne Cho Park ◽  
AJin Cho ◽  
Do Hyoung Kim ◽  
Kyu-sang Yun ◽  
Juhee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Renal Function Decline ◽  
Observational Cohort

Renamezin® is a modified capsule-type oral spherical adsorptive carbon which lowers indoxyl sulfate levels in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This 24-week prospective observational cohort study was performed to evaluate the effect of Renamezin® upon attenuation of renal function decline. A total of 1,149 adult patients with baseline serum creatinine 2.0–5.0 mg/dL were enrolled from 22 tertiary hospital in Korea from April 2016 to September 2018. Among them, a total of 686 patients completed the study and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 1,061 patients were included in the safety analysis. The mean age was 63.5 years and male patients were predominant (63.6%). Most of the patients (76.8%) demonstrated high compliance with study drug (6g per day). After 24 week of treatment, serum creatinine was increased from 2.86±0.72 mg/dL to 3.06±1.15 mg/dL (p<0.001), but estimated glomerular filtration rate was not changed significantly during observation period (22.3±6.8 mL/min/1.73m2 to 22.1±9.1 mL/min/1.73m2, p = 0.243). Patients with age over 65 years old and those under good systolic blood pressure control <130 mmHg were most likely to get benefit from Renamezin® treatment to preserve renal function. A total of 98 (9.2%) patients out of 1,061 safety population experienced 134 adverse events, of which gastrointestinal disorders were the most common. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Renamezin® can be used safely to attenuate renal function decline in moderately advanced CKD patients.

Observational cohort study of first-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (HGCSG0802): Comparison of infusional FU/oxaliplatin(OX)+BV and oral FU/OX+BV.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Hirohito Naruse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Observational Cohort

527 Background: A few reports have shown no difference between the efficacy of infusional FU and that of oral FU (Capecitabine/S-1) for colorectal cancer, and some studies have reported the non-inferiority between infusional FU/Oxaliplatin (OX) and oral FU/OX for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We performed a sub-group comparison between infusional FU/OX (mFOLFOX6 + BV: iFU) and oral FU/OX (CapeOX/SOX + BV: oFU) from the HGCSG0802 observational cohort study with investigated Japanese patients (pts) treated with first line BV for mCRC. Methods: The objective of HGCSG0802 was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment-failure (TTF), response rate (RR), safety and so on. The key eligibility criteria of HGCSG0802 were with evaluable lesions, older than 20 years, ECOG PS 0-2, and this analysis used the cohort treated with OX-based regimens.In this analysis, pts characteristics, RR and safety were compared using Fisher’s exact test. PFS and TTF were compared using log-rank test. Results: Of 108 pts (the full analysis set), 95 pts were evaluable for treated with OX-based regimens. Forty-eight pts (50.5%) were treated with iFU and 47 pts (49.5%) were treated with oFU (CapeOX + BV 42 pts/SOX + BV 5 pts). The pts characteristics between those were generally balanced except for PS 0-1 (72.9% in iFU/93.6% in oFU; p=0.012) and synchronous liver metastases (mets) (93.8% in iFU/78.8% in oFU; p=0.040). Adverse events ≥grade 3 were balanced except for leucopenia (25.0% in iFU versus 2.1% in oFU; p=0.002) and neutropenia (43.5% in iFU and 10.9% in oFU; p=0.001). Hand-foot skin reaction was not different between two cohorts. RR was 62.5% in iFU versus 71.1% in oFU (p=0.835). The median PFS was 8.3 months in iFU versus 8.2 months in oFU (p=0.835). Conclusions: The HGCSG0802 could be a database to investigate first line BV for mCRC in clinical practice. As a result of this analysis, in Japanese daily practice, efficacy was no significant difference between infusional FU/OX and oral FU/OX, and the profiles of adverse events varied from each regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document