scholarly journals Intensification of older adults’ outpatient blood pressure treatment at hospital discharge: national retrospective cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k3503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S Anderson ◽  
Charlie M Wray ◽  
Bocheng Jing ◽  
Kathy Fung ◽  
Sarah Ngo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Antihypertensive Treatment ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Blood Pressure Treatment ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hospital To Home

AbstractObjectivesTo assess how often older adults admitted to hospital for common non-cardiac conditions were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment, and to identify markers of appropriateness for these intensifications.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUS Veterans Administration Health System.ParticipantsPatients aged 65 years or over with hypertension admitted to hospital with non-cardiac conditions between 2011 and 2013.Main outcome measuresIntensification of antihypertensive treatment, defined as receiving a new or higher dose antihypertensive agent at discharge compared with drugs used before admission. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to control for characteristics of patients and hospitals.ResultsAmong 14 915 older adults (median age 76, interquartile range 69-84), 9636 (65%) had well controlled outpatient blood pressure before hospital admission. Overall, 2074 (14%) patients were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment, more than half of whom (1082) had well controlled blood pressure before admission. After adjustment for potential confounders, elevated inpatient blood pressure was strongly associated with being discharged on intensified antihypertensive regimens. Among patients with previously well controlled outpatient blood pressure, 8% (95% confidence interval 7% to 9%) of patients without elevated inpatient blood pressure, 24% (21% to 26%) of patients with moderately elevated inpatient blood pressure, and 40% (34% to 46%) of patients with severely elevated inpatient blood pressure were discharged with intensified antihypertensive regimens. No differences were seen in rates of intensification among patients least likely to benefit from tight blood pressure control (limited life expectancy, dementia, or metastatic malignancy), nor in those most likely to benefit (history of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, or renal disease).ConclusionsOne in seven older adults admitted to hospital for common non-cardiac conditions were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment. More than half of intensifications occurred in patients with previously well controlled outpatient blood pressure. More attention is needed to reduce potentially harmful overtreatment of blood pressure as older adults transition from hospital to home.

scholarly journals Hypertension treatment practices and its determinants among ambulatory patients: retrospective cohort study in Ethiopia

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e015743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derbew Fikadu Berhe ◽  
Katja Taxis ◽  
Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp ◽  
Afework Mulugeta ◽  
Yewondwossen Tadesse Mengistu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Ambulatory Patients

ObjectivesWe examined determinants of achieving blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and of treatment intensification in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP).DesignA retrospective cohort study in six public hospitals, Ethiopia.ParticipantsAdult ambulatory patients with hypertension and with at least one previously prescribed antihypertensive medication in the study hospital.OutcomeControlled BP (<140/90 mm Hg) and treatment intensification of patients with uncontrolled BP.ResultsThe study population comprised 897 patients. Their mean age was 57 (SD 14) years, 63% were females, and 35% had one or more cardiometabolic comorbidities mainly diabetes mellitus. BP was controlled in 37% of patients. Treatment was intensified for 23% patients with uncontrolled BP. In multivariable (logistic regression) analysis, determinants positively associated with controlled BP were treatment at general hospitals (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.83) compared with specialised hospitals and longer treatment duration (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06). Negatively associated determinants were previously uncontrolled BP (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.43), treatment regimens with diuretics (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.94) and age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00). The only significant—positive—determinant for treatment intensification was duration of therapy (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09).ConclusionsThe level of controlled BP and treatment intensification practice in this study was low. The findings suggest the need for in-depth understanding and interventions of the identified determinants such as uncontrolled BP on consecutive visits, older age and type of hospital.

scholarly journals Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is common in primary care patients: Retrospective cohort study of 221,803 adults

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0248362
Author(s):  
Finlay A. McAlister ◽  
Brendan Cord Lethebe ◽  
Alexander A. Leung ◽  
Rajdeep S. Padwal ◽  
Tyler Williamson
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Antihypertensive Treatment ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Objective Although high visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events, the frequency of high BPV is unknown. We conducted this study to define the frequency of high BPV in primary care patients, clinical correlates, and association with antihypertensive therapies. Methods Retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data (with previously validated case definitions based on billing codes, free text analysis of progress notes, and prescribing data) from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network of 221,803 adults with multiple clinic visits over a 2-year period. We a priori defined a standard deviation>13.0 mm Hg in visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) as “high BPV” based on prior literature. Results Overall, 85,455 (38.5%) patients had hypertension (mean 6.56 visits with SBP measurement, mean SBP 134.4 with Standard Deviation [SD] 11.3, 33.2% exhibited high BPV) and 136,348 did not (mean 3.96 visits with SBP measurement, mean SBP 120.9 with SD 8.2, 16.5% had high BPV). BPV increased with age regardless of whether individuals had hypertension or not; at all ages BPV varied across antihypertensive treatment regimens and was greater in those receiving renin angiotensin blockers or beta-blockers (p<0.001). High BPV was more frequent in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dementia, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or Parkinson’s disease. Conclusions High visit-to-visit BPV is present in one sixth of non-hypertensive adults and one third of hypertensive individuals and is more common in those with comorbidities. The frequency of high BPV varies across antihypertensive treatment regimens.

Blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a retrospective cohort study

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umit Aydogan ◽  
Yusuf C. Doganer ◽  
Aslı Atik ◽  
James E. Rohrer ◽  
Deniz Engin Gok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Blood Pressure Control ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pressure Control

scholarly journals Is therapeutic inertia present in hyperglycaemia, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia management among adults with type 2 diabetes in three health clinics in Malaysia? a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boon-How Chew ◽  
Husni Hussain ◽  
Ziti Akthar Supian
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Therapeutic Inertia ◽  
Treatment Targets ◽  
Health Clinics

Abstract Background Good-quality evidence has shown that early glycaemic, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) leads to better outcomes. In spite of that, diseases control have been inadequate globally, and therapeutic inertia could be one of the main cause. Evidence on therapeutic inertia has been lacking at primary care setting. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the proportions of therapeutic inertia when treatment targets of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol were not achieved in adults with T2D at three public health clinics in Malaysia. Methods The index prescriptions were those that when the annual blood tests were reviewed. Prescriptions of medication were verified, compared to the preceding prescriptions and classified as 1) no change, 2) stepping up and 3) stepping down. The treatment targets were HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg and LDL-cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L. Therapeutic inertia was defined as no change in the medication use in the present of not reaching the treatment targets. Descriptive, univariable, multivariable logistic regression and sensitive analyses were conducted. Results A total of 552 cohorts were available for the assessment of therapeutic inertia (78.9% completion rate). The mean (SD) age and diabetes duration were 60.0 (9.9) years and 5.0 (6.0) years, respectively. High therapeutic inertia were observed in oral anti-diabetic (61–72%), anti-hypertensive (34–65%) and lipid-lowering therapies (56–77%), and lesser in insulin (34–52%). Insulin therapeutic inertia was more likely among those with shorter diabetes duration (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.87, 0.98). Those who did not achieve treatment targets were less likely to experience therapeutic inertia: HbA1c ≥ 7.0%: adjusted OR 0.10 (0.04, 0.24); BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg: 0.28 (0.16, 0.50); LDL-cholesterol ≥ 2.6 mmol/L: 0.37 (0.22, 0.64). Conclusions Although therapeutic intensifications were more likely in the presence of non-achieved treatment targets but the proportions of therapeutic inertia were high. Possible causes of therapeutic inertia were less of the physician behaviours but might be more of patient-related non-adherence or non-availability of the oral medications. These observations require urgent identification and rectification to improve disease control, avoiding detrimental health implications and costly consequences. Trial registration Number NCT02730754, April 6, 2016.

scholarly journals Characteristics and Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized in an Orthogeriatric Unit Versus an Orthopedic Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932098629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia Bugaevsky ◽  
Yochai Levy ◽  
Avital Hershkovitz ◽  
Irena Ocheretny ◽  
Adaya Nissenholtz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Orthopedic Department ◽  
Successful Recovery

Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant health risk in older adults and a major cause of morbidity, functional decline and mortality. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes of older patients hospitalized in an ortho-geriatric (OG) unit to those hospitalized in an orthopedic department (OD) for surgical treatment of a hip fracture. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of hip fractured patients hospitalized between 2015-2016 in a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center. Included were patients aged 65 and older who had undergone hip fracture surgery and were admitted to either a geriatric or orthopedic ward. Results: 441 patients met the inclusion criteria (195 in the OG unit, 246 in the OD); 257 were transferred to an affiliated geriatric center hospital (107 from the OG unit and 127 from the OD) for rehabilitation. Patients in the OG unit were older, more cognitively and functionally impaired and with more comorbidities. The 1-year mortality rate was significantly lower in the OD group (OR 0.32, CI 95% 0.19-0.53, p < 0.001), however, after propensity matching, the 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were similar in both groups. No difference was found in the rehabilitation length of stay between the groups. The functional independence measure improvement was similar in both groups, with a non-significant trend toward better functional improvement among OG unit patients. Conclusions: Despite the higher complexity of patients, worse baseline functional capacity in the OG unit, improvement after rehabilitation was similar in both groups. These results demonstrate the advantages of the OG unit in treating and stabilizing frail older adults, thus maximizing their chances for a successful recovery after hip fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document