scholarly journals Comparative assessment of CDS, CLSI disc diffusion and Etest techniques for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofNeisseria gonorrhoeae: a 6-year study

BMJ Open ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e000969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Singh ◽  
Manju Bala ◽  
Monika Kakran ◽  
V Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disc Diffusion ◽  
Ofneisseria Gonorrhoeae

Evaluation of standardized automated rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales-containing blood cultures: a proof-of-principle study

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3218-3229
Author(s):  
Stefano Mancini ◽  
Elias Bodendoerfer ◽  
Natalia Kolensnik-Goldmann ◽  
Sebastian Herren ◽  
Kim Röthlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Method ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Inhibition Zone ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disc Diffusion ◽  
Inhibition Zones ◽  
Reading System

Abstract Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) of bacteria causing bloodstream infections is critical for implementation of appropriate antibiotic regimens. Objectives We have established a procedure to prepare standardized bacterial inocula for Enterobacterales-containing clinical blood cultures and assessed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data generated with the WASPLabTM automated reading system. Methods A total of 258 blood cultures containing Enterobacterales were examined. Bacteria were enumerated by flow cytometry using the UF-4000 system and adjusted to an inoculum of 106 cfu/mL. Disc diffusion plates were automatically streaked, incubated for 6, 8 and 18 h and imaged using the fully automated WASPLabTM system. Growth inhibition zones were compared with those obtained with inocula prepared from primary subcultures following the EUCAST standard method. Due to time-dependent variations of the inhibition zone diameters, early AST readings were interpreted using time-adjusted tentative breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty. Results and conclusions Inhibition zones obtained after 18 h incubation using an inoculum of 106 cfu/mL prepared directly from blood cultures were highly concordant with those of the EUCAST standard method based on primary subcultures, with categorical agreement (CA) of 95.8%. After 6 and 8 h incubation, 89.5% and 93.0% of the isolates produced interpretable results, respectively, with CA of >98.5% and very low numbers of clinical categorization errors for both the 6 h and 8 h readings. Overall, with the standardized and automated RAST method, consistent AST data from blood cultures containing Enterobacterales can be generated after 6–8 h of incubation and subsequently confirmed by standard reading of the same plate after 18 h.

scholarly journals The EUCAST rapid disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 968-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Jonasson ◽  
Erika Matuschek ◽  
Gunnar Kahlmeter
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Disc Diffusion

Abstract Objectives With increasing antimicrobial resistance, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) becomes important, especially in patients with bloodstream infections. EUCAST decided to develop a standardized rapid method, based on EUCAST disc diffusion, to offer susceptibility reports within 4–8 h of a positive blood culture (BC). Methods BC bottles were spiked with clinical isolates (n = 332) of the seven most relevant sepsis pathogens with a variety of resistance mechanisms. RAST was performed directly from the bottle and zones read after 4, 6 and 8 h. Several variables were investigated, including the effect of using different BC bottles and of a 0–18 h delay between a positive signal and the performance of RAST. Results For five species, most inhibition zones could be read after 4 h. The proportion of results that could be interpreted increased from 75% at 4 h to 84% after 8 h. Categorical agreement against the reference method was good, with error rates of false susceptibility of 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.2% at 4, 6 and 8 h and false resistance of 1.2%, 0.2% and 0.1% at 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively. Conclusions With the EUCAST RAST method, reliable AST results can be delivered within 4–8 h of positivity of BC bottles for seven important bloodstream infection pathogens. To reduce the occurrence of errors and to absorb the variability caused by using a non-standardized inoculum, material from different manufacturers and workflow-related delays, we have introduced an area in which interpretation is not permitted, the Area of Technical Uncertainty.

scholarly journals EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3230-3238
Author(s):  
Anna Åkerlund ◽  
Emma Jonasson ◽  
Erika Matuschek ◽  
Lena Serrander ◽  
Martin Sundqvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Disc Diffusion

Abstract Objectives When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. Methods RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. Results The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. Conclusions The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document