scholarly journals Promoting physical activity in vulnerable adults ‘at risk’ of homelessness: a randomised controlled trial protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e026466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Stringer ◽  
Mike Loosemore ◽  
Eloise Moller ◽  
Sarah E Jackson ◽  
Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mental And Physical Health

IntroductionPeople who are homeless, or at risk of homelessness, have substantially poorer health. Sustained and regular participation in physical activity is beneficial for both mental and physical health. Limited data suggest that levels of physical activity in the homeless and those at risk of homelessness are low, and access to community-based exercise is limited or non-existent for this population. Nonetheless, exercise programmes for the homeless could provide a feasible and scalable intervention for providing beneficial effects on physical and mental health in this population. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a group exercise intervention on activity levels in people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness in central London, UK. The secondary aim is to evaluate the impact of the intervention on mental and physical health outcomes.Method and analysisA 2-arm, individually randomised controlled trial in people who are homeless and those vulnerable and at risk of homelessness in central London, UK. Participants will be recruited through a London-based homeless charity, Single Homeless Project. Following baseline assessments and allocation to intervention (exercise classes) or control (usual care), participants will be followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcomes will be change in objective physical activity. The secondary outcomes will include change in fitness assessments and mental health parameters. Changes in drug use and alcohol dependency will also be explored.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval to process and analyse data and disseminate findings was obtained through the Anglia Ruskin University Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Ethics Committee. Results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations.

scholarly journals Improving Depressive Symptoms through Personalised Exercise and Activation (IDEA): Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6306
Author(s):  
Aitana García-Estela ◽  
Natalia Angarita-Osorio ◽  
Sandra Alonso ◽  
Maria Polo ◽  
Maria Roldán-Berengué ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Global Functioning ◽  
Motivational Messages ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Group Programme

Individuals who suffer from depressive symptoms experience a substantial impact on psychosocial functioning, physical health, mortality, and quality of life. In the search for therapeutic strategies, exercise has been found to play a relevant part in its treatment. However, the promotion of exercise entails adherence difficulties that arose out of the tendency towards sedentarism led by symptomatology. Personalised exercise plans on top of usual care have the potential to enhance behavioural changes and mental health. The present study aims at evaluating the changes in functioning deriving from a blended intervention merging a psychological intervention with a personalised exercise programme based on medical assessment. We will conduct a three-arm randomised controlled trial in which 172 participants suffering from mild–moderate depressive symptoms will be allocated to Intervention A (personalised exercise group programme + app with motivational messages), B (personalised exercise group programme + app with no motivational messages) or control group (app with no motivational messages). Data regarding global functioning, well-being, symptoms, physical activity, and exercise capacity will be collected at baseline, 4, 12, and 36 weeks. The results of this trial will provide information about whether this physical activity support programme may be efficient for improving mental and physical health outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04857944 (accessed on 15 April 2021). Registered April 2021.

The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life in lung cancer patients: A randomised controlled trial (RCT).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9507-9507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janette L. Vardy ◽  
Melanie Bell ◽  
Hidde van der Ploeg ◽  
Jane Turner ◽  
Michael Kabourakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

A Randomised Controlled Trial Study of the Effects of a Digital Divorce Platform on Mental and Physical Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Sander ◽  
Gert Martin Hald ◽  
Ana Cipric ◽  
Camilla S. Øverup ◽  
Jenna Marie Strizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Mental And Physical Health

scholarly journals Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian Haddock ◽  
Daniel Pratt ◽  
Patricia A. Gooding ◽  
Sarah Peters ◽  
Richard Emsley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Suicidal Behaviour ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Prevention Therapy ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Acute Psychiatric Wards ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundSuicidal behaviour is common in acute psychiatric wards resulting in distress, and burden for patients, carers and society. Although psychological therapies for suicidal behaviour are effective in out-patient settings, there is little research on their effectiveness for in-patients who are suicidal.AimsOur primary objective was to determine whether cognitive–behavioural suicide prevention therapy (CBSP) was feasible and acceptable, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) for in-patients who are suicidal. Secondary aims were to assess the impact of CBSP on suicidal thinking, behaviours, functioning, quality of life, service use, cost-effectiveness and psychological factors associated with suicide.MethodA single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial comparing TAU to TAU plus CBSP in in-patients in acute psychiatric wards who are suicidal (the Inpatient Suicide Intervention and Therapy Evaluation (INSITE) trial, trial registration: ISRCTN17890126). The intervention consisted of TAU plus up to 20 CBSP sessions, over 6 months continuing in the community following discharge. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks and 6 months post-baseline.ResultsA total of 51 individuals were randomised (27 to TAU, 24 to TAU plus CBSP) of whom 37 were followed up at 6 months (19 in TAU, 18 in TAU plus CBSP). Engagement, attendance, safety and user feedback indicated that the addition of CBSP to TAU for in-patients who are acutely suicidal was feasible and acceptable while on in-patient wards and following discharge. Economic analysis suggests the intervention could be cost-effective.DiscussionPsychological therapy can be delivered safely to patients who are suicidal although modifications are required for this setting. Findings indicate a larger, definitive trial should be conducted.Declaration of interestThe trial was hosted by Greater Manchester Mental health NHS Trust (formerly, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care NHS Trust). The authors are affiliated to the University of Manchester, Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation trust and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre. Y.A. is a trustee for a North-West England branch of the charity Mind.

scholarly journals A randomised controlled trial of energetic activity for depression in young people (READY): a multi-site feasibility trial protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Howlett ◽  
L. Bottoms ◽  
A. Chater ◽  
A. B. Clark ◽  
T. Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Young People ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Exercise Session ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Prevalence of depression is increasing in young people, and there is a need to develop and evaluate behavioural interventions which may provide benefits equal to or greater than talking therapies or pharmacological alternatives. Exercise could be beneficial for young people living with depression, but robust, large-scale trials of effectiveness and the impact of exercise intensity are lacking. This study aims to test whether a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention targeting young people living with depression is feasible by determining whether it is possible to recruit and retain young people, develop and deliver the intervention as planned, and evaluate training and delivery. Methods The design is a three-arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation. Participants will be help-seeking young people, aged 13–17 years experiencing mild to moderate low mood or depression, referred from three counties in England. The intervention will be delivered by registered exercise professionals, supported by mental health support workers, twice a week for 12 weeks. The three arms will be high-intensity exercise, low-intensity exercise, and a social activity control. All arms will receive a ‘healthy living’ behaviour change session prior to each exercise session and the two exercise groups are energy matched. The outcomes are referral, recruitment, and retention rates; attendance at exercise sessions; adherence to and ability to reach intensity during exercise sessions; proportions of missing data; adverse events, all measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months; resource use; and reach and representativeness. Discussion UK National Health Service (NHS) policy is to provide young people with advice about using exercise to help depression but there is no evidence-based exercise intervention to either complement or as an alternative to medication or talking therapies. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that exercise can be an effective treatment, but the evidence base is relatively weak. This feasibility trial will provide evidence about whether it is feasible to recruit and retain young people to a full RCT to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exercise intervention for depression. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN66452702. Registered 9 April 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document