Finalising the administration of co-SSPedi, a dyad approach to symptom screening for paediatric patients receiving cancer treatments

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003169
Author(s):  
Deborah Tomlinson ◽  
Tal Schechter ◽  
Mark Mairs ◽  
Robyn Loves ◽  
Daniel Herman ◽  
...  

ObjectivesSymptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) is a validated self-report symptom screening tool for patients with cancer 8–18 years of age. Co-SSPedi is a novel dyad approach in which both child and parent complete SSPedi together. The objective was to finalise the approach to co-SSPedi administration with instruction that is easy to understand, resulting in dyads completing co-SSPedi correctly.MethodWe enrolled child and parent dyads, who understood English and where children (4–18 years) had cancer or were hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. We provided each dyad with instruction on how to complete co-SSPedi together. Mixed methods were used to determine how easy or hard the instruction was to understand. Two raters adjudicated if co-SSPedi was completed correctly. Dyads were enrolled in cohorts of 12 evenly divided by age (4–7, 8–10, 11–14 and 15–18 years).ResultsWe enrolled 5 cohorts of 12 dyads, resulting in 60 dyads. Following verbal instruction provided in the first cohort, we identified the need for written instruction emphasising children should wait for parent response prior to entering scores. The instruction was iteratively refined based on qualitative feedback until the fifth cohort, where all 12 dyads found the instruction easy to understand and completed co-SSPedi correctly.ConclusionsWe developed a standard approach to dyad symptom screening named co-SSPedi with instruction that is easy to understand, resulting in correct co-SSPedi completion. Future efforts should focus on co-SSPedi validation and understanding how co-SSPedi scores compare to self- or proxy-reported symptom reporting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 5526-5534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Tomlinson ◽  
Erin Plenert ◽  
Grace Dadzie ◽  
Robyn Loves ◽  
Sadie Cook ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Wen Wu ◽  
Rebecca Johnson ◽  
Karen G. Schepp ◽  
Donna L. Berry

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy O'Sullivan ◽  
L Lee Dupuis ◽  
Paul Gibson ◽  
Donna L Johnston ◽  
Christina Baggott ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe previously developed the paper-based Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) designed for paediatric cancer symptom screening. Objectives were to evaluate and refine the electronic mobile application (app) of SSPedi using the opinions of children with cancer.MethodsParticipants were children 8–18 years of age with cancer. Participants completed electronic SSPedi on their own and then responded to semistructured questions to determine whether they found electronic SSPedi easy or difficult to complete and understand, understood and liked the app features (audio and animation), and understood previously difficult to understand concepts with the introduction of a help menu. After each group of 10 children, responses were reviewed to determine whether modifications were required.Results20 children evaluated electronic SSPedi. None found electronic SSPedi difficult to complete or understand. All children understood the app features and each of the 4 more difficult to understand concepts after using the help menu. 19 of 20 children thought the app was a good way to communicate with doctors and nurses.ConclusionsWe finalised an electronic version of SSPedi that is easy to use and understand with features specifically designed to facilitate child self-report. Future work will evaluate the psychometric properties of electronic SSPedi.


Author(s):  
Shannon Hyslop ◽  
Deborah Tomlinson ◽  
Christina Baggott ◽  
David Dix ◽  
Paul Gibson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S25-S26
Author(s):  
Jason Schiffman ◽  
Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar ◽  
Zachary Millman ◽  
Elizabeth Thompson ◽  
Peter Phalen

Abstract Background Falsely observing symptoms of psychosis risk in youth is a critical limitation to pluripotent prevention efforts. Factors including race, age, and measurement construction may affect the validity of semi-structured interviews and self-report screening tools designed to identify symptoms. Consideration of different constructs measured within a single screening tool, what a screening tool can offer beyond prediction of psychosis-like symptoms, and how to maximize efficiency may all influence the ability to effectively identify people who would benefit from services. Methods Help-seeking adolescents (N=134) ages 12–25 completed various screening tools for psychosis risk, and the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS). The influence of race and age on screen scores and SIPS (CHR) symptoms were examined. We also evaluated alternatives to CHR symptom screening beyond conventional CHR screening tools. Results Higher Prime Screen scores increased the probability of clinician assessed symptoms among White participants, but not Black participants (interaction: b = -0.50 Wald χ2[1] = 4.63, p = .03, Exp[B] = 0.60), and younger participants were more likely to use the Prime Screen as a dichotomous (yes/no) screener relative to older participants, reducing screener efficacy (b = -0.04, Wald χ2[1] = 3.75, p = .05, Exp[B] = 0.96). Given discrepancies across groups, we attempted to expand screening strategies. First, to better understand the Prime Screen, factor analysis suggested two distinct factors that appear to measure different constructs. Additionally, an IRT model of several CHR screening tools suggested the value of an ultra-brief two-item measure. Finally, analyses of the BASC-2, a more comprehensive measure of behavior that includes, but is not limited to, psychosis risk items, also demonstrated accurate prediction of psychosis symptoms, as well as more pluripotent conceptualizations of symptoms. Discussion Results suggest that contextual or individual factors influence the accurate identification of individuals exhibiting psychosis-risk symptoms. Tailored approaches to screening based on an awareness of context, identity, setting, and preferences of clients are possible, and customizing assessment efforts accordingly may be useful for the accurate identification of a variety of people who might benefit from services.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e048287
Author(s):  
Sergio Gomez ◽  
Carmen Salaverria ◽  
Erin Plenert ◽  
Gisela Gonzalez ◽  
Gisela D'Angelo ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo translate a symptom screening tool developed for paediatric patients receiving cancer therapies called Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) into Argentinian Spanish and to evaluate the understandability and cultural relevance of the translated version of SSPedi among children with cancer and paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.MethodsWe conducted a multiphase, descriptive study to translate SSPedi into Argentinian Spanish. Using two translators, forward and backward translations were performed. The translated version was evaluated by Spanish-speaking paediatric patients 8–18 years of age receiving cancer treatments in two centres in Argentina and El Salvador.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was patient self-reported difficulty with understanding of the SSPedi instructions and each symptom using a 5-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes were incorrect understanding of the SSPedi instructions, symptoms and response scale determined by cognitive interviews with the patients and rated using a 4-point Likert scale. Cultural relevance was assessed qualitatively.ResultsThere were 30 children enrolled and included in cognitive interviews; 16 lived in Argentina and 14 lived in El Salvador. The most common types of Spanish spoken were Central American (17, 57%) followed by South American (10, 33%) and Castilian (3, 10%). No changes to Argentinian Spanish SSPedi were required based on the outcomes or qualitative comments. No issues with cultural relevance were identified by any of the respondents.ConclusionsWe translated and finalised Argentinian Spanish SSPedi. Future research will focus on its use to describe bothersome symptoms by Argentinian Spanish-speaking children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Carol S. North ◽  
David Baron

Agreement has not been achieved across symptom factor studies of major depressive disorder, and no studies have identified characteristic postdisaster depressive symptom structures. This study examined the symptom structure of major depression across two databases of 1181 survivors of 11 disasters studied using consistent research methods and full diagnostic assessment, addressing limitations of prior self-report symptom-scale studies. The sample included 808 directly-exposed survivors of 10 disasters assessed 1–6 months post disaster and 373 employees of 8 organizations affected by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks assessed nearly 3 years after the attacks. Consistent symptom patterns identifying postdisaster major depression were not found across the 2 databases, and database factor analyses suggested a cohesive grouping of depression symptoms. In conclusion, this study did not find symptom clusters identifying postdisaster major depression to guide the construction and validation of screeners for this disorder. A full diagnostic assessment for identification of postdisaster major depressive disorder remains necessary.


Author(s):  
Irena Boskovic ◽  
Thomas Merten ◽  
Harald Merckelbach

AbstractSome self-report symptom validity tests, such as the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI), rely on a detection strategy that uses bizarre, extreme, or very rare symptoms. Thus, items are constructed to invite respondents with an invalid response style to affirm pseudosymptoms that are usually not experienced by genuine patients. However, these pseudosymptoms should not be easily recognizable, because otherwise sophisticated over-reporters could strategically avoid them and go undetected. Therefore, we tested how well future psychology professionals were able to differentiate between genuine complaints and pseudosymptoms in terms of their plausibility and prevalence.Psychology students (N = 87) received the items of the SRSI online and were given the task to rate each item as to its plausibility and prevalence in the community.Students evaluated genuine symptoms as significantly more plausible and more prevalent than pseudosymptoms. However, 56% of students rated pseudosymptoms as moderately plausible, whereas 17% rated them as moderately prevalent in the general public.Overall, it appears that psychology students are successful in distinguishing bizarre, unusual, or rare symptoms from genuine complaints. Yet, the majority of students still attributed relatively high prima facie plausibility to pseudosymptoms. We contend that if such a trusting attitude is true for psychology students, it may also be the case for young psychology practitioners, which, consequently, may diminish the probability of employing self-report validity measures in psychological assessments.


2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412097969
Author(s):  
Meghan A. Richards ◽  
Kirsten A. Oinonen

A premenstrual screening tool is needed when time constraints and attrition limit the feasibility of daily ratings. The present study examines the utility of a novel, 33-item, retrospective, dimensional, DSM-5-based, screening measure developed to explore women’s perceptions of premenstrual symptomatology. This is the first measure that examines perception of impairment for each DSM-5 symptom and assesses the frequency criterion. Participants (N = 331) reported symptoms ranging from none to a level consistent with a provisional DSM-5 diagnosis of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). Initial psychometric properties indicated a five-factor structure: (1) affective symptoms; (2) fatigue, sleep, and anhedonia; (3) symptom frequency; (4) impairment and severity of appetite change and physical symptoms; and (5) difficulty concentrating. The total symptom scale and the frequency, severity, and impairment subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. Strong correlations between this dimensional measure and other retrospective and prospective premenstrual symptom measures suggest strong convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity. Premenstrual symptom groups created using this screening measure (minimal, mild/moderate, severe) differed on other retrospective and prospective measures of premenstrual symptoms. There was evidence of divergent validity and lack of an acquiescence bias. We also report data describing women’s perceptions of the frequency, level of impairment, and level of severity for each DSM-5 PMDD symptom over a 12-month period and discuss implications for future research on premenstrual phenomenology. Initial evidence for the reliability and construct validity of this symptom screening measure suggests potential value for assessing premenstrual symptomatology in research and practice.


Dose-Response ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 155932582098216
Author(s):  
Bing Wang ◽  
Kaoru Tanaka ◽  
Takanori Katsube ◽  
Kouichi Maruyama ◽  
Yasuharu Ninomiya ◽  
...  

Radioadaptive response (RAR) describes a phenomenon in a variety of in vitro and in vivo systems that a low-dose of priming ionizing radiation (IR) reduces detrimental effects of a subsequent challenge IR at higher doses. Among in vivo investigations, studies using the mouse RAR model (Yonezawa Effect) showed that RAR could significantly extenuate high-dose IR-induced detrimental effects such as decrease of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells, acute radiation hematopoietic syndrome, genotoxicity and genomic instability. Meanwhile, it has been demonstrated that diet intervention has a great impact on health, and dietary restriction shows beneficial effects on numerous diseases in animal models. In this work, by using the mouse RAR model and mild dietary restriction (MDR), we confirmed that combination of RAR and MDR could more efficiently reduce radiogenotoxic damage without significant change of the RAR phenotype. These findings suggested that MDR may share some common pathways with RAR to activate mechanisms consequently resulting in suppression of genotoxicity. As MDR could also increase resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in normal cells, we propose that combination of MDR, RAR, and other cancer treatments (i.e., chemotherapy and radiotherapy) represent a potential strategy to increase the treatment efficacy and prevent IR risk in humans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document