scholarly journals In people with ultra high risk symptoms, risk of transition to psychotic disorders is highest in the first 2 years

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-39
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 131-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D McGorry ◽  
Cristina Mei

Within the embryonic early psychosis field in the early 1990s, the conceptualisation and definition of an at-risk or ultra-high-risk (UHR) mental state for psychosis was a breakthrough which transformed the clinical and research landscape in psychiatry. Twenty-five years later, we have a new evidence base that has illuminated the neurobiology of the onset phase of psychotic disorder, delivered Cochrane level 1 evidence showing that the onset of full-threshold sustained psychotic disorder can be at least delayed, and is paving the way to a new generation of transdiagnostic research. Here, we document the contribution of the UHR approach to understanding the underlying mechanisms of psychosis onset as well as the long-term outcomes. Particularly, we highlight that psychosis onset can be delayed in those meeting UHR criteria and that these criteria have a higher valence for subsequent psychotic disorders and some valence for persistent non-psychotic syndromes. Critiques have helped to identify some of the limitations of this paradigm, which are acknowledged. These include evidence that psychotic disorders can emerge more acutely and from other, as yet undefined, precursor states. Rather than defending, or alternatively questioning the value of, the UHR approach, we propose a broader, transdiagnostic staging model that is consistent with the pluripotent and variably comorbid trajectories for mental disorders. This approach moves beyond psychosis to capture a wider range of subthreshold symptoms and full-threshold disorders, thus enhancing prediction for the emergence and progression of a range of mental disorders, as well as providing new avenues for early intervention and prevention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S93-S93
Author(s):  
Irina Falkenberg ◽  
Huai-Hsuan Tseng ◽  
Gemma Modinos ◽  
Barbara Wild ◽  
Philip McGuire ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies indicate that people with schizophrenia and first-episode psychosis experience deficits in their ability to accurately detect and display emotions through facial expressions, and that functioning and symptoms are associated with these deficits. This study aims to examine how emotion recognition and facial emotion expression are related to functioning and symptoms in a sample of individuals at ultra-high risk, first-episode psychosis and healthy controls. Methods During fMRI, we combined the presentation of emotional faces with the instruction to react with facial movements predetermined and assigned. 18 patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP), 18 individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis (UHR) and 22 healthy controls (HCs) were examined while viewing happy, sad, or neutral faces and were instructed to simultaneously move the corners of their mouths either (a). upwards or (b). downwards, or (c). to refrain from movement. The subjects’ facial movements were recorded with an MR-compatible video camera. Results Neurofunctional and behavioral response to emotional faces were measured. Analyses have only recently commenced and are ongoing. Full results of the clinical and functional impact of behavioral and neuroimaging results will be presented at the meeting. Discussion Increased knowledge about abnormalities in emotion recognition and behaviour as well as their neural correlates and their impact on clinical measures and functional outcome can inform the development of novel treatment approaches to improve social skills early in the course of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders.


2014 ◽  
Vol 153 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takahashi ◽  
Stephen J. Wood ◽  
Alison R. Yung ◽  
Barnaby Nelson ◽  
Ashleigh Lin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah V. Clark ◽  
Vijay A. Mittal ◽  
Jessica A. Bernard ◽  
Aral Ahmadi ◽  
Tricia Z. King ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kraan ◽  
E. Velthorst ◽  
L. Koenders ◽  
K. Zwaart ◽  
H. K. Ising ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrevious research has established the relationship between cannabis use and psychotic disorders. Whether cannabis use is related to transition to psychosis in patients at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis remains unclear. The present study aimed to review the existing evidence on the association between cannabis use and transition to psychosis in UHR samples.MethodA search of PsychInfo, Embase and Medline was conducted from 1996 to August 2015. The search yielded 5559 potentially relevant articles that were selected on title and abstract. Subsequently 36 articles were screened on full text for eligibility. Two random-effects meta-analyses were performed. First, we compared transition rates to psychosis of UHR individuals with lifetime cannabis use with non-cannabis-using UHR individuals. Second, we compared transition rates of UHR individuals with a current DSM-IV cannabis abuse or dependence diagnosis with lifetime users and non-using UHR individuals.ResultsWe found seven prospective studies reporting on lifetime cannabis use in UHR subjects (n = 1171). Of these studies, five also examined current cannabis abuse or dependence. Lifetime cannabis use was not significantly associated with transition to psychosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.856–1.524, p = 0.37]. A second meta-analysis yielded an OR of 1.75 (95% CI 1.135–2.710, p = 0.01), indicating a significant association between current cannabis abuse or dependence and transition to psychosis.ConclusionsOur results show that cannabis use was only predictive of transition to psychosis in those who met criteria for cannabis abuse or dependence, tentatively suggesting a dose–response relationship between current cannabis use and transition to psychosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Pantelis ◽  
D. Velakoulis ◽  
S. J. Wood ◽  
M. Yücel ◽  
A. R. Yung ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yun ◽  
Lisa J. Phillips ◽  
Sue Cotton ◽  
Alison R. Yung ◽  
Shona M. Francey ◽  
...  

Objective: An association between birth and pregnancy complications and the later development of schizophrenia has been described for decades and obstetric complications (OCs) have been proposed as a vulnerability marker for psychosis in line with the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of psychotic disorders. Previous studies of OCs have focused on established schizophrenia. In this study, the association between OCs and the development of psychotic disorder was studied in a group of 74 young people identified as being at very high risk for the first onset of psychosis. Method: The ‘ultra’ high risk (UHR) cohort was identified by the presence of subthreshold psychotic symptoms, or a combination of first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder and recent functional decline. Thirty-eight per cent of the cohort developed an acute psychotic episode over the 12-month period after recruitment. As a component of a larger research study, the level of OCs experienced by the UHR cohort was assessed at intake. Results: Obstetric complicationswere not associated with the later development of psychosis in the UHR group included in this study. Conclusions: This study does not suppor t a role for OCs as a risk factorfor the later development of psychosis; however, we cannot conclude that they should be completely ignored as a candidate risk factor for onset of psychosis. A number of weaknesses of the study suggest that it may be premature to dismiss OCs as a risk factor for the development of psychosis and further research is urged in this area.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S107-S107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby Nelson ◽  
G. Paul Amminger ◽  
Connie Markulev ◽  
Hok Pan Yuen ◽  
Suzie Lavoie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document