A COMPARISON OF THE HEART, TIMI AND GRACE SCORES IN THE PREDICTION OF A MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENT (MACE) IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CARDIAC CHEST PAIN: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY IN A UK POPULATION.

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 916.2-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
PD Reaney ◽  
H Elliott ◽  
J Cooper
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jalili ◽  
Zia Hejripour ◽  
Amir Reza Honarmand ◽  
Nasim Pourtabatabaei

BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e003877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Foldes-Busque ◽  
Isabelle Denis ◽  
Julien Poitras ◽  
Richard P Fleet ◽  
Patrick Archambault ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jamie G. Cooper ◽  
James Ferguson ◽  
Lorna A. Donaldson ◽  
Kim M.M. Black ◽  
Kate J. Livock ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e031871
Author(s):  
Helge Brandberg ◽  
Thomas Kahan ◽  
Jonas Spaak ◽  
Kay Sundberg ◽  
Sabine Koch ◽  
...  

IntroductionManagement of acute chest pain focuses on diagnosis or safe rule-out of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aim to determine the additional value of self-reported computerised history taking (CHT).Methods and analysisProspective cohort study design with self-reported, medical histories collected by a CHT programme (Clinical Expert Operating System, CLEOS) using a tablet. Women and men presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department at Danderyd University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) are eligible. CHT will be compared with standard history taking for completeness of data required to calculate ACS risk scores such as History, ECG, Age, Risk factors and Troponin (HEART), Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI). Clinical outcomes will be extracted from hospital electronic health records and national registries. The CLEOS-Chest Pain Danderyd Study project includes (1) a feasibility study of CHT, (2) a validation study of CHT as compared with standard history taking, (3) a paired diagnostic accuracy study using data from CHT and established risk scores, (4) a clinical utility study to evaluate the impact of CHT on the management of chest pain and the use of resources, and (5) data mining, aiming to generate an improved risk score for ACS. Primary outcomes will be analysed after 1000 patients, but to allow for subgroup analysis, the study intends to recruit 2000 or more patients. This ongoing project may lead to new and more effective ways for collecting thorough, accurate medical histories with important implications for clinical practice.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been reviewed and approved by the Stockholm Regional Ethical Committee (now Swedish Ethical Review Authority). Results will be published, regardless of the outcome, in peer-reviewed international scientific journals.Trial registration numberThis study is registered athttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov(unique identifier:NCT03439449).


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e0116431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon G. van der Meer ◽  
Barbra E. Backus ◽  
Yolanda van der Graaf ◽  
Maarten J. Cramer ◽  
Yolande Appelman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document