scholarly journals Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study

2020 ◽  
pp. emermed-2019-208908
Author(s):  
Chung-Hsien Chaou ◽  
Shiuan-Ruey Yu ◽  
Roy Yi Ling Ngerng ◽  
Lynn Valerie Monrouxe ◽  
Li-Chun Chang ◽  
...  

BackgroundFeedback is an effective pedagogical tool in clinical teaching and learning, but the actual perception by learners of clinical feedback is often described as unsatisfactory. Unlike assessment feedback or teaching sessions, which often happen within protected time and space, clinical feedback is influenced by numerous clinical factors. Little is known about clinical teachers’ motivations to provide feedback in busy clinical settings. We aimed to investigate the motivations behind feedback being given in emergency departments (EDs).MethodsA qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview data was conducted between August 2015 and June 2016. Eighteen attending physicians were purposively sampled from three teaching hospital EDs in Taiwan. Data were thematically analysed, both inductively (from the data) and deductively (using self-determination theory (SDT)). Themes were mapped to the different motivation types identified by the SDT.Results and discussionDespite working in busy clinical settings, Taiwanese ED clinical teachers reported being motivated to provide feedback when they felt responsible for their learners, when they understood the importance of feedback (patient safety and partner building), or simply because they were committed to following a tradition of passing on their clinical knowledge to their juniors. Suggestions to facilitate the internalisation of external motivations are proposed.ConclusionsIn this qualitative study, motivations for clinical feedback were identified. Although the motivations are mostly extrinsic, the elicitation of internal motivation is possible once true satisfaction is fostered during the feedback-giving process. This understanding can be used to develop interventions to enable clinical feedback to be provided in a sustained manner.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-204
Author(s):  
Claudio Diaz ◽  
Nicolas Acuña ◽  
Barbara Ravanal ◽  
Ignacio Riffo

Purpose of the study: This research aims to analyze parents’ perceptions towards the learning of English and the ways they help their children deal with English and language assessment. Methodology: This qualitative study addresses 74 Chilean parents’ perceptions of English teaching and learning. A semi-structured interview was conducted to capture the participants’ perceptions. The data were categorized using content and frequency analysis and the principles of metaphoric analysis. Main findings: The findings suggest that parents hold a positive perception of the English language and believe it is useful for their children’s lives even though they might find the learning of the language difficult. Social implications/Originality: Participants can produce metaphors that regard English as an ability and metaphors that focus on the process of learning the language. The findings of this research are useful for university stakeholders, teachers, preservice teachers, and students. Novelty/Originality of this study: In this study parents, stakeholders who have usually left aside from the language teaching and learning process, are interviewed to unfold their perceptions of what they see and believe when their children learn English.


2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.V. Ernstzen ◽  
E. Bitzer ◽  
K. Grimmer-Somers

Background: Clinical  education  forms  a  core  component of the training  of physiotherapy students.  Little research on the efficacy of commonly used  physiotherapy  clinical  learning  and  teaching  opportunities are available. Objective: This  paper  sought  to  identify  the  clinical  teaching  and  learning  opportunities  that  undergraduate  physiotherapy  students  and  clinical  teachers viewed as effective in enhancing learning, as well as the reasoning behind their views.Design: A qualitative research design was used.  Data was analyzed using content analysis.   Data was coded, cate gorized and conceptualized into key themes and patterns. Participants: All third year (n=40) and fourth year (n=40) physiotherapy students as well as their clinical teachers (n=37) were eligible to participate. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample consisting of six third-year students, six fourth-year students and six clinical teachers.  Results:  The  results  indicated  that  learning  is  best  facilitated  in  open,  relaxed  environments.Demonstrations  of patient management by teachers and students, discussion of patient cases, feedback and formative assessment were identified to be effective strategies to enhance development of clinical competence.  Conclusion: Clinical education, using focused and structured processes, could ensure that students are exposed to a range of learning opportunities for development of clinical competence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Gagnon ◽  
Carolle Bernier ◽  
Sylvie Houde ◽  
Marianne Xhignesse

Clinical reasoning is an essential part of medical practice and therefore should be an important part of clinical teaching. However, it has been and is still a challenge for clinical teachers to support learners in the development of their clinical reasoning skills. As learners progress in clerkship, so do their learning needs. As a result, teachers need multiple tools to foster the development of clinical reasoning and should know when and why to use them. This article presents tools gathered as part of a clinical teacher's toolbox aimed at coaching learners towards the next step in their clinical reasoning development as well as helping teachers diagnose clinical reasoning difficulties and meet the diverse learning needs of their learners. The article focuses on three tools that were developed by faculty at the University of Sherbrooke Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences: the iSNAPPS-OMP Technique, the Anticipatory Supervision Technique and the Clinical Sudoku or table of discriminating clues. This article uses the term ‘tools’ as a generic expression to signify ‘items in a toolbox’. It includes all kinds of resources (techniques, strategies, models) that were gathered to help clinical teachers with the teaching of clinical reasoning.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
JA Ansary ◽  
I Ara ◽  
NA Zayeed ◽  
S Debnath ◽  
MS Amin

This was a qualitative study conducted in one government and one private dental college selected purposively. Study population was final year clinical teachers of selected Dental Colleges. A total of 35 teachers (twenty from private dental college and fifteen from govt. dental college) participated in this study. An open ended questionnaire was developed for  in-depth interview of the teachers. Analysis of the teachers' responses revealed that their views were related to only three issues: (1) Organization of teaching experiences: Make objectives realistic and practical, feedback, (2) Clinical experiences related factors: Student’s active involvement, working with patient and their family/ attendant and (3) Supervisory factors: Knowledgeable faculty, positive attitude of teachers. Dental faculty involved in teaching activities should be encouraged to take formal training. Study recommended increasing time and patient availability in clinical setting for effective clinical learning and skill competency.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v3i1.16592 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.3(1) 2013: 25-29


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Ilona Petsch ◽  
Aglaé Velasco González ◽  
Boris Buerke

Radiologists in radiology courses (RC) at teaching and university hospitals train medical students in competent image interpreting and reporting (IIR). Information extracted from imaging is crucial for clinical decisions and therapies. This article attempted to explore a teaching approach adapted from adult education for clinical teachers in radiology to address learning needs (LN) in radiology by interacting and tailoring teaching content to LN. The following conclusions were drawn: Addressing LN could encourage students to learn about IIR; Integrating students to negotiate teaching content should take place if feasible, despite high workload and little teaching time in clinical routine; Negotiating with students and co-teachers of other imaging disciplines would help to tailor course specifics to LN and avoid redundancies; Interacting with medical students could be efficient and effective for clinical teaching and learning in RC.


Author(s):  
Judith Werner ◽  
Graham Hendry

Purpose: In dental education, feedback from clinical teachers is critical for developing students’ clinical competence. However, students have identified inconsistency of clinical feedback from clinical teachers as a major area of concern. Compared to research on the student perspective of consistency in clinical feedback, dental clinical teachers’ own views of the consistency of their feedback is not as thoroughly researched. The purpose of this study is to redress that balance.Methodology: This qualitative study explored dental clinical teachers’ views of the clinical feedback process during the 2017 academic year, with a focus on their perceptions of consistency of their own feedback.Findings: Our results show that clinical teachers use a number of parameters in judging students’ performance and giving feedback, and were aware that their feedback may not be consistent with other clinical teachers’ feedback. Teachers also recognised that this inconsistency could lead to an adverse effect on students’ learning and clinical competence. Research implications: To improve the consistency of their feedback and calibrate their judgement of students’ performance, clinical teachers recommended that their Dental School should provide opportunities for them to engage in collegial discussion and interactive, case-based teaching development programs. They also believed clinical teaching and its significance to dental student learning and competence should be recognised and valued more highly by the School.Practical implications: Implementation of professional development initiatives endorsed by clinical teachers has the potential to improve the consistency of teachers’ feedback and the quality of clinical dental education, and ultimately the quality of oral health care.Originality: This is the first study to explore clinical teachers’ views of how they judge students’ performance and the consistency of their feedback.Limitations: A limitation of this study is that clinical teachers who volunteered to participate may have different opinions compared to teachers who did not participate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document