Massive transfusion in paediatric trauma: a single centre experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A10.3-A11
Author(s):  
Robert Hearn
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Blood Parameters ◽  
Major Haemorrhage ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Paediatric Trauma

AimsTo report the occurrence of major haemorrhage in children following major trauma, the practice of blood products transfusion including monitoring of laboratory parameters in such patients and the outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the local paediatric trauma database of all children following trauma call activation on arrival to the Emergency Department in a major urban trauma centre in London. We studies over a period of 15 months, May 2008–August 2009. We defined massive transfusion as packed red cells >40 ml/kg in the first 4 h or >80 ml/kg in the first 24 h.Results227 children presented to the accidents and emergency during this period following major trauma call activation. The median age at presentation was 10.2 years. 13 (5.7%) children had major haemorrhage. The median ISS WAS 35 (IQR 10–60). All but one were males. Three had penetrating trauma, one of whom made it to theatre but all died. Four had emergency damage control surgery. Abnormal results were seen in three patients, each having one abnormal result (INR=1.9 and APTT=86, low Hb=7.6, thrombocytopaenia =63). 8/13 patients received additional blood products such as Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), platelets and Cryoprecipitate. However, no patient received the ration of blood products RBC:FFP of 1:1 as practised in adult trauma. Two patients had no admission bloods done. Worsening coagulation parameters were seen in two patients when measure post-transfusion and the remaining 11 patients did not have routine monitoring of blood parameters post-transfusion. 8 (62%) patients died of which 7 died in the Emergency Department.ConclusionsMajor haemorrhage is associated with a very high mortality in severely injured children. There is a need for instituting a major haemorrhage policy in paediatric trauma and consideration of point-of-care testing of blood parameters.

Chronic mesenteric ischaemia presenting as possible large bowl malignancy: an easily overlooked differential diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e240202
Author(s):  
Benjamin McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Mesenteric Ischaemia ◽  
Abdominal Symptoms ◽  
Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia ◽  
Descending Colon

An 80-year-old woman presented to a regional emergency department with postprandial pain, weight loss and diarrhoea for 2 months and a Computed Tomography (CT) report suggestive of descending colon malignancy. Subsequent investigations revealed the patient to have chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) with associated bowel changes. She developed an acute-on-chronic ischaemia that required emergency transfer, damage control surgery and revascularisation. While the patient survived, this case highlights the importance of considering CMI in elderly patients with vague abdominal symptoms and early intervention to avoid potentially catastrophic outcomes.

scholarly journals Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Roberts ◽  
◽  
Niklas Bobrovitz ◽  
David A. Zygun ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Clinical Scenario ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Iliac Vessel ◽  
Civilian Trauma ◽  
Definitive Surgery

Abstract Background Although damage control (DC) surgery is widely assumed to reduce mortality in critically injured patients, survivors often suffer substantial morbidity, suggesting that it should only be used when indicated. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine which indications for DC have evidence that they are reliable and/or valid (and therefore in which clinical situations evidence supports use of DC or that DC improves outcomes). Methods We searched 11 databases (1950–April 1, 2019) for studies that enrolled exclusively civilian trauma patients and reported data on the reliability (consistency of surgical decisions in a given clinical scenario) or content (surgeons would perform DC in that clinical scenario or the indication predicted use of DC in practice), construct (were associated with poor outcomes), or criterion (were associated with improved outcomes when DC was conducted instead of definitive surgery) validity for suggested indications for DC surgery or DC interventions. Results Among 34,979 citations identified, we included 36 cohort studies and three cross-sectional surveys in the systematic review. Of the 59 unique indications for DC identified, 10 had evidence of content validity [e.g., a major abdominal vascular injury or a packed red blood cell (PRBC) volume exceeding the critical administration threshold], nine had evidence of construct validity (e.g., unstable patients with combined abdominal vascular and pancreas gunshot injuries or an iliac vessel injury and intraoperative acidosis), and six had evidence of criterion validity (e.g., penetrating trauma patients requiring > 10 U PRBCs with an abdominal vascular and multiple abdominal visceral injuries or intraoperative hypothermia, acidosis, or coagulopathy). No studies evaluated the reliability of indications. Conclusions Few indications for DC surgery or DC interventions have evidence supporting that they are reliable and/or valid. DC should be used with respect for the uncertainty regarding its effectiveness, and only in circumstances where definitive surgery cannot be entertained.

scholarly journals Damage control in the emergency department, a bridge to life

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. e4004801
Author(s):  
Laureano Quintero ◽  
Juan Jose Melendez-Lugo ◽  
Helmer Emilio Palacios-Rodríguez ◽  
Natalia Padilla ◽  
Luis Fernando Pino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Trauma Patient ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Massive Hemorrhage ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Airway Injury ◽  
Hemostatic Resuscitation ◽  
Altered State Of Consciousness

Patients with hemodynamic instability have a sustained systolic blood pressure less or equal to 90 mmHg, a heart rate greater or equal to 120 beats per minute and an acute compromise of the ventilation/oxygenation ratio and/or an altered state of consciousness upon admission. These patients have higher mortality rates due to massive hemorrhage, airway injury and/or impaired ventilation. Damage control resuscitation is a systematic approach that aims to limit physiologic deterioration through a group of strategies that address the physiologic debt of trauma. This article aims to describe the experience earned by the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) of Cali, Colombia in the management of the severely injured trauma patient in the emergency department following the basic principles of damage control surgery. Since bleeding is the main cause of death, the management of the severely injured trauma patient in the emergency department requires a multidisciplinary team, which should perform damage control maneuvers aimed at rapidly control bleeding, hemostatic resuscitation and/or prompt transfer to the operating room, if required.

scholarly journals DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD ATEEQ ◽  
SHAZIA JAHAN ◽  
M. HANIF
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Pelvic Trauma ◽  
Biliary Fistula ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Abdominal Packing

Objective: To analyze the role of damage control in surgery in severely injured and polytrauma patients. D e s i g n:Descriptive study. S e t t i n g : Surgical unit of District Headquarter (teaching) Hospital, Rawalpindi. P e r i o d : January 2000 to December 2007.Patients a n d m e t h o d s : This study included 28 severely injured patients who presented in the accident and emergency department ofDistrict Headquarters (teaching) Hospital, Rawalpindi. These patients were unstable because of life threatening hemorrhage following someblunt or penetrating trauma. After immediate shifting to operation theater, resuscitation and operative intervention was done simultaneously.Different procedures of damage control surgery like abdominal packing for hepatic and pelvic trauma, major vascular ligation for vascularinjuries of neck and extremities were adopted in phase I. In phase II patients were managed in ITC for coagulopathy and hypothermia.Definitive treatment was done in Phase III after 24-72 hours once patients got stable. R e s u l t s : Total 28 patients included in the study. In18 patients abdominal packing for hepatic injury (n=11) and pelvic fractures (n=7) was done. Major vascular ligations in n=11 and temporaryintestinal clamping in n=1 patient. Planned re-exploration after 24-72 hours in n=16 and unplanned re-exploration within 24 hours in n=5patients was done. Complications included ongoing hemorrhage (n=5), coagulopathy (n=2), controlled biliary fistula (n=1), abdominalcompartment syndrome (n=1), cerebral ischemia (n=1) and gangrene of abdominal wall (n=1). Two patients died.

Trauma

2020 ◽  
pp. 433-448
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Splenic Injury ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Blast Injuries ◽  
Compression Injury ◽  
Specific Organ ◽  
Thoracic And Abdominal

This chapter covers trauma and the mechanisms of injury (blunt, penetrating, and burns or scalds), grading of injury severity, and initial management. The incidence, clinical features, and management of thoracic and abdominal trauma, including specific organ injury, and blast injuries are all described. The concepts of damage control resuscitation (DCR) and damage control surgery (DCS); organ injury scaling (OIS), blunt and penetrating trauma, compression injury to the chest; pneumothorax; liver injury; splenic injury: and intestinal injury are detailed. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is emphasized in liver and splenic injury. Blast injuries affecting children are also reviewed.

scholarly journals Damage control for renal trauma: the more conservative the surgeon, better for the kidney

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. e4094682
Author(s):  
Alexander Salcedo ◽  
Carlos Alberto Ordoñez ◽  
Michael W Parra ◽  
José Daniel Osorio ◽  
Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Renal Trauma ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Kidney Trauma ◽  
Tract Damage ◽  
Radiological Studies

Urologic trauma is frequently reported in patients with penetrating trauma. Currently, the computerized tomography and vascular approach through angiography/embolization are the standard approaches for renal trauma. However, the management of renal or urinary tract trauma in a patient with hemodynamic instability and criteria for emergency laparotomy, is a topic of discussion. This article presents the consensus of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) from Cali, for the management of penetrating renal and urinary tract trauma through damage control surgery. Intrasurgical perirenal hematoma characteristics, such as if it is expanding or actively bleeding, can be a reference for deciding whether a conservative approach with subsequent radiological studies is possible. However, if there is evidence of severe kidney trauma, surgical exploration is mandatory and entails a high probability of requiring a nephrectomy. Urinary tract damage control should be conservative and deferred because this type of trauma does not represent a risk in acute trauma management.

scholarly journals Tools to predict acute traumatic coagulopathy in the pre-hospital setting: a review of the literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Simon Robinson ◽  
Jordan Kirton
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
Traumatic Coagulopathy

<sec id="s1">Introduction: Recognising acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC) poses a significant challenge to improving survival in emergency care. Paramedics are in a prime position to identify ATC in pre-hospital major trauma and initiate appropriate coagulopathy management. </sec> <sec id="s2">Method: A database literature review was conducted using Scopus, CINAHL and MEDLINE. </sec> <sec id="s3">Results: Two themes were identified from four studies: prediction tools, and point-of-care testing. Prediction tools identified key common ATC markers in the pre-hospital setting, including: systolic blood pressure, reduced Glasgow Coma Score and trauma to the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Point-of-care testing was found to have limited value. </sec> <sec id="s4">Conclusion: Future research needs to explore paramedics using prediction tools in identifying ATC, which could alert hospitals to prepare for blood products for damage control resuscitation. </sec>

Massive Transfusion in a Child

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Sabato
Keyword(s):  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Damage Control Resuscitation ◽  
Acute Hemorrhage ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Major Morbidity ◽  
The Core

The traditional early management of hemorrhagic shock is currently being challenged, and many centers around the world have already changed their practice. Damage-control resuscitation, in conjunction with damage-control surgery, has been shown to improve major morbidity and mortality outcomes in adults. In children there is little direct evidence for these new approaches, but supporting evidence is accumulating. This chapter will introduce these concepts while also reinforcing the core principles of managing acute hemorrhage in the trauma setting.

scholarly journals Human factors in decision making in major trauma in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
GS Arul ◽  
HEJ Pugh ◽  
SJ Mercer ◽  
MJ Midwinter
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Patient Pathway ◽  
Theatre Staff

Introduction The concentration of major trauma experience at Camp Bastion has allowed continuous improvements to occur in the patient pathway from the point of wounding to surgical treatment. These changes have involved clinical management as well as alterations to the physical layout of the hospital, training and decision making. Consideration of the human factors has been a major part of these improvements. Methods We describe the Camp Bastion patient pathway with the communication template that focused decision making at various key moments during damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery (DCR–DCS). This system identifies four key stages: ‘command huddle’, ‘snap brief’, ‘sit-reps’ (situation reports) and ‘sign-out/debrief’. The attitude of staff to communication and decision making is also evaluated. Results Twenty cases admitted to Camp Bastion with battlefield injuries were studied from 6 September to 6 October 2012. Qualitative responses from 115 members of staff were collected. All patients were haemodynamically shocked with a median pH of 7.25 (range: 6.83–7.40) and a median of 18 units of mixed red cells and plasma were transfused. In 89% of instances, theatre staff were aware of what was required of them at the beginning of the case, 86% felt there were regular updates and 93% understood what was required of them as the case progressed. Conclusions The evolution of the hospital at Camp Bastion has been a unique learning experience in the field of major trauma. The Defence Medical Services have responded with continuous innovation to optimise DCR–DCS for seriously injured patients. Together with the improvements in clinical care, a communication and decision making matrix was developed. Staff evaluation showed a high degree of satisfaction with the quality of communication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document