scholarly journals Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related?

Gut ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
G T Deans ◽  
P Sedman ◽  
D F Martin ◽  
C M S Royston ◽  
C K Leow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ascending Cholangitis ◽  
Retroperitoneal Perforation ◽  
The Common

Background—Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy is increasingly performed in younger patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the safety of endo- scopic sphincterotomy in this age group, relative to that in older patients, is unknown.Aim—To determine whether the development of short term complications following endoscopic sphincterotomy is age related.Patients and methods—A prospective multicentre audit of 958 patients (mean age 73, range 14–97, years) undergoing a total of 1000 endoscopic sphincterotomies.Results—Two deaths occurred, both from postsphincterotomy acute pancreatitis. Postprocedural complications developed in 24 patients: pancreatitis in 10, ascending cholangitis in seven, bleeding in four, and retroperitoneal perforation in three. There were six complications (five cases of pancreatitis and one bleed; 2.2%) and no deaths in the 281 (29.3%) patients aged under 65 years. In comparison, 18 (2.6%) of the 677 patients aged over 65 years developed a complication (cholangitis in seven, pancreatitis in five, bleeding in three, and perforation in three). Patients under 35, 45, 55, and 65 years were not at significantly increased risk of complication than those over these ages (relative risk for those under compared with those over 65 years 0.83, 95% confidence intervals 0.41–1.67, p=0.74).Conclusion—Short term complications following endoscopic sphincterotomy are not related to age. Younger patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy need not be denied endoscopic sphincterotomy for fear that the risks are greater than if they undergo surgical exploration of the common bile duct.

Positive Intraoperative Cholangiography during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Necessary?

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 750-753
Author(s):  
Gabriel Akopian ◽  
James Blitz ◽  
Thomas Vander Laan
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
The Common

The treatment of choledocholithiasis discovered incidentally during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not yet standardized. Options include laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES), and no intervention. We undertook a review of our case series to determine whether LCBDE is obligatory and which LCBDE method is unsuccessful. During the 6-year study period, 91 patients with choledocholithiasis were identified. Fifty-six patients (62%) underwent LCBDE. Thirteen (23%) of these 56 patients subsequently required ERCP. Balloon sweeping of the common bile duct failed in 10 of 21 patients (48% failure) compared to any other combination of techniques with a failure rate of 1/33 (3%; P < 0.001). Two patients did not undergo complete duct exploration because of technical problems. Thirty-five patients (38%) did not undergo LCBDE. Nine of these patients (26%) did not have ERCP-ES. None of the patients who underwent postoperative ERCP-ES required additional procedures or surgery. LCBDE can successfully treat common bile duct stones, with minimal to no morbidity, but is not mandatory for safely treating choledocholithiasis. Additionally, advanced techniques for clearing the common bile duct are more successful. Surgeons should be proficient at performing these techniques.

scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Vinicius Silva Ney ◽  
Fauze Maluf-Filho ◽  
Paulo Sakai ◽  
Bruno Zilberstein ◽  
Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Bile Duct Diameter

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrassonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrassonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrassonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.

scholarly journals Common Bile Duct Stone Formed around a Migrated Clip: An Unexpected Complication of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas M. Hussameddin ◽  
Iba Ibrahim AlFawaz ◽  
Reema Fahad AlOtaibi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Stone Formation ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Surgical Clip ◽  
The Common

Surgical clip migration into the common bile duct with subsequent stone formation is a rare complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Very few cases have been reported in the literature. We report a case of bile duct stone formation around a migrated surgical clip 16 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient presented with right upper quadrant pain, fever, and chills for one week. Investigation with abdominal ultrasound showed dilatation of the common bile duct and moderate dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and the patient was managed successfully with sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The exact mechanism of clip migration is not fully understood. Presenting symptoms are similar to non-clip-induced choledocholithiasis. Time of presentation can vary significantly with an average of 26 months. Most cases reported in the literature required surgical intervention. Clip migration should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postcholecystectomy biliary colic and cholangitis. Management with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the treatment of choice.

scholarly journals Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen A Lehman
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Sphincter Of Oddi ◽  
Recurrent Pancreatitis ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Idiopathic Pancreatitis ◽  
Minor Papilla ◽  
The Common

History, physical examination, simple laboratory and radiological tests, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are able to establish the cause of recurrent acute pancreatitis in 70% to 90% of patients. Dysfunction of the biliary and/or pancreatic sphincter, as identified by sphincter of Oddi manometry, accounts for the majority of the remaining cases. The diagnosis may be missed if the pancreatic sphincter is not evaluated. Pancreas divisum is a prevalent congenital abnormality that is usually innocuous but can lead to recurrent attacks of acute pancreatitis or abdominal pain. In select cases, endoscopic sphincterotomy of the minor papilla can provide relief of symptoms and prevent further attacks. A small proportion of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis have tiny stones in the common bile duct (microlithiasis). Crystals can be visualized during microscopic analysis of bile that is aspirated at the time of ERCP. Neoplasia is a rare cause of pancreatitis, and the diagnosis can usually be established by computerized tomography or ERCP. A wide variety of medications can also cause recurrent pancreatitis. ERCP, sphincter of Oddi manometry, and microscopy of aspirated bile should be undertaken in patients with recurrent pancreatitis in whom the diagnosis is not obvious.

scholarly journals Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 263177452110629
Author(s):  
Abdellah Hedjoudje ◽  
Chérifa Cheurfa ◽  
Jad Farha ◽  
Bénédicte Jaïs ◽  
Alain Aubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bayesian Network ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comparative Safety

Background and aims: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis (PAP) and post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage are known adverse events of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Various electrosurgical currents can be used for endoscopic sphincterotomy. The extent to which this influences adverse events remains unclear. We assessed the comparative safety of different electrosurgical currents, through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of published studies merging direct and indirect comparison of trials. Methods: We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Results: Nine studies comparing four electrocautery modes (blended cut, pure cut, endocut, and pure cut followed by blended cut) with a combined enrollment of 1615 patients were included. The pooled results of the network meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in preventing post-sphincterotomy pancreatitis when comparing electrocautery modes. However, pure cut was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bleeding compared with endocut [relative risk = 4.30; 95% confidence interval (1.53–12.87)]. On the other hand, the pooled results of the network meta-analysis showed no significant difference in prevention of bleeding when comparing blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus blended cut, pure cut versus blended cut, and pure cut versus pure cut followed by blended cut. The results of rank probability found that endocut was most likely to be ranked the best. Conclusion: No electrocautery mode was superior to another with regard to preventing PAP. Endocut was superior with respect to preventing bleeding. Therefore, we suggest performing endoscopic sphincterotomy with endocut.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of D-Dimer in Younger Patients with Pulmonary Embolism

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Jovanović ◽  
Vesna Subota ◽  
Milena Rajković ◽  
Bojana Subotić ◽  
Boris Džudović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract In patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), the D-Dimer assay is commonly utilized as part of the diagnostic workup, but data on D-Dimer for early risk stratification and short-term mortality prediction are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine D-Dimer levels as a predictive biomarker of PE outcomes in younger (<50 years of age) compared to older patients. We conducted retrospective analysis for 930 patients diagnosed with PE between 2015 and 2019 as part of the Serbian University Multicenter Pulmonary Embolism Registry (SUPER).All patients had D-Dimer levels measured within 24 hours of hospital admission. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days or during hospitalization. Patients were categorized into two groups based on age (≤ 50 and >50 years of age). Younger patients constituted 20.5% of the study cohort. Regarding all-cause mortality, 5.2% (10/191)of patients died in group under the 50 years of age; the short-term all-causemortality was 12.4% (92/739) in older group.We have found that there was significant difference in plasma D-Dimer level between patients ≤ 50 years of age and older group (>50), p= 0.006.D-Dimer plasma level had good predictive value for the primary outcome in younger patients (c-statistics 0.710; 95% CI, 0.640-0.773; p<0.031). The optimal cutoff level for D-Dimer to predict PE-cause death in patients aged > 50 years was found to be 8.8 mg/l FEU(c-statistics 0,580; 95% CI 0.544-0.616; p=0.049). In younger PE patients, D-Dimer levels have good prognostic performance for 30-day all-cause mortalityand concentrations above 6.3 mg/l FEU are associated with increased risk of death. D-Dimer in patients aged over 50 years does not have predictive ability for all-caused short-term mortality. The relationship between D-Dimer and age in patients with PE may need further evaluation.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Treatment оf Mirizzi Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-574
Author(s):  
F. A. Khadzhibayev ◽  
F. B. Alidzhanov ◽  
F. K. Gulomov ◽  
Zh. B. Yarov
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Mirizzi Syndrome ◽  
Laparoscopic Treatment ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
The Common

Background. Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a relatively rare complication of cholelithiasis, which occurs in a wide range from 0.2 to 5% according to different authors. Today, the surgical treatment of MS remains a challenge.Aim of study. To determine the possibilities of laparoscopic interventions in the surgical correction of various types of MS.Material AND methods. The work is based on a prospective analysis of cases of laparoscopic treatment of 19 patients with MS who were treated in the emergency surgery departments of the Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care in 2017–2019. This is 22.9% of all admitted patients (83) with MS during this period. Type 1 MS was diagnosed in 3 patients (15.7%), type 2 was diagnosed in 16 patients (84.2%).Results. In all cases of type 1 MS, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. A new method for the correction of type 2 MS by forming a sleeve from the gallbladder wall was suggested, which was performed in 10 patients with good results. In the postoperative period, no nonspecific complications were observed in patients undergoing laparoscopic interventions. One patient had residual choledocholithiasis, which was managed by day 5 after the surgery with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic papillosphincterotomy and the removal of the calculus from the common bile duct. The average duration of stay of patients in a hospital bed was 10.8 days. Fatal outcome was observed in 1 case (5.3%).Conclusion. 1. The inclusion of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and magnetic resonance imaging cholangiography in the diagnostic scheme improves the accuracy and quality of recognition of Mirizzi syndrome and allows the indications for the use of video laparoscopy to be evaluated. 2. Indication for laparocopic treatment of type 2 Mirizzi syndrome is the presence of a single calculus in the supraduodenal part of the common bile duct, which makes it possible to reduce the number of conversion to laparotomy. 3. In cases of type 1 Mirizzi syndrome, the operation of choice is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 4. The operation of choice in patients with type 2 Mirizzi syndrome is laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy, fistula plasty with a gallbladder flap on the Kehr’s T-tube drain with the formation of a “cystic duct”-type sleeve.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document