Reduction in opioid use and postoperative pain scores after elective laparotomy with implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on a gynecologic oncology service

ObjectiveEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to mitigate the physiologic stress response created by surgery, to decrease the time to resumption of daily activities, and to improve overall recovery. This study aims to investigate postoperative recovery outcomes following gynecologic surgery before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing elective laparotomy at a major academic center following implementation of an ERAS protocol (11/4/2014–7/27/2016) with comparison to a historical cohort (6/23/2013–9/30/2014). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included surgical variables, time to recovery of baseline function, opioid usage, pain scores, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher’s exact, and chi squared tests.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-three women on the ERAS protocol who underwent elective laparotomy were compared with 121 historical controls. There was no difference in length of stay between cohorts (median 4 days; P = 0.71). ERAS participants had lower intraoperative (45 vs 75 oral morphine equivalents; P < 0.0001) and postoperative (45 vs 154 oral morphine equivalents; P < 0.0001) opioid use. ERAS patients reported lower maximum pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (three vs six; P < 0.0001) and on postoperative day 1 (four vs six; P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in complication or readmission rates.ConclusionsERAS protocol implementation was associated with decreased intraoperative and postoperative opioid use and improved pain scores without significant changes in length of stay or complication rates.

Download Full-text

Impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes in open gynecologic surgery

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2019-000622 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (9) ◽

pp. 1417-1424 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Maria D Iniesta ◽

Javier Lasala ◽

Gabriel Mena ◽

Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo ◽

Gloria Salvo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Surgery ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Operative Outcomes ◽

Tertiary Center ◽

Operative Complications ◽

Eras Protocol ◽

Post Operative Complications

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate if varying levels of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted post-operative outcomes (length of stay, complications, readmissions, and re-operations) in gynecologic surgery at a tertiary center.MethodsWe included 584 patients who had open gynecologic surgery between November 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. Patients were categorized into subgroups according to their date of surgery from the time of the ERAS protocol implementation. Patients were categorized by their per cent compliance into two groups:<80% versus ≥80%. We analyzed compliance with the elements of the protocol over time and its relation with post-operative outcomes, length of stay, post-operative complications, readmission, and re-operations rates. We modeled the probability of having a post-operative complication within 30 days of surgery as a function of overall compliance.ResultsOverall compliance was 72.3%. Patients with compliance ≥80% had significantly less complications (P<0.001) and shorter length of stay (P<0.001). Readmission and re-operation rates were not impacted by compliance (P=0.182, P=0.078, respectively). Avoidance of salt water overload, early mobilization, early oral nutrition, and early removal of Foley catheter were significantly associated with less post-operative complications within 30 days.ConclusionsCompliance with an ERAS pathway exceeding 80% was associated with lower complication rates and shorter length of stay without impacting on re-operations or readmissions.

Download Full-text

Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Use After Elective Spine and Peripheral Nerve Surgery Using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program

Pain Medicine ◽

10.1093/pm/pnaa233 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (12) ◽

pp. 3283-3291

Author(s):

Tracy M Flanders ◽

Joseph Ifrach ◽

Saurabh Sinha ◽

Disha S Joshi ◽

Ali K Ozturk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Peripheral Nerve ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Foley Catheter ◽

Control Group ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Eras Protocol ◽

Nerve Surgery

Abstract Objective Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have previously been shown to be feasible and safe in elective spinal procedures. As publications on ERAS pathways have recently emerged in elective neurosurgery, long-term outcomes are limited. We report on our 18-month experience with an ERAS pathway in elective spinal surgery. Methods A historical cohort of 149 consecutive patients was identified as the control group, and 1,141 patients were prospectively enrolled in an ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was the need for opioid use one month postoperation. Secondary outcomes were opioid and nonopioid consumption on postoperative day (POD) 1, opioid use at three and six months postoperation, inpatient pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, postoperative Foley catheter use, mobilization/ambulation on POD0–1, length of stay, complications, and intensive care unit admissions. Results There was significant reduction in use of opioids at one, three, and six months postoperation (38.6% vs 70.5%, P < 0.001, 36.5% vs 70.9%, P < 0.001, and 23.6% vs 51.9%, P = 0.008) respectively. Both groups had similar surgical procedures and demographics. PCA use was nearly eliminated in the ERAS group (1.4% vs 61.6%, P < 0.001). ERAS patients mobilized faster on POD0 compared with control (63.5% vs 20.7%, P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the ERAS group required postoperative catheterization (40.7% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001). The ERAS group also had decreased length of stay (3.4 vs 3.9 days, P = 0.020). Conclusions ERAS protocols for all elective spine and peripheral nerve procedures are both possible and effective. This standardized approach to patient care decreases opioid usage, eliminates the use of PCAs, mobilizes patients faster, and reduces length of stay.

Download Full-text

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Radical Cystectomy Decreases Postoperative Complications at Different Times

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000518163 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

François Lannes ◽

Jochen Walz ◽

Thomas Maubon ◽

Stanislas Rybikowski ◽

Sami Fakhfakh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Radical Cystectomy ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Fast Recovery ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Eras Protocol ◽

Over Time

Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves, at different time points, postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric study using prospectively maintained databases including all patients treated by radical cystectomy between January 2015 and July 2019. An ERAS protocol was applied in all patients from February 2018. We analyzed and compared between non-ERAS and ERAS groups early and 90-day postoperative complications and 90-day readmission. ERAS was analyzed to know its implication in fast recovery improvement over time. Results: A total of 150 patients underwent radical cystectomy, 74 without ERAS and 76 with ERAS protocol. ERAS decreased significantly early (p = 0.039) and 90-day (0.012) postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, ERAS was an independent factor associated with less early (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.96; p = 0.37) and 90-day (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.68; p = 0.004) postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between groups for 90-day readmission (p = 0.349). Mean length of stay did not differ significantly between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (12.7 ± 6.2 and 13.1 ± 5.7 days, respectively; p = 0.743). Discussion/Conclusion: Our study shows that ERAS has an early positive impact that lasts over time on postoperative complications. ERAS implementation has decreased early and 90-day postoperative complications without increasing 90-day readmission. In our cohort, length of stay was not improved with ERAS protocol.

Download Full-text

Oral Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery

January 2018 - Pain Physician ◽

10.36076/ppj.2020/23/57 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1;23 (1;1) ◽

pp. 57-64 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Joseph H. Marcotte

Keyword(s):

Pain Management ◽

Colorectal Surgery ◽

Postoperative Nausea ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Eras Protocol

Background: Multimodal pain management within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to decrease opioid use, promote mobilization, and decrease postoperative complications. Objectives: To evaluate the role of intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen within an established ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery. Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study. Setting: This research took place within an established perioperative colorectal surgery protocol. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive elective colorectal resections performed according to an ERAS protocol using only IV acetaminophen (IV group) were compared with 84 consecutive resections performed using one dose of IV acetaminophen followed by subsequent administration of oral acetaminophen (PO group). Our multimodal pain management strategy also included transverse abdominis plane blocks, celecoxib, and ketorolac medications for both groups. Opioid requirements, maximum and average daily pain scores by the Visual Analog Scale, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: There were no differences in maximum or average pain scores on postoperative days 0-3 or at time of discharge between IV and PO groups. Compared with the IV acetaminophen only group, the PO group received significantly more perioperative opioids through 72 hours postoperatively (68.8 oral morphine equivalents [OME] IV group vs. 93.7 OME PO group; P < 0.0001), were more likely to require opioid patient-controlled analgesia (8.9% IV group vs. 46.4% PO group; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (33.0% IV group vs. 48.8% PO group; P = 0.0449). Limitations: Significant limitations include the studies’ retrospective nature and that it was performed at a single institution. Conclusions: Restriction of IV acetaminophen within an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery was associated with increased opioid use, greater need for opioid patient-controlled analgesia, and increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. IV acetaminophen may be superior to oral acetaminophen in the early postoperative setting. Key words: Perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery after surgery, acetaminophen, multimodal pain control, nonopioid

Download Full-text

Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological operations: a randomized controlled trial

Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology ◽

10.1186/s42077-020-00116-4 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Amr Nady Abdelrazik ◽

Ahmad Sameer Sanad

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Gynecologic Surgery ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Control Groups ◽

Analog Scale ◽

Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery on length of hospital stay, pain management, and complication rate. Results The length of hospital stay was reduced in ERAS groups when compared with the control groups (3.46 days vs 2.28 days; P < 0.0001; CI − 1.5767 to − 0.7833 for laparotomy groups and 2.18 vs 1.76 days; P = 0.0115; CI − 0.7439 to − 0.0961 for laparoscopy groups respectively). Intraoperative fluid use was reduced in both ERAS groups compared to the two control groups (934 ± 245 ml and 832 ± 197 ml vs 1747 ± 257 ml and 1459 ± 304 respectively; P < 0.0001) and postoperative fluid use was also less in the ERAS groups compared to the control groups (1606 ± 607 ml and 1210 ± 324 ml vs 2682 ± 396 ml and 1469 ± 315 ml respectively; P < 0.0001). Pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 0 was 4.8 ± 1.4 and 4.1 ± 1.2 (P = 0.0066) for both laparotomy control and ERAS groups respectively, while in the laparoscopy groups, VAS was 3.8 ± 1.1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0024) in control and ERAS groups respectively. Conclusion Implementation of ERAS protocols in gynecologic surgery was associated with significant reduction in length of hospital stay, associated with decrease intravenous fluids used and comparable pain control without increase in complication rates.

Download Full-text

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Cesarean Delivery: Effect on Opioid Use and Pain Scores [5K]

Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.1097/01.aog.0000558858.22192.c3 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 133 (1) ◽

pp. 119S-119S ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Emily E. Fay ◽

Carlos C. Delgado ◽

Jane Hitti ◽

Leah Savitsky ◽

Elizabeth Mills ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Delivery ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Pain Scores

Download Full-text

Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance?

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2019-000268 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (4) ◽

pp. 810-815 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Basile Pache ◽

Jonas Jurt ◽

Fabian Grass ◽

Martin Hübner ◽

Nicolas Demartines ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Oncology ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Gynecologic Surgery ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Prolonged Length ◽

Academic Center ◽

The Impact

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines in gynecologic surgery are a set of multiple recommendations based on the best available evidence. However, according to previous studies, maintaining high compliance is challenging in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of compliance to individual ERAS items on clinical outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of 446 consecutive women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery (both open and minimally invasive) within an ERAS program from 1 October 2013 until 31 January 2017 in a tertiary academic center in Switzerland. Demographics, adherence, and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed, with adjustment for confounding factors. Main outcomes were overall compliance, compliance to each individual ERAS item, and impact on post-operative complications according to Clavien classification.ResultsA total of 446 patients were included, 26.2 % (n=117) had at least one complication (Clavien I–V), and 11.4 % (n=51) had a prolonged length of hospital stay. The single independent risk factor for overall complications was intra-operative blood loss > 200 mL (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.89, p=0.001). Overall compliance >70% with ERAS items (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66, p=0.12) showed a protective effect on complications. Increased compliance was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.435 to 0.93, p=0.001).ConclusionsCompliance >70% with modifiable ERAS items was significantly associated with reduced overall complications. Best possible compliance with all ERAS items is the goal to achieve lower complication rates after gynecologic oncology surgery.

Download Full-text

Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2019-000597 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (8) ◽

pp. 1235-1243 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ester Miralpeix ◽

Gemma Mancebo ◽

Sonia Gayete ◽

Marta Corcoy ◽

Josep-Maria Solé-Sedeño

Keyword(s):

Functional Capacity ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Oncology ◽

Psychological Support ◽

Gynecologic Surgery ◽

Nutritional Counseling ◽

Oncology Patients ◽

Operative Recovery ◽

Eras Protocol

Patients undergoing major surgery are predisposed to a decrease in functional capacity as a response to surgical stress that can delay post-operative recovery. A prehabilitation program consists of patient preparation strategies before surgery, and include pre-operative measures to improve functional capacity and enhance post-operative recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation may include exercise, nutritional counseling, psychological support, and optimization of underlying medical conditions, as well as cessation of unfavorable health behaviors such as smoking and drinking. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for prehabilitation, and the existent studies are heterogeneous; however, multimodal approaches are likely to have a greater impact on functional outcomes than single management programs. We have reviewed the literature on prehabilitation in general, and in gynecologic surgery in particular, to identify tools to establish an optimal prehabilitation program within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynecologic oncology patients. We suggest a safe, reproducible, functional, and easy-to-apply multimodal prehabilitation program for gynecologic oncology practice based on patient-tailored pre-operative medical optimization, physical training, nutritional counseling, and psychological support. The analysis of the prehabilitation program implementation in an ERAS protocol should undergo further research in order to test the efficacy on surgical outcome and recovery after surgery.

Download Full-text

Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy ◽

10.1177/1945892419892834 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 34 (2) ◽

pp. 280-289 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yunbo Gao ◽

Chengshuo Wang ◽

Guyan Wang ◽

Xu Cui ◽

Guang Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Adverse Reactions ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Sinus Surgery ◽

Self Rating ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Lower Pain ◽

Traditional Care ◽

Eras Protocol

Background Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely applied during perioperative periods for different diseases, there are few reports of ERAS in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study therefore aimed to evaluate the benefits of ERAS protocol compared to traditional care following ESS. Methods A total of 55 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing ESS were prospectively assigned to 1 of 5 treatment groups; ERAS groups with postoperative intravenous Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump, traditional care with Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump (NERAS groups), or traditional care without postoperative intravenous analgesia group (control). All patients completed the Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Self-rating Anxiety Scale at admission and before discharge. Pain scores were recorded at 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours postsurgery and adverse reactions to analgesics were noted. Results Patients in ERAS group demonstrated significantly higher general comfort scores and lower self-rating anxiety scores compared to patients in NERAS and control groups. Compared to control patients, patients in ERAS group reported significantly lower pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours. Moreover, pain alleviated from 6 hours postsurgery in ERAS group compared to 48 hours in NERAS group. Patients using opioids experienced more adverse nausea events than patients using only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Conclusions The use of patient-tailored ERAS programs following ESS may help to attain higher general comfort and to alleviate perioperative anxiety compared with traditional perioperative care. Adequate postoperative analgesia with NSAIDs in ERAS protocol may alleviate pain earlier with fewer adverse reactions.

Download Full-text

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery ◽

10.1055/s-0039-1693699 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (09) ◽

pp. 695-704 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Carol E. Soteropulos ◽

Sherry Y.Q. Tang ◽

Samuel O. Poore

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Breast Reconstruction ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Fluid Management ◽

Patient Counseling ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Full Spectrum ◽

Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction

Background Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) principles have received focused attention in breast reconstruction. Many protocols have been described in the literature for both autologous and alloplastic reconstruction. This systematic review serves to better characterize successful ERAS protocols described in the literature for potential ease of adoption at institutions desiring implementation. Methods A systematic review of ERAS protocols for autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction was conducted using Medline, the Cochrane Database, and Web of Science. Results Eleven cohort studies evaluating ERAS protocols for autologous (n = 8) and alloplastic (n = 3) breast reconstruction were included for review. The majority compared with a retrospective cohort of traditional perioperative care. All studies described the full spectrum of implemented ERAS protocols including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care. Most frequently reported significant outcomes were reduced length of stay and opioid use with ERAS implementation. No significant change in major complication or readmission rate was demonstrated. Conclusion Based on this systematic review, several core elements that make up a successful perioperative enhanced recovery protocol for breast reconstruction have been identified. Elements include patient counseling and education, limited preoperative fasting, appropriate thromboprophylaxis and antibiotic prophylaxis dependent on reconstructive method, preoperative antiemetics, multimodal analgesia and use of local anesthetic, goal-directed intravenous fluid management, prompt removal of drains and catheters, early diet advancement, and encouragement of ambulation postoperatively. Implementation of ERAS protocols in both autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction can positively enhance patient experience and improve outcomes by reducing length of stay and opioid use, without compromising successful reconstructive outcomes.

Download Full-text