scholarly journals 300 Final analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine in stage III/IV melanoma: 36-month analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A327-A327
Author(s):  
Lexy Adams ◽  
Robert Chick ◽  
Guy Clifton ◽  
Timothy Vreeland ◽  
Patrick McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Stage Iv Melanoma

BackgroundThe tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is created ex vivo by loading autologous dendritic cells (DC) with yeast cell wall particles (YCWP) containing autologous tumor lysate, thus delivering tumor antigens to the DC cytoplasm via phagocytosis. TLPLDC then activates a robust T cell response against the unique antigens for each patient. The primary analysis of the prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma showed TLPLDC improved 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) in the per-treatment (PT) analysis (patients completing the 6-month primary vaccine series). Here, we examine the secondary endpoint of 36-month DFS and overall survival (OS).MethodsPatients with resected stage III/IV melanoma were randomized 2:1 to TLPLDC vaccine or placebo (autologous DC loaded with empty YCWP). Treatments were given at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 months. The protocol was amended to include patients receiving concurrent checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to follow changes in standard of care. The co-primary endpoints were 24-month DFS by intention-to-treat (IT) analysis and per-treatment (PT) analysis, with secondary endpoints including 36-month DFS and OS by ITT and PT analysis, pre-specified analysis by stage, and safety as measured by CTCAE v4.03.ResultsOverall, 103 patients received TLPLDC and 41 placebo. In PT analysis, 65 patients received TLPLDC and 32 placebo. Total adverse events (AEs), grade 3+ AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were similar in placebo vs TLPLDC groups, with one related SAE per treatment arm. By ITT analysis, 36-month OS was 76.2% for TLPLDC vs 70.3% for placebo (HR 0.72, p=0.437) and 36-month DFS was 35.6% vs 27.1% (HR 0.95, p=0.841). By PT analysis, 36-month DFS was improved with TLPLDC (57.5% vs 35.0%; HR 0.50, p=0.025, figure 1). This effect was even more dramatic in resected stage IV patients (36-month DFS: 60.9% vs 0%; HR 0.12, p=0.001, figure 2).ConclusionsThis phase IIb trial again demonstrates the safety of the TLPLDC vaccine, and an improved 36-month DFS in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma who complete the primary vaccine series, particularly in the stage IV subgroup. Next, a phase III trial will evaluate the efficacy of TLPLDC vaccine as adjuvant treatment for resected stage IV melanoma, with patients randomized to receive standard of care PD-1 inhibitors + TLPLDC versus PD-1 inhibitors + placebo.Abstract 300 Figure 136-month disease free survival for patients receiving TLPLDC vs placebo by PT analysisAbstract 300 Figure 236-month disease free survival for subset of stage IV melanoma patients receiving TLPLDC vs placebo by PT analysisTrial RegistrationThis is a phase IIb clinical trial registered under NCT02301611Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Western IRB, protocol 20141932.

scholarly journals 431 Prospective, randomized trial of the tumor lysate, particle only vaccine compared to the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine to prevent recurrence for resected stage III/IV melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A456-A457
Author(s):  
Patrick McCarthy ◽  
Lexy Adams ◽  
Robert Chick ◽  
Guy Clifton ◽  
Timothy Vreeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Dendritic Cell ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free

BackgroundThe autologous tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is safe and effective in improving 24 and 36-month disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with resected stage III/IV melanoma who completed the primary vaccine series. The tumor lysate, particle only (TLPO) vaccine has been developed to accelerate production by omitting DC isolation and ex vivo loading in favor of in vivo phagocytosis of the TL-loaded particles. We are currently conducting a randomized and double-blind trial of the TLPO vs TLPLDC to improve DFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected late stage melanoma.MethodsPatients with stage III/IV melanoma who were clinically disease-free after standard of care therapies were randomized to receive TLPO vs TLPLDC (2:1) as a continuation of the phase IIb trial comparing TLPLDC vs placebo (2:1). For the TLPLDC vaccine, autologous TL was loaded into yeast cell wall particles (YCWP) which were then phagocytized by isolated autologous DC ex vivo. For the placebo DC were loaded with empty YCWP. For TLPO, the autologous TL-loaded YCWP were coated with a chemoattractant and injected intradermally for in vivo phagocytosis. Some patients in the TLPLDC arm received G-CSF prior to DC harvest to minimize blood draw (60 mL instead of 120 mL without G-CSF). For all arms, six vaccine/placebo doses were administered intradermally at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 mos. Data was analyzed by an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for DFS and OS by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.Results63 pts were randomized to TLPO (n=43) vs TLPLDC (n=20). The TLPO cohort contained more females and received less chemotherapy (0% vs 10%), but otherwise were comparable. There were no differences in DFS (p=0.948) or OS (p=0.779) between the two vaccines (figures 1&2). Comparing the TLPO pts to all other pts in the phase IIb trial [TLPLDC+G-CSF (n=57), TLPLDC-G-CSF (n=46), and placebo (n=41)] the TLPO arm had improved DFS compared to placebo (p=0.019) and TLPLDC+G-CSF (p=0.001), but roughly equivalent to the TLPLDC-G-CSF arm (p=0.276) (figure 3). A similar trend was seen in OS analysis, though differences were not statistically significant (figure 4).Abstract 431 Figure 1TLPO vs TLPLDC (n=20) DFS. Disease-free survival of TLPO patients compared to similar TLPLDC patients (n=20)Abstract 431 Figure 2TLPO vs TLPLDC (n=20) OS. Overall survival of TLPO patients compared to similar TLPLDC patients (n=20)Abstract 431 Figure 3TLPO vs TLPLDC subsets vs Placebo DFS. Disease-free survival of TLPO patients compared to placebo and all TLPLDC patients (n=103) stratified by use of G-CSFAbstract 431 Figure 4TLPO vs TLPLDC subsets vs Placebo OS. Disease-free survival of TLPO patients compared to placebo and all TLPLDC patients (n=103) stratified by use of G-CSFConclusionsTLPO and TLPLDC vaccines (without the use of G-CSF) improve DFS in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma compared to placebo. The TLPO vaccine may offer advantages via reduced cost and vaccine production time. TLPO should be closely considered for further clinical trials.Trial RegistrationNCT02301611: Phase IIB TL + YWCP + DC in MelanomaTLPLDC IND#16101TLPO IND#17274Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by WIRB; protocol #20141932

Randomized Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Mitomycin Plus Tegafur in Patients With Resected Stage III Gastric Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3810-3815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluís Cirera ◽  
Anna Balil ◽  
Eduard Batiste-Alentorn ◽  
Ignasi Tusquets ◽  
Teresa Cardona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is controversial. We conducted a phase III, randomized, multicentric clinical trial with the goal of assessing the efficacy of the combination of mitomycin plus tegafur in prolonging the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with resected stage III gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected stage III gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned, using sealed envelopes, to receive either chemotherapy or no further treatment. Chemotherapy was started within 28 days after surgery according to the following schedule: mitomycin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (bolus) at day 1 of chemotherapy; 30 days later, oral tegafur at 400 mg bid daily for 3 months. Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Between January 1988 and September 1994, 148 patients from 10 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 37 months. The tolerability of the treatment was excellent. The overall survival and disease-free survival were higher in the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (P = .04 for survival and P = .01 for disease-free survival in the log-rank test). The overall 5-year survival rate and the 5-year disease-free survival rate were, respectively, 56% and 51% in the treatment group and 36% and 31% in the control group. CONCLUSION: Our positive results are consistent with the results of recent studies; which conclude that there is a potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer.

Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine to prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients: A subgroup analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 63-63
Author(s):  
Robert Connor Chick ◽  
Mark B. Faries ◽  
Diane F. Hale ◽  
Phillip M. Kemp Bohan ◽  
Annelies Hickerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free

63 Background: A novel vaccine strategy may prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients (pts). The TLPLDC vaccine uses yeast cell wall particles (YCWP) to load tumor lysate into autologous dendritic cells (DC). In this phase IIb trial of TLPLDC vs. placebo in resected stage III/IV pts, TLPLDC increased 24 month (mo) disease free survival (DFS) in the per treatment (PT) population. Here, we present a 24mo DFS subgroup analysis and estimated overall 36mo DFS. Methods: Disease-free pts were randomized 2:1 to the TLPLDC vaccine vs. unloaded YCWP+DC at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18mo. The protocol was amended to allow concurrent adjuvant checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy once approved. The pre-specified PT population included only pts completing the primary vaccine/placebo series (PVS) at 6 mo. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS were used to compare treatment arms by stage (III or IV) and CPI therapy (yes/no) in the ITT and PT populations. Results: 144 pts were randomized (103 TLPLDC, 41 placebo); 98 pts (66 TLPLDC, 32 placebo) completed the PVS. There were no clinicopathologic differences between treatment groups. There was no difference in 24mo DFS in stage III pts (n = 112), but in stage IV pts (n = 32), the 24mo DFS was 44% vs 0% (TLPLDC vs placebo) (p = 0.41) in ITT and 73.3% vs. 0% (HR 0.14, p = 0.002) in PT. Stage IV pts were more likely to receive CPI than stage III pts (50% vs. 30%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in 24mo DFS for pts who did not receive CPI (n = 102), but in pts who received CPI (n = 42), the 24mo DFS was 49.3% vs. 31.3% (p = 0.71) in ITT and 68.8% vs. 41.7% (HR 0.46, p = 0.28) in PT, showing a trend toward improved DFS in pts who completed the PVS and received CPI (n = 31). Overall, the 36mo estimated DFS was 34.2% vs. 21.6% (p = 0.89) for ITT and 56.9% vs. 27.9% (p = 0.021) for PT. Conclusions: The TLPLDC vaccine improved DFS in patients completing the PVS at 24 and 36 mos, particularly in the resected stage IV subset. The apparent synergistic effect with TLPLDC + CPI will be confirmed in a phase III study evaluating adjuvant TLPLDC + CPI vs. CPI alone in resected stage IV melanoma pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02301611.

Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin as Effective Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Curatively Resected Stage III Colon Cancer: Results of the Trial adjCCA-01

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1787-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Porschen ◽  
Andreas Bermann ◽  
Thomas Löffler ◽  
Gregor Haack ◽  
Klaus Rettig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: Adjuvant postoperative treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole in curatively resected stage III colon cancer significantly reduces the risk of cancer recurrence and improves survival. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin has resulted in increased remission rates in metastatic colorectal cancer, thus reflecting an increased tumor-cell kill. The impact of 5-FU plus leucovorin on survival and tumor recurrence was analyzed in comparison with the effects of 5-FU plus levamisole in the prospective multicentric trial adjCCA-01. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a curatively resected International Union Against Cancer stage III colon cancer were stratified according to T, N, and G category and randomly assigned to receive one of the two adjuvant treatment schemes: 5-FU 400 mg/m2 body-surface area intravenously in the first chemotherapy course, then 450 mg/m2 × 5 days; 12 cycles, plus leucovorin 100 mg/m2 (arm A), or 5-FU plus levamisole (Moertel scheme; arm B). RESULTS: Six hundred eighty (96.9%) of 702 patients enrolled onto this study were eligible. After a median follow-up time of 46.5 months, the 5-FU plus leucovorin combination significantly improved disease-free survival (P = .037) and significantly decreased overall mortality (P = .0089) in comparison with 5-FU plus levamisole. In a multivariate proportional hazards model, adjuvant chemotherapy emerged as a significant prognostic factor for survival (P = .0059) and disease-free survival (P = .03). Adjuvant treatment with 5-FU plus levamisole as well as with 5-FU plus leucovorin was generally well tolerated; only a minority of patients experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION: After a curative resection of a stage III colon cancer, adjuvant treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin is generally well tolerated and significantly more effective than 5-FU plus levamisole in reducing tumor relapse and improving survival.

scholarly journals 310 The effect of pretreatment with G-CSF prior to dendritic cell collection during the phase IIb trial of an autologous DC-based vaccine for advanced, resectable melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A337-A337
Author(s):  
Anne O’Shea ◽  
Robert Chick ◽  
Guy Clifton ◽  
Timothy Vreeland ◽  
Lexy Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cell ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundWe have completed a prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine given to prevent recurrences in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. During the trial, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered to some patients to mobilize dendritic cells (DCs) precursors prior to harvest, allowing for similar DC yield with reduced blood draws. This study examines the impact of DC collection methods on vaccine effectiveness.MethodsTLPLDC is produced by loading tumor lysate into pre-prepared yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) and exposing them to autologous DCs. DC precursors were isolated either by collection of 50–70 mL of blood following pre-administration of 300µg of G-CSF 24–48 hrs prior, or collection of 120 mL of peripheral blood without G-CSF pretreatment based on patient and provider preference. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive TLPLDC or placebo (DCs exposed to empty YCWPs). 1–1.5 × 106 cells/dose were injected intradermally at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months. Differences in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by log rank.ResultsOf 144 patients randomized, 103 received TLPLDC and 41 received placebo. Within the TLPLDC group, 57 received pretreatment with G-CSF (TLPLDC+G-CSF) and 46 did not (TLPLDC–G-CSF). There were no significant clinicopathologic or treatment differences between the three treatment arms. 36-month DFS was significantly better in TLPLDC–G-CSF vs. TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo (51.8% vs. 23.4% and 27.1% respectively, p=0.027) (figure 1). TLPLDC–G-CSF had correspondingly improved OS (92.9% vs. 62.8% and 72.3% respectively, p=0.022) (figure 2). Subgroup analysis revealed TLPLDC–G-CSF had increased DFS over TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo in Stage IV (68.6% vs. 18.8% and 0.0% respectively, p=0.058). Similarly, the DFS survival benefit of TLPLDC–G-CSF was enhanced in patients who received prior immunotherapy (IO) (61.9% vs. 11.5% and 35.7% respectively, p=0.007) or checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) (48.5% vs. 10.6% and 37.5% respectively, p=0.039).Abstract 310 Figure 1DFS at 36 monthsAbstract 310 Figure 2OS at 36 monthsConclusionsTLPLDC vaccine created without G-CSF pretreatment significantly improved 36-month DFS and OS compared to TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo in stage III/IV (resected) melanoma patients. On further subgroup analysis, the increases in OS and DFS were more profound in patients who received additional immune therapies to include CPI. Ongoing evaluation will determine if G-CSF mobilization leads to collection of phenotypically different DCs. Based on these results, we are planning a phase III trial of TLPLDC–G-CSF + CPI vs. placebo + CPI in advanced melanoma post-resection.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT02301611Ethics ApprovalThis study was reviewed and approved by the IRB or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of each participating center prior to study initiation.

Eight Cycles of ABVD Versus Four Cycles of BEACOPPescalated Plus Four Cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in Stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, High-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma: First Results of the Phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (17) ◽  
pp. 2028-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrice Carde ◽  
Matthias Karrasch ◽  
Catherine Fortpied ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Hussein Khaled ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
International Prognostic Score ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To compare patients with high-risk stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the phase III European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 20012 Intergroup trial (Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Hodgkin’s Lymphoma) who were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or to bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP). Patients and Methods Patients with clinical stage III or IV HL, International Prognostic Score of 3 or higher, and age 60 years or younger received ABVD for eight cycles (ABVD8) or escalated-dose BEACOPP (BEACOPPescalated) for four cycles followed by baseline BEACOPP (BEACOPPbaseline) for four cycles (BEACOPP4+4) without radiotherapy. Primary end points were event-free survival (EFS), treatment discontinuation, no complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu) after eight cycles, progression, relapse, or death. Secondary end points were CR rate, overall survival (OS), quality of life, secondary malignancies, and disease-free survival in CR/CRu patients. Results Between 2002 and 2010, 549 patients were randomly assigned to ABVD8 (n = 275) or BEACOPP4+4 (n = 274). Other characteristics included median age, 35 years; male, 75%; stage IV, 74%; “B” symptoms, 81%; and International Prognostic Score ≥ 4, 59%. WHO performance status was 0 (34%), 1 (48%), or 2 (17%). Median follow-up was 3.6 years. CR/CRu was 82.5% in both arms. At 4 years, EFS was 63.7% for ABVD8 versus 69.3% for BEACOPP4+4 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.15; P = .312); disease-free survival was 85.8% versus 91.0% (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.06; P = .076), and OS was 86.7% versus 90.3% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.21; P = .208). Death as a result of toxicity occurred in six and five patients, early discontinuation (before cycle 5) in 12 and 26 patients, treatment crossovers in five and 10 patients, and secondary malignancies in eight and 10 patients in the ABVD8 and BEACOPP4+4 arms, respectively. Conclusion ABVD8 and BEACOPP4+4 resulted in similar EFS and OS in patients with high-risk advanced-stage HL. Because BEACOPP4+4 did not demonstrate a favorable effectiveness or toxicity ratio compared with ABVD8, treatment burden, immediate and late toxicities, and associated costs must be considered before selecting one of these regimens on which to build future treatment strategies.

Cisplatin, vincristine, and fluorouracil therapy for hepatoblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
E C Douglass ◽  
M Reynolds ◽  
M Finegold ◽  
A B Cantor ◽  
A Glicksman
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE To estimate the disease-free survival rate in children with grossly resected hepatoblastoma treated with cisplatin, vincristine, and fluorouracil (CDDP/VCR/FU) and to assess the disease-response rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate in children with unresectable or metastatic tumors treated with this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty assessable patients with hepatoblastoma received therapy with five (stage I and II) to seven (stage III and IV) courses of CDDP (90 mg/m2), day 1, and VCR (1.5 mg/m2), and FU (600 mg/m2), day 3. RESULTS Nineteen of 21 patients with stage I or II disease survive free of disease (actuarial survival, 90% at 5 years). Twenty-four of 31 patients with stage III disease achieved a complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy and surgical excision; actuarial DFS at 4 years is 67%. Only one of eight patients with stage IV disease achieved a remission and survives. CONCLUSION Relatively brief exposure to chemotherapy with CDDP/VCR/FU provided excellent disease control to patients with grossly resected tumors. In patients with initially unresectable disease, this therapy provides a response rate and DFS rate comparable to regimens that contain doxorubicin (DOX).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document