SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF TERIFLUNOMIDE IN CLINICAL STUDIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.26-e4
Author(s):  
David Barnes ◽  
Thomas Leist ◽  
Mark Freedman ◽  
Tomas Olsson ◽  
Aaron Miller ◽  
...  

IntroductionTeriflunomide, approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, has a well-characterized safety profile based on individual clinical studies. We report pooled safety and tolerability data from four, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of teriflunomide. Post-approval updates on hair thinning and pregnancy outcomes, sometimes concerns for patients initiating teriflunomide, are reported.MethodsData were pooled from phase 2 (NCT01487096) and phase 3 TEMSO (NCT00134563), TOWER (NCT00751881), and TOPIC (NCT00622700) studies. Patients were randomized to receive teriflunomide 14 mg, 7 mg, or placebo. Safety analyses were performed for all patients exposed to teriflunomide.ResultsThe pooled dataset included 3044 patients. Commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were in accordance with individual clinical studies, most being transient and mild-to-moderate in intensity. Incidence of hepatic AEs was higher in teriflunomide groups; however, serious hepatic AEs were similar across groups (∼2–3%). Hair thinning was higher in teriflunomide than placebo groups, but typically resolved on treatment without intervention and led to discontinuation in <2% of patients. No structural or functional abnormalities were reported in 42 newborns from teriflunomide-exposed parents.ConclusionsThese data from >6800 patient-years of teriflunomide exposure were consistent with individual studies and no new, unexpected safety signals were observed. (Study supported by Genzyme, a Sanofi company).

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.23-e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basil Sharrack ◽  
Lori Mayer ◽  
Alasdair Coles ◽  
Hans-Peter Hartung ◽  
Eva Havrdova ◽  
...  

In the 2-year, phase 3 CARE-MS studies of alemtuzumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, infusion-associated reactions (IARs) were the most common adverse events. Here we report on IARs during 4-year follow-up. Patients who were treatment-naive (CARE-MS I; NCT00530348) or with inadequate efficacy response to prior therapy (CARE-MS II; NCT00548405) received 2 annual courses of alemtuzumab 12 mg, and as-needed retreatment in an extension study (NCT00930553). Patients received methylprednisolone on the first 3 days of each course. IARs were any adverse event occurring between start of infusion and within 24 hours after end of infusion. 742/811 alemtuzumab-treated patients entered extension. Over 4 years, 70.4% received only 2 initial treatment courses; 22.6% and 6.1% received 3 and 4 courses, respectively. IARs were most frequent in Course 1 (84.7%) versus Courses 2 (68.5%), 3 (65.7%), and 4 (71.1%); frequency decreased on infusion Days 2 and 3 versus Day 1. IARs were predominantly mild to moderate; none led to study withdrawal or death. Serious IAR incidence was 3.1%. Most common IARs were skin disorders (predominantly rash), headache, pyrexia, and nausea. One confirmed anaphylaxis and one non-anaphylactoid hypotension event resolved with treatment. Effective IAR management included premedication, infusion monitoring, symptomatic treatment, and infusion interruption/adjustment.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3109-3109
Author(s):  
Joanna Howard ◽  
Kevin H.M. Kuo ◽  
Abdulafeez Oluyadi ◽  
Hui Shao ◽  
Susan Morris ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-threatening, hereditary hemoglobin (Hb) disorder characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia, pain, end-organ damage, and poor quality of life. The key pathology is red blood cell (RBC) sickling due to polymerization of deoxygenated sickle Hb (HbS), which can be exacerbated by increased levels of the glycolytic metabolite 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG), and decreased ATP. Sickled RBCs are rigid, not deformable, and fragile, resulting in vaso-occlusion triggering pain and chronic hemolysis. SCD treatment options are limited, with an unmet need for safe and effective therapies to improve anemia and reduce pain. Mitapivat is an investigational, first-in-class, oral, small-molecule allosteric activator of the RBC-specific form of pyruvate kinase (PKR), a key enzyme in glycolysis. Activation of wild-type PKR decreases 2,3-DPG and increases ATP, which may reduce HbS polymerization, RBC sickling, and hemolysis in SCD. Data from the Phase 1 National Institutes of Health multiple ascending dose study of up to 100 mg mitapivat twice daily (BID) in SCD (NCT04000165) showed that mitapivat was safe and tolerable, and was associated with a dose-dependent increase in ATP and decrease in 2,3-DPG, in addition to improvements in anemia and hemolytic markers. Based on these results, a Phase 2/3 study investigating the safety and efficacy of mitapivat in patients (pts) with SCD is planned. Methods: This Phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in pts with SCD. Eligible: pts ≥ 16 years of age with documented SCD (HbSS, HbSC, HbSβ 0/HbSβ + thalassemia, other SCD variants), 2-10 sickle cell pain crises (SCPCs; acute pain needing medical contact, acute chest syndrome, priapism, hepatic or splenic sequestration) in the prior 12 months, and an Hb level of 5.5-10.5 g/dL. If taking hydroxyurea (HU), the dose must be stable for ≥ 90 days before starting study drug. Not eligible: pts receiving regularly scheduled blood transfusions, with severe kidney disease or hepatobiliary disorders, currently receiving treatment with SCD therapies (excluding HU) or who have received gene therapy, bone marrow or stem cell transplantation. In the double-blind Phase 2 part of the study, 69 pts will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive 50 mg mitapivat, 100 mg mitapivat, or placebo BID for 12 weeks. The primary objective of the Phase 2 part of the study is to determine the recommended Phase 3 dose of mitapivat by evaluating anemia and safety vs placebo via the following endpoints: Hb response, defined as a ≥ 1.0 g/dL increase in average Hb concentration over Weeks 10-12 compared with baseline; and type, severity, and relationship of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). In the double-blind Phase 3 part of the study, 198 pts who did not participate in the Phase 2 study will be randomized (2:1) to receive the selected Phase 3 dose of mitapivat or placebo, BID, for 52 weeks, stratified by the number of SCPCs in the prior year (&lt; 5, ≥ 5) and by HU use. The primary objectives of the Phase 3 study are to determine the effect of mitapivat vs placebo on anemia in pts with SCD, measured by Hb response, defined as a ≥ 1.0 g/dL increase in average Hb concentration over Weeks 24-52 compared with baseline, and to determine the effect of mitapivat vs placebo on SCPC, measured by annualized rate of SCPCs. Key secondary endpoints include change over Weeks 24-52 compared with baseline in the following: average Hb concentration, indirect bilirubin, percent reticulocyte, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System ® (PROMIS) fatigue 13a Short Form scores; annualized frequency of hospitalizations for SCPC. Other secondary objectives include evaluation of effect on additional markers of hemolysis and erythropoiesis, additional clinical efficacy measures related to SCPC, additional patient-reported measures of fatigue and pain, physical activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of mitapivat. Pts who complete the double-blind period of either the Phase 2 or Phase 3 part of the study will be eligible to receive mitapivat for an additional 216 weeks in the open-label extension period. Results: Not yet available Conclusion: This Phase 2/3 study will investigate the efficacy and safety of the pyruvate kinase activator mitapivat in pts ≥ 16 years of age with SCD and enrollment will begin in 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Howard: Resonance Health: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kuo: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oluyadi: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Shao: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Morris: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Zaidi: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Van Beers: RR Mechatronics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth P Johnson

Copolymer I (Copaxone) was evaluated in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial at 11 US universities. Two hundred and fifty-one relapsing-remitting ambulatory MS patients were randomized to receive 20 mg of copolymer 1 or placebo by daily subcutaneous injection for approximately 30 months. At conclusion, the copolymer 1 group had 32% fewer relapses (P=0.002) and significantly more were relapse-free (P=0.035). Significantly, more patients were receiving copolymer 1 had improved during the study, while more patients on placebo showed neurological decline (P=0.001). There were few side effects and no drug related laboratory abnormalities. Copolymer 1 is being considered by North American and European regulatory agencies for approval as a commercially available agent for the control of multiple sclerosis.


Author(s):  
T. O. Simaniv ◽  
M. N. Zakharova ◽  
A. N. Boyko ◽  
N. Yu. Lashch ◽  
S. V. Kotov ◽  
...  

The article presents the results of safety fi ndings during international multicenter randomized double-blind, active and placebo-controlled, comparative phase 3 trial. 158 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned into 3 groups: Timexon (glatiramer acetate, manufactured by JSC «BIOCAD», Russia), copaxone-Teva (Teva Pharmaceutical Enterprise Co., Ltd., Israel) and placebo, at a ratio of 2:2:1, respectively. At the second group 63 patients received Copaxone-Teva, after 48 weeks of therapy they received Timexon. Switching between therapy was not associated with adverse eff ect frequency. There was no clinically signifi cant diff erences in profi le and frequency of adverse eff ects between the groups of Copaxone-Teva and Timexon. Also, effi cacy analysis of therapy demonstrated no diff erences between timexone group and Copaxone-Teva group in both MRI parameters and frequency of relapses. The data obtained from the present study confi rm the equivalence in safety of Timexon (CJSC BIOCAD, Russia) and Copaxone-Teva, that is important for further implementation of glatiramer acetate generic in the clinical practice of multiple sclerosis therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A27-A27
Author(s):  
Michael Smith ◽  
Robert Newton ◽  
Sherry Owens ◽  
Xiaohua Gong ◽  
Chuan Tian ◽  
...  

BackgroundIDO1 is the initial rate-limiting enzyme in one breakdown pathway of tryptophan. It reduces tryptophan levels and generates metabolites (e.g., kynurenine [KYN]) that contribute to tumor-associated immune suppression. Epacadostat (EPA) is a novel, potent, selective, reversible inhibitor of IDO1 studied in clinical trials in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Epacadostat-induced decreases in plasma KYN have been used as a pharmacodynamic measure of drug activity and have aided in dose selection for clinical studies. Despite encouraging signs of efficacy in combination with pembrolizumab (PMB) in the ECHO-202 study, a large phase 3 study in melanoma (ECHO-301) failed to reproduce this outcome.1MethodsLongitudinal plasma samples were obtained from participants in EPA clinical studies. Plasma KYN and EPA concentrations were measured by validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (qMSI) of intratumoral tryptophan metabolites was also performed.ResultsAnalysis of plasma KYN levels demonstrated that PMB monotherapy significantly elevated KYN. While blocking the PMB-induced increase, EPA (100 mg BID) in combination with PMB failed to normalize KYN to healthy control levels as was reported for EPA monotherapy.2 Because anti-PD-1 treatment can induce interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production and IDO1 expression is IFNg inducible,3 we hypothesize that PMB-induced IFN-γ may be responsible for the observed increase of plasma KYN levels. Combined analysis of plasma KYN from additional EPA/anti-PD-1 combination (ECHO-202; EPA/PMB, ECHO-204; EPA/nivolumab) and monotherapy (ECHO-210) studies, with EPA doses ranging from 50 to 600 mg BID, suggested that higher EPA doses (≥600 mg BID) may be necessary to overcome the anti-PD-1–associated KYN elevation. Doses ≥600 mg BID are projected to cover the EPA IC90 value for 24h. The POD1UM-102 study is currently evaluating the combination of a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab) plus EPA at doses up to 900 mg BID. Preliminary results from this study indicate that 600 mg BID is the maximally tolerated dose and is capable of maintaining suppression of KYN to healthy control levels through treatment cycle 4. Additionally, qMSI of paired pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies demonstrated intratumoral suppression of KYN production with EPA 600 mg BID.ConclusionsUsing suppression of plasma KYN as a pharmacodynamic marker of EPA activity, we demonstrated that maximal blockade of IDO1 activity in the context of anti-PD-1 treatment requires doses of EPA substantially higher than those tested in prior clinical studies. These findings are now informing additional proof of concept clinical studies.AcknowledgementsThese studies were sponsored by Incyte Corporation (ECHO-210, POD1UM-102) and in collaboration with MSD (ECHO-301, ECHO-202) and Bristol Myers Squibb (ECHO-204).Trial RegistrationECHO-202 [NCT NCT02178722]; ECHO-204 [NCT02327078]; ECHO-210 [NCT01685255]; ECHO-301 [NCT02752074]; POD1UM-102 [NCT03589651]Ethics ApprovalThese studies were each approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee of participating institutions.ReferencesLong GV, Dummer R, Hamid O, et al. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252): a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1083–1097Beatty GL, O’Dwyer PJ, Clark J, et al. First-in-human phase I study of the oral inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 epacadostat (INCB024360) in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:3269–3276.Munn, DH, Mellor AL. IDO in the tumor microenvironment: inflammation, counter-regulation, and tolerance. Trends Immunol 2016;37:193–207.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S661-S662
Author(s):  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Takuhiro Sonoyama ◽  
Luis Casanova ◽  
Tsutae Den Nagata ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC), the first siderophore cephalosporin, is approved in the United States (complicated urinary tract infections [cUTI]) and Europe for the treatment of patients with Gram-negative (GN) infections with limited treatment options. Methods This analysis investigated the safety profile of CFDC across three prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical studies: APEKS-cUTI (double-blind, non-inferiority Phase 2 study in patients with cUTI) vs imipenem-cilastatin (1 g/1 g, three-times daily); APEKS-NP (double-blind, non-inferiority Phase 3 study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia [NP]) vs meropenem (2 g, q8h); CREDIBLE-CR (open-label, descriptive Phase 3 study in patients with cUTI, NP, bloodstream infections/sepsis [BSI/sepsis]) caused by carbapenem-resistant GN bacteria; patients in the control arm received best available therapy (BAT; up to 3 agents, dosing based on local label). CFDC was given at 2 g, q8h, infused over 1 (APEKS-cUTI) or 3 (APEKS-NP, CREDIBLE-CR) hours. One adjunctive agent with CFDC was only allowed in CREDIBLE-CR. Results 549 patients were treated with CFDC, 347 control treated (Table 1). More than 50% of patients were aged ≥65 years, except BAT arm in CREDIBLE-CR. The majority of patients were admitted to the ICU in APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR. The median treatment duration with CFDC was similar (9–11 days) across studies. The rates of TEAEs and serious AEs (SAEs) between CDFC and comparators were similar in each study (Table 2). The rates of adverse drug reactions were lower with CFDC than with comparators in each study, with a greater difference in CREDIBLE-CR than in APEKS-cUTI and APEKS-NP. TEAEs leading to death rates are shown in Table 2. Eight CFDC-related Clostridioides difficile infections occurred across studies (APEKS-cUTI: n=1; APEKS-NP: n=4; CREDIBLE-CR: n=3 [ie, C. difficile colitis; pseudomembranous colitis]). In total, eight experienced seizures (APEKS-cUTI: CFDC n=1; APEKS-NP: CFDC n=3, meropenem n=2; CREDIBLE-CR: CFDC n=1, BAT n=1), none of which were related to study drugs. Parameters of iron homeostasis showed no differences between CFDC and comparators. Table 1. Baseline characteristics and treatment duration (safety populations) Table 2. Overall safety parameters (safety populations) Conclusion CFDC demonstrated a comparable safety profile to carbapenems or other cephalosporins and was generally well tolerated in critically ill patients. Disclosures Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Takuhiro Sonoyama, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Luis Casanova, PharmD, Shionogi B.V. (Employee) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Fabio De Gregorio, MD, Shionogi B.V. (Employee) Eriko Ogura, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Simon Portsmouth, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document