scholarly journals 1292. Safety Profile of the Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin Cefiderocol in Randomized Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Studies of Serious Gram-Negative Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S661-S662
Author(s):  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Takuhiro Sonoyama ◽  
Luis Casanova ◽  
Tsutae Den Nagata ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Iron Homeostasis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC), the first siderophore cephalosporin, is approved in the United States (complicated urinary tract infections [cUTI]) and Europe for the treatment of patients with Gram-negative (GN) infections with limited treatment options. Methods This analysis investigated the safety profile of CFDC across three prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical studies: APEKS-cUTI (double-blind, non-inferiority Phase 2 study in patients with cUTI) vs imipenem-cilastatin (1 g/1 g, three-times daily); APEKS-NP (double-blind, non-inferiority Phase 3 study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia [NP]) vs meropenem (2 g, q8h); CREDIBLE-CR (open-label, descriptive Phase 3 study in patients with cUTI, NP, bloodstream infections/sepsis [BSI/sepsis]) caused by carbapenem-resistant GN bacteria; patients in the control arm received best available therapy (BAT; up to 3 agents, dosing based on local label). CFDC was given at 2 g, q8h, infused over 1 (APEKS-cUTI) or 3 (APEKS-NP, CREDIBLE-CR) hours. One adjunctive agent with CFDC was only allowed in CREDIBLE-CR. Results 549 patients were treated with CFDC, 347 control treated (Table 1). More than 50% of patients were aged ≥65 years, except BAT arm in CREDIBLE-CR. The majority of patients were admitted to the ICU in APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR. The median treatment duration with CFDC was similar (9–11 days) across studies. The rates of TEAEs and serious AEs (SAEs) between CDFC and comparators were similar in each study (Table 2). The rates of adverse drug reactions were lower with CFDC than with comparators in each study, with a greater difference in CREDIBLE-CR than in APEKS-cUTI and APEKS-NP. TEAEs leading to death rates are shown in Table 2. Eight CFDC-related Clostridioides difficile infections occurred across studies (APEKS-cUTI: n=1; APEKS-NP: n=4; CREDIBLE-CR: n=3 [ie, C. difficile colitis; pseudomembranous colitis]). In total, eight experienced seizures (APEKS-cUTI: CFDC n=1; APEKS-NP: CFDC n=3, meropenem n=2; CREDIBLE-CR: CFDC n=1, BAT n=1), none of which were related to study drugs. Parameters of iron homeostasis showed no differences between CFDC and comparators. Table 1. Baseline characteristics and treatment duration (safety populations) Table 2. Overall safety parameters (safety populations) Conclusion CFDC demonstrated a comparable safety profile to carbapenems or other cephalosporins and was generally well tolerated in critically ill patients. Disclosures Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Takuhiro Sonoyama, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Luis Casanova, PharmD, Shionogi B.V. (Employee) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Fabio De Gregorio, MD, Shionogi B.V. (Employee) Eriko Ogura, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Simon Portsmouth, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee)

SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF TERIFLUNOMIDE IN CLINICAL STUDIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.26-e4
Author(s):  
David Barnes ◽  
Thomas Leist ◽  
Mark Freedman ◽  
Tomas Olsson ◽  
Aaron Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Tolerability Data ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
To Receive

IntroductionTeriflunomide, approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, has a well-characterized safety profile based on individual clinical studies. We report pooled safety and tolerability data from four, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of teriflunomide. Post-approval updates on hair thinning and pregnancy outcomes, sometimes concerns for patients initiating teriflunomide, are reported.MethodsData were pooled from phase 2 (NCT01487096) and phase 3 TEMSO (NCT00134563), TOWER (NCT00751881), and TOPIC (NCT00622700) studies. Patients were randomized to receive teriflunomide 14 mg, 7 mg, or placebo. Safety analyses were performed for all patients exposed to teriflunomide.ResultsThe pooled dataset included 3044 patients. Commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were in accordance with individual clinical studies, most being transient and mild-to-moderate in intensity. Incidence of hepatic AEs was higher in teriflunomide groups; however, serious hepatic AEs were similar across groups (∼2–3%). Hair thinning was higher in teriflunomide than placebo groups, but typically resolved on treatment without intervention and led to discontinuation in <2% of patients. No structural or functional abnormalities were reported in 42 newborns from teriflunomide-exposed parents.ConclusionsThese data from >6800 patient-years of teriflunomide exposure were consistent with individual studies and no new, unexpected safety signals were observed. (Study supported by Genzyme, a Sanofi company).

scholarly journals 1143. Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem in Neonatal and Pediatric Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S663-S664
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Roilides ◽  
Negar Ashouri ◽  
John S Bradley ◽  
Matthew G Johnson ◽  
Julia Lonchar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Step Down ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a cephalosporin–β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia in adults. Safety and efficacy of C/T in neonatal and pediatric participants with cUTI was assessed. Methods This phase 2, randomized, double-blind study (NCT03230838) compared C/T with meropenem (MEM) for treatment of cUTI, including pyelonephritis in participants from birth to 18 years of age. Treatment duration was 7-14 days. After 3 days of intravenous therapy, optional oral step-down therapy was allowed. Participants were stratified and dosed by age group (Table 1). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of C/T compared with MEM, and key secondary end points included clinical response and per-participant microbiologic response at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC). Results Participants were randomized 3:1 and treated with C/T (n=100) or MEM (n=33). The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population (mMITT) included 95 participants in the C/T (n=71) and MEM (n=24) arms; the most common reason for mMITT exclusion was lack of a qualifying baseline uropathogen (28.4%). Pyelonephritis was the most common baseline diagnosis (83.2%), and Escherichia coli was the most common qualifying baseline uropathogen (77.9%). Overall mean treatment duration was comparable in both arms (C/T, 10.2 days; MEM, 10.7); a total of 50 (70.4%) and 20 (83.3%) participants switched to optional oral step-down therapy in the C/T and MEM arms, respectively, both for a mean of approximately 6 days. The overall incidence of adverse events (AE; all and drug related), serious AE (SAE), and AE leading to discontinuation was comparable between C/T and MEM arms. There were no AE leading to death, drug-related SAE, or discontinuations due to drug-related AE or SAE (Table 2). For C/T and MEM, rates of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication at EOT and TOC were high (Figure). Conclusion In this study, C/T was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to MEM and to the previously reported safety profile for C/T in adults with cUTI. C/T achieved high clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates and is a potential new treatment option for children with cUTI. Disclosures Emmanuel Roilides, MD, PhD, FIDSA, FAAM, FESCMID, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Negar Ashouri, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Grant/Research Support) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Julia Lonchar, MSc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Feng-Hsiu Su, MPH, MBA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Myra W. Popejoy, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Carisa S. De Anda, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Elizabeth G. Rhee, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (Employee, Shareholder) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1319-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Portsmouth ◽  
David van Veenhuyzen ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
Mitsuaki Machida ◽  
Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Tract Infections

The Scientific Case against Prescribing Insulin for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
John F Burd
Keyword(s):  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Nutritional Supplement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Intermittent Fasting ◽  
Moderate Exercise ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Obesity and type 2 diabetes are related worldwide epidemics which could be erased with the help of governments and medical communities using tools that are readily available today. Prevailing diet recommendations, which are clearly wrong, are a significant cause of both obesity and type 2 diabetes and have led to the current dire situation. According to the CDC, in the United States alone there are currently 34.2 million people with diabetes of which 30 million have type 2 diabetes. In addition, 88 million Americans have prediabetes (defined as an A1c above 5.7%) which will almost certainly progress to type 2 diabetes if not treated and reversed. The cause of insulin resistance, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes is “glucose toxicity” as explained below, and understanding this medical term is paramount to the case against using insulin for type 2 diabetes. Glucose reacts with all the proteins in the body leading to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, nearly 20% of adults with type 2 diabetes are prescribed insulin injections often in conjunction with oral pharmaceutical medications. Because people with with type 2 diabetes have insulin resistance, prescribing insulin is a very bad idea, since they will need an ever-increasing dosage of insulin as time passes, leading to a lifetime of insulin injections. There is only one product, Lysulin (www.lysulin.com), that targets the cause of insulin resistance and has been proven in double blind, placebo controlled clinical studies to improve insulin resistance and better cell function. The recommend initial treatment for type 2 diabetes should be moderate exercise, intermittent fasting, a low calorie, low carbohydrate ketrogenic diet combined with Lysulin before instituting insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. By adhering to a ketogenic diet that includes moderate exercise, intermittent fasting and nutritional supplementation with Lysulin, diabetes can be halted and quite possibly reversed. Lysulin is a patented nutritional supplement that contains lysine, zinc, and vitamin C [1]. Double-blind placebo-controlled clinical studies have shown the effectiveness of this nutritional supplement [2, 3].

Results of the phase 1b soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) portion of the global randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tazemetostat (TAZ) plus doxorubicin (DOX) as frontline therapy for advanced epithelioid sarcoma (ES).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11563-11563
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Melissa Amber Burgess ◽  
James Lin Chen ◽  
Robin Lewis Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Limited Effectiveness ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Frontline Therapy

11563 Background: ES is a rare, aggressive subtype of STS for which cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited effectiveness. TAZ, an FDA-approved EZH2 inhibitor, has shown single-agent clinical activity and a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic or locally advanced ES. In preclinical studies, TAZ has shown synergistic antitumor activity with DOX, which is often used as frontline treatment for STS. Here, we present results of the phase 1b study (NCT04204941), designed to assess the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D), safety, and efficacy of TAZ + DOX in patients with advanced STS. Methods: The open-label, phase 1b portion of this study enrolled adult patients with previously untreated advanced STS. A standard 3 + 3 design was used to assess TAZ 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg orally twice daily in combination with DOX (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each cycle, for up to 6 cycles) as frontline therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were predefined in the protocol. The RP3D of TAZ was determined by Scientific Review Committee review of the safety and pharmacokinetic data from the phase 1b trial, with a target DLT rate of < 33%. Results: As of February 1, 2021, 16 patients are enrolled, including 2 with ES; 10 are still receiving TAZ + DOX and 6 have discontinued (5 due to disease progression, 1 due to patient withdrawal). The median age was 49.5 years (range, 29–82) and all had unresectable STS. Median (range) time on treatment was 13 (0.1–51.1+) weeks across all dose levels evaluated. Two DLTs, both of febrile neutropenia, were observed, one in the TAZ 600 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/6, 17%), and one in the TAZ 800 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/3, 33%). When used in combination with DOX, the RP3D of TAZ was 800 mg. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TR-TEAEs) occurred in 13/16 (81.3%) patients. The most common (≥ 20%) TR-TEAEs were neutropenia (n = 11, 69%), anemia (n = 10, 63%), fatigue (n = 10, 63%), stomatitis (n = 9, 56%), nausea (n = 8, 50%), febrile neutropenia (n = 7, 44%), constipation (n = 6, 38%), vomiting (n = 6, 38%), and decreased appetite (n = 5, 31%). TR-TEAEs were defined as attributable to either study agent. Conclusions: The combination of TAZ + DOX was generally well tolerated in this dose finding study in patients with advanced STS. The RP3D to be tested in the phase 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study is TAZ 800 mg twice daily + DOX. The safety profile of this combination is consistent with the respective safety information for TAZ and for DOX. The TR-TEAEs include known toxicities of DOX or TAZ. Further comparison with DOX + placebo in the phase 3 trial will aid in assessing efficacy and safety of the combination of TAZ + DOX. The global phase 3 confirmatory trial will enroll patients with ES who have unresectable disease and have had no prior systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04204941.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by US Census Division

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S371-S372
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Us Census ◽  
Phenotype Screen ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. In this study, the activities of C-T and comparators vs. GN isolates from each of the 9 US Census divisions were compared. Methods A total of 18,856 Enterobacteriaceae (ENT) and 4,735 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) isolates were collected from 32 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). The following resistant phenotypes were analyzed for ENT: carbapenem resistant (CRE); extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype screen-positive (ESBL); and ESBL, nonCRE. or PSA, MER-nonsusceptible (NS), TZP-NS, and CAZ-NS isolates were analyzed. CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used. Results For all ENT, 94.2% were S to C-T, 91.5% were S to TZP, 98.0% were S to MER, and 98.8% were S to AMK; 1,697 (9.0%) were ESBL, nonCRE and 356 (1.9%) were CRE. For all PSA isolates, 97.4% were S to C-T, 99.3% were S to COL, 96.9% were S to AMK, and 81.2% were S to MER. The % C-T S for each division (DIV) are shown in the table. The % C-T S for ENT ranged from 98.1% (DIV 4) to 87.4% (DIV 2) and % C-T S for ESBL, nonCRE ranged from 93.8% in DIV 4 to 79.8% in DIV 7. For PSA, the % C-T S ranged from 99.6% in DIV 4 to 94.9% in DIV 9. Activity of C-T against PSA NS to MER, CAZ or TZP varied by division and was &gt;80% for all except DIV 9. Conclusion Against PSA, only COL was more active than C-T. C-T demonstrated potent activity against PSA NS to other β-lactams. For ENT, overall activity was good. For both PSA and ENT, C-T varied by DIV. Disclosures D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant

scholarly journals A pooled analysis of patients with wound infections in the Phase 3 REVIVE trials: randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iclaprim versus vancomycin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-630
Author(s):  
Stephanie Noviello ◽  
G. Ralph Corey ◽  
Thomas L. Holland ◽  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
William O’Riordan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Difference ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

Introduction. Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to Gram-positive pathogens. Aim. This analysis evaluates patients with wound infections from two Phase 3 trials of ABSSSI. Methodology. Six-hundred-two patients with wound infections from two Phase 3, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active controlled trials (REVIVE-1/–2) were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of iclaprim 80 mg compared with vancomycin 15 mg kg–1 administered intravenously every 12 h for 5–14 days. The primary endpoint was to determine whether iclaprim was non-inferior (10 % margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20 % reduction from baseline in lesion size 48–72 h after starting study drug (early clinical response [ECR]). Safety was assessed. Results. In REVIVE-1, ECR was 83.5 % with iclaprim versus 79.7 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 3.77%, 95 % CI −4.50%, 12.04%). In REVIVE-2, ECR was 82.7 % with iclaprim versus 76.3 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 6.38%, 95 % CI −3.35%, 16.12%). In the pooled dataset, iclaprim had similar ECR rates compared with vancomycin among wound infection patients (83.2 % vs 78.2 %) with a treatment difference of 5.01 % (95 % CI −1.29%, 11.32%). The safety profile was similar in iclaprim- and vancomycin-treated patients, except for a higher incidence of diarrhea with vancomycin (n=17) compared with iclaprim (n=6) and fatigue with iclaprim (n=17) compared with vancomycin (n=8). Conclusion. Based on early clinical response, iclaprim achieved non-inferiority to vancomycin with a similar safety profile in patients with wound infections suspected or confirmed as caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for wound infections.

scholarly journals 1477. A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Cefepime Combined with the Novel Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase Inhibitor Enmetazobactam in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S539-S539
Author(s):  
Yehuda Carmeli ◽  
Philipp Knechtle ◽  
Jeff Hardenberg ◽  
Mathias Knecht
Keyword(s):  
Study Drug ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been classified as critical priority pathogens. The novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitor enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101; EMT) in combination with cefepime (FEP) is currently being developed as a carbapenem-sparing treatment of serious Gram-negative infections in settings with a high prevalence of 3GC-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. We report here the results from a phase 2 study that assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Methods Forty-five patients were enrolled in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of hospitalized adults with cUTI/AP. Patients received dosing regimens of FEP or FEP-EMT IV therapy q8h by 2 hours infusion (table) for 7 to 10 days with a 28-day follow-up. Efficacy was evaluated in the microbiological-modified ITT (µMITT) population. Safety was monitored in patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Clinical cure was designated as the resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry. Plasma and urine PK were determined from all patients. Results The study drugs were well tolerated in each cohort, with similar % adverse events and no new or unexpected safety concerns (table). Two discontinuations were due to allergic dermatitis. The microbiological- and clinical responses at test-of-cure for the combined FEP-EMT group were 83.3% (20/24) and 95.8% (23/24) compared with responses in the combined FEP group of 73.3% (11/15) and 93.3% (14/15), respectively (table). The most common baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli (66.7%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.1%): 28.2% of isolates produced ESBLs with eradication rates for the combined FEP-EMT group of 85.7% (6/7) and for the combined FEP group of 75.0% (3/4). FEP and EMT PK were best described by a 2-compartment, linear PK model. Both agents exhibited half-lives of 2.3 hours. Creatinine clearance had a significant covariate effect on FEP and EMT, consistent with predominant renal excretion of both agents. Conclusion Results from this phase 2 study justify advancement to phase 3 studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Regimens of Eravacycline versus Ertapenem for Adult Community-Acquired Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1847-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Solomkin ◽  
Mayakonda Krishnamurthy Ramesh ◽  
Gintaras Cesnauskas ◽  
Nikolajs Novikovs ◽  
Penka Stefanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Abdominal Infections

ABSTRACTEravacycline is a novel fluorocycline, highly active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogensin vitro, including those with tetracycline and multidrug resistance. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in adult hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Patients with confirmed cIAI requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention and antibacterial therapy were randomized (2:2:1) to receive eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h), eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg every 12 h (q12h), or ertapenem at 1 g (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 10 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug therapy. Overall, 53 patients received eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 56 received eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 30 received ertapenem. For the ME population, the clinical success rate at the TOC visit was 92.9% (39/42) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 100% (41/41) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 92.3% (24/26) in the ertapenem group. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were 35.8%, 28.6%, and 26.7%, respectively. Incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were low in both eravacycline groups. Both dose regimens of eravacycline were as efficacious as the comparator, ertapenem, in patients with cIAI and were well tolerated. These results support the continued development of eravacycline for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01265784.)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document