scholarly journals O19.2 Pre-exposure prophylaxis and risk compensation: evidence of decreased condom use at three-month follow-up among predominantly gay male participants in the vicprep study

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A68.1-A68 ◽  
Author(s):  
JBF de Wit ◽  
DA Murphy ◽  
L Lal ◽  
JM Audsley ◽  
N Roth ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e036231
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Huang ◽  
Yaokai Chen ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Yonghui Zhang ◽  
...  

IntroductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces the risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men by up to 99%. However, in real-world settings, PrEP users may exhibit risk compensation after uptake of PrEP, including more condomless anal intercourse (CAI) and increased sexually transmitted infection (STI) acquisition. HIV self-testing (HIVST) decreases CAI among men who have sex with men (MSM) by providing awareness of the HIV status of oneself and one’s sexual partners. Here, we describe the rationale and design of a randomised waitlist-controlled trial to examine the impact of HIVST on risk compensation among PrEP users.Methods and analysisThe study is a two-arm randomised waitlist-controlled trial with 1000 HIV-negative MSM in four major cities in China who will be taking oral PrEP (involving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) either daily (n=500) or in an event-driven regimen (n=500). The participants will be randomised (1:1) to either the immediate HIVST intervention arm (HIVST plus standard facility-based counselling and testing from 0 to 12 months) or the waitlist arm (standard facility-based counselling and testing from 0 to 6 months, then crossover to receive the HIVST intervention in months 7–12). Participants will provide blood samples to assess the incidence of syphilis and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) during a follow-up. The primary outcomes will be the occurrence of CAI, number of sexual partners and incidence of syphilis and HSV-2 during a follow-up. The secondary outcomes will be the HIV and STI testing frequency and STI treatment adherence during a follow-up. The planned start and end dates for the study is 26 December 2018 and 31 December 2020.Ethics and disseminationThe Medical Science Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University has approved the study (IRB(2018)273).Trial registration numberChiCTR1800020374


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S461-S462
Author(s):  
Ronnie M Gravett ◽  
Andrew O Westfall ◽  
Kachina Kudroff ◽  
Edgar T Overton ◽  
Jeanne Marrazzo

Abstract Background Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively prevents HIV acquisition in men who have sex with men (MSM), if taken appropriately. Effective PrEP requires persistence in PrEP care. We defined the PrEP care continuum in a Deep South PrEP clinic and examined factors related to persistence in care among MSM. Methods We reviewed data for MSM at a university-affiliated PrEP clinic in Birmingham, AL from 2014–2018 to define the PrEP continuum at five major steps: screening, initial visit, follow-up visit, current persistence, and self-reported adherence. We defined persistence as attending a PrEP clinic visit in the last 6 months and nonpersistence as prior attendance without a visit in the last 6 months. We compared demographics, insurance status, and patient-reported behaviors from initial and most recent visits between those who persisted (“persisters”) and did not (“non-persisters”) using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test. Results 226 (100%) MSM were screened, 141 (62%) MSM attended an initial visit, 116 (51%) MSM attended follow-up, 43 (19.0%) persisted in PrEP care, and 29 (13%) MSM self-reported good adherence (figure). Among 139 MSM (46 persisters, 93 nonpersisters), persisters were older than nonpersisters (33 vs. 32 yr, P = 0.03), and were less likely to report inconsistent condom use at their initial visit (48% vs. 73%; P = 0.01) as compared with their last visit (69% vs. 63%, P = 0.13). 23% of persisters and 29% of nonpersisters were black (P = 0.39), and 98% of persisters and 90% of nonpersisters were insured (P = 0.50). 60% of persisters and 74% of nonpersisters had multiple sex partners at initial visit (P = 0.19) as compared with 56% and 60% at their last visit, respectively (P = 0.83). Conclusion At a Deep South PrEP clinic, persistence overall was poor for MSM. More nonpersisters had inconsistent condom use, indicating higher risk despite nonpersistence. Although not statistically significant, nonpersisters were more likely to be black, uninsured, and have multiple sexual partners when compared with persisters. Disparities seen nationally in new HIV diagnoses are reflected in nonpersisters. Nonpersisters may not realize the extent of their risk of HIV acquisition and warrant intensive engagement interventions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S521-S522
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Silva-Nash ◽  
Stacie Bordelon ◽  
Ryan K Dare ◽  
Sherrie Searcy

Abstract Background Nonoccupational post exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) following sexual assault can prevent HIV transmission. A standardized Emergency Department (ED) protocol for evaluation, treatment, and follow up for post assault victims was implemented to improve compliance with CDC nPEP guidelines. Methods A single-center observational study of post sexual assault patients before/after implementation of an ED nPEP protocol was conducted by comparing the appropriateness of prescriptions, labs, and necessary follow up. A standardized order-set based on CDC nPEP guidelines, with involvement of an HIV pharmacist and ID clinic, was implemented during the 2018-2019 academic year. Clinical data from pre-intervention period (07/2016-06/2017) was compared to post-intervention period (07/2018-08/2019) following a 1-year washout period. Results During the study, 147 post-sexual assault patients (59 Pre, 88 Post) were included. One hundred thirty-three (90.4%) were female, 68 (46.6%) were African American and 133 (90.4%) were candidates for nPEP. Median time to presentation following assault was 12.6 hours. nPEP was offered to 40 (67.8%) and 84 (95.5%) patients (P< 0.001) and ultimately prescribed to 29 (49.2%) and 71 (80.7%) patients (P< 0.001) in pre and post periods respectively. Renal function (37.3% vs 88.6%; P< 0.001), pregnancy (39.0% vs 79.6%; P< 0.001), syphilis (3.4% vs 89.8%; P< 0.001), hepatitis B (15.3% vs 95.5%; P< 0.001) and hepatitis C (27.1% vs 94.3%) screening occurred more frequently during the post period. Labratory, nPEP Prescription and Follow up Details for Patients Prescribed nPEP Conclusion The standardization of an nPEP ED protocol for sexual assault victims resulted in increased nPEP administration, appropriateness of prescription, screening for other sexually transmitted infectious and scheduling follow up care. While guideline compliance dramatically improved, further interventions are likely warranted in this vulnerable population. Disclosures Ryan K. Dare, MD, MS, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc (Research Grant or Support)


Author(s):  
Jacklyn D. Foley ◽  
Madison Firkey ◽  
Alan Sheinfil ◽  
Jeremy Ramos ◽  
Sarah E. Woolf-King ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert L. Cooper ◽  
Paul D. Juarez ◽  
Matthew C. Morris ◽  
Aramandla Ramesh ◽  
Ryan Edgerton ◽  
...  

There is growing evidence that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV acquisition. However, in the United States, approximately only 4% of people who could benefit from PrEP are currently receiving it, and it is estimated only 1 in 5 physicians has ever prescribed PrEP. We conducted a scoping review to gain an understanding of physician-identified barriers to PrEP provision. Four overarching barriers presented in the literature: Purview Paradox, Patient Financial Constraints, Risk Compensation, and Concern for ART Resistance. Considering the physician-identified barriers, we make recommendations for how physicians and students may work to increase PrEP knowledge and competence along each stage of the PrEP cascade. We recommend adopting HIV risk assessment as a standard of care, improving physician ability to identify PrEP candidates, improving physician interest and ability in encouraging PrEP uptake, and increasing utilization of continuous care management to ensure retention and adherence to PrEP.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn M. Kopp ◽  
Jennifer H. Tang ◽  
Gretchen S. Stuart ◽  
William C. Miller ◽  
Michele S. O’Shea ◽  
...  

Dual method use, use of condoms plus another effective contraceptive method, is important in settings with high rates of unintended pregnancy and HIV infection. We evaluated the association of HIV status with dual method use in a cohort of postpartum women. Women completed baseline surveys in the postpartum ward and telephone surveys about contraceptive use 3, 6, and 12 months later. Nonpregnant women who completed at least one follow-up survey were eligible for this secondary analysis. Prevalence ratios were calculated using generalized estimating equations. Of the 511 sexually active women who completed a follow-up survey, condom use increased from 17.6% to 27.7% and nonbarrier contraceptive use increased from 73.8% to 87.6% from 3 to 12 months after delivery. Dual method use increased from 1.0% to 18.9% at 3 to 12 months after delivery. Dual method use was negligible and comparable between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women at 3 months but significantly higher among HIV-infected women at 6 months (APR = 3.9, 95% CI 2.2, 7.1) and 12 months (APR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.7, 4.3). Dual method use was low but largely driven by condom use among HIV-infected women at 6 and 12 months after delivery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Hevey ◽  
Jennifer L. Walsh ◽  
Andrew E. Petroll

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective method of reducing HIV incidence. Questions remain regarding PrEP's efficacy and outcomes in real-world clinical settings. We conducted a retrospective review to assess PrEP outcomes in an academic clinic setting and focused on retention in care, reasons for discontinuation, and receipt of appropriate preventive care (immunizations, HIV testing, and STI testing). One hundred thirty-four patients were seen between 2010 and 2016 over 309 visits. One hundred sixteen patients (87%) started daily PrEP and of those, 88 (76%) attended at least one 6-month follow-up visit. Over 60% of PrEP patients completed all recommended STI screening after starting PrEP. Only 40% of patients had all appropriate immunizations at baseline; 78% had all appropriate immunizations at study completion. This study demonstrated high rates of both retention and of attaining recommended preventive care in a clinical setting outside of the rigors of clinical trials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Meriam Caboral Stevens ◽  
Godfrey Aneke ◽  
Andrew Neplock

Human lmmunodeficiency Virus (HlV) epidemic continues to represent a major global health issue. Today, there are several tools available to prevent the spread of HIV infection. However, there are several constraints to the current prevention strategies including low condom use, low acceptance of testing, low awareness of vulnerability and more emphasis on treatment. Prevention strategy is redirected towards reducing acquisition of HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP is the latest groundbreaking innovation in biomedical research in the prevention of HIV transmission.The purpose of this paper is to review preex ding the current guidelines in the use of PreP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-492
Author(s):  
Marisa Felsher ◽  
Scarlett Bellamy ◽  
Brogan Piecara ◽  
Barbara Van Der Pol ◽  
Rose Laurano ◽  
...  

This study used Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations (BMVP) to identify factors associated with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation among women who inject drugs (WWID) when PrEP was offered at a syringe services program (SSP). Participants (n = 89) were WWID, $ge18 years, and eligible for PrEP. Most (69) initiated PrEP. Chi square and t tests were used to identify bivariate relationships between BMVP factors and PrEP initiation. A greater proportion of PrEP initiators (compared to non-initiators) reported sexual assault, frequent SSP attendance, earning $ge$5,000 annually and inconsistent condom use. Findings can inform the development of gender-specific strategies to promote PrEP among WWID.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document