scholarly journals Performance of manned and unmanned aerial surveys to collect visual data and imagery for estimating arctic cetacean density and associated uncertainty

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Ferguson ◽  
R.P. Angliss ◽  
A. Kennedy ◽  
B. Lynch ◽  
A. Willoughby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marine Mammal ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft ◽  
Bowhead Whale ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Camera System ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
The Cost

Manned aerial surveys have been used successfully for decades to collect data to infer cetacean distribution, density (number of whales/km2), and abundance. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have potential to augment or replace some manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. We conducted a three-way comparison among visual observations made by marine mammal observers aboard a Turbo Commander aircraft; imagery autonomously collected by a Nikon D810 camera system mounted to a belly port on the Turbo Commander; and imagery collected by a similar camera system on a remotely controlled ScanEagle® UAS operated by the US Navy. Bowhead whale density estimates derived from the marine mammal observer data were higher than those from the Turbo Commander imagery; comparisons to the UAS imagery depended on survey sector and analytical method. Beluga density estimates derived from either dataset collected aboard the Turbo Commander were higher than estimates derived from the UAS imagery. Uncertainties in density estimates derived from the marine mammal observer data were lower than estimates derived from either imagery dataset due to the small sample sizes in the imagery. The visual line-transect aerial survey conducted by marine mammal observers aboard the Turbo Commander was 68.5% of the cost of the photo strip-transect survey aboard the same aircraft and 9.4% of the cost of the UAS survey.

On bias, precision and accuracy in wildlife aerial surveys

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Hone
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
True Value ◽  
Wildlife Population ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
Precision And Accuracy ◽  
Definition Of

Bias, precision and accuracy have been studied extensively in wildlife population estimation including aerial surveys. A review of the literature shows that the concepts of bias and precision are used broadly consistently. Aerial survey data from known populations of feral pig carcases and white-tailed deer show that few density estimates are unbiased and precise. Research is needed, however, to clarify how much bias and how much precision are enough for the various types of wildlife management activities. Accuracy is used in two closely related but different ways. One set of definitions of accuracy relates to deviations from the true value (bias) and the second set relates to squared deviations from the true value (bias and precision). The implications are that authors are encouraged to clearly state which definition of accuracy they use, or focus solely on bias and precision.

scholarly journals Group IV humpback whales: their status from aerial and landbased surveys off Western Australia, 2005

2020 ◽  
pp. 223-234
Author(s):  
Charles G.M. Paxton ◽  
Sharon l. Hedley ◽  
John l. Bannister
Keyword(s):  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Reliable Estimate ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Absolute Abundance ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Land Station

Single platform aerial line transect and land-based surveys of Southern Hemisphere Group IV humpback whales were undertaken to provide absoluteabundance estimates of animals migrating northward along the western Australian coast during June–August 2005. The aerial survey was designedto cover the whole period of northward migration but the resulting estimates from that survey alone could only, at best, provide relative abundanceestimates as it was not possible to estimate g(0), the detection probability along the trackline, from the data. Owing to logistical constraints, theland-based survey was only possible for a much shorter period (two weeks during the expected peak of the migration in mid-July). This paperproposes three methods that utilise these complementary data in different ways to attempt to obtain absolute abundance estimates. The aerial linetransect data were used to estimate relative whale density (for each day), allowing absolute abundance from the land-based survey to be estimatedfor the short period of its duration. In turn, the land-based survey allowed estimation of g(0) for the aerial survey. Absolute estimates of abundancefor the aerial survey were obtained by combining the g(0) estimate with the relative density estimates, summing over the appropriate number ofdays. The most reliable estimate of northward migrating whales passing the land station for the period of the land-based survey only was 4,700(95% CI 2,700–14,000). The most reliable estimate for the number of whales passing through the aerial survey region for the duration of that survey(55 days from June through to August) was 10,300 (95% CI 6,700–24,500). This is a conservative estimate because the duration of the aerial surveywas almost certainly shorter than the period of the migration. Extrapolation beyond the end of this survey was considered unreliable, but abundancefrom the estimated start of the migration to the end of the survey (87 days from mid-April to August) was estimated to be 12,800 (95% CI 7,500–44,600). The estimated number of whales depends crucially on the assumed migration and period of migration. Results for different migrationparameters are also presented. The point estimates of abundance, whilst higher than those from a previous survey in 1999 (when adjusted for surveyduration) are not significantly so. The peak of the whales’ distribution was found at c.90m water depth.

Comparison of Helicopter Line Transects with Walked Line Transects for Estimating Densities of Kangaroos

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 397 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Clancy ◽  
A. R. Pople ◽  
L. A. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Line Transect Sampling ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Transect Sampling ◽  
Grey Kangaroo ◽  
Line Transects

The performance of helicopter surveys for estimating population densities of red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) and common wallaroos (Macropus robustus) was investigated by comparing line-transect density estimates obtained from helicopter surveys with those from ground (walked) surveys. Comparisons were made at four sites in central western Queensland (areas with high densities of red kangaroos and common wallaroos) that were surveyed during winter and summer from December 1991 until February 1995, and one site in south-eastern Queensland (an area of high eastern grey kangaroo density) surveyed annually during autumn from March 1991 until March 1994. Helicopter surveys generally recorded lower sample sizes than did ground surveys (means ± s.e = 34 ± 6%, 33 ± 9% and 76 ± 2% lower for red kangaroos, eastern grey kangaroos and wallaroos, respectively). Density estimates obtained from the helicopter surveys were not significantly different from those obtained from ground surveys for both red and eastern grey kangaroos as assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA and regression analysis. However, helicopter surveys of common wallaroos consistently returned density estimates about half those of ground surveys. The relationships between the two methods did not differ between winter and summer for any species. The conventional aerial survey method for kangaroos of strip transects from fixed-wing aircraft has limited ability to adjust for varying sightability conditions. Therefore, helicopter surveys with line-transect sampling are an attractive alternative.

Automated Vertical Photography for Detecting Pelagic Species in Multitaxon Aerial Surveys

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K.D. Taylor ◽  
Robert D. Kenney ◽  
Donald J. LeRoi ◽  
Scott D. Kraus
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Method ◽  
Photographic Method ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Leatherback Turtles ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
Manual Processing ◽  
Digital Documentation ◽  
The Cost

AbstractMarine aerial surveys are designed to maximize the potential for detecting target species. Collecting data on different taxa from the same platform is economically advantageous but normally comes at the cost of compromising optimal taxon-specific scanning patterns and survey parameters, in particular altitude. Here, we describe simultaneous visual and photographic sampling methods as a proof of concept for detecting large whales and turtles from a single aircraft, despite very different sighting cues. Data were collected for fishing gear, fish, sharks, turtles, seals, dolphins, and whales using two observers and automated vertical photography. The photographic method documented an area directly beneath the aircraft that would otherwise have been obscured from observers. Preliminary density estimates were calculated for five species for which there were sufficient sample sizes from both methods after an initial year of data collection. The photographic method yielded significantly higher mean density estimates for loggerhead turtles, ocean sunfish, and blue sharks (p < 0.01), despite sampling a substantially smaller area than visual scanning (less than 11%). Density estimates from these two methods were not significantly different for leatherback turtles or basking sharks (p > 0.05), two of the largest species included in the analysis, which are relatively easy to detect by both methods. Although postflight manual processing of photographic data was extensive, this sampling method comes at no additional in-flight effort and obtains high-quality digital documentation of sightings on the trackline. Future directions for this project include automating photographic sighting detections, expanding the area covered by photography, and performing morphometric measurement assessments.

scholarly journals Comparison of Surveys of Kangaroos in Queensland Using Helicopters and Fixed-Wing Aircraft.

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
AR Pople ◽  
SC Cairns ◽  
TF Clancy ◽  
GC Grigg ◽  
LA Beard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Population Estimates ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Australian State ◽  
Transect Counts ◽  
Comparative Accuracy ◽  
Harvest Quotas ◽  
Strip Transect

Kangaroo harvest quotas for each Australian state have been set mainly as proportions of population estimates derived from aerial surveys. Estimating population size from strip transect counts using fixed- wing aircraft has become an established technique, but counts must be adjusted by correction factors to ensure population estimates are both accurate and repeatable. Surveys of kangaroos in Queensland are currently conducted with helicopters using line transect methodology, but cost restricts their use to relatively small survey blocks. Nevertheless, they return more accurate and repeatable estimates of kangaroo density than surveys with fixed-wing aircraft. A comparison of the above two techniques was made along the same transect lines in seven survey blocks (5000-10,000 km2) in southern and western Queensland, allowing an assessment of the comparative accuracy of the fixed-wing method. For red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), required correction factors of 0.7-3.1 were similar to those used previously. However, for eastern grey kangaroos (M. giganteus), substantially larger correction factors of 3.4-10.2 were needed to approach true density. For wallaroos (M. robustus), correction factors of 3.8-4.8 were required, but can be considered conservative because helicopter-derived density estimates are known to be underestimated by a factor of 2-3. Further work is needed to establish how correction factors for each species should be applied on a broader scale and whether they lead to repeatable estimates of kangaroo density. Key words: aerial survey, line transect, correction factors, strip transect, wallaroo.

scholarly journals Application of an Ultralight Aircraft to Aerial Surveys of Kangaroos on Grazing Properties

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Grigg ◽  
A. R. Pople ◽  
L. A. Beard
Keyword(s):  
Species Identification ◽  
Small Area ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Accreditation Process ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Future Scenario ◽  
Numerical Comparisons ◽  
Aerial Surveys

A Drifter ultralight aircraft was used as a platform for line-transect aerial surveys of three species of kangaroo in the sheep rangelands south-east of Blackall and north of Longreach in central-western Queensland in winter 1993 and 1994. Favourable comparisons between the results of ultralight surveys and those made from a helicopter flying the same transects and foot surveys along another set of transects, all within a few days of the ultralight survey, confirmed the expectation we had that an ultralight would be a satisfactory and much cheaper vehicle for conducting aerial surveys of kangaroos. The comparisons are even more favourable when data for the three species surveyed are combined, pointing to a problem in species identification and underlining the importance of using only experienced observers for aerial survey of kangaroos, whatever the platform. The use of an ultralight aircraft could have particular value where a comparatively small area, such as an individual sheep or cattle property, is under consideration. In this paper, we present the numerical comparisons, along with an evaluation of the practicability of using this type of aircraft. We also describe a possible future scenario in which an accreditation process could see approved kangaroo surveyors undertaking property assessments by ultralight, under contract to graziers or other interested parties.

Aerial survey methodology and the cost of control for feral goats in Western Queensland

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Pople ◽  
T. F. Clancy ◽  
J. A. Thompson ◽  
S. Boyd-Law
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Survey Methodology ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Capra Hircus ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Capita Cost

Feral goats (Capra hircus) were shot from a helicopter on four sites in central-western Queensland. These sites centred on Idalia National Park (660 km2) and three nearby properties: Lissoy (360 km2), Mt Calder (260 km2) and Ravensbourne (320 km2), the order reflecting increasing goat density. On Idalia, 134 goats were shot in 8 h of flying time. On Lissoy, 28 goats were shot in 3 h, 1038 goats were shot on Mt Calder in 15 h, while 2307 goats were shot on Ravensbourne in 21 h. The reduction was monitored by aerial surveys using fixed-wing aircraft. No goats were recorded on either Idalia or Lissoy immediately following shooting and substantial reductions in goat numbers were achieved on Mt Calder (75%) and Ravensbourne (49%). Surveys conducted six months after this reduction indicated population increases on all sites following shooting. This was particularly marked on Ravensbourne, where goat numbers had increased by 31% despite further substantial removals by commercial mustering. These population increases were largely the result of immigration. The cooperation of landowners over a large area is therefore essential for effective control of goats. The per capita cost of shooting goats from a helicopter was essentially constant down to a threshold density of <1 goat km-2 , below which the cost increased substantially. The accuracy of fixed-wing aerial surveys was improved by using double-counting and these corrected estimates compared favourably with index–manipulation–index estimates. Estimates of densities <1 goat km-2 were imprecise and at these densities goats were difficult to detect. The extent of vegetation cover did not affect the sightability of goats, whereas group size was positively correlated with the sightability of goats. To estimate true density, correction factors of 1–2 were applied to goat group sizes using survey parameters of 100 m strip width, a survey height of 76 m and a speed of 187 km h-1.

Detectability of penguins in aerial surveys over the pack-ice off Antarctica

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Southwell ◽  
Charles G. M. Paxton ◽  
David L. Borchers
Keyword(s):  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Transect Line ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
Abundance Estimates ◽  
Transect Sampling ◽  
Pack Ice ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Ice Floes

Knowledge of penguin abundance at regional and circumpolar scales across the Southern Ocean is important for the development of ecosystem models and to estimate prey consumption by penguins to assess potential competition with fisheries’ operations. One means of estimating penguin abundance is to undertake aerial surveys across the pack-ice surrounding Antarctica where penguins forage. However, it has long been recognised that aerial counts and resultant abundance estimates are likely to be negatively biased unless detectability is estimated and taken into account. Mark–recapture line-transect methods were used to estimate the detectability of penguin groups resting on ice floes during helicopter surveys over the pack-ice off Antarctica. Group size had the greatest effect of several measured covariates on detectability. Despite a concerted effort to meet the central assumption of conventional line-transect sampling (all objects on the transect line are detected), this was close to being achieved by single observers only in the case of the occasional very large group of >20 penguins. Emperor penguins were more detectable than Adélie penguins. Although observers undertook an extensive simulation training program before the survey, overall they improved in their ability to detect penguin groups throughout the survey. Mark–recapture line-transect methods can provide less biased estimation than conventional line-transect methods in aerial survey applications. This improvement comes with some costs, including the need for more demanding data-recording procedures and the need to use larger, more expensive aircraft. These additional costs will often be small compared with the basic cost, but the gain in terms of improved estimation may be substantial.

Correcting for Incomplete Sighting in Aerial Surveys of Kangaroos

1986 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Barnes ◽  
GJE Hill ◽  
GR Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Species Differences ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Mathematical Properties ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
Alternative Method ◽  
Management Procedures ◽  
Continued Use

Kangaroo density estimates derived from aerial survey depend on the method of deriving sightability correction factors developed by Caughley. The method depends on five assumptions, some concerned with the mathematical properties of a model for sightability probabilities and others with deriving correction factors from this model. All these assumptions can be criticized. In addition, evidence on the performance of the method does not suggest that it is accurate. Published density estimates are less precise than indicated, and may include biases due to factors not considered in the correction factors used, e.g. seasonal conditions, time of day, and species differences. At present, no satisfactory alternative method of correction exists but, because inaccuracies may be large, continued use of the method requires much greater caution than has previously been shown. This is particularly relevant where density estimates are used to determine management procedures.

Estimating kangaroo density by aerial survey: a comparison of thermal cameras with human observers

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Lethbridge ◽  
Michael Stead ◽  
Cameron Wells
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Imaging ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Population Data ◽  
Aerial Survey ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Human Observer ◽  
Thermal Camera ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Aerial Surveys ◽  
Animal Populations

Abstract ContextAerial surveys provide valuable information about the population status and distribution of many native and pest vertebrate species. They are vital for evidence-based monitoring, budget planning and setting management targets. Despite aircraft running costs, they remain one of the most cost-effective ways to capture distribution and abundance data over a broad area. In Australia, annual surveys of large macropods are undertaken in several states to inform management, and in some jurisdictions, to help set commercial kangaroo harvest quotas. Improvements in the cost efficiencies of these surveys are continually sought. Aerial thermal imaging techniques are increasingly being tested for wildlife surveys, but to date no studies have directly compared population data derived from thermal imaging with data collected by human observers during the same flight. AimsDuring an aerial survey of western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus), eastern grey kangaroos (M. giganteus) and red kangaroos (Osphranter rufus) across the state of Victoria, Australia, the objective was to conduct a direct comparison of the effectiveness of thermal camera technology and human observers for estimating kangaroo populations from aerial surveys. MethodsA thermal camera was mounted alongside an aerial observer on one side of the aircraft for a total of 1360km of transect lines. All thermal footage was reviewed manually. Population density estimates and distance sampling models were compared with human observer counts. Key resultsOverall, the kangaroo density estimates obtained from the thermal camera data were around 30% higher than estimates derived from aerial observer counts. This difference was greater in wooded habitats. Conversely, human-derived counts were greater in open habitats, possibly due to interference from sunlight and flushing. It was not possible to distinguish between species of macropod in the thermal imagery. ConclusionsThermal survey techniques require refining, but the results of the present study suggest that with careful selection of time of day for surveys, more accurate population estimates may be possible than with conventional aerial surveys. ImplicationsConventional aerial surveys may be underestimating animal populations in some habitats. Further studies that directly compare the performance of aerial observers and thermal imaging are required across a range of species and habitats.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document