Comparative root system morphologies of seeded-in-place, bareroot, and containerized Douglas-fir seedlings after outplanting

1979 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Preisig ◽  
W. C. Carlson ◽  
L. C. Promnitz
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
Lateral Root ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Douglas Fir ◽  
Tree Stability ◽  
Stock Type ◽  
Stock Types ◽  
Root Orientation

Root systems of 5- to 8-year-old Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco seedlings of natural, bareroot, and container origin were quantitatively analyzed to determine the effects of seedling source on root system morphology. Lateral root orientation was stressed.Container and planting constrictions on root system morphology were recognizable after outplanting; planted stock types were differentiated from seeded-in-place seedlings on the basis of root system morphology. Container and natural seedlings had less variation in root system morphology within stock type than bareroot stock. Root spiraling was so low in the Douglas-fir stock types studies that it is not likely to affect tree stability. There was no overall effect of root system morphology on height of seedlings around 6 years of age.

Comparative root system morphologies of seeded-in-place, bareroot, and container-cultured plug Sitka spruce seedlings after outplanting

1980 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Carlson ◽  
C. L. Preisig ◽  
L. C. Promnitz
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
Growth Retardation ◽  
Lateral Root ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Sitka Spruce ◽  
Stock Types

Root systems of Piceasitchensis (Bong.) Carr. seedlings of natural, bareroot, and container origin were quantitatively analyzed to determine effects of seedling source on root system morphology, particularly lateral root orientation.Planted stock types were differentiated from natural seedlings on the basis of root system morphology. Container-induced effects on root system morphology were no greater than effects of bareroot cultural and planting practices. The data presented indicate that effects of culturing and planting on root system morphology are probably not severe enough to cause instability or growth retardation.

scholarly journals Root biomass of beech as a factor influencing the wind tree stability 

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (No. 12) ◽  
pp. 549-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kodrík ◽  
M. Kodrík
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
Groundwater Level ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Lateral Roots ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Static Stability ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Tree Stability ◽  
Ground Biomass ◽  
Below Ground

Beech is, thanks to its root system, in general considered to be a wind-resistant woody plant species. Nevertheless, the research on beech root systems has revealed that it is not possible to mechanically divide the woody plants into deep rooted and shallow rooted, because their root systems are modified according to various stand conditions. The root system shape, growth and development are mostly influenced by soil conditions and groundwater level. In the case of a high groundwater level beech root systems do not form tap roots and the lateral roots are rather thin and weak. Important factor for the tree static stability is number of roots with diameter 3–10 cm. The most important for the tree stability are roots with diameter over 10 cm. Wood-destroying fungi have strong negative impact on tree static stability. There are differences between beech below-ground biomass growing in soils rich in nutrients and poor in nutrients. The total below-ground biomass of the beech stands poor in nutrients is higher.

Lateral Root Pruning – A Promising Forest Nursery Practice

1968 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Eis
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Root ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Douglas Fir ◽  
Root Pruning ◽  
Height Increment ◽  
Forest Nursery

The regeneration and growth of pruned roots of Douglas-fir seedlings were studied under nursery conditions. Root pruning did not decrease the height increment of seedlings. For the best development of dense and compact root systems, the bottom pruning should be done early in spring and the side pruning around the middle of June, on both sides of the row simultaneously.

scholarly journals Clifford Spinors and Root System Induction: $$H_4$$ and the Grand Antiprism

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Philippe Dechant
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Invariant Sets ◽  
Simple Construction ◽  
Reflection Groups ◽  
Computational Work ◽  
Algebraic Framework ◽  
Underlying Geometry ◽  
Coxeter Plane ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractRecent work has shown that every 3D root system allows the construction of a corresponding 4D root system via an ‘induction theorem’. In this paper, we look at the icosahedral case of $$H_3\rightarrow H_4$$ H 3 → H 4 in detail and perform the calculations explicitly. Clifford algebra is used to perform group theoretic calculations based on the versor theorem and the Cartan–Dieudonné theorem, giving a simple construction of the $${\mathrm {Pin}}$$ Pin and $${\mathrm {Spin}}$$ Spin covers. Using this connection with $$H_3$$ H 3 via the induction theorem sheds light on geometric aspects of the $$H_4$$ H 4 root system (the 600-cell) as well as other related polytopes and their symmetries, such as the famous Grand Antiprism and the snub 24-cell. The uniform construction of root systems from 3D and the uniform procedure of splitting root systems with respect to subrootsystems into separate invariant sets allows further systematic insight into the underlying geometry. All calculations are performed in the even subalgebra of $${\mathrm {Cl}}(3)$$ Cl ( 3 ) , including the construction of the Coxeter plane, which is used for visualising the complementary pairs of invariant polytopes, and are shared as supplementary computational work sheets. This approach therefore constitutes a more systematic and general way of performing calculations concerning groups, in particular reflection groups and root systems, in a Clifford algebraic framework.

Lateral root formation and nutrients: nitrogen in the spotlight

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Mathieu Pélissier ◽  
Hans Motte ◽  
Tom Beeckman
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Root System ◽  
Root Development ◽  
Lateral Root ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Root Formation ◽  
Lateral Roots ◽  
Nutrient Use Efficiency ◽  
Lateral Root Formation ◽  
Lateral Root Development

Abstract Lateral roots are important to forage for nutrients due to their ability to increase the uptake area of a root system. Hence, it comes as no surprise that lateral root formation is affected by nutrients or nutrient starvation, and as such contributes to the root system plasticity. Understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating root adaptation dynamics towards nutrient availability is useful to optimize plant nutrient use efficiency. There is at present a profound, though still evolving, knowledge on lateral root pathways. Here, we aimed to review the intersection with nutrient signaling pathways to give an update on the regulation of lateral root development by nutrients, with a particular focus on nitrogen. Remarkably, it is for most nutrients not clear how lateral root formation is controlled. Only for nitrogen, one of the most dominant nutrients in the control of lateral root formation, the crosstalk with multiple key signals determining lateral root development is clearly shown. In this update, we first present a general overview of the current knowledge of how nutrients affect lateral root formation, followed by a deeper discussion on how nitrogen signaling pathways act on different lateral root-mediating mechanisms for which multiple recent studies yield insights.

On Closed Subsets of Root Systems

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ž. Doković ◽  
P. Check ◽  
J.-Y. Hée
Keyword(s):  
Weyl Group ◽  
Root System ◽  
Irreducible Component ◽  
Product Space ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Inner Product Space ◽  
Inner Product ◽  
Closed Sets ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Real Inner Product Space

AbstractLet R be a root system (in the sense of Bourbaki) in a finite dimensional real inner product space V. A subset P ⊂ R is closed if α, β ∊ P and α + β ∊ R imply that α + β ∊ P. In this paper we shall classify, up to conjugacy by the Weyl group W of R, all closed sets P ⊂ R such that R\P is also closed. We also show that if θ:R —> R′ is a bijection between two root systems such that both θ and θ-1 preserve closed sets, and if R has at most one irreducible component of type A1, then θ is an isomorphism of root systems.

scholarly journals Morphological Characterization of Root System Architecture in Diverse Tomato Genotypes during Early Growth

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 3888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Alaguero-Cordovilla ◽  
Francisco Gran-Gómez ◽  
Sergio Tormos-Moltó ◽  
José Pérez-Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
System Architecture ◽  
Lateral Root ◽  
Morphological Plasticity ◽  
Root System Architecture ◽  
Morphological Characterization ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Wild Tomato Species ◽  
Local Soil

Plant roots exploit morphological plasticity to adapt and respond to different soil environments. We characterized the root system architecture of nine wild tomato species and four cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties during early growth in a controlled environment. Additionally, the root system architecture of six near-isogenic lines from the tomato ‘Micro-Tom’ mutant collection was also studied. These lines were affected in key genes of ethylene, abscisic acid, and anthocyanin pathways. We found extensive differences between the studied lines for a number of meaningful morphological traits, such as lateral root distribution, lateral root length or adventitious root development, which might represent adaptations to local soil conditions during speciation and subsequent domestication. Taken together, our results provide a general quantitative framework for comparing root system architecture in tomato seedlings and other related species.

Extension and Longitudinal Growth During the Development of Red Pine Root Systems

1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. F. Fayle
Keyword(s):  
Root System ◽  
Root Systems ◽  
Red Pine ◽  
Longitudinal Growth ◽  
Rooting Depth ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Moisture Availability ◽  
Below Ground

Extension of the root system and stem during the first 30 years of growth of plantation-grown red pine (Pinusresinosa Ait.) on four sites was deduced by root and stem analyses. Maximum rooting depth was reached in the first decade and maximum horizontal extension of roots was virtually complete between years 15 and 20. The main horizontal roots of red pine seldom exceed 11 m in length. Elongation of vertical and horizontal roots was examined in relation to moisture availability and some physical soil conditions. The changing relations within the tree in lineal dimensions and annual elongation of the roots and stem are illustrated. The development of intertree competition above and below ground is considered.

Root systems of older immature hemlock, cedar, and Douglas-fir

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-657
Author(s):  
S. Eis
Keyword(s):  
Root Systems ◽  
Douglas Fir

not available

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document