scholarly journals Probing anomalous quartic $$\gamma \gamma \gamma \gamma $$ couplings in light-by-light collisions at the CLIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. İnan ◽  
A. V. Kisselev

AbstractThe anomalous quartic neutral couplings of the $$\gamma \gamma \gamma \gamma $$ γ γ γ γ vertex in a polarized light-by-light scattering of the Compton backscattered photons at the CLIC are examined. Both differential and total cross sections are calculated for $$e^+e^-$$ e + e - collision energies 1500 GeV and 3000 GeV. The helicity of the initial electron beams is taken to be $$\pm \,0.8$$ ± 0.8 . The unpolarized and SM cross sections for the same values of helicities are also estimated. The 95% C.L. exclusion limits on two anomalous photon couplings $$\zeta _1$$ ζ 1 and $$\zeta _2$$ ζ 2 are calculated. The best bounds on these couplings are found to be $$6.85 \times 10^{-16} \text { GeV}^{-4}$$ 6.85 × 10 - 16 GeV - 4 and $$1.43 \times 10^{-15} \text { GeV}^{-4}$$ 1.43 × 10 - 15 GeV - 4 , respectively. The results are compared with the exclusion bounds obtained previously for the LHC and HL-LHC. It is shown that the light-by-light scattering at the CLIC, especially the polarized, has a greater potential to search for the anomalous quartic neutral couplings of the $$\gamma \gamma \gamma \gamma $$ γ γ γ γ vertex.

Author(s):  
S. Golladay

The theory of multiple scattering has been worked out by Groves and comparisons have been made between predicted and observed signals for thick specimens observed in a STEM under conditions where phase contrast effects are unimportant. Independent measurements of the collection efficiencies of the two STEM detectors, calculations of the ratio σe/σi = R, where σe, σi are the total cross sections for elastic and inelastic scattering respectively, and a model of the unknown mass distribution are needed for these comparisons. In this paper an extension of this work will be described which allows the determination of the required efficiencies, R, and the unknown mass distribution from the data without additional measurements or models. Essential to the analysis is the fact that in a STEM two or more signal measurements can be made simultaneously at each image point.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanrong Gao

AbstractIn this work, we introduce the concept of anisotropic dielectric susceptibility matrix of anisotropic medium for both nondepolarizing and depolarizing medium. The concept provides a new way of analyzing light scattering properties of anisotropic media illuminated by polarized light. The explicit expressions for the elements of the scattering matrix are given in terms of the elements of the Fourier transform of the anisotropic dielectric susceptibility matrix of the medium. Finally, expressions for the elements of the Jones matrix of a thin layer of a deterministic anisotropic medium and the elements of the Mueller matrix of a depolarizing medium are given. The results obtained in this work is helpful for deriving information about the correlated anisotropic structures in depolarizing media from measured Mueller matrices. The findings in this work may also well prove stimulating to researchers working on new methods for analyzing light scattering properties.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman N. Lee ◽  
Alexey A. Lyubyakin ◽  
Vyacheslav A. Stotsky

Abstract Using modern multiloop calculation methods, we derive the analytical expressions for the total cross sections of the processes e−γ →$$ {e}^{-}X\overline{X} $$ e − X X ¯ with X = μ, γ or e at arbitrary energies. For the first two processes our results are expressed via classical polylogarithms. The cross section of e−γ → e−e−e+ is represented as a one-fold integral of complete elliptic integral K and logarithms. Using our results, we calculate the threshold and high-energy asymptotics and compare them with available results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Beale ◽  
S Armitage ◽  
G Laricchia

1998 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Grimes ◽  
J. D. Anderson ◽  
R. W. Bauer ◽  
V. A. Madsen

1966 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.F. Measday ◽  
J.N. Palmieri

1954 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillman ◽  
R. H. Stahl ◽  
N. F. Ramsey

2009 ◽  
Vol 194 (4) ◽  
pp. 042038 ◽  
Author(s):  
K N Joshipura ◽  
Sumona Gangopadhyay ◽  
Harshit N Kothari ◽  
Foram A Shelat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document