NATURAL DRIFT IN ORGANIZATIONS

Author(s):  
PATRICIA DUPIN
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 105971232110306
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Raimondi

Genetic reductionism is increasingly seen as a severely limited approach to understanding living systems. The Neo-Darwinian explanatory framework tends to overlook the role of the organism for an understanding of development and evolution. In the current fast-changing theoretical landscape, the autopoietic approach provides conceptual distinctions and tools that may contribute to building an alternative framework. In this article, I examine the implications of the theories of autopoiesis and natural drift for an organism-centered view of evolution. By shifting the attention from genes to ontogenetic organism-niche configurations and their transformations over generations, this approach presents a compelling perspective on the role of organismal behavior in guiding phylogenetic drift.


Author(s):  
Francisco J. Varela ◽  
Evan Thompson ◽  
Eleanor Rosch

This chapter demonstrates how unique histories of structural coupling can be understood from the vantage point of evolution. To this end, it provides a critique of the adaptationist view of evolution as a process of progressive fitness, and articulates an alternative view of evolution as natural drift. These unique histories of coupling, which enact incommensurable kinds of “color space,” should not be explained as optimal adaptations to different regularities in the world. Instead, they should be explained as the result of different histories of natural drift. Moreover, since organism and environment cannot be separated but are in fact codetermined in evolution as natural drift, the environmental regularities that one associates with these various color spaces must ultimately be specified in tandem with the perceptually guided activity of the animal.


SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 215824401983746
Author(s):  
Trino Baptista ◽  
Elis Aldana ◽  
Charles I. Abramson

Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) was deeply influenced by Plato and conceived each species as an Idea, whose shape is essentially and permanently predetermined. He rejected Lamarck’s proposal of organ’s use/disuse as a source of evolution, but he was close to the orthogenetic movement that developed after his death. The philosopher did not conceive biological individual variability as a source for evolution, mathematical population analysis, and gradual evolution; he even imagined an ultra-rapid saltatory model in “higher forms.” Moreover, he conceived a metaphysically based coupling among all phenomena which resembles the contemporary model of natural drift of evolution. Hence, Schopenhauer did not strictly anticipate Darwin’s model of natural selection. However, he expressed in his own words competition and struggle for life. The philosopher thus anticipated more the orthogenesis and natural drift and less the Darwinian’s mechanisms of evolution than what is generally alleged. His work is a valuable philosophical source in the contemporary search for a new synthesis in evolutionary thought.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arantza Etxeberria

The contribution of the theory of autopoiesis to the definition of life and biological theory affirms biological autonomy as a central notion of scientific and philosophical inquiry, and opposes other biological approaches, based on the notion of genetic information, that consider reproduction and evolution to be the central aspects of life and living phenomenology. This article reviews the autopoietic criticisms of genetic information, reproduction, and evolution in the light of a biology that can solve the problem of living organization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Maturana R. ◽  
Ximena Dávila Yáñez ◽  
Simón Ramírez Muñoz

1985 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 909-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Larkin ◽  
D. W. McKone

The model of McLay (J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 27: 359–370) for describing the drift of stream organisms was tested in a variety of field experiments in which organisms were disturbed from the substrate and/or the natural drift was blocked. In each situation, appropriate corrections may be made for the catch of drift organisms by the sampling nets. Disturbed animals drifted at a rate much less than stream velocity. The logarithm of the distance travelled was a linear function of the logarithm of mean stream velocity and conformed to the McLay model. Similarly, the model adequately described experiments in which two disturbances were done simultaneously, when drift was blocked for a 2-h period, and when there was both disturbance and blockage. A more comprehensive version of the model was only partially successful in describing the drift at various distances downstream of a blockage sustained for 4 d, probably because of upstream migration of organisms through the substrate, spatial differences in the densities of animals in the substrate, or a reduction in drift rate at lower density in the substrate.


1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay S. Efran ◽  
Etiony Aldarondo ◽  
Kerry P. Heffner

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2333-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
SIGAL SHEFER ◽  
AVIGDOR ABELSON ◽  
OFER MOKADY ◽  
ELI GEFFEN

Author(s):  
HUMBERTO MATURANA-ROMESIN ◽  
JORGE MPODOZIS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document