A NEW FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL FOR OPEN PIT MINES EQUIPMENT SELECTION

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (03) ◽  
pp. 279-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABBAS AGHAJANI BAZZAZI ◽  
MORTEZA OSANLOO ◽  
BEHROOZ KARIMI
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real World ◽  
Mine Planning ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Open Pit Mining ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Good Precision ◽  
Mining Equipment ◽  
Equipment Selection ◽  
Proposed Model

Nowadays, the capital cost of open-pit mining equipment is very high so any mistake in the selection of quantity, type and capacity of equipment may cause irreparable impact on the net present value of mining project. Mine planning engineers generally use their intuition and experience in decision making even though equipment selection is a complex multi criteria decision problem. Considering the tangible along with intangible factors in the mine equipment selection problem, this paper proposes a new method of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) that makes it possible to select the optimal equipment that satisfies the decision maker. In a real-world situation, because of incomplete or non-obtainable information, the data (attributes) are often not deterministic but they are usually fuzzy-imprecise. Our proposed model considers objective, critical, and subjective factors as the three main common factors in equipment selection analysis. The last two factors, critical and subjective factors, are defined by decision maker's judgments for more adoption with real world problems. A case study is presented to illustrate the use of the proposed model and to demonstrate the capability of the model. The result of this study shows significant reduction of time consumption of calculation and good precision compared to customary methods such as Chang's fuzzy AHP method.

scholarly journals A Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method to Weight the Sustainability Criteria of System Selection for Surface Mining

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3066
Author(s):  
Michał Patyk ◽  
Przemysław Bodziony ◽  
Zbigniew Krysa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Surface Mining ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Mining Equipment ◽  
Surface Mines ◽  
Mining Conditions ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Selection Of

Selection and assessment of mining equipment used in open pit rock mines relies chiefly on estimates of overall exploitation cost. The rational arrangement of mining equipment and systems comprising loading machines, haul trucks and crushing plants should be preceded by a thorough analysis of technical and economic aspects, such as investment outlays and the costs of further exploitation, which largely determine the costs of mining operations and the deposit value. Additionally, the operational parameters of the mining equipment ought to be considered. In this study, a universal set of evaluation criteria has been developed, and an evaluation method has been applied for the selection of surface mining equipment and the processing system to be operated in specific mining conditions, defined by the user. The objective of this study is to develop and apply the new methodology of multi-criteria selection of open pit rock mining equipment based on multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedures, to enable the optimization of loading, handling and crushing processes. The methodology, underpinned by the principles of MCDM, provides the dedicated ranking procedures, including the ELECTRE III. The applied methodology allows the alternative options (variants) to be ranked accordingly. Ultimately, a more universal methodology is developed, applicable in other surface mines where geological and mining conditions are similar. It may prove particularly useful in selection and performance assessment of mining equipment and process line configurations in mining of low-quality rock deposits. Therefore, we undertook to develop universal criteria and applications for the selection and performance assessment of process machines for surface mines, taking into account environmental aspects as well as deposit quality.

An algebraic approach to N-soft sets with application in decision-making using TOPSIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shabir ◽  
Rimsha Mushtaq ◽  
Munazza Naz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Real World ◽  
Algebraic Approach ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Commutative Monoids ◽  
Soft Sets ◽  
Algebraic Properties ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Selection Of

In this paper, we focus on two main objectives. Firstly, we define some binary and unary operations on N-soft sets and study their algebraic properties. In unary operations, three different types of complements are studied. We prove De Morgan’s laws concerning top complements and for bottom complements for N-soft sets where N is fixed and provide a counterexample to show that De Morgan’s laws do not hold if we take different N. Then, we study different collections of N-soft sets which become idempotent commutative monoids and consequently show, that, these monoids give rise to hemirings of N-soft sets. Some of these hemirings are turned out as lattices. Finally, we show that the collection of all N-soft sets with full parameter set E and collection of all N-soft sets with parameter subset A are Stone Algebras. The second objective is to integrate the well-known technique of TOPSIS and N-soft set-based mathematical models from the real world. We discuss a hybrid model of multi-criteria decision-making combining the TOPSIS and N-soft sets and present an algorithm with implementation on the selection of the best model of laptop.

A framework of decision making based on bipolar fuzzy competition hypergraphs

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Sundas Shahzadi ◽  
Areen Rasool ◽  
Musavarah Sarwar ◽  
Muhammad Akram
Keyword(s):  
Biological Sciences ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Social Networking ◽  
Real World ◽  
Fuzzy Models ◽  
New Concepts ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Business Market ◽  
Strength Of Competition

Bipolarity plays a key role in different domains such as technology, social networking and biological sciences for illustrating real-world phenomenon using bipolar fuzzy models. In this article, novel concepts of bipolar fuzzy competition hypergraphs are introduced and discuss the application of the proposed model. The main contribution is to illustrate different methods for the construction of bipolar fuzzy competition hypergraphs and their variants. Authors study various new concepts including bipolar fuzzy row hypergraphs, bipolar fuzzy column hypergraphs, bipolar fuzzy k-competition hypergraphs, bipolar fuzzy neighborhood hypergraphs and strong hyperedges. Besides, we develop some relations between bipolar fuzzy k-competition hypergraphs and bipolar fuzzy neighborhood hypergraphs. Moreover, authors design an algorithm to compute the strength of competition among companies in business market. A comparative analysis of the proposed model is discuss with the existing models such bipolar fuzzy competition graphs and fuzzy competition hypergraphs.

scholarly journals Establishing a Sustainable Sports Tourism Evaluation Framework with a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Explore Potential Sports Tourism Attractions in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Jen Yang ◽  
Huai-Wei Lo ◽  
Chen-Shen Chao ◽  
Chih-Chien Shen ◽  
Chin-Cheng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Government Support ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Sports Tourism ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Tourism Attractions ◽  
Multiple Experts

In recent years, the awareness of sustainable tourism has risen around the world. Many tourism industries combine sports to attract more customers to facilitate the development of the economy and the promotion of local culture. However, it is an important task to establish a comprehensive tourism evaluation framework for sustainable sports tourism. This study proposes a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model to discuss the above issues, using the Bayesian Best Worst Method (Bayesian BWM) to integrate multiple experts’ judgments to generate the group optimal criteria weights. Next, the modified Visekriterijumska Optimizacija i Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) technique is combined with the concept of aspiration level to determine the performance of sports attractions and their priority ranks. In addition, this study adds a perspective of institutional sustainability to emphasize the importance of government support and local marketing. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model is demonstrated through potential sports tourism attractions in Taiwan. A sensitivity analysis and models comparison were also performed in this study. The results show that the proposed model is feasible for practical applications and that it effectively provides some management implications to support decision-makers in formulating improvement strategies.

scholarly journals SELECTING THE OPTIMAL RENEWABLE ENERGY USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini ◽  
Mohammad Majid Fouladgar ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
S. Hamzeh Haji Moini
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Energy Resources ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Negative Ideal Solution ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Ideal

Renewable energies are well-known as one of the most important energy resources not only due to limited other energy resources, but also due to environmental problems associated with air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable energy project selection is a multi actors and sophisticated problem because it is a need to incorporate social, economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are powerful tools to evaluate and rank the alternatives among a pool of alternatives and select the best one. COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) is an MCDM technique which determines the best alternative by calculating the ratio to the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution. On the other hand, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is widely used in order to calculate the importance weights of evaluation criteria. In this paper an integrated COPRAS-AHP methodology is proposed to select the best renewable energy project. In order to validate the output of the proposed model, the model is compared with five MCDM tools. The results of this paper demonstrate the capability and effectiveness of the proposed model in selecting the most appropriate renewable energy option among the existing alternatives.

scholarly journals An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Location Selection of Transshipment Ports

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Feng Ding ◽  
Chien-Chang Chou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Container Logistics ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Fuzzy Mcdm ◽  
Selection Of

The role of container logistics centre as home bases for merchandise transportation has become increasingly important. The container carriers need to select a suitable centre location of transshipment port to meet the requirements of container shipping logistics. In the light of this, the main purpose of this paper is to develop a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to evaluate the best selection of transshipment ports for container carriers. At first, some concepts and methods used to develop the proposed model are briefly introduced. The performance values of quantitative and qualitative subcriteria are discussed to evaluate the fuzzy ratings. Then, the ideal and anti-ideal concepts and the modified distance measure method are used in the proposed model. Finally, a step-by-step example is illustrated to study the computational process of the quantitative and qualitative fuzzy MCDM model. The proposed approach has successfully accomplished our goal. In addition, the proposed fuzzy MCDM model can be empirically employed to select the best location of transshipment port for container carriers in the future study.

scholarly journals A multi-criteria decision-making model dealing with correlation among criteria for reservoir flood control operation

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feilin Zhu ◽  
Ping-an Zhong ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Ye-nan Wu ◽  
Yu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Flood Control ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Control Operation ◽  
Criterion System ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Flood Control Operation ◽  
Reservoir Flood Control Operation ◽  
Ranking Order

Flood control operation in a multi-reservoir system is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, in which the considered criteria are often correlated with each other. In this paper, we propose an MCDM model for reservoir flood control operation to deal with correlation among criteria. Considering the flood control safety of reservoirs and downstream protected regions, we establish the hierarchical structure of the criterion system. We use the principal component analysis method to eliminate the correlation, and transform the original criterion system into an independent comprehensive criterion system. The comprehensive decision matrix coupled with the weight vector obtained by the improved entropy weight method serves as the input to TOPSIS method, fuzzy optimum method, and fuzzy matter-element method, by which we determine the ranking order of the alternatives. We apply the proposed model to a cascade system of reservoirs at the Daduhe River basin in China. The results show that the dimensionality of the criterion system is reduced and the correlation among criteria is eliminated simultaneously, and the ranking order of the alternatives is reasonable. The proposed model provides an effective way to deal with correlation among criteria, and can be extended to wider applications in many other MCDM problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document