scholarly journals Locating primary somatosensory cortex in human brain stimulation studies: systematic review and meta-analytic evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Paul Holmes ◽  
Luigi Tamè
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Indirect Methods ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
Stereotactic Navigation ◽  
Scalp Location ◽  
Hand Area

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human primary somatosensory cortex (S1), unlike over primary motor cortex (M1), does not produce an immediate, objective output. Researchers must therefore rely on one or more indirect methods to position the TMS coil over S1. The “gold standard” method of TMS coil positioning is to use individual functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (f/sMRI) alongside a stereotactic navigation system. In the absence of these facilities, however, one common method used to locate S1 is to find the scalp location that produces twitches in a hand muscle (e.g., the first dorsal interosseus, M1-FDI) and then move the coil posteriorly to target S1. There has been no systematic assessment of whether this commonly reported method of finding the hand area of S1 is optimal. To do this, we systematically reviewed 124 TMS studies targeting the S1 hand area and 95 fMRI studies involving passive finger and hand stimulation. Ninety-six TMS studies reported the scalp location assumed to correspond to S1-hand, which was on average 1.5–2 cm posterior to the functionally defined M1-hand area. Using our own scalp measurements combined with similar data from MRI and TMS studies of M1-hand, we provide the estimated scalp locations targeted in these TMS studies of the S1-hand. We also provide a summary of reported S1 coordinates for passive finger and hand stimulation in fMRI studies. We conclude that S1-hand is more lateral to M1-hand than assumed by the majority of TMS studies.

scholarly journals Locating primary somatosensory cortex in human brain stimulation studies: experimental evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Paul Holmes ◽  
Luigi Tamè ◽  
Paisley Beeching ◽  
Mary Medford ◽  
Mariyana Rakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Brain ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Indirect Methods ◽  
Scalp Location ◽  
Hand Area

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) does not produce immediate outputs. Researchers must therefore rely on indirect methods for TMS coil positioning. The “gold standard” is to use individual functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, but the majority of studies don’t do this. The most common method to locate the hand area of S1 (S1-hand) is to move the coil posteriorly from the hand area of primary motor cortex (M1-hand). Yet, S1-hand is not directly posterior to M1-hand. We localized the index finger area of S1-hand (S1-index) experimentally in four ways. First, we reanalyzed functional MRI data from 20 participants who received vibrotactile stimulation to their 10 digits. Second, to assist the localization of S1-hand without MRI data, we constructed a probabilistic atlas of the central sulcus from 100 healthy adult MRIs and measured the likely scalp location of S1-index. Third, we conducted two experiments mapping the effects of TMS across the scalp on tactile discrimination performance. Fourth, we examined all available neuronavigation data from our laboratory on the scalp location of S1-index. Contrary to the prevailing method, and consistent with systematic review evidence, S1-index is close to the C3/C4 electroencephalography (EEG) electrode locations on the scalp, ~7–8 cm lateral to the vertex, and ~2 cm lateral and 0.5 cm posterior to the M1-hand scalp location. These results suggest that an immediate revision to the most commonly used heuristic to locate S1-hand is required. The results of many TMS studies of S1-hand need reassessment. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Noninvasive human brain stimulation requires indirect methods to target particular brain areas. Magnetic stimulation studies of human primary somatosensory cortex have used scalp-based heuristics to find the target, typically locating it 2 cm posterior to the motor cortex. We measured the scalp location of the hand area of primary somatosensory cortex and found that it is ~2 cm lateral to motor cortex. Our results suggest an immediate revision of the prevailing method is required.

The effect of bilateral cold block of the primate face primary somatosensory cortex on the performance of trained tongue-protrusion task and biting tasks

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 985-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. Lin ◽  
G. M. Murray ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Tongue Protrusion ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Control Series ◽  
Holding Period

1. Studies using ablation, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) and surface stimulation, and single-neuron recordings have suggested that the primate primary somatosensory cortex (SI) may play an important role in movement control. Our aim was to determine whether bilateral inactivation of face SI would indeed interfere with the control of tongue or jaw-closing movements. 2. Effects of reversible inactivation by cooling of face SI was investigated in two monkeys trained to perform both a tongue-protrusion task and a biting task. The cooling experiments were carried out after the orofacial representation within SI was identified by systematically defining the mechanoreceptive field of single neurons recorded in face SI. The deficits in the tongue or jaw-closing movement were evaluated by the success rates for the monkeys' performance of both tasks and by the force and electromyographic (EMG) activity recorded from the masseter, genioglossus, and digastric muscles associated with the tasks. 3. During bilateral cooling of face SI, there was a statistically significant reduction in the success rates for the performance of the tongue-protrusion task in comparison with control series of trials while the thermodes used to cool face SI were kept at 37 degrees C. Detailed analyses of force and EMG activity showed that the principal deficit was the inability of the monkeys to maintain a steady tongue-protrusive force in the force holding period during each trial and to exert a consistent tongue-protrusion force between different trials. The task performance returned to control protocol levels at 4 min after commencement of rewarming. 4. Identical cooling conditions did not significantly affect the success rates for the performance of the biting task. Although the extent of the deficit was not severe enough to cause a significant reduction in successful rates for the biting task, cooling did significantly affect the ability of the monkeys to maintain a steady force in the holding period during each trial and to exert a consistent force between different trials. In one monkey the success rate of the biting task was also not affected by bilaterally cooling of face SI with a pair of larger thermodes placed on the dura over most of the face SI, face primary motor cortex (face MI), and adjacent cortical regions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals High-order thalamic inputs to primary somatosensory cortex are stronger and longer lasting than cortical inputs

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanying Zhang ◽  
Randy M Bruno
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Pyramidal Neurons ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Specific Substrate ◽  
Medial Nucleus ◽  
Posterior Medial Nucleus ◽  
Cortical Inputs

Layer (L) 2/3 pyramidal neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) are sparsely active, spontaneously and during sensory stimulation. Long-range inputs from higher areas may gate L2/3 activity. We investigated their in vivo impact by expressing channelrhodopsin in three main sources of feedback to rat S1: primary motor cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex, and secondary somatosensory thalamic nucleus (the posterior medial nucleus, POm). Inputs from cortical areas were relatively weak. POm, however, more robustly depolarized L2/3 cells and, when paired with peripheral stimulation, evoked action potentials. POm triggered not only a stronger fast-onset depolarization but also a delayed all-or-none persistent depolarization, lasting up to 1 s and exhibiting alpha/beta-range oscillations. Inactivating POm somata abolished persistent but not initial depolarization, indicating a recurrent circuit mechanism. We conclude that secondary thalamus can enhance L2/3 responsiveness over long periods. Such timescales could provide a potential modality-specific substrate for attention, working memory, and plasticity.

scholarly journals Motor planning brings human primary somatosensory cortex into action-specific preparatory states

eLife ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Ariani ◽  
J Andrew Pruszynski ◽  
Jörn Diedrichsen
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Activity Patterns ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Motor Planning ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Movement Planning ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex

Motor planning plays a critical role in producing fast and accurate movement. Yet, the neural processes that occur in human primary motor and somatosensory cortex during planning, and how they relate to those during movement execution, remain poorly understood. Here we used 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a delayed movement paradigm to study single finger movement planning and execution. The inclusion of no-go trials and variable delays allowed us to separate what are typically overlapping planning and execution brain responses. Although our univariate results show widespread deactivation during finger planning, multivariate pattern analysis revealed finger-specific activity patterns in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), which predicted the planned finger action. Surprisingly, these activity patterns were as informative as those found in contralateral primary motor cortex (M1). Control analyses ruled out the possibility that the detected information was an artifact of subthreshold movements during the preparatory delay. Furthermore, we observed that finger-specific activity patterns during planning were highly correlated to those during execution. These findings reveal that motor planning activates the specific S1 and M1 circuits that are engaged during the execution of a finger press, while activity in both regions is overall suppressed. We propose that preparatory states in S1 may improve movement control through changes in sensory processing or via direct influence of spinal motor neurons.

scholarly journals Metaplasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex: effects on physiology and tactile perception

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 2681-2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina B. Jones ◽  
Tea Lulic ◽  
Aaron Z. Bailey ◽  
Tanner N. Mackenzie ◽  
Yi Qun Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Median Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Ratio ◽  
Theta Burst

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over human primary motor cortex evokes plasticity and metaplasticity, the latter contributing to the homeostatic balance of excitation and inhibition. Our knowledge of TBS-induced effects on primary somatosensory cortex (SI) is limited, and it is unknown whether TBS induces metaplasticity within human SI. Sixteen right-handed participants (6 females, mean age 23 yr) received two TBS protocols [continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS)] delivered in six different combinations over SI in separate sessions. TBS protocols were delivered at 30 Hz and were as follows: a single cTBS protocol, a single iTBS protocol, cTBS followed by cTBS, iTBS followed by iTBS, cTBS followed by iTBS, and iTBS followed by cTBS. Measures included the amplitudes of the first and second somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) via median nerve stimulation, their paired-pulse ratio (PPR), and temporal order judgment (TOJ). Dependent measures were obtained before TBS and at 5, 25, 50, and 90 min following stimulation. Results indicate similar effects following cTBS and iTBS; increased amplitudes of the second SEP and PPR without amplitude changes to SEP 1, and impairments in TOJ. Metaplasticity was observed such that TOJ impairments following a single cTBS protocol were abolished following consecutive cTBS protocols. Additionally, consecutive iTBS protocols altered the time course of effects when compared with a single iTBS protocol. In conclusion, 30-Hz cTBS and iTBS protocols delivered in isolation induce effects consistent with a TBS-induced reduction in intracortical inhibition within SI. Furthermore, cTBS- and iTBS-induced metaplasticity appear to follow homeostatic and nonhomeostatic rules, respectively.

scholarly journals Localization of Palatal Area in Human Somatosensory Cortex

2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bessho ◽  
Y. Shibukawa ◽  
M. Shintani ◽  
Y. Yajima ◽  
T. Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Central Sulcus ◽  
Precise Location ◽  
Greater Palatine Foramen ◽  
Hand Area ◽  
Stimulation Of

To determine the ’hard palate representing’ area in the primary somatosensory cortex, we recorded somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields from the cortex in ten healthy volunteers, using magnetoencephalography. Following electrical stimulation of 3 sites on the hard palate (the first and third transverse palatine ridges, and the greater palatine foramen), magnetic responses showed peak latencies of 15, 65, and 125 ms. Equivalent current dipoles for early magnetic responses were found along the posterior wall of the inferior part of the central sulcus. These dipoles were localized anterior-inferiorly, compared with locations for the hand area in the cortex. However, there were no significant differences in three-dimensional locations among the 3 selected regions for hard palate stimulation. These results demonstrated the precise location of palatal representation in the primary somatosensory cortex, the actual area being small.

scholarly journals Layer-specific sensory processing impairment in the primary somatosensory cortex after motor cortex infarction

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fukui ◽  
Hironobu Osaki ◽  
Yoshifumi Ueta ◽  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Takakazu Kawamata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Temporal Coding ◽  
Network Activity ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Sensory Impairment

AbstractPrimary motor cortex (M1) infarction occasionally causes sensory impairment. Because sensory signal plays an important role in motor control, sensory impairment compromises recovery and rehabilitation from motor disability. Despite the importance of sensory-motor integration for rehabilitation after M1 infarction, the neural mechanism of the sensory impairment is poorly understood. We show that the sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was impaired in the acute phase of M1 infarction and recovered in a layer-specific manner in the subacute phase. This layer dependent recovery process and the anatomical connection pattern from M1 to S1 suggested the functional connectivity from M1 to S1 plays a key role in the impairment of sensory processing in S1. The simulation study demonstrated that the loss of inhibition from M1 to S1 in the acute phase of M1 infarction could cause the sensory processing impairment in S1, and the complementation of inhibition could recover the temporal coding. Taken together, we revealed how focal stroke of M1 alters cortical network activity of sensory processing, in which inhibitory input from M1 to S1 may be involved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document