scalp location
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 18-20
Author(s):  
Subhabrata Das ◽  
Mala Mistri ◽  
Sukanta Sikdar

The transformed cells in a neoplasm, whether benign or malignant, often resemble each other, as though all had been derived from a single progenitor, consistent with the monoclonal origin of the tumor. Myxoid neurobroma (MN) is a benign tumor of perineural origin, which is demonstrated by positive immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein. The most common locations are the face, shoulder, anus, periungual, and feet. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an MN in the scalp, which is a very rare location that has been reported earlier. The differential diagnosis of the tumor at this location MN should be kept in mind. This 56 years old male who presented with a large swelling in the scalp (occipital region) which extended to the nape of nack for last 3 years which is gradually increasing in size along with heaviness, intermittent severe pain in the head. Clinically (25x20) cm size swelling in the occipital area and extending to the nape of the neck. The swelling is nontender. It is ovoid in shape . Soft cystic in consistency, the surface is smooth, margins are well dened, the mobility is absent. Fluctuation test is negative but the swelling is brilliantly transilluminant. CONCLUSION: We report this case because of the rarity of both the tumor and its scalp location and also a giant size and to provide a review of the literature. This case study illustrates that any slowly progressing swelling in an unusual location should have been properly investigated and complete surgical excision is the preferred choice of treatment for future recurrence. The MN should be included in the differential diagnosis of tumors at this location.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Goldschmied ◽  
Karine Lacourse ◽  
Greg Maislin ◽  
Jacques Delfrate ◽  
Philip Gehrman ◽  
...  

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep spindles, a defining feature of stage N2 sleep, are maximal at central electrodes and are found in the frequency range of the electroencephalogram (EEG) (sigma 11–16 Hz) that is known to be heritable. However, relatively little is known about the heritability of spindles. Two recent studies investigating the heritability of spindles reported moderate heritability, but with conflicting results depending on scalp location and spindle type. The present study aimed to definitively assess the heritability of sleep spindle characteristics. Methods We utilized the polysomnography data of 58 monozygotic and 40 dizygotic same-sex twin pairs to identify heritable characteristics of spindles at C3/C4 in stage N2 sleep including density, duration, peak-to-peak amplitude, and oscillation frequency. We implemented and tested a variety of spindle detection algorithms and used two complementary methods of estimating trait heritability. Results We found robust evidence to support strong heritability of spindles regardless of detector method (h2 > 0.8). However not all spindle characteristics were equally heritable, and each spindle detection method produced a different pattern of results. Conclusions The sleep spindle in stage N2 sleep is highly heritable, but the heritability differs for individual spindle characteristics and depends on the spindle detector used for analysis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Cruzat ◽  
Mireia Torralba ◽  
Manuela Ruzzoli ◽  
Alba Fernández ◽  
Gustavo Deco ◽  
...  

AbstractSeveral past studies have shown that attention and perception can depend upon the phase of ongoing neural oscillations at stimulus onset. Here, we extend this idea to the memory domain. We tested the hypothesis that ongoing fluctuations in neural activity have an impact on memory encoding using a picture paired-associates task to gauge episodic memory performance. Experiment 1 capitalized on the principle of phase reset. We tested if subsequent memory performance fluctuates rhythmically, time-locked to a reset cue presented before the to-be-remembered pairs. We found indication that behavioral performance was periodically and selectively modulated at theta frequency (∼4 Hz). In Experiment 2 we focused on prestimulus ongoing activity using scalp EEG recorded while participants performed the pair-associate task. We analyzed subsequent memory performance as a function of theta and alpha activity around the presentation of the to-be-remembered pairs. The results of the pre-registered analyses, using large electrode clusters and generic spectral ranges, returned null results of prestimulus phase-behavior correlation. However, we found that post-stimulus theta-power modulations in left frontal scalp predicted subsequent memory performance. This post-stimulus effect in theta power was used to guide a post-hoc prestimulus phase analysis, narrowed down to more precise scalp location and frequency. This analysis returned a correlation between prestimulus theta phase and subsequent memory. Altogether, these results suggest that the prestimulus theta activity at encoding has an impact on later memory performance.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagi Jaffe-Dax ◽  
Amit H. Bermano ◽  
Yotam Erel ◽  
Lauren L. Emberson

AbstractSignificanceWe propose a novel video-based, motion-resilient, and fast method for estimating the position of optodes on the scalp.AimMeasuring the exact placement of probes (e.g., electrodes, optodes) on a participant’s head is a notoriously difficult step in acquiring neuroimaging data from methods which rely on scalp recordings (e.g., EEG and fNIRS), and is particularly difficult for any clinical or developmental population. Existing methods of head measurements require the participant to remain still for a lengthy period of time, are laborious, and require extensive training. Therefore, a fast and motion-resilient method is required for estimating the scalp location of probes.ApproachWe propose an innovative video-based method for estimating the probes’ positions relative to the participant’s head, which is fast, motion-resilient, and automatic. Our method builds on capitalizing the advantages, and understanding the limitations, of cutting-edge computer vision and machine learning tool. We validate our method on 10 adult subjects and provide proof of feasibility with infant subjects.ResultsWe show that our method is both reliable and valid compared to existing state-of-the-art methods by estimating probe positions in a single measurement, and by tracking their translation and consistency across sessions. Finally, we show that our automatic method is able to estimate the position of probes on an infant head without lengthy offline procedures, a task which is considered challenging until now.ConclusionsOur proposed method allows, for the first time, the use of automated spatial co-registration methods on developmental and clinical populations, where lengthy, motion-sensitive measurement methods routinely fail.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Paul Holmes ◽  
Luigi Tamè

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human primary somatosensory cortex (S1), unlike over primary motor cortex (M1), does not produce an immediate, objective output. Researchers must therefore rely on one or more indirect methods to position the TMS coil over S1. The “gold standard” method of TMS coil positioning is to use individual functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (f/sMRI) alongside a stereotactic navigation system. In the absence of these facilities, however, one common method used to locate S1 is to find the scalp location that produces twitches in a hand muscle (e.g., the first dorsal interosseus, M1-FDI) and then move the coil posteriorly to target S1. There has been no systematic assessment of whether this commonly reported method of finding the hand area of S1 is optimal. To do this, we systematically reviewed 124 TMS studies targeting the S1 hand area and 95 fMRI studies involving passive finger and hand stimulation. Ninety-six TMS studies reported the scalp location assumed to correspond to S1-hand, which was on average 1.5–2 cm posterior to the functionally defined M1-hand area. Using our own scalp measurements combined with similar data from MRI and TMS studies of M1-hand, we provide the estimated scalp locations targeted in these TMS studies of the S1-hand. We also provide a summary of reported S1 coordinates for passive finger and hand stimulation in fMRI studies. We conclude that S1-hand is more lateral to M1-hand than assumed by the majority of TMS studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Paul Holmes ◽  
Luigi Tamè ◽  
Paisley Beeching ◽  
Mary Medford ◽  
Mariyana Rakova ◽  
...  

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) does not produce immediate outputs. Researchers must therefore rely on indirect methods for TMS coil positioning. The “gold standard” is to use individual functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, but the majority of studies don’t do this. The most common method to locate the hand area of S1 (S1-hand) is to move the coil posteriorly from the hand area of primary motor cortex (M1-hand). Yet, S1-hand is not directly posterior to M1-hand. We localized the index finger area of S1-hand (S1-index) experimentally in four ways. First, we reanalyzed functional MRI data from 20 participants who received vibrotactile stimulation to their 10 digits. Second, to assist the localization of S1-hand without MRI data, we constructed a probabilistic atlas of the central sulcus from 100 healthy adult MRIs and measured the likely scalp location of S1-index. Third, we conducted two experiments mapping the effects of TMS across the scalp on tactile discrimination performance. Fourth, we examined all available neuronavigation data from our laboratory on the scalp location of S1-index. Contrary to the prevailing method, and consistent with systematic review evidence, S1-index is close to the C3/C4 electroencephalography (EEG) electrode locations on the scalp, ~7–8 cm lateral to the vertex, and ~2 cm lateral and 0.5 cm posterior to the M1-hand scalp location. These results suggest that an immediate revision to the most commonly used heuristic to locate S1-hand is required. The results of many TMS studies of S1-hand need reassessment. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Noninvasive human brain stimulation requires indirect methods to target particular brain areas. Magnetic stimulation studies of human primary somatosensory cortex have used scalp-based heuristics to find the target, typically locating it 2 cm posterior to the motor cortex. We measured the scalp location of the hand area of primary somatosensory cortex and found that it is ~2 cm lateral to motor cortex. Our results suggest an immediate revision of the prevailing method is required.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Meteyard ◽  
Nicholas Holmes

AbstractThe magnetic pulse generated during Transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS] also stimulates cutaneous nerves and muscle fibres, with the most commonly reported side effect being muscle twitches and sometimes painful sensations. These sensations affect behaviour during experimental tasks, presenting a potential confound for ‘online’ single-pulse TMS studies. Our objective was to systematically map the degree of disturbance (ratings of annoyance, pain, and muscle twitches) caused by TMS at 43 locations across the scalp. Ten participants provided ratings whilst completing a choice reaction time task, and ten participants provided ratings whilst completing a ‘flanker’ reaction time task. TMS over frontal and inferior regions resulted in the highest ratings of annoyance, pain, and muscle twitches caused by TMS. In separate analyses we predicted the difference in reaction times (RT) under TMS by scalp location and subjective ratings. Frontal and inferior scalp locations showed the greatest cost to RTs under TMS (i.e., slowing), with midline sites showing no or minimal slowing. Increases in subjective ratings of disturbance predicted longer RTs under TMS. Critically, ratings were a better predictor of the cost of TMS than scalp location or scalp-to-cortex distance, and the more difficult ‘flanker’ task showed a greater effect of subjective disturbance. The peripheral sensations and discomfort caused by TMS pulses significantly and systematically influence RTs during single-pulse, online TMS experiments. We provide the data as an online resource (http://www.tms-smart.info) so that researchers can select control sites that account for the level of general interference in task performance caused by online single-pulse TMS.


2017 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junko Ozao-Choy ◽  
Daniel W. Nelson ◽  
Jason Hiles ◽  
Stacey Stern ◽  
Jeong Lim Yoon ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-498.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Xie ◽  
Yan Pan ◽  
Catriona McLean ◽  
Victoria Mar ◽  
Rory Wolfe ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (7-5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syazreen Hashim ◽  
Norlaili Mat Safri ◽  
Mohd Afzan Othman ◽  
Nor Aini Zakaria

Cortical network between brain regions is one of the topics that being investigated by brain researchers. Methods that are used to investigate brain developments of cognitive function include Partial Directed Coherence (PDC) and the power spectrum of the brain activity. The purposes of this study were to determine the cortico-cortical functional connectivity between brain regions using PDC and to investigate the power spectrum of brain activity while performing cognitive function assessments. Twenty healthy young adults, age between 20 to 30 years old, were asked to perform two tasks/tests; Trail Making Test (TMTA-alphabet, TMTA-number, TMTB-mixed alphabets and numerical) and Stroop Task. An electroencephalogram (EEG) machine was used to record the brain signals, and the data were analyzed using PDC and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).Our findings showed that not only frontal area but temporal and occipital area also generates information and the information was sent to various scalp location. Theta frequency was significantly increased at frontal area while gamma and high-gamma frequency bands were significantly increased at centro-parieto-occipito-temporal regions. All of these areas are associated with cognitive function doing specific task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document