The effect of bilateral cold block of the primate face primary somatosensory cortex on the performance of trained tongue-protrusion task and biting tasks

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 985-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. Lin ◽  
G. M. Murray ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Tongue Protrusion ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Control Series ◽  
Holding Period

1. Studies using ablation, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) and surface stimulation, and single-neuron recordings have suggested that the primate primary somatosensory cortex (SI) may play an important role in movement control. Our aim was to determine whether bilateral inactivation of face SI would indeed interfere with the control of tongue or jaw-closing movements. 2. Effects of reversible inactivation by cooling of face SI was investigated in two monkeys trained to perform both a tongue-protrusion task and a biting task. The cooling experiments were carried out after the orofacial representation within SI was identified by systematically defining the mechanoreceptive field of single neurons recorded in face SI. The deficits in the tongue or jaw-closing movement were evaluated by the success rates for the monkeys' performance of both tasks and by the force and electromyographic (EMG) activity recorded from the masseter, genioglossus, and digastric muscles associated with the tasks. 3. During bilateral cooling of face SI, there was a statistically significant reduction in the success rates for the performance of the tongue-protrusion task in comparison with control series of trials while the thermodes used to cool face SI were kept at 37 degrees C. Detailed analyses of force and EMG activity showed that the principal deficit was the inability of the monkeys to maintain a steady tongue-protrusive force in the force holding period during each trial and to exert a consistent tongue-protrusion force between different trials. The task performance returned to control protocol levels at 4 min after commencement of rewarming. 4. Identical cooling conditions did not significantly affect the success rates for the performance of the biting task. Although the extent of the deficit was not severe enough to cause a significant reduction in successful rates for the biting task, cooling did significantly affect the ability of the monkeys to maintain a steady force in the holding period during each trial and to exert a consistent force between different trials. In one monkey the success rate of the biting task was also not affected by bilaterally cooling of face SI with a pair of larger thermodes placed on the dura over most of the face SI, face primary motor cortex (face MI), and adjacent cortical regions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of reversible inactivation by cooling of the primate face motor cortex on the performance of a trained tongue-protrusion task and a trained biting task

1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Murray ◽  
L. D. Lin ◽  
E. M. Moustafa ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Cortical Function ◽  
Tongue Protrusion ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Control Series ◽  
Holding Period ◽  
The Face

1. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) and surface stimulation studies of primate face motor cortex have shown an extensive representation within face motor cortex devoted to movements of the tongue and face; only a very small representation for jaw-closing movements has ever been demonstrated. These data suggest that face motor cortex plays a critical role in the generation of tongue and facial movements but is less important in the generation of jaw-closing movements. Our aim was to determine whether disruption of primate face motor cortical function would indeed interfere with the generation of tongue movements but would not interfere with the generation of jaw-closing movements. 2. The face motor cortex was reversibly inactivated with the use of cooling in two monkeys that were trained to perform both a tongue-protrusion task and a biting task. Recording of single neuronal activity in the cortex beneath the thermode confirmed the reversible inactivation of the cortex. Each task involved a series of trials in which the monkey was required to produce a preset force level for a 0.5-s force holding period; the monkey received a fruit-juice reward if it successfully completed a task trial. Cooling of the ICMS-defined face motor cortex was achieved bilaterally or, in one experiment, unilaterally by circulating coolant through thermodes placed either on intact dura overlying face motor cortex in both monkeys or directly on the exposed pia in one of the monkeys;thermode temperature was lowered to 3-5 degrees C during cooling. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were also made from masseter, genioglossus, and digastric muscles. 3. During bilateral cooling of the thermodes on the dura overlying the face motor cortex, there was a significant reduction in the success rates for the performance of the tongue-protrusion task in comparison with control series of trials (i.e., precool and postcool) in which the thermodes were kept at 37 degrees C. Quantitative analyses of force and EMG activity showed that the principal deficit was an inability of each monkey to exert sufficient force with its tongue for a sufficient length of time onto the tongue-protrusion task transducer; this deficit was paralleled by a reduction in the level of genioglossus and digastric EMG activity. At 4 min after commencement of rewarming, task performance had returned to control, precool levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Motor planning brings human primary somatosensory cortex into action-specific preparatory states

eLife ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Ariani ◽  
J Andrew Pruszynski ◽  
Jörn Diedrichsen
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Activity Patterns ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Motor Planning ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Movement Planning ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex

Motor planning plays a critical role in producing fast and accurate movement. Yet, the neural processes that occur in human primary motor and somatosensory cortex during planning, and how they relate to those during movement execution, remain poorly understood. Here we used 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a delayed movement paradigm to study single finger movement planning and execution. The inclusion of no-go trials and variable delays allowed us to separate what are typically overlapping planning and execution brain responses. Although our univariate results show widespread deactivation during finger planning, multivariate pattern analysis revealed finger-specific activity patterns in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), which predicted the planned finger action. Surprisingly, these activity patterns were as informative as those found in contralateral primary motor cortex (M1). Control analyses ruled out the possibility that the detected information was an artifact of subthreshold movements during the preparatory delay. Furthermore, we observed that finger-specific activity patterns during planning were highly correlated to those during execution. These findings reveal that motor planning activates the specific S1 and M1 circuits that are engaged during the execution of a finger press, while activity in both regions is overall suppressed. We propose that preparatory states in S1 may improve movement control through changes in sensory processing or via direct influence of spinal motor neurons.

scholarly journals Locating primary somatosensory cortex in human brain stimulation studies: systematic review and meta-analytic evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Paul Holmes ◽  
Luigi Tamè
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Indirect Methods ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
Stereotactic Navigation ◽  
Scalp Location ◽  
Hand Area

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human primary somatosensory cortex (S1), unlike over primary motor cortex (M1), does not produce an immediate, objective output. Researchers must therefore rely on one or more indirect methods to position the TMS coil over S1. The “gold standard” method of TMS coil positioning is to use individual functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (f/sMRI) alongside a stereotactic navigation system. In the absence of these facilities, however, one common method used to locate S1 is to find the scalp location that produces twitches in a hand muscle (e.g., the first dorsal interosseus, M1-FDI) and then move the coil posteriorly to target S1. There has been no systematic assessment of whether this commonly reported method of finding the hand area of S1 is optimal. To do this, we systematically reviewed 124 TMS studies targeting the S1 hand area and 95 fMRI studies involving passive finger and hand stimulation. Ninety-six TMS studies reported the scalp location assumed to correspond to S1-hand, which was on average 1.5–2 cm posterior to the functionally defined M1-hand area. Using our own scalp measurements combined with similar data from MRI and TMS studies of M1-hand, we provide the estimated scalp locations targeted in these TMS studies of the S1-hand. We also provide a summary of reported S1 coordinates for passive finger and hand stimulation in fMRI studies. We conclude that S1-hand is more lateral to M1-hand than assumed by the majority of TMS studies.

scholarly journals High-order thalamic inputs to primary somatosensory cortex are stronger and longer lasting than cortical inputs

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanying Zhang ◽  
Randy M Bruno
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Pyramidal Neurons ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Specific Substrate ◽  
Medial Nucleus ◽  
Posterior Medial Nucleus ◽  
Cortical Inputs

Layer (L) 2/3 pyramidal neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) are sparsely active, spontaneously and during sensory stimulation. Long-range inputs from higher areas may gate L2/3 activity. We investigated their in vivo impact by expressing channelrhodopsin in three main sources of feedback to rat S1: primary motor cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex, and secondary somatosensory thalamic nucleus (the posterior medial nucleus, POm). Inputs from cortical areas were relatively weak. POm, however, more robustly depolarized L2/3 cells and, when paired with peripheral stimulation, evoked action potentials. POm triggered not only a stronger fast-onset depolarization but also a delayed all-or-none persistent depolarization, lasting up to 1 s and exhibiting alpha/beta-range oscillations. Inactivating POm somata abolished persistent but not initial depolarization, indicating a recurrent circuit mechanism. We conclude that secondary thalamus can enhance L2/3 responsiveness over long periods. Such timescales could provide a potential modality-specific substrate for attention, working memory, and plasticity.

scholarly journals Metaplasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex: effects on physiology and tactile perception

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 2681-2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina B. Jones ◽  
Tea Lulic ◽  
Aaron Z. Bailey ◽  
Tanner N. Mackenzie ◽  
Yi Qun Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Median Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Ratio ◽  
Theta Burst

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over human primary motor cortex evokes plasticity and metaplasticity, the latter contributing to the homeostatic balance of excitation and inhibition. Our knowledge of TBS-induced effects on primary somatosensory cortex (SI) is limited, and it is unknown whether TBS induces metaplasticity within human SI. Sixteen right-handed participants (6 females, mean age 23 yr) received two TBS protocols [continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS)] delivered in six different combinations over SI in separate sessions. TBS protocols were delivered at 30 Hz and were as follows: a single cTBS protocol, a single iTBS protocol, cTBS followed by cTBS, iTBS followed by iTBS, cTBS followed by iTBS, and iTBS followed by cTBS. Measures included the amplitudes of the first and second somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) via median nerve stimulation, their paired-pulse ratio (PPR), and temporal order judgment (TOJ). Dependent measures were obtained before TBS and at 5, 25, 50, and 90 min following stimulation. Results indicate similar effects following cTBS and iTBS; increased amplitudes of the second SEP and PPR without amplitude changes to SEP 1, and impairments in TOJ. Metaplasticity was observed such that TOJ impairments following a single cTBS protocol were abolished following consecutive cTBS protocols. Additionally, consecutive iTBS protocols altered the time course of effects when compared with a single iTBS protocol. In conclusion, 30-Hz cTBS and iTBS protocols delivered in isolation induce effects consistent with a TBS-induced reduction in intracortical inhibition within SI. Furthermore, cTBS- and iTBS-induced metaplasticity appear to follow homeostatic and nonhomeostatic rules, respectively.

Functional properties of single neurons in the primate face primary somatosensory cortex. III. Modulation of responses to peripheral stimuli during trained orofacial motor behaviors

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2401-2413 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. Lin ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Lingual Nerve ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Single Neurons ◽  
Tongue Protrusion ◽  
Task Period ◽  
The Face ◽  
Evoked Activity ◽  
Two Phases

1. In previous papers we have demonstrated that most single neurons in the face primary somatosensory cortex (SI) alter their firing rate during a trained tongue-protrusion task and some also during a trained biting task. Although the data suggest that some of the task-related activity in face SI might conceivably come from reafferent inputs from moving orofacial structures, it is possible that orofacial inputs are modulated during the trained orofacial movements. This study was initiated to investigate the possible modulation of evoked orofacial somatosensory responses of face SI neurons during trained tongue-protrusion and biting tasks. 2. Two monkeys were trained to perform a tongue-protrusion and a biting task and to accept stimulation applied to the facial skin or the lingual nerve during the tasks. For SI neurons with a tongue mechanoreceptive field (RF), electrical stimulation was applied to the lingual nerve to elicit neuronal activity; for SI neurons with a RF at the other locations, electrical or mechanical stimulation was applied to the RF to elicit neuronal activity. Modulation of neuronal activity evoked by low-threshold stimulation of the RF was tested, during the tongue-protrusion and/or biting tasks, in 44 face SI neurons and an additional 3 forelimb SI neurons with a palm RF (palm RF neurons). The 44 face SI neurons included 13 with a tongue RF (tongue RF neurons), 29 with a lip RF (lip RF neurons), and 2 with a lateral face RF (face RF neurons). 3. For face SI neurons tested during both force dynamic and holding phases of the task period, the evoked activity (i.e., the number of evoked spikes in 50 ms after the onset of stimulation) was decreased in at least one of the two phases for the majority (90%) of 31 neurons studied during the tongue-protrusion task and 61% of 23 studied during the biting task. The proportion of neurons modulated during the tongue-protrusion task was significantly higher than that during the biting task. For the 18 face SI tested during both tasks, a decrease in evoked activity occurred in 10 lip RF neurons for both tasks and in the remaining 5 lip RF and 3 tongue RF neurons for the tongue-protrusion task only. No neurons tested showed a clear facilitation of evoked activity during the task period of either task.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Layer-specific sensory processing impairment in the primary somatosensory cortex after motor cortex infarction

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fukui ◽  
Hironobu Osaki ◽  
Yoshifumi Ueta ◽  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Takakazu Kawamata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Temporal Coding ◽  
Network Activity ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Sensory Impairment

AbstractPrimary motor cortex (M1) infarction occasionally causes sensory impairment. Because sensory signal plays an important role in motor control, sensory impairment compromises recovery and rehabilitation from motor disability. Despite the importance of sensory-motor integration for rehabilitation after M1 infarction, the neural mechanism of the sensory impairment is poorly understood. We show that the sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was impaired in the acute phase of M1 infarction and recovered in a layer-specific manner in the subacute phase. This layer dependent recovery process and the anatomical connection pattern from M1 to S1 suggested the functional connectivity from M1 to S1 plays a key role in the impairment of sensory processing in S1. The simulation study demonstrated that the loss of inhibition from M1 to S1 in the acute phase of M1 infarction could cause the sensory processing impairment in S1, and the complementation of inhibition could recover the temporal coding. Taken together, we revealed how focal stroke of M1 alters cortical network activity of sensory processing, in which inhibitory input from M1 to S1 may be involved.

scholarly journals A cortico-cortical pathway targets inhibitory interneurons and modulates paw movement during locomotion in mice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-wei Chang ◽  
Meiling Zhao ◽  
Samantha Grudzien ◽  
Max F Oginsky ◽  
Yexin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Brain Slices ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Inhibitory Interneuron ◽  
The Body ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Female Mice ◽  
Secondary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Inputs

The primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is important for the control of movement as it encodes sensory input from the body periphery and external environment during ongoing movement. Mouse S1 consists of several distinct sensorimotor subnetworks that receive topographically organized cortico-cortical inputs from distant sensorimotor areas, including the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) and primary motor cortex (M1). The role of the vibrissal S1 area and associated cortical connections during active sensing is well documented, but whether (and if so, how) non-whisker S1 areas are involved in movement control remains relatively unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that unilateral silencing of the non-whisker S1 area in both male and female mice disrupts hind paw movement during locomotion on a rotarod and a runway. S2 and M1 provide major long range inputs to this S1 area. Silencing S2 to non whisker S1 projections alters the hind paw orientation during locomotion while manipulation of the M1 projection has little effect. Using patch clamp recordings in brain slices from male and female mice, we show that S2 projection preferentially innervates inhibitory interneuron subtypes. We conclude that S2 S1 corticocortical interactions mediated by local interneurons are critical for efficient locomotion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document