How to discriminate conclusively among different models of decision making?
2016 ◽
Vol 115
(5)
◽
pp. 2251-2254
◽
Keyword(s):
A popular and successful class of decision-making models (the “evidence accumulator” models) has been recently challenged by a new hypothesis called the urgency-gating model. Hawkins et al. ( J Neurophysiol 114: 40–47, 2015) used a sophisticated curve-fitting procedure to show that these models are discriminable and thus testable in constant evidence tasks. In this Neuro Forum article I raise possible limitations of such an approach, discuss some of its implications, and propose alternative solutions.
2019 ◽
Vol 191
(2)
◽
2009 ◽
Vol 147-149
◽
pp. 606-611
2014 ◽
Vol 30
(5-6)
◽
pp. 519-528
◽
2000 ◽
Vol 44
(1)
◽
pp. 72-83
◽
2004 ◽
Vol 29
(4)
◽
pp. 312-318
◽
1993 ◽
Vol 4
(3)
◽
pp. 263-264
◽