Quantitative Phase Analysis of Devonian Shales by Computer Controlled X-Ray Diffraction of Spray Dried Samples

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T. Smith ◽  
Robert L. Snyder ◽  
W. E. Brownell

Spray drying is shown to be an effective and rapid method for preparing samples for quantitative analysis by x-ray powder diffraction. Previously intractable problems like the simultaneous analysis of multiple phases in orientation prone systems can be carried out. Using this method, and a computer controlled diffractometer, five and six phase analyses of Devonian shales can be accomplished in approximately forty minutes. A rapid and convenient method for using the absorption diffraction technique for x-ray quantitative analysis is described.

Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanko Popović

X-ray powder diffraction is an ideal technique for the quantitative analysis of a multiphase sample. The intensities of diffraction lines of a phase in a multiphase sample are proportional to the phase fraction and the quantitative analysis can be obtained if the correction for the absorption of X-rays in the sample is performed. Simple procedures of quantitative X-ray diffraction phase analysis of a multiphase sample are presented. The matrix-flushing method, with the application of reference intensities, yields the relationship between the intensity and phase fraction free from the absorption effect, thus, shunting calibration curves or internal standard procedures. Special attention is paid to the doping methods: (i) simultaneous determination of the fractions of several phases using a single doping and (ii) determination of the fraction of the dominant phase. The conditions to minimize systematic errors are discussed. The problem of overlapping of diffraction lines can be overcome by combining the doping method (i) and the individual profile fitting method, thus performing the quantitative phase analysis without the reference to structural models of particular phases. Recent suggestions in quantitative phase analysis are quoted, e.g., in study of the decomposition of supersaturated solid solutions—intermetallic alloys. Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis, organized by the IUCr Commission on Powder Diffraction, is discussed shortly. The doping methods have been applied in various studies, e.g., phase transitions in titanium dioxide, biomineralization processes, and phases in intermetallic oxide systems and intermetallic alloys.


1980 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 253-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. McCarthy ◽  
R.C. Gehringer ◽  
D.K. Smith ◽  
V.M. Injaian ◽  
D.E. Pfoertsch ◽  
...  

Quantitative phase analysis by X-ray diffraction (QTXRD) has been an established tool of analytical chemistry for more than four decades. Despite its age, this tool remains ascendant as the only universally applicable method for determining the manner in which elements are combined into crystalline phases in multiphase solids. QTXRD is entering its second renaissance. The first came with the introduction of the counter diffractometer in the late 1940's. The specimen preparation and data collection processes were exacting and tedious, but reasonably accurate analyses could be obtained. The second came with the introduction of computer controlled diffractometers, whose software packages include QTXRD routines, in the late 1970's. With the tedium of data collection and analysis greatly reduced, we can expect even more widespread adoption of this tool in the general analytical laboratory.


2014 ◽  
Vol 881-883 ◽  
pp. 1241-1244
Author(s):  
Wei Jin Zeng ◽  
Chao Zeng ◽  
Wei He

The quantitative phase analyses of a slag have been successfully carried out by using both of the full-profile Rietveld and RIR methods from X-ray powder diffraction data. The qualitative phase analysis indicates that the slag contains mayenite (CaO)12(Al2O3)7, olivine Ca2(SiO4), gehlenite Ca2Al (AlSiO7), lemite Ca2(SiO4) and hibonite CaO(Al2O3)6. The quantitative analysis from Rietveld refinement shows that the weight concentrations of mayenite, olivine, gehlenite, lemite and hibonite for the slag are 48.8(4) wt.%, 32.2(5) wt.%, 11.0(9) wt.%, 6.2(1.1) wt.% and 1.8 (1.2) wt.%, respectively. The quantitative phase analysis results obtained by Rietveld method are more precise then those by RIR method.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter N. Schreiner ◽  
Ron Jenkins

Quantitative phase analysis by powder diffractometry requires accurate measurement of the integrated intensities of the diffracted, lines. When lines are isolated and on simple backgrounds, count integration techniques work very well. However, when one or more lines overlap the line of interest, or a complex background is present, profile fitting techniques are required in order to eliminate interferences.Profile fitting involves choosing a mathematical model to represent the expected profile shapes. Experience has shown that the profile shapes obtained with a parafocusing powder diffractometer are not easily described and many models have been tried with varying degrees of success. Generally the more free parameters allowed In the model the ‘setter the fits, although, aesthetically one would like to keep the number of free parameters to a minimum.


2014 ◽  
Vol 633 ◽  
pp. 443-446
Author(s):  
Kai Li ◽  
Hai Jian Li ◽  
Ping Wu

This paper studied the problems met in the quantitative analysis of synthetic Mullite phase,which was based on the analysis of various typical Mullite composite scheme. A method of quantitative analysis of Mullite phase (excluding amorphous phase SiO2) by use X-ray diffraction was discussed. The error of the analysis can be verified by chemical analysis of Al2O3 content. The method can effectively improve the accuracy of quantitative analysis of the Mullite phase, the error analysis is less than 3%. The error range can meet the accuracy requirement of Mullite content in the production.Studies show that this method is preliminarily solved how to quantitative the content of mullite phase by X-ray diffraction method .


Author(s):  
Marek Kotrlý

The majority of expert examination in forensic science is concerned with comparison, determination, and description of diversified samples. X-ray diffraction (powdered and/or single crystal) is bringing big benefits and analytical possibilities into forensic expert work, which are not easily provided by other methods. XRD methods are used in combination with other analytical methods (SEM with EDS/WDS, micro XRF, optical microscopy, FTIR, etc.).Importance of XRD phase analysis in forensic science lies namely in: analysis of relatively small-volume samples, relatively non-destructive, exact phase analysis, quantitative analysis (in majority of cases). And method is conclusive for a court.


1966 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1741-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Karlak ◽  
D. S. Burnett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document