scholarly journals Sudden Death by Pulmonary Thromboembolism due to a Large Uterine Leiomyoma with a Parasitic Vein to the Mesentery

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Varsha Podduturi ◽  
Danielle R. Armstrong-Briley ◽  
Joseph M. Guileyardo

The pathophysiology of venous thrombosis is classically attributed to alterations in one or more components of Virchow’s triad: hypercoagulability, stasis, and damage to the vascular endothelium. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) may lead to pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), and the latter is culpable for many deaths annually in the United States; however, DVT as a complication of uterine leiomyoma has rarely been reported. We report a case of a 57-year-old woman whose death was due to a large pedunculated subserosal leiomyoma externally compressing the pelvic veins resulting in stasis and venous thrombosis leading to fatal PE. The association of large pelvic masses with venous thrombosis has clinical implications, since prophylactic surgery could be life-saving.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Casique-Bocanegra ◽  
Aranzazu Rodríguez-Garrote ◽  
Gaisha Danabayeva ◽  
Javier Alonso-Díaz ◽  
Noelia Diez-Martín ◽  
...  

Abstract Venous thromboembolic disease is a complex and multifactorial pathology, the result of the interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. The Virchow triad, first described in 1859, is still valid to explain the pathogenesis of thrombosis, where three main factors are reflected: a) hypercoagulable state; b) impaired blood flow; c) endothelial injury. The outbreak of a new COVID-19 pandemic has led to drastic confinement measures, with the consequent syndrome of immobility, as occurred in Spain between the months of March to June 2020. Pregnancy and hormonal contraception have proven to be an environmental factor predisposing to venous thrombosis. The presence of genetic factors, such as the mutation of the prothrombin gene G20210A, has been shown to be a risk factor for the presentation of venous thrombosis. We present the case of a 23-year-old non-smoking woman, a heterozygous carrier of a prothrombin gene mutation G20210A (hypercoagulability), who after confinement due to COVID-19 (impaired blood flow due to immobility) and use of hormonal patch contraceptives (endothelial abnormality), triggered deep vein thrombosis (DVT) / pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) that required hospital admission; and who, after rapid withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment, presented a second and a third episode of DVT. We highlight the usefulness of evaluating risk factors in G20210A heterozygous patients and the proper management of anticoagulation to avoid recurrences in patients susceptible to DVT / PE.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Casique-Bocanegra ◽  
Aranzazu Rodríguez-Garrote ◽  
Gaisha Danabayeva ◽  
Javier Alonso-Díaz ◽  
Noelia Diez-Martín ◽  
...  

Abstract Venous thromboembolic disease is a complex and multifactorial pathology, the result of the interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. The Virchow triad, first described in 1859, is still valid to explain the pathogenesis of thrombosis, where three main factors are reflected: a) hypercoagulable state; b) impaired blood flow; c) endothelial injury. The outbreak of a new COVID-19 pandemic has led to drastic confinement measures, with the consequent syndrome of immobility, as occurred in Spain between the months of March to June 2020. Pregnancy and hormonal contraception have proven to be an environmental factor predisposing to venous thrombosis. The presence of genetic factors, such as the mutation of the prothrombin gene G20210A, has been shown to be a risk factor for the presentation of venous thrombosis. We present the case of a 23-year-old non-smoking woman, a heterozygous carrier of a prothrombin gene mutation G20210A (hypercoagulability), who after confinement due to COVID-19 (impaired blood flow due to immobility) and use of hormonal patch contraceptives (endothelial abnormality), triggered deep vein thrombosis (DVT) / pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) that required hospital admission; and who, after rapid withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment, presented a second and a third episode of DVT. We highlight the usefulness of evaluating risk factors in G20210A heterozygous patients and the proper management of anticoagulation to avoid recurrences in patients susceptible to DVT / PE.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 263-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Williams ◽  
Emma Abbey

Aims and MethodAll patients attending the local supervised drug consumption clinics were surveyed over a month. They were asked via a questionnaire to list the risks of injecting drugs, particularly the symptoms and consequences of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Of 69 patients surveyed, 46 agreed to take part.ResultsOnly 9 patients (20%) had never injected drugs, whereas 16 (43%) of those injecting had injected into the groin; 10 patients (22%) had experienced a venous thrombosis themselves, and 35 (76%) knew of someone who had. Only 30 (65%) knew what a clot or thrombosis was. Pain and swelling were the most commonly reported symptoms, but few drug misusers knew of other symptoms. The best informed were those who had experienced thrombosis themselves recently.Clinical ImplicationsThe results indicate an apparent lack of basic knowledge about the risks of DVT in this sample of drug misusers, and a need for some new initiatives to address health education in this area for all drug misusers.


Author(s):  
Danielle T Vlazny ◽  
Ahmed K Pasha ◽  
Wiktoria Kuczmik ◽  
Waldemar E Wysokinski ◽  
Matthew Bartlett ◽  
...  

1972 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 89-91

Earlier this year1 we discussed the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and concluded that heparin in low dosage seemed the most promising drug for preventing deep-vein thrombosis postoperatively, although the optimum regimen was not yet known. Sharnoff and his associates who began this work 10 years ago claim to have shown that this treatment largely prevents fatal pulmonary embolism.2


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo A. Escobar ◽  
Peter K. Henke ◽  
Thomas W. Wakefield

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise venous thromboembolism (VTE). Together, they comprise a serious health problem as there are over 275,000 new VTE cases per year in the United States, resulting in a prevalence of one to two per 1,000 individuals, with some studies suggesting that the incidence may even be double that. This review covers assessment of a VTE event, initial evaluation of a patient suspected of having VTE, medical history, clinical presentation of VTE, physical examination, laboratory evaluation, imaging, prophylaxis against perioperative VTE, indications for immediate intervention (threat to life or limb), indications for urgent intervention, and management of nonemergent VTE. Figures show a modified Caprini score questionnaire used at the University of Michigan to determine individual risk of VTE and the indicated prophylaxis regimen; Wells criteria for DVT and PE; phlegmasia cerulea dolens secondary to acute left iliofemoral DVT after thigh trauma; compression duplex ultrasonography of lower extremity veins; computed tomographic angiogram of the chest demonstrating a thrombus in the pulmonary artery, with extension into the right main pulmonary; management of PE according to Wells criteria findings; management of PE with right heart strain in cases of massive or submassive PE; treatment of DVT according to clinical scenario; a lower extremity venogram of a patient with May-Thurner syndrome and its subsequent endovascular treatment; and various examples of retrievable vena cava filters (not drawn to scale). Tables list initial clinical assessment for VTE, clinical scenarios possibly benefiting from prolonged anticoagulation after VTE, indications for laboratory investigation of secondary thrombophilia, venous thromboembolic risk accorded to hypercoagulable states, and Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria Score to avoid the need for D-dimer in patients suspected of having PE.   This review contains 11 highly rendered figures, 5 tables, and 167 references. Key words: anticoagulation; deep vein thrombosis; postthrombotic syndrome; pulmonary embolism; recurrent venous thromboembolism; thrombophilia; venous thromboembolism; PE; VTE; DVT 


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber

Venous thromboembolism, which involves venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and is being seen with increasing frequency in outpatients. This chapter discusses the risk factors, etiology, classification, pathophysiology, natural history, prognosis, diagnosis (including venous thrombosis, recurrent venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (including the pharmacology of antithrombotic agents), as well as venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and miscellaneous thromboembolic disorders (including thrombosis of unusual sites).  This review contains 8 figures, 16 tables, and 79 references. Keywords: Venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, embolectomy, thrombolysis, hypercoagulability, duplex ultrasonography, D-dimer, anticoagulation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document