scholarly journals An In Vitro Assessment of Gutta-Percha Coating of New Carrier-Based Root Canal Fillings

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghad Abdulrazzaq Alhashimi ◽  
Richard Foxton ◽  
Shihab Romeed ◽  
Sanjukta Deb
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Microcomputed Tomography ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Orthodontic Wire ◽  
In Vitro Assessment ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Push Out

The first aim of this paper was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of the gutta-percha coating of Thermafil and GuttaCore and compare it with that of gutta-percha used to coat an experimental hydroxyapatite/polyethylene (HA/PE) obturator. The second aim was to assess the thickness of gutta-percha around the carriers of GuttaCore and HA/PE obturators using microcomputed tomography (μCT). Ten (size 30) 1 mm thick samples of each group (Thermafil, GuttaCore, and HA/PE) were prepared. An orthodontic wire with a diameter of 0.5 mm was attached to the plunger of an Instron machine in order to allow the push-out testing of the gutta-percha coating. Five samples of (GuttaCore and HA/PE) were scanned usingμCT. The data obtained were analysed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test. HA/PE obturators exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength (P<0.001) determined at 6.84 ± 0.96 than those of Guttacore around 3.75 ± 0.75 and Thermafil at 1.5 ± 0.63. GuttaCore demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than Thermafil (P<0.001).μCT imaging revealed that the thickness of gutta-percha around the experimental HA/PE carrier was homogeneously distributed. The bondability and thickness of gutta-percha coating around HA/PE carriers were superior to those of GuttaCore and Thermafil obturators.

scholarly journals Effect of Triple Antibiotic Paste on The Bond Strength of Epoxy and Methacrylate Resin–Based Sealers to Root Canal Dentine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereshte Sobhnamayan ◽  
Alireza Adl ◽  
Mahdi Sedigh-Shams ◽  
Hossein Mirkhaghani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Triple Antibiotic Paste ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background: Triple antibiotic pastes (TAP) has gained popularity as a root canal medicament in regenerative endodontic procedures and other endodontic treatment modalities. As this medicament changes the chemical structure of dentine, it may affect the bond strength of endodontic sealers to radicular dentine. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of TAP on the bond Strength of epoxy and methacrylate resin- based sealers to root canal dentine.Methods: In this in vitro study, eighty single-rooted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper rotary system. The specimens were randomly divided into a control group (without intracanal dressing) and an experimental group receiving TAP (n = 40). The intracanal dressing was removed after three weeks. Then samples of each group were randomly divided into four subgroups (n = 10) and obturated with gutta-percha and different resin-based sealers. G1: AH Plus, G2: Syntex, G3: EndoREZ, G4: MetaSEAL. After one week, 16 Slices of 1±0.1 mm thickness were obtained from the midroots of teeth in each subgroup and a push-out test was used to measure the bond strength. Slices were examined using a stereomicroscope at 30× to determine the mode of failure. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, one- way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests (α = 0.05).Results: Compared to control group, TAP significantly increased the bond strength of MetaSeal and EndoREZ (p<0.05). In the control group, epoxy resin- based sealers showed higher bond strength compared to methacrylate ones (p=0.00). In TAP group, Syntex and EndoREZ showed significantly the greatest and the lowest bond strengths respectively (p<.05). The analysis of failure modes revealed a predominance of mixed failures in all groups except for Syntex group in which most failures were cohesive.Conclusions: TAP significantly increased the bond strength of methacrylate resin- based sealers.

scholarly journals Effect of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: An in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Roopadevi Garlapati ◽  
KolluriMohana Chandra ◽  
PraveenKumar Gali ◽  
Bolla Nagesh ◽  
Sayesh Vemuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Atmospheric Plasma ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Push Out

In vitro evaluation of the push-out bond strength of the epoxy resin-based root canal sealer to root dentin irradiated with double-wavelength lasers

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-197
Author(s):  
Massoud Rahati ◽  
Ezatolah Kazeminejad ◽  
Sareh Said Yekta-Michael ◽  
Norbert Gutknecht
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Effect of exposure to etidronic acid on the bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements after 1 and 21 days: an in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Rebolloso de Barrio ◽  
Juan José Pérez-Higueras ◽  
Ernesto García-Barbero ◽  
Lucía Gancedo-Caravia
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Setting Time ◽  
Etidronic Acid ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Background After reparation of root perforations with calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC), the surface of the material is expected to be exposed to root canal irrigants (RCI) while resuming the root canal treatment. Methods The aim of this study was to compare the effect of exposure to a mixture of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and etidronic acid (HEBP) or other irrigants on the Push Out Bond Strength (POBS) of CSBC after two different setting times. 240 root slices 1 mm thick were obtained from single-rooted human teeth. A 1.4 mm diameter perforation was performed on each slice and filled with Biodentine (BD) or ProRoot MTA (PMTA). After 1 or 21 days they were exposed to 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 5.25% NaOCl, a mixture of 5.25% NaOCl and 9% HEBP (NaOCl + HEBP) or saline (n = 15) and submitted to a push-out test. POBS results were analysed with ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results BD showed higher POBS than PMTA after 1 day (p < .05). After 21 days no differences were found between materials. After 1 day exposure to NaOCl + HEBP resulted in higher POBS, compared to the other irrigants (p < .05). Conclusion POBS results are influenced by the cement, the setting time and the exposure to irrigants.

scholarly journals Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Humberto Nunes ◽  
Ricardo Gariba Silva ◽  
Edson Alfredo ◽  
Manoel D. Sousa-Neto ◽  
Yara T. C. Silva-Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
Push Out

This study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document