scholarly journals Comparison of Modifications in Flap Anastomosis Patterns and Skin Incision Types for External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Anterior-Only Flap Anastomosis with W Skin Incision versus Anterior and Posterior Flap Anastomosis with Linear Skin Incision

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burcu Dirim ◽  
Selam Yekta Sendul ◽  
Mehmet Demir ◽  
Erdem Ergen ◽  
Zeynep Acar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drainage System ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Posterior Flap ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Scar Assessment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Group B

Purpose. To compare the outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy (E-DCR) by using two different flap anastomosis patterns and skin incision types.Methods. This study included 79 patients (88 eyes) with lacrimal drainage system disorders who underwent E-DCR surgery. Fifty eyes of 44 patients (group A) underwent E-DCR by suturing anterior and posterior flaps (H-flap) of the lacrimal sac with curvilinear skin incision whereas in 38 eyes of 35 patients (group B) DCR was performed by suturing only anterior flaps (U-flap) with W skin incision.Results. The success rate was evaluated according to lacrimal patency and scar assessment scores. Patency was achieved in 78 patients (88.6%). In terms of groups, patency was 44 eyes (88.0%) in group A and 34 eyes (89.5%) in group B. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rates of lacrimal patency between the two groups. Further, there was no statistically significant difference concerning cutaneous scar scores.Conclusion. Our study suggests that anastomoses of only anterior flaps or both anterior and posterior flaps have similar success rates; suturing only anterior flaps is easier to perform and shortens the operative time. In addition, W skin incision is a reasonable alternative to curvilinear incision for reducing scar formation.

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

scholarly journals Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadir Özdamar ◽  
Alper Sen
Keyword(s):  
Retention Rates ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Temporal Muscle ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Status ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Age Range

Abstract Background There are no studies in the literature, comparing the functional and anatomical successes of the use of fascial and perichondrial grafts in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasties. Objectives To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of grafting with the fascia of the temporalis muscle and with the perichondrium of the tragal cartilage in patients undergoing primary transcanal type 1 tympanoplasty with endoscopy. Methods We enrolled a total of 151 patients (80 females and 71 males with a mean age of 26.0 ± 9.3 years in the age range between 18-57) with MERI scores ranging from 1 to 3 and who underwent a transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the type of the graft used. The patients were assigned to either the tragal cartilage perichondrium group (Group A) or the fascia of the temporal muscle (Group B). The groups were compared according to the pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps and to the status of the tympanic membrane. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of the age, gender, localization, MERI scores, the duration of the operation, and the size of the perforation (all p values> 0.05). The pre-operative air-bone gap values of Group A and B did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.073). The postoperative improvement in the air-bone gap value did not demonstrate a significant difference between Group A and B (p = 0.202). The graft retention rates were 94.9 and 97.2% in Group A and in Group B respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the graft retention success rates (p = 0.743). Conclusion Perichondrium and fascia were suitable for use in endoscopic tympanoplasties.

scholarly journals Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy done with and without Silicon Tube Stents: A Comparative Case Series Analysis Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir Naik ◽  
Sarika S Naik ◽  
S Ravishankara ◽  
Mohan K Appaji ◽  
MK Goutham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Series Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Silicon Tube ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Primary Healing

ABSTRACT Background/objectives Neo-ostium cicatrization and closure is considered a major factor for surgical failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EnDCR). Wide neo-ostium, mucosal flaps, sac marsupialization with primary healing and silicone tube stent improves surgical outcomes of EnDCR. Materials and methods EnDCR were done in 238 patients. Group A included 172 patients where no stents were used and group B included 66 patients where silicon tube stents were used. All the surgeries were done under general anesthesia. Results In our study, 89.53% success in syringing patency was seen in group A, 89.39% success in syringing patency was seen in group B at 6 months of follow-up. No significant difference in success rate were seen in the two study groups. Conclusion No significant difference in EnDCR success rates were seen with the use of stents in our study. So stenting probing and dilatation are not advocated routinely in all cases and a wide neo-ostium with mucosal flaps and primary healing is the secret to success. How to cite this article Naik SM, Mushannavar AS, Ravishankara S, Appaji MK, Goutham MK, Devi NP, Naik SS. Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy done with and without Silicon Tube Stents: A Comparative Case Series Analysis Study. Int J Head Neck Surg 2012;3(3):147-153.

scholarly journals Antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision versus after cord clamping in the prevention of maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity after cesarean section

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W H Eltantawy ◽  
K M Labib ◽  
A M Farag
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Infectious Morbidity ◽  
Cord Clamping ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background the purpose of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures is not to sterilize tissues but to reduce colonisation pressure of microorganisms introduced at the time of the operation to a level that can be overcome by the patient’s immune system. Aim of the study to compare the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis administered in cesarean section preoperatively versus after neonatal cord clamp on postoperative infectious complications for both the mother and the neonate. Patients and Methods This comparative study was carried out between August 2017 and February 2018, at Ain Shams maternity hospital and Al-Galaa teaching hospital, a prospective randomized control comparativestudy of 874 pregnant ladies undergoing cesarean section after obtaining the approval of the local ethical committee and a fully-informed written consent. Results Of 874 pregnant ladies undergoing cesarean section, mean gestational age in group A (38.71±1.09); while in group B mean gestational age (38.86±1.06). In group A, wound infection 8 cases (1.6%), endometritis 25 cases (5.7%), UTI 18 case (4.1%). In group B, wound infection 16 cases (3.7%), endometritis 35 cases (8%), UTI 28 case (6.4%). No cases suffered from early or long term neonatal complications. Conclusion there is no significant difference between timing of antibiotic either before skin incision or after cord clamping, however there are risk factors that increase the maternal, fetal infectious morbidity as high BMI, low gestational age, previous section, general anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Single vs. extended antibiotic for prevention of surgical infection in emergent cesarean delivery

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
David Nitrushwa ◽  
Rahel Ghebre ◽  
Marie A Unyuzimana ◽  
Urania Magriples ◽  
Maria Small ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Surgical Infection ◽  
Emergency Cesarean ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: Emergency Cesarean Section (ECS) improves maternal and neonatal outcomes but can be associated with complications including Surgical Site Infections (SSI). Prophylactic antibiotics reduce SSIs but inappropriate use increases antibiotic resistance. The study aim was to assess single versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for SSI prevention in a limited-resource setting. Methods: All patients undergoing ECS in a rural district hospital were assessed for eligibility from 2015 to 2016. Participants were randomized, Group A received one dose of 2 g Ampicillin 15 to 60 minutes before skin incision and Group B received 2 g prior to skin incision with additional 1g every 8 hours over 72 hours. Participants were followed for 30 days, Demographic and clinical data were collected by chart review and patient phone interviews were performed on Days 3, 7, 15 and 30. Results: Three hundred and one participants were analyzed (147 in Group A; 154 in Group B). There were 8 surgical site infections in Group A and 4 in Group B (p=0.089). The overall prevalence of surgical site infections was lower than expected (4.00%). Most of SSIs cases were diagnosed on day 7 (66.6% of all cases of SSI) and only 22.2% of cases were diagnosed at discharge (day 3). Only 1 additional case was diagnosed at day 15. Conclusion: Compliance to infection control measures can reduce the rate of SSIs. There was no significant difference between the use of a single vs multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics in our study but the SSI rate was low.

Trabeculectomy with OloGen versus Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Silicone Oil-Induced Glaucoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham Samy Shalaby ◽  
Noureldin Hussein Hashem
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Aim To compare the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and success rate of trabeculectomy with OloGen to that of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in cases of silicone oil-induced glaucoma. Materials and Methods Forty eyes of forty patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitrectomy and silicone oil injection (followed by silicone oil removal) were assigned to two groups. Group A included 20 cases who underwent trabeculectomy with OloGen, while group B cases contained 20 cases undergoing trabeculectomy with MMC. The follow-up period was 24 months. Patients enrolled had IOP > 21 mmHg despite being on antiglaucoma medications. Results The mean postoperative IOP reduction was lower in group A than in group B at all follow-up visits, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Moreover, group A and B patients were found to be similar as regards the need for postoperative antiglaucoma medications on all follow-up visits. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis curves for the two groups revealed slightly higher success rates in group B than in group A. However, these differences were not statistically significant for both qualified success (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with or without antiglaucoma medications) and complete success (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg without antiglaucoma medications). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Conclusion OloGen implant lowers IOP to a similar extent as MMC when combined with trabeculectomy for the treatment of silicone oil-induced glaucoma, and with comparable success rates. The rate of postoperative complications is similar for OloGen implantation and MMC.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Penyembuhan Luka Insisi Menggunakan Pisau Bedah dan Pisau Elektrokauter Dinilai dengan Vancouver scar score pada Operasi Luka Bersih

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diadon Mitaart ◽  
Mendy Hatibie ◽  
Djarot Noersasongko
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Group B ◽  
Scar Score

Abstract: Skin incision is usually performed by using a scalpel. It is assumed that electrocautery knife, a more recent alternative, can increase the risk of infection, impair healing, and result in poor cosmetic scar. This study was aimed to compare the healing process of incision wounds performed by using sclapels and electrocautery knives assessed with Vancouver Scar Score (VSS) at three months after operation. This was an experimental study. Subjects were 17 male patients, aged 18-55 years old, with elective operation (categorized as clean wound operation) from March through June 2016 at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado. Each incision was performed with a scalpel first (Group A) and continued with an electrocautery knife (Group B). After 3 months of operation, the wound scars were assessed with VSS. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed no significant difference between the VSS of the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no difference in wound healing of incised wounds performed by using scalpels and by using electrocautery knives.Keywords: VSS, electrocautery, wound healing, scarAbstrak: Insisi kulit biasanya dilakukan dengan menggunakan pisau bedah. Peralatan elektrokauter merupakan alternatif baru yang dianggap meningkatkan risiko infeksi, memperlambat penyembuhan, dengan hasil secara kosmetik yang buruk. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan proses penyembuhan dari luka insisi menggunakan pisau bedah dan pisau elektrokauter yang dinilai dengan Vancouver Scar Score (VSS) pada operasi dengan luka bersih. Jenis penelitian ialah eksperimental. Penelitian dilakukan selama periode Maret 2016 s/d Juni 2016 pada 17 orang pasien berjenis kelamin laki-laki, berusia 18-55 tahun yang memerlukan operasi elektif di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado dan dikategorikan operasi dengan luka bersih. Setiap insisi selalu dilakukan terlebih dahulu dengan pisau bedah (kelompok A) dan sisanya dilakukan dengan pisau elektrokauter (kelompok B), kemudian luka dinilai dengan VSS setelah 3 bulan kemudian. Hasil uji Wilcoxon signed ranks terhadap hasil VSS saat 3 bulan setelah operasi memperlihatkan tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara hasil perlakuan A dan B (P > 0,05). Simpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan dalam penyembuhan dari kedua bagian luka insisi yang menggunakan pisau bedah dan pisau elektrokauter pada operasi dengan luka bersih.Kata kunci: VSS, elektrokauter, penyembuhan luka, jaringan parut

scholarly journals Preliminary results of Preserflo Microshunt versus Preserflo Microshunt and Ologen implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iraklis Vastardis ◽  
Sofia Fili ◽  
Georgios Perdikakis ◽  
Kalliopi Kontopoulou ◽  
Miltos Balidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose To report preliminary 6-month results on the use of the Preserflo Microshunt implant with and without Ologen in 50 pseudophakic eyes with moderate to advanced primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods Fifty pseudophakic eyes underwent ab externo Preserflo Microshunt implantation. Data was gathered retrospectively and two groups were then created, group A with application of MMC 0.2 mg/ml and group B with MMC 0.2 mg/ml and Ologen collagen matrix (OCM) implantation. Absolute success was regarded as the percentage of eyes achieving: a) 5 ≤ intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 13 mmHg, b) 5 ≤ IOP ≤ 16 mmHg, and c) 5 ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg without additional medication or surgery and qualified success was regarded as the percentage of eyes achieving a) IOP ≤ 13 mmHg, b) IOP ≤ 16 mmHg, and c) IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with or without medication. Evaluation was performed using a log-rank Kaplan-Meier test. A scatterplot analysis presented the treatment effect data of all eyes with a minimum of 20% IOP reduction per case. Failure was defined as requiring additional surgery, IOP greater than 21 mmHg with or without medication and failure to reach 20% IOP reduction. Results Mean postoperative IOP was significantly lower in both groups. IOP decreased by 49.06% in group A and by 53.01% in group B at 6 months (P < 0.88), respectively. Medication use was lower in both groups (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.001). The absolute and qualified success rates were not statistically significant between the groups (all P > 0.05). Cumulative IOP results per case were not statistically different in group A compared with group B. One revision surgery in group A (4% failure rate) and three in group B (12% failure rate) were performed. Conclusions Both groups showed equal results in terms of cumulative and mean IOP reduction, medication reduction as well as in absolute and qualified success rates. No significant difference was found in any parameters tested between Preserflo Microshunt with MMC 0.2 mg/ml and with or without OCM implantation at 6 months. Long-term follow-up is required to further evaluate this data.

scholarly journals Scar formation after lower eyelid incision for reconstruction of the inferior orbital wall related to the lower eyelid crease or ridge in Asians

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 310-318
Author(s):  
Seong Jin Oh ◽  
Kwang Seog Kim ◽  
Jun Ho Choi ◽  
Jae Ha Hwang ◽  
Sam Yong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Lower Eyelid ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Optimal Location ◽  
Eyelid Margin ◽  
Eyelid Skin ◽  
Scar Assessment ◽  
Orbital Wall ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Transcutaneous lower eyelid approaches are associated with a risk of postoperative scarring depending on the distance between the incision line and the lower eyelid margin. The lower eyelid crease of Caucasians corresponds to a ridge-shaped fold in young Asians. However, this relationship has not been sufficiently evaluated in the latter. The authors, therefore, investigated the location of the scar and the lower eyelid crease or ridge to find the optimal location for the incision line.Methods: This study included 60 out of 139 patients who underwent inferior orbital wall reconstruction through a lower eyelid skin incision between July 2019 and June 2020. According to the location of the scar, the patients were classified into three groups: group A ( ≥ 2 mm above the lower eyelid crease or ridge), group B (within the lower eyelid crease or ridge to 2 mm above the lower eyelid crease or ridge), and group C (within the lower eyelid crease or ridge to 2 mm below the lower eyelid crease or ridge). At 6 or 12 months after surgery, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score was obtained, the distance between the lower eyelid margin and the scar (DMS) and the distance between the margins of the peripheral pupil and the lower eyelid (DMPE) were measured, and the occurrence of ectropion was evaluated.Results: Group B had the lowest POSAS score (A: 22.7 ± 8.0, B: 20.9 ± 2.4, C: 32.5 ± 4.1, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that the DMS was positively correlated with the POSAS score (p < 0.001) and that the risk of DMPE widening increased as the DMS decreased (p = 0.029). None of the patients had ectropion.Conclusion: When using the transcutaneous approach for inferior orbital wall reconstruction, the optimal incision site is within the lower eyelid crease or ridge to 2 mm above the lower eyelid crease or ridge.

DeVega versus ring annuloplasty in severe functional tricuspid insufficiency and their impact on the right ventricle

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Yasser Hamdy ◽  
Mohammed Mahmoud Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Elminshawy
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Tricuspid Valve ◽  
Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Tricuspid Valve Repair ◽  
Ring Annuloplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Right

Background: Functional tricuspid valve regurgitation secondary to left-sided valve disease is common. DeVega repair is simple, but residual regurgitation with subsequent impairment of the right ventricular function is a concern. This study aims to compare tricuspid valve repair using DeVega vs. ring annuloplasty and their impact on the right ventricle in the early postoperative period and after six months. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 51 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent tricuspid valve repair for secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation. Patients were divided into two groups: group A; DeVega repair (n=34) and group B; ring annuloplasty repair (n=17). Patients were assessed clinically and by echocardiography before discharge and after six months for the degree of tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular diameter and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Results: Preoperative echocardiographic assessment showed no difference in left ventricular end-systolic diameter, end-diastolic diameter, ejection fraction and right ventricular diameter, however; group A had significantly better preoperative right ventricular function measured by TAPSE (1.96 ± 0.27 vs1.75 ± 0.31 cm; p=0.02). Group B had significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (127.65 ± 13.56 vs. 111.74 ± 18.74 minutes; p= 0.003) and ischemic time (99.06 ± 11.80 vs. 87.15 ± 16.01 minutes; p= 0.009). Pre-discharge, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of tricuspid regurgitation, but the right ventricular diameter was significantly lower in group B (2.66 ± 0.41 and 2.40 ± 0.48 cm; p=0.049). After six months of follow up, the degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p= 0.029) and the right ventricular diameter were significantly lower in the ring annuloplasty group (2.56 ± 0.39 and 2.29 ± 0.44 cm; p=0.029). Although there was a statistically significant difference in preoperative TAPSE, this difference disappeared after six months. Conclusion: Both DeVega and ring annuloplasty techniques were effective in the early postoperative period, ring annuloplasty was associated with lesser residual regurgitation and better right ventricular remodeling in severe functional tricuspid regurgitation than DeVega procedure after 6-months of follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document