scholarly journals Trastuzumab in Esophagogastric Cancer: HER2-Testing and Treatment Reality outside Clinical Studies in Germany

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Merx ◽  
Manuel Barreto Miranda ◽  
Lenka Kellermann ◽  
Ulrich Mahlknecht ◽  
Oliver Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Test Quality ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Multiple Metastases

We analysed trends over time in palliative first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Special focus was on frequency and quality of HER2-testing and trends in drug use in combination with trastuzumab. Earlier published data about patients treated outside clinical studies showed a relatively low rate of HER2-testing and insufficient test quality. A total of 2,808 patients retrospectively documented in Therapiemonitor®from 2006 to 2013 were analysed regarding treatment intensity and trends in used drugs. Data on HER2-testing and therapies were analysed in two cohorts documented in 2010 and 2011 (1) compared to 2012 and 2013 (2). Treatment intensity increased: 49.3% of patients received at least a triplet in 2013 compared to 10.1% in 2006. In cohort 2 HER2 expression was tested in 79.1% of the cases. Still, in 26.9% testing was not done as requested by guidelines. Good performance status, multiple metastases, age ≤ 65 years, the objective “to prevent progression,” good cognitive capabilities, estimated good compliance, and social integration positively influenced the probability of HER2-testing; comorbidities negatively affected it. Usage of the combination of fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin with trastuzumab declined from 67% in cohort 1 to 50% in cohort 2.

Recent Strategies for Treating Stage IV Gastric Cancer: Roles of Palliative Gastrectomy, Chemotherapy, and Radiotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunihiko Izuishi ◽  
Hirohito Mori
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Iv Gastric Cancer ◽  
Palliative Gastrectomy ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Previously Treated

Recently, many strategies have been reported for the effective treatment of gastric cancer. However, the strategy for treating stage IV gastric cancer remains controversial. Conducting a prospective phase III study in stage IV cancer patients is difficult because of heterogeneous performance status, age, and degree of cancer metastasis or extension. Due to poor prognosis, the variance in physical status, and severe symptoms, it is important to determine the optimal strategy for treating each individual stage IV patient. In the past decade, many reports have addressed topics related to stage IV gastric cancer: the 7th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system has altered its stage IV classification; new chemotherapy regimens have been developed through the randomized ECF for advanced and locally advanced esophagogastric cancer (REAL)-II, S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer (SPIRITS), trastuzumab for gastric cancer (ToGA), ramucirumab monotherapy for previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD), and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW) trials; and the survival efficacy of palliative gastrectomy has been denied by the reductive gastrectomy for advanced tumor in three Asian countries (REGATTA) trial. Current strategies for treating stage IV patients can be roughly divided into the following five categories: palliative gastrectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, gastric stent, or bypass. In this article, we review recent publications and guidelines along with above categories in the light of individual symptoms and prognosis. Abbreviations: APC: argon plasma coagulation; AVAGAST: anti-angiogenic antibody bevacizumab, the avastin in gastric cancer; BSC: best supportive care; CF: cisplatin and fluorouracil; CRP: C-reactive protein; DCF: docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU; FISH: fluorescent in-situ hybridization; GJ: gastrojejunostomy; GPS: Glasgow Prognostic Score; HER: human epidermal growth factor receptor; HR: hazard ratio; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OS: overall survival; PS: performance status; QOL: quality of life; RAINBOW: ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; RCTs: randomized controlled trials; REAL: randomized ECF for advanced and locally advanced esophagogastric cancer; REGARD: ramucirumab monotherapy for previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; REGATTA: reductive gastrectomy for advanced tumor in three Asian countries; SEER: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results; SEMS: self-expandable metal stents; SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer; ToGA: trastuzumab for gastric cancer; TTP: time-to-progression; VEGFR: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Impact of socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in Northern Ireland

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20531-e20531
Author(s):  
Y. Manikyam ◽  
G. G. Hanna ◽  
R. J. Harte ◽  
P. G. Henry ◽  
R. F. Houston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

e20531 Background: The survival advantage for combination chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is well documented. Epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with either 5FU (ECF) or capecitabine (ECX) result in response rates of 35–46% and a median survival of around 9 months in RCT. We report the impact of socioeconomic status on the outcome of ECF and ECX treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients in Northern Ireland between 2000 and 2007. Methods: All patients with advanced esophageal (O), gastric (G), or esophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma, receiving palliative chemotherapy from January 2000 to August 2007, were identified from our institutional database. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients receiving chemotherapy in a clinical trial were excluded. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Deprivation was assessed using the patient's home address deprivation index (DPI) (Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2005; May 2005. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. www.nisra.gov.uk ). Results: 274 eligible patients (m=200, f=74, O=114, OGJ=19, G=141) were identified. Median age was 62 years (range 22–83). 172 (62.8%) had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. 231 patients (84.3%) had metastatic disease, 43 (15.7%) had locally advanced disease. 216 (78.8%) patients received ECF and 58 (21.2%) patients received ECX. Overall median survival was 7.3 months. Treatment response and performance status were strong predictors of survival, however disease extent did not influence survival. Median survival was significantly longer in those with DPIs in the upper two quintiles than the lower 3 quintiles (9.5 months vs. 6.8 months, p=0.032). Conclusions: Outcomes achieved with palliative ECF/ECX treatment are similar to the reference clinical trials. Socioeconomic deprivation is significantly associated with reduced survival in this group of patients and is unrelated to disease extent at presentation; however it may be related to nutritional status and comorbidity and requires further investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy and tolerability of FOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers (AGC): A single-center experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14705-e14705
Author(s):  
Rozana Abdul Rahman ◽  
MinYuen Teo ◽  
Felicity McDonnell ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
First Line Treatment

e14705 Background: There are a number of options for first line treatment for AGC. We sought to review the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFOX (F) in AGC, and compare outcomes with anthracycline-based (A) ctx-treated patients (pts). Methods: Pts with AGC treated with F and A (EOX and ECF) were identified from institutional database. Pt. demographics, disease characteristics and treatment details were extracted from medical charts and pharmacy database. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from commencement of ctx to radiographic evidence of progression and death, respectively, estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were made via log-rank method. Other descriptive statistics calculated via t-test or chi-square methods as appropriate. Results: Between July 05 and December 11, 27 pts were treated with F. Twenty-one (77.8%) were male and median age was 68yrs (range: 42 – 77). ECOG performance status was 0 -1 in 24 pts (88.9%) and 2 in 3 (11.1%). Median Charlson score prior to metastatic disease was 2 (range: 0 – 3). Three had relapsed disease and another three had locally-advanced disease. Sites of metastatic disease were liver (12), peritoneum (12), non-regional nodes (2) and lungs (2). Median number of cycles of F was 5 (range: 1 - 12), 51.8% of pts completed ≥10 cycles, while the rest discontinued treatment due to disease progression (33%) and toxicities (14.8%). 21 pts (77.8%) required dose reduction and 17 (63%) experienced treatment delay. Fourteen (51.8%), 6 and 2 pts had 2nd, 3rd and 4th line of ctx, respectively. Median PFS was 7.2 mos and median OS is 9.7 mos. Sixteen pts were treated with A. Pts were significantly younger (p=0.002) but other characteristics were similar. Median PFS with A was 6.6 mos and median OS was 9.2 mos. The hazard ratio (F vs A) for PFS was 1.11 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.18, p = 0.77) and for OS was 0.73 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.51, p = 0.40). Conclusions: Despite an older pts cohort with co-morbidities, high percentage of treatment delays and dose reductions, our data suggest that significant percentage of pts were able to complete ≥10 cycles of F and subsequent therapies. Outcomes are comparable to our A cohort and published data.

Washington University experience with FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvin F. Peddi ◽  
Benjamin R. Tan ◽  
Joel Picus ◽  
Steven Sorscher ◽  
Rama Suresh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease ◽  
Grade 3

354 Background: The FOLFIRINOX (5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) regimen has recently been shown to be an effective treatment with a significant survival benefit in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Concern for treatment-related toxicity, however, has hampered the adoption of this regimen in clinical practice. A FOLFIRINOX registry was created at our institution to document FOLFIRINOX tolerability and efficacy. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer who had received at least one dose of FOLFIRINOX were enrolled in the registry. Demographic information, treatment dosage, adverse events, and efficacy data were obtained. Radiographic response was independently verified by a radiologist. Results: Between January 2010 and August 2011, 29 patients were identified with a median age of 57 (range 37-71). 26 (92.8%) had ECOG performance status of 0-1. FOFIRINOX was given to 16 patients with metastatic disease, 12 with locally advanced disease, and one with borderline resectable disease. 17 (61%) received the first cycle with a dose reduction in either irinotecan and/or 5-FU dosage. UGT1A1*28/*28 homozygous genotype was found in 4 patients who all received dose reduced irinotecan. 13 patients (46%) were started on G-CSF prophylactically with the first cycle while 5 additional patients (18%) had G-CSF support added in later cycles. Main adverse events were neutropenia (grade 3-4 in 14.2%), and abdominal pain and diarrhea (grade 3-4 in 7% and 4% respectively). One incidence of neutropenic fever was observed. Four patients were hospitalized for treatment-related toxicity while three had therapy discontinued due to intolerance. At present, 19 patients have imaging available to determine efficacy: 5 (26%) had partial response, 12 (63%) stable disease, and 2 (11%) had progression of disease as their best response. For patients with locally advanced disease, 11 out of 12 had clinical benefit on FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: In our practice, FOLFIRINOX was well tolerated and was efficacious, consistent with previously published data. It was frequently used in the setting of locally advanced disease and had similar benefit and tolerability in this setting.

Which patients with pre-treated locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma benefit most from trabectedin treatment: First results of a retrospective study of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-14 - ReTraSarc).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11554-11554
Author(s):  
Daniel Pink ◽  
Adrian Richter ◽  
Dimosthenis Andreou ◽  
Stephan Richter ◽  
Anne Flörcken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Published Data ◽  
German Population ◽  
Life Study ◽  
Number Of Patients

11554 Background: Despite the growing amount of published data regarding the outcomes of sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin, still some questions remain unanswered. The aim of the ReTraSarc trial (NCT03284320) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trabectedin in a large German population. Methods: Patients treated between 2007-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had histologically confirmed soft tissue (STS; n = 478) or bone (BS; n = 31) sarcoma; either metastatic (n = 468) or locally advanced (n = 41) disease, and had received at least one cycle of trabectedin. Based on follow-up data (until October 2019), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after initiation of trabectedin treatment were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 509 patents were analyzed. Patients had a mean age of 54 years for STS and 30 years for BS-patients, and 25.4% of them aged > 65 years. Overall, 71.4% of patients had a good performance status (ECOG 0/1), and 37.7% received two prior lines, 28.3% three and 34% received > 3 prior lines of systemic treatment. Patients received a median of 3 cycles (IQR: 2-6 cycles) of trabectedin. Trabectedin resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 10% with a 37.4% of disease control rate (DCR). The median PFS and OS were 2.5 months (IQR: 1.4-6.1 months) and 8.2 months (IQR: 3-21 months), respectively. Significantly more patients with liposarcoma (22.1%; 95% CI: 15.2-32.2) were free from progression at 12 months after treatment as compared with patients with leiomyosarcoma (8.5%; 95% CI: 4.8-14.9). More analyses of effectiveness and safety are in progress (e.g. stratified per sarcoma subtypes or therapeutic line) and will be presented. Conclusions: The results of this real-life study, with a large number of patients and long-term follow-up, allow us to better analyze PFS and OS in sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin, given in different treatment lines and after dose modifications and/or cycle delays. Additionally, the results of this study enable us to evaluate the real-life impact of rechallenge with trabectedin in a further therapy line. Clinical trial information: NCT03284320 .

scholarly journals ECOG-ACRIN 2399: analysis of patient related outcomes after Chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Cmelak ◽  
Mary S. Dietrich ◽  
Shuli Li ◽  
Sheila Ridner ◽  
Arlene Forastiere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Barium Swallow ◽  
Functional Communication ◽  
Swallowing Function ◽  
Modified Barium Swallow

Abstract Background We conducted a correlative study for E2399, a function preservation trial for resectable locally advanced oropharynx and larynx cancer, to prospectively assess effects of chemoradiation (CCR) on quality of life (QOL), swallowing and voice. We correlated the results of swallow assessments done via questionnaires and objective assessments by modified barium swallow (MBS). Methods The Functional Assessment of Cancer-HN (FACT-HN), the Performance Status Scale – Head and Neck (PSS-HN), swallow assessments (including modified barium swallow studies), and voice assessments: Voice Handicap Index (VHI), the Voice Disability Assessment (VDA), and American Speech-Language Hearing Association’s Functional Communication Measure (FCM) were conducted at baseline and periodically post-treatment for 2 years. Results Baseline QOL and swallowing function predicted overall survival. Patients experienced a marked decrease in QOL, swallowing, and speech post CCR although the decrease in vocal function was modest. Function and QOL returned towards baseline in the majority of patients by 12 months post treatment. Less than 10% of patients had severe dysphagia and were PEG dependent at 12 months post treatment. There was a high degree of correlation between the FACT-HN and PSS-HN swallow items. Statistically significant correlations were found between subjective and objective measures of swallow function. Conclusions Patients experience marked loss in swallowing function post CCR which returned to baseline in the majority of patients. The correlations between the FCM and self-report swallow items on the PSS and FACT-HN appear to be sufficiently strong to justify their use as a surrogate marker for swallowing disability in large therapeutic trials.

scholarly journals PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thales Paulo BATISTA ◽  
Candice Amorim de Araujo Lima SANTOS ◽  
Gustavo Fernandes Godoy ALMEIDA
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Multimodal Therapy ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Stages

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and a main cause of cancer-related death worldwide, since the majority of patients suffering of this malignancy are usually faced with a poor prognosis due to diagnosis at later stages. In order to improve treatment outcomes, the association of surgery with chemo and/or radiotherapy (multimodal therapy) has become the standard treatment for locally advanced stages. However, despite several treatment options currently available for management of these tumors, perioperative chemotherapy has been mainly accepted for the comprehensive therapeutic strategy including an appropriated D2-gastrectomy. This manuscript presents a (nonsystematic) critical review about the use of perioperative chemotherapy, with a special focus on the drugs delivery.

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document