scholarly journals Unilateral Discomfort Increases the Use of Contralateral Side during Sit-to-Stand Transfer

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Simisola O. Oludare ◽  
Charlie C. Ma ◽  
Alexander S. Aruin
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Biceps Femoris ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
The Body ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Lower Limb Muscles ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Movement Asymmetry

Individuals with unilateral impairment perform symmetrical movements asymmetrically. Restoring symmetry of movements is an important goal of rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of using discomfort-inducing devices on movement symmetry. Fifteen healthy individuals performed the sit-to-stand (STS) maneuver using devices inducing unilateral discomfort under the left sole and left thigh or right sole and right thigh and without them. 3D body kinematics, ground reaction forces, electrical activity of muscles, and the level of perceived discomfort were recorded. The center of mass (COM), center of pressure (COP), and trunk displacements as well as the magnitude and latency of muscle activity of lower limb muscles were calculated during STS and compared to quantify the movement asymmetry. Discomfort on the left and right side of the body (thigh and feet) induced statistically significant displacement of the trunk towards the opposite side. There was statistically significant asymmetry in the activity of the left and right Tibialis Anterior, Medial Gastrocnemius, and Biceps Femoris muscles when discomfort was induced underneath the left side of the body (thigh and feet). The technique was effective in causing asymmetry and promoted the use of the contralateral side. The outcome provides a foundation for future investigations of the role of discomfort-inducing devices in improving symmetry of the STS in individuals with unilateral impairment.

scholarly journals Coordinated Ground Forces Exerted by Buttocks and Feet are Adequately Programmed for Weight Transfer During Sit-to-Stand

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 3021-3029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helga Hirschfeld ◽  
Maria Thorsteinsdottir ◽  
Elisabeth Olsson
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
The Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Preparatory Phase ◽  
Base Distance ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Weight Transfer

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis whether weight transfer during sit-to-stand (STS) is the result of coordinated ground forces exerted by buttocks and feet before seat-off. Whole-body kinematics and three-dimensional ground forces from left and right buttock as well as from left and right foot were recorded for seven adults during STS. We defined a preparatory phase from onset of the first detectable anterior/posterior (A/P) force to seat-off (buttock forces fell to 0) and a rising phase from seat-off to the decrease of center of mass (CoM) vertical velocity to zero. STS was induced by an increase of vertical and backward directed ground forces exerted by the buttocks that significantly preceded the onset of any trunk movement. All ground forces peaked before or around the moment of seat-off, whereas all kinematic variables, except trunk forward rotation and hip flexion, peaked after seat-off, during or after the rising phase. The present study suggests that the weight transfer from sit to stand is induced by ground forces exerted by buttocks and feet before seat-off, i.e., during the preparatory phase. The buttocks generate the isometric “rising forces,” e.g., the propulsive impulse for the forward acceleration of the body, while the feet apply adequate damping control before seat-off. This indicates that the rising movement is a result of these coordinated forces, targeted to match the subject's weight and support base distance between buttocks and feet. The single peaked, bell-shaped profiles peaking before seat-off, were seen beneath buttocks for the “rising drive,” i.e., between the time of peak backward directed force and seat-off, as well as beneath the feet for the “damping drive,” i.e., from onset to the peak of forward-directed force and for CoM A/P velocity. This suggests that both beginning and end of the weight transfer process are programmed before seat-off. The peak deceleration of A/P CoM took place shortly (∼100 ms) after CoM peak velocity, resulting in a well controlled CoM deceleration before seat-off. In contrast to the view of other authors, this suggests that body equilibrium is controlled during weight transfer.

scholarly journals Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing?

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 1622-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro G. Morasso ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Muscle Stiffness ◽  
The Body ◽  
Ankle Muscles ◽  
Upright Standing ◽  
Stiffness Control ◽  
Control Patterns ◽  
Physiological Values

A stiffness control model for the stabilization of sway has been proposed recently. This paper discusses two inadequacies of the model: modeling and empiric consistency. First, we show that the in-phase relation between the trajectories of the center of pressure and the center of mass is determined by physics, not by control patterns. Second, we show that physiological values of stiffness of the ankle muscles are insufficient to stabilize the body “inverted pendulum.” The evidence of active mechanisms of sway stabilization is reviewed, pointing out the potentially crucial role of foot skin and muscle receptors.

scholarly journals Human kinematic, kinetic and EMG data during different walking and stair ascending and descending tasks

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Lencioni ◽  
Ilaria Carpinella ◽  
Marco Rabuffetti ◽  
Alberto Marzegan ◽  
Maurizio Ferrarin
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Human Locomotion ◽  
Surface Emg ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Bipedal Robots ◽  
Lower Limb Muscles ◽  
Reaction Forces

AbstractThis paper reports the kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic (EMG) dataset of human locomotion during level walking at different velocities, toe- and heel-walking, stairs ascending and descending. A sample of 50 healthy subjects, with an age between 6 and 72 years, is included. For each task, both raw data and computed variables are reported including: the 3D coordinates of external markers, the joint angles of lower limb in the sagittal, transversal and horizontal anatomical planes, the ground reaction forces and torques, the center of pressure, the lower limb joint mechanical moments and power, the displacement of the whole body center of mass, and the surface EMG signals of the main lower limb muscles. The data reported in the present study, acquired from subjects with different ages, represents a valuable dataset useful for future studies on locomotor function in humans, particularly as normative reference to analyze pathological gait, to test the performance of simulation models of bipedal locomotion, and to develop control algorithms for bipedal robots or active lower limb exoskeletons for rehabilitation.

scholarly journals The Effect of Step Width on Muscle Contributions to Body Mass Center Acceleration During the First Stance of Sprinting

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruoli Wang ◽  
Laura Martín de Azcárate ◽  
Paul Sandamas ◽  
Anton Arndt ◽  
Elena M. Gutierrez-Farewik
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Rectus Femoris ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Biceps Femoris ◽  
The Body ◽  
Step Width ◽  
Acceleration Analysis

BackgroundAt the beginning of a sprint, the acceleration of the body center of mass (COM) is driven mostly forward and vertically in order to move from an initial crouched position to a more forward-leaning position. Individual muscle contributions to COM accelerations have not been previously studied in a sprint with induced acceleration analysis, nor have muscle contributions to the mediolateral COM accelerations received much attention. This study aimed to analyze major lower-limb muscle contributions to the body COM in the three global planes during the first step of a sprint start. We also investigated the influence of step width on muscle contributions in both naturally wide sprint starts (natural trials) and in sprint starts in which the step width was restricted (narrow trials).MethodMotion data from four competitive sprinters (2 male and 2 female) were collected in their natural sprint style and in trials with a restricted step width. An induced acceleration analysis was performed to study the contribution from eight major lower limb muscles (soleus, gastrocnemius, rectus femoris, vasti, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, and adductors) to acceleration of the body COM.ResultsIn natural trials, soleus was the main contributor to forward (propulsion) and vertical (support) COM acceleration and the three vasti (vastus intermedius, lateralis and medialis) were the main contributors to medial COM acceleration. In the narrow trials, soleus was still the major contributor to COM propulsion, though its contribution was considerably decreased. Likewise, the three vasti were still the main contributors to support and to medial COM acceleration, though their contribution was lower than in the natural trials. Overall, most muscle contributions to COM acceleration in the sagittal plane were reduced. At the joint level, muscles contributed overall more to COM support than to propulsion in the first step of sprinting. In the narrow trials, reduced COM propulsion and particularly support were observed compared to the natural trials.ConclusionThe natural wide steps provide a preferable body configuration to propel and support the COM in the sprint starts. No advantage in muscular contributions to support or propel the COM was found in narrower step widths.

scholarly journals The Identification of Motor Neurones Innervating an Abdominal Ventilatory Muscle in the Locust

1983 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
QIN-ZHAO YANG
Keyword(s):  
Cell Body ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
The Body ◽  
Dorsal Muscle ◽  
The Third ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
Motor Neurones ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Ventral Muscle ◽  
Ventilatory Muscles

Motor neurones to abdominal ventilatory muscles, with their axons innerve 6 of the metathoracic ganglion of the locust, have been identified by intracellular recording and staining. Three muscles are innervated by the larger branches of this nerve: nerve 6a contains six motor neurones innervating the ventral diaphragm; nerve 6b contains four motor neurones innervating the median internal ventral muscle, and nerve 6d contains five motorneurones innervating the longitudinal dorsal muscle. All motor neuronesinnervate muscles on one side of the body only. Both the median internalventral and the longitudinal dorsal muscles contract during the expiratoryphase of ventilation. Three excitatory motor neurones to the median internalventral muscles spike during expiration whilst the fourth, an inhibitorymotor neurone, is active during both expiration and inspiration. Two of theexcitatory motor neurones have cell bodies in the half of the ganglion ipsilateralto the muscle they innervate. Their neuropilar branches, however, are in both left and right halves of the ganglion. The third excitatory motorneurone has its cell body close to the midline and has most of its neuropilarbranches in the half of the ganglion ipsilateral to its axon. The inhibitorymotor neurone has its cell body just to the contralateral side of the midline, and three distinct areas of neuropilar branches, two contralateral and oneipsilateral to its axon.

Attributes of Quiet Stance in the Chronic Spinal Cat

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 3056-3065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Fung ◽  
Jane M. Macpherson
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Close Relation ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Spinal Reflexes ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Axis Orientation ◽  
Dynamic Task ◽  
Horizontal Orientation

Standing is a dynamic task that requires antigravity support of the body mass and active regulation of the position of the body center of mass. This study examined the extent to which the chronic spinal cat can maintain postural orientation during stance and adapt to changes in stance distance (fore-hindpaw separation). Intact cats adapt to changes in stance distance by maintaining a constant horizontal orientation of the trunk and changing orientation of the limbs, while keeping intralimb geometry constant and aligning the ground reaction forces closely with the limb axes. Postural adaptation was compared in four cats before and after spinalization at the T6 level, in terms of the forces exerted by each paw against the support, body geometry (kinematics) and electromyographic (EMG) activity recorded from chronic, indwelling electrodes, as well as the computed net torques in the fore and hindlimbs. Five fore-hindpaw distances spanning the preferred distance were tested before spinalization, with a total range of 20 cm from the shortest to the longest stance. After spinalization, the cats were trained on a daily basis to stand on the force platform, and all four cats were able to support their full body weight. Three of the four cats could adapt to changes in stance distance, but the range was smaller and biased toward the shorter distances. The fourth cat could stand only at one stance distance, which was 8 cm shorter than the preferred distance before spinalization. All cats shifted their center of pressure closer to the forelimbs after spinalization, but the amount of shift could largely be accounted for by the weight loss in the hindquarters. The three cats that could adapt to changes in stance distance used a similar strategy as the intact cat by constraining the trunk and changing orientation of the limb axes in close relation with the forces exerted by each limb. However, different postures in the fore- and hindlimbs were adopted, particularly at the scapula (more extended) and pelvis (tipped more anteriorly). Other changes from control included a redistribution of net extensor torque across the joints of the forelimb and of the hindlimb. We concluded that the general form of body axis orientation is relatively conserved in the spinal cat, suggesting that the lumbosacral spinal circuitry includes rudimentary set points for hindlimb geometry. Both mechanical and neural elements can contribute toward maintaining body geometry through stiffness regulation and spinal reflexes.

scholarly journals Transition versus Continuous Slope Walking: Adaptation to Change Center of Mass Velocity in Young Men

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yoon No Gregory Hong ◽  
Jinkyu Lee ◽  
Choongsoo S. Shin
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Human Locomotion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Horizontal Distance ◽  
Downhill Walking ◽  
Walking Adaptation ◽  
Propulsion Phase

During continuous uphill walking (UW) or downhill walking, human locomotion is modified to counteract the gravitational force, aiding or impeding the body’s forward momentum, respectively. This study aimed at investigating the center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) velocities and their relative distance during the transition from uphill to downhill walking (UDW) to determine whether locomotor adjustments differ between UDW and UW. Fourteen participants walked on a triangular slope and a continuous upslope of 15°. The kinematics and COPs were obtained using a force plate and a motion capture system. The vertical velocity of the COM in the propulsion phase, the horizontal distance between the COM and COP at initial contact, and the duration of the subphases significantly differed between UDW and UW (all p<0.05). Compared with the results of UW, longer durations and the deeper downward moving COM in the propulsion phase were observed during UDW (all p<0.05). Additionally, a shorter horizontal distance between the COM and COP at initial contact was associated with a slower vertical COM velocity in the propulsion phase during UDW. The reduced velocity is likely a gait alteration to decrease the forward momentum of the body during UDW.

scholarly journals An exploration of strategies used by dressage horses to control moments around the center of mass when performing passage

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary M. Clayton ◽  
Sarah Jane Hobbs
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Force Production ◽  
The Body ◽  
Camera Motion ◽  
Slow Speed ◽  
Moment Arms ◽  
Trunk Posture ◽  
The Moment

BackgroundLocomotion results from the generation of ground reaction forces (GRF) that cause translations of the center of mass (COM) and generate moments that rotate the body around the COM. The trot is a diagonally-synchronized gait performed by horses at intermediate locomotor speeds. Passage is a variant of the trot performed by highly-trained dressage horses. It is distinguished from trot by having a slow speed of progression combined with great animation of the limbs in the swing phase. The slow speed of passage challenges the horse’s ability to control the sagittal-plane moments around the COM. Footfall patterns and peak GRF are known to differ between passage and trot, but their effects on balance management, which we define here as the ability to control nose-up/nose-down pitching moments around the horse’s COM to maintain a state of equilibrium, are not known. The objective was to investigate which biomechanical variables influence pitching moments around the COM in passage.MethodsThree highly-trained dressage horses were captured by a 10-camera motion analysis system (120 Hz) as they were ridden in passage over four force platforms (960 Hz). A full-body marker set was used to track the horse’s COM and measure balance variables including total body center of pressure (COP), pitching moments, diagonal dissociation timing, peak force production, limb protraction–retraction, and trunk posture. A total of twenty passage steps were extracted and partial correlation (accounting for horse) was used to investigate significant (P < 0.05) relationships between variables.ResultsHindlimb mean protraction–retraction correlated significantly with peak hindlimb propulsive forces (R = 0.821;P < 0.01), mean pitching moments (R = 0.546,P = 0.016), trunk range of motion, COM craniocaudal location and diagonal dissociation time (P < 0.05).DiscussionPitching moments around the COM were controlled by a combination of kinematic and kinetic adjustments that involve coordinated changes in GRF magnitudes, GRF distribution between the diagonal limb pairs, and the moment arms of the vertical GRFs. The moment arms depend on hoof placements relative to the COM, which were adjusted by changing limb protraction–retraction angles. Nose-up pitching moments could also be increased by providing a larger hindlimb propulsive GRF.

The Effect of Strength Shoes on Muscle Activity during Quiet Standing

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Frank ◽  
Richard V. Baratta ◽  
Moshe Solomonow ◽  
Mackie Shilstone ◽  
Kevin Riché
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Gluteus Maximus ◽  
Rectus Femoris ◽  
Biceps Femoris ◽  
Surface Emg ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Triceps Surae ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Quiet Standing ◽  
Emg Activity

The goal of this work was to study the effect of Strength Shoes on the activity of leg and postural muscles to gain insight into the mechanisms by which the shoes may improve athletic performance. Surface EMG signals were obtained from the tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae of 18 healthy athletic subjects. The subjects stood quietly while wearing either normal athletic shoes or Strength Shoes. EMG root mean square value was compared in each muscle using trimmed paired t tests. Significant (p < .002) increases in EMG activity were found in the MG, TA, GM, and ES muscles when the subjects were wearing Strength Shoes as compared to normal shoes. These changes served to stiffen the ankle, counteracting the dorsiflexion moment created by the shoes, and to support an anterior leaning posture, which compensates for the anterior shift in center of pressure. No significant changes were detected in the activities of RF or BF muscles. Using Strength Shoes increased activity in the triceps surae complex and in other muscles mat support the changes in postural requirements caused by the anterior shift in center of pressure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document