scholarly journals Current Role of Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapesh Bhattacharyya ◽  
Geethu Babu ◽  
Cessal Thommachan Kainickal

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is highly radio- and chemosensitive tumor with its unique clinical and biological behavior. Treatment of stage I disease is radical radiotherapy alone. For stage II disease treatment is radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (stages III-IVB) is concurrent chemoradiation. Optimum timing and sequence of chemotherapy are not yet well-defined. The role of adjuvant and induction chemotherapy is debatable. Here we are going to highlight the role of chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, its benefit, and controversies regarding timing and sequences.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Cosphiadi Irawan ◽  
Andhika Rachman ◽  
Puji Rahman ◽  
Arif Mansjoer

Background. The three-year survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in Indonesia is lower than in other Asian countries. Calculation of hemoglobin-to-platelet ratio (HPR) may become a more practical predictor than the ratios using leukocyte cell components. Yet, no study has been conducted to investigate the potential of HPR in predicting survival outcomes in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Objective. To determine the role of pretreatment hemoglobin-to-platelet ratio in predicting the three-year overall survival (OS) of locally advanced NPC. Method. A retrospective cohort study followed up on 289 locally advanced NPC patients who had undergone therapy at the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital between January 2012 and October 2016. HPR cut-off was determined using ROC. Subjects were classified into two groups according to the HPR value. Kaplan-Meier curve was utilized to illustrate patients’ three-year survival, and Cox regression test analyzed confounding variables to yield an adjusted hazard ratio (HR). Results. The optimal cut-off for HPR was 0.362 (AUC 0.6228, 95% CI: 0.56-0.69, sensitivity 61.27%, specificity 60.34%). Of the subjects, 48.44% had HPR ≤ 0.362 , and they had a higher three-year mortality rate than those with HPR > 0.362 (50% vs. 31.54%). In bivariate analysis, HPR ≤ 0.362 and age ≥ 60 significantly showed a worse three-year OS ( p value = 0.003 and 0.075, respectively). In multivariate analysis, we concluded that a pretreatment HPR ≤ 0.362 was an independent negative predictor of three-year OS in locally advanced NPC patients (adjusted HR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.25–2.65). Conclusion. Pretreatment HPR ≤ 0.362 was a negative predictor of three-year OS in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farida Nazeer ◽  
Rejnish Ravi Kumar ◽  
Malu Rafi ◽  
Lekha M. Nair ◽  
Kainickal Cessal Thommachan ◽  
...  

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma is relatively rare and has the worst prognosis of all head and neck cancers. Initially, surgery followed by postoperative radiation was the standard of care for locally advanced disease. In the recent years, various organ sparing approaches have evolved. There are mainly two schools of thought regarding larynx preservation in hypopharyngeal cancers which include either induction chemotherapy followed by response assessment for radical radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation. An ongoing trial is comparing the effectiveness between these two established approaches. The role of anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy is still being evaluated. Despite all the advancements in treatment, hypopharyngeal cancers are still associated with poor treatment outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6027-6027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaf Usman ◽  
Sara Rasheed ◽  
Ali Raza ◽  
Raza Hussain ◽  
Arif Jamshed

6027 Background: The current standard of treatment in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer is concurrent chemoradiation, however recent addition of induction chemotherapy in the already established regimen has presented an attractive alternative approach. We report on survival with induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin (GC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) in the treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, 300 patients (M 70%: F 30%) with histologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Histological subtypes WHO I 4% (13) and WHO III 96% (287). AJCC (7th edition) stage was Stage III 28% (85) and Stage IV 72% (215) patients. IC included a 2 drug combination; intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 only. Radiotherapy was given as a phase treatment to a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Concurrent three weekly cisplatin (75 mg/m2) was administered to all patients. Results: Median follow up time was 30 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS), loco regional control (LRC) and relapse free survival (RFS) rates were 70% (95% CI 6.43 – 7.52), 69% (95% CI 6.52 – 7.64) and 52% (95% CI 5.25 – 6.34) respectively. One hundred and seven patients failed treatment; local or loco-regional 39% (42), regional 16% (17) and distant 45% (48). Conclusions: We conclude that induction gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by chemo-radiation is an effective regimen in management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, meriting further investigation in randomized clinical trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e228956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Nicoleta Budure ◽  
Eric Winquist ◽  
David Palma ◽  
Rohann Jonathan Mark Correa

Herein we present a case of a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease who was diagnosed with locally invasive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In the context of CMT, the use of standard platinum-based radio-sensitising chemotherapy would have been neurotoxic and is contraindicated in patients with CMT. However, no alternate antineoplastic treatment strategies for patients with CMT have been described in the literature. In this case, an innovative approach was taken using radical radiotherapy concurrently with the biological agent cetuximab. The patient did not suffer any neurotoxicity, though he did experience several expected toxicities commonly associated with this regimen. The patient nonetheless completed treatment and has experienced an excellent response both clinically and radiographically and remains disease free.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3525
Author(s):  
Junaid Arshad ◽  
Philippos A. Costa ◽  
Priscila Barreto-Coelho ◽  
Brianna Nicole Valdes ◽  
Jonathan C. Trent

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. The management of locally advanced or metastatic unresectable GIST involves detecting KIT, PDGFR, or other molecular alterations targeted by imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The role of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas is growing fast due to multiple clinical and pre-clinical studies with no current standard of care. The potential therapies include cytokine-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-KIT monoclonal antibodies, bi-specific monoclonal antibodies, and cell-based therapies. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the immunotherapeutic strategies for GIST.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Prestwich ◽  
D. Shakespeare ◽  
S. Waters

AbstractCombined-modality treatment using chemotherapy and radiotherapy, particularly concurrently, has now become the standard of care for many solid tumour sites on the basis of improvements in locoregional disease control and in some cases survival. The rationale for combined-modality treatment, potential mechanisms of interaction, the therapeutic ratio and the current place of sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are discussed.


2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Cortesina ◽  
Antonella De Stefani ◽  
Andrea Cavalot ◽  
Roberto Albera ◽  
Paola Rosso ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document