scholarly journals Influence of Polishing Methods on the Bonding Effectiveness and Durability of Different Resin Cements to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingyan Ren ◽  
Mingfei Li ◽  
Yahui Pan ◽  
Xiangfeng Meng
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Water Degradation ◽  
Diamond Bur ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Self Etch

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of polishing methods on the bonding effectiveness and durability of different resin cements to dentin. The dentin surfaces were either treated with a fine-grit diamond bur (polishing A) or further polished by polishing disks (polishing B), and then they were bonded with any one of the three resin cements, namely, etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive resin cements. After 24-hour or 2-year water storage, a microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test was performed. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the morphology of the smear layer as well as the resin-dentin bonding interface. The results indicated that a thinner smear layer thickness was created by polishing B compared with polishing A. Although self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements achieved a relatively high primary bond strength before water degradation, etch-and-rinse resin cement obtained a stable bond strength during water degradation. The application of an additional polishing procedure could improve the bond strength of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements.

scholarly journals Bond Durability of Different Resin Cements to Caries-Affected Dentin Under Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
MF Mohamed ◽  
HA El Deeb ◽  
IE Gomaa ◽  
EH Mobarak
Keyword(s):  
Failure Modes ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Dihydrogen Phosphate ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Machine Failure ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the durability of the bond of different resin cement systems to normal dentin (ND) and caries-affected dentin (CAD) with and without simulated intrapulpal pressure (IPP). Methods and Materials Molars with midcoronal caries were used. Occlusal enamel was cut to expose both dentin substrates (ND and CAD). Dentin substrates were differentiated using visual, tactile, caries-detecting dye, and dye-permeability methods. Prepared crown segments were equally divided according to the tested resin cement systems: etch-and-rinse resin cement, self-etch resin cement containing methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP), and self-adhesive resin cement. In addition to the dentin substrates and the resin cement types, the effect of application/storage conditions (with or without simulated IPP and with or without thermocycling) were tested. A microtensile bond strength test was done using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were determined using a scanning electron microscope. Results Etch-and-rinse resin cement strength values were significantly affected by the difference in the dentin substrates as well as the different application/storage conditions. Self-etch adhesive containing MDP bonded equally to ND and CAD and remained stable under all tested conditions. Self-adhesive resin cement revealed a similar bond to ND and CAD; however, its values were the lowest, especially when IPP and thermocycling were combined. Mixed failure was the predominant failure mode. Conclusions Etch-and-rinse resin cement was sensitive to dentin substrate and application/storage conditions. Resin cement with self-etch adhesive containing MDP revealed more reliable bonding to ND/CAD even when IPP and thermocycling were combined. The bonding of the self-adhesive resin cement could not compete with other resin cements.

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems Used for Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
RC Ferreira-Filho ◽  
C Ely ◽  
RC Amaral ◽  
JA Rodrigues ◽  
J-F Roulet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and three-month water storage behavior of adhesives when used for immediate dentin sealing (IDS). Methods and Materials: Four adhesive systems were used to perform IDS: a one-step self-etch (Xeno V), a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond), a two-step etch-and-rinse (XP Bond), and a three-step etch-and-rinse (Optibond FL). For the control group, IDS was not performed. The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem was used for the luting procedures. After seven days of water storage, specimens (n=6) were sectioned into beams (n=5) with an approximately 1-mm2 cross-sectional area. Half of the specimens were tested in tension after seven days of water storage at 37°C, while the other half was stored for three months prior to testing in tension using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The failure pattern was determined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05). Results: After seven days, the control group presented the lowest μTBS but did not differ from XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. After three months, there was no μTBS difference between the IDS groups and the control. Conclusions: After seven days of water storage, the groups with IDS presented higher μTBS values than the control group, although XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond did not present significant differences. However, after three months of storage in water, IDS groups did not differ significantly from control group, which did not receive IDS.

The Effect of Dentin Treated with Calcium Phosphate Desensitizer on Shear Bond Strength with Different Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 232020682110502
Author(s):  
İdris Kavut ◽  
Mehmet Uğur
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Self Etch

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of calcium phosphate based desensitizing agent on shear bond strength of self-etch/adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty dentin specimens were prepared from freshly extracted human third molar teeth and were classified, randomly ( n = 20). Half of groups were treated with calcium phosphate based Teethmate Desensitizer and then Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate (containing self-etch primer), Panavia SA, and RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cements were luted to all dentin surfaces. All specimens were stored in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Shear bond strength was tested by a universal test machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed with a statistical program. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical differences ( P <.05). Dentin surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at x5000 and x10000 magnifications. Results: The higher shear bond values were observed in the groups with Teethmate Desensitizer applied and cemented with self-etch (16.05 ± 6.24 and 14.73 ± 4.75), whereas the lowest bonding values were observed in the groups with self-adhesive resin cement without Teethmate Desensitizer (3.73 ± 0.77 and 5.85 ± 4.19; P <.001). As the main effect of the treatment, the bond strength was 9.39 ± 6.04 in the control group, whereas it was 13.49 ± 5.44 in the Teethmate applied groups ( P <.05) Conclusions: Calcium phosphate desensitizer did not adversely effected shear bond strength of self-etch/adhesive resin cements to dentin. It even significantly increased the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements.

Effect of Resin Cement System and Root Region on the Push-out Bond Strength of a Translucent Fiber Post

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
LR Calixto ◽  
MC Bandéca ◽  
V Clavijo ◽  
MF Andrade ◽  
LGeraldo Vaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Root Region ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Root Canal Dentin ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The use of self-adhesive resin cements is an option for bonding fiber-reinforced composite posts to root canal dentin. Traditional resin cements apparently provide higher bond strengths than self-etch resin cements. Because of this, the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to root dentin should be evaluated.

Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 232020682110527
Author(s):  
Mehmet Uğur ◽  
I˙dris Kavut ◽  
Şafak Külünk ◽  
Mehmet Şerif Akdeniz ◽  
Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cleaning Methods ◽  
Self Etch

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and ıntra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test ( α = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups ( P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements ( P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups ( P <.05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.

Development of a Cavity Disinfectant Containing Antibacterial Monomer MDPB

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (13) ◽  
pp. 1487-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hirose ◽  
R. Kitagawa ◽  
H. Kitagawa ◽  
H. Maezono ◽  
A. Mine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Oral Bacteria ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

An experimental cavity disinfectant (ACC) that is intended to be used for various direct and indirect restorations was prepared by adding an antibacterial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinum bromide (MDPB) at 5% into 80% ethanol. The antibacterial effectiveness of ACC and its influences on the bonding abilities of resin cements were investigated. To examine the antibacterial activity of unpolymerized MDPB, the minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) were determined for Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, Actinomyces naeslundii, Parvimonas micra, Enterococcus faecalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Antibacterial activities of ACC and the commercial cavity disinfectant containing 2% chlorhexidine and ethanol (CPS) were evaluated by agar disk diffusion tests through 7 bacterial species and by MIC and MBC measurement for S. mutans. The effects of ACC and CPS to kill bacteria in dentinal tubules were compared with an S. mutans–infected dentin model. Shear bond strength tests were used to examine the influences of ACC on the dentin-bonding abilities of a self-adhesive resin cement and a dual-cure resin cement used with a primer. Unpolymerized MDPB showed strong antibacterial activity against 7 oral bacteria. ACC produced inhibition zones against all bacterial species similar to CPS. For ACC and CPS, the MIC value for S. mutans was identical, and the MBC was similar with only a 1-step dilution difference (1:2). Treatment of infected dentin with ACC resulted in significantly greater bactericidal effects than CPS ( P < 0.05, analysis of variance and Tukey’s honest significant difference test). ACC showed no negative influences on the bonding abilities to dentin for both resin cements, while CPS reduced the bond strength of the self-adhesive resin cement ( P < 0.05). This study clarified that the experimental cavity disinfectant containing 5% MDPB is more effective in vitro than the commercially available chlorhexidine solution to eradicate bacteria in dentin, without causing any adverse influences on the bonding abilities of resinous luting cements.

scholarly journals The Effect of Self-adhesive and Self-etching Resin Cements on the Bond Strength of Nonmetallic Posts in Different Root Thirds

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽  
Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez ◽  
Omar El-Mowafy ◽  
Matheus Coelho Bandeca ◽  
Thiago Soares Porto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Microtensile Testing ◽  
Special Machine ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Post Space

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements on the bond strength of nonmetallic posts in different root regions. Materials and methods Sixty single-rooted human teeth were decoronated, endodontically treated, post-space prepared, and divided into six groups. Glass-fiber (GF) posts (Exacto, Angelus) and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts (EverStick, StickTeck) were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Breeze) (SA) (Pentral Clinical) and self-etching resin cement (Panavia-F) (SE) (Kuraray). Six 1-mm-thick rods were obtained from the cervical (C), middle (M), and apical (A) regions of the roots. The specimens were then subjected to microtensile testing in a special machine (BISCO; Schaumburg, IL, USA) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Results Means (and SD) of the MPa were: GF/SA/C: 14.32 (2.84), GF/SA/M: 10.69 (2.72), GF/SA/A: 6.77 (2.17), GF/SE/C: 11.56 (4.13), GF/SE/M: 6.49 (2.54), GF/SE/A: 3.60 (1.29), FRC/SA/C: 16.89 (2.66), FRC/SA/M: 13.18 (2.19), FRC/SA/A: 8.45 (1.77), FRC/SE/C: 13.69 (3.26), FRC/SE/M: 9.58 (2.23), FRC/SE/A: 5.62 (2.12). The difference among the regions was statistically significant for all groups (p < 0.05). The selfadhesive resin cement showed better results than the selfetching resin cement when compared to each post (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in bond strengths of the resin cements when comparable to each post (p > 0.05). Conclusion The bond strength values were significantly affected by the resin cement and the highest values were found for self-adhesive resin cement. How to cite this article da Silva MB, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Assis FS, Tonetto MR, Porto TS, Bhandi SH, El-Mowafy O, de Toledo Porto Neto S, Bandeca MC. The Effect of Self-adhesive and Self-etching Resin Cements on the Bond Strength of Nonmetallic Posts in Different Root Thirds. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(2):147-153.

Bond Strength and Interfacial Micromorphology of Etch-and-Rinse and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Rodrigues Vaz ◽  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Etch And Rinse

Is Conventional Resin Cement Adhesive Performance to Dentin Better Than Self-adhesive? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laboratory Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 484-495
Author(s):  
LL Miotti ◽  
AC Follak ◽  
AF Montagner ◽  
RT Pozzobon ◽  
BL da Silveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Laboratory Studies ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Adhesive Performance

Clinical Relevance Conventional multistep resin cements presented higher adhesive performance to dentin than simplified self-adhesive cements, which is an important criterion for indirect restoration prognosis. SUMMARY This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on laboratory studies assessing bonding performance to dentin of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements, in cementing indirect restorations. This review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement. Of a total of 518 studies, 36 were screened full text and reviewed according to exclusion criteria. Nineteen papers were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses, according to the following inclusion criteria: studies that evaluated the bond strength to dentin of indirect restorations cemented with dual conventional or self-adhesive resin cements and those that presented bond strength data in MPa as an outcome. Statistical analyses were conducted using Rev-Man 5.1. Comparisons were performed with random effects models at 5% significance level. A global analysis comparing conventional and self-adhesive cements and three subgroup analyses comparing immediate and long-term results were performed. Global analysis showed a difference between groups, with conventional resin cements presenting higher bond strength results than self-adhesive resin cements, in immediate and long-term time periods (both p=0.03). Immediate and longterm bond strength results were different for self-adhesive cements, favoring immediate bond strength (p=0.03), but immediate and long-term bond strength results for conventional resin cements were not different (p=0.06). Medium or high risk of bias was found in all studies. Conventional multistep resin cements showed superior overall adhesive performance compared with simplified self-adhesive resin cements when used to cement indirect restorations to dentin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document