scholarly journals Glycemic Index and Load of Selected Ethiopian Foods: An Experimental Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebiyu Dereje ◽  
Gadise Bekele ◽  
Yemisrach Nigatu ◽  
Yoseph Worku ◽  
Roger P. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Glycemic Load ◽  
Postprandial Glucose ◽  
Wheat Bread ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
White Wheat ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meal Planning ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

Background. Determining the glycemic index and load of foods has significant impact on meal planning for diabetes. However, there is no data on the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of Ethiopian foods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the glycemic index and glycemic load of Teff Injera, Corn Injera, and White Wheat Bread. Methods. Experimental study design was conducted among selected healthy adults. Teff Injera, Corn Injera, and White Wheat Bread were selected as test foods for the study, and glucose was used as the reference food. The postprandial glucose concentrations in the blood were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, 90, and 120 minutes. The relative glycemic index of each food was calculated, and the presence of statistical difference in glycemic index among the three foods was analyzed. Results. The mean age of the participants was 23 years (±1.6 years). The glycemic indexes of Teff Injera, White Wheat Bread, and Corn Injera were 36 (low), 46 (low), and 97 (high), respectively, and the glycemic loads were 7 (low), 14 (moderate), and 22 (high), respectively. There was a significant difference in glycemic index and load among the three food items (p<0.001). Teff Injera had a much lower glycemic index and load compared with Corn Injera (p<0.001) and White Wheat Bread (p=0.03). Conclusions. Teff Injera and White Wheat Bread have low glycemic index and are recommended to be consumed by diabetic patients, whereas Corn Injera has high glycemic index and is not recommended for diabetic patients. Therefore, Teff Injera should be considered globally in the dietary modification programs for diabetes.

scholarly journals Glycemic Index of Selected Foods in Jamaica

2019 ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Ryan Francis ◽  
Perceval S Bahado-Singh ◽  
Andrew O Wheatley ◽  
Ann Marie Smith ◽  
Helen N Asemota
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Glycemic Load ◽  
Psidium Guajava ◽  
Serum Glucose ◽  
Dietary Advice ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Citrullus Vulgaris ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

Background: Fruits, vegetables and legumes for their complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber and micronutrients, should form an essential part of every diet. In order to give good dietary advice to diabetic patients, it is necessary to know the glycemic index of foods commonly consumed locally. The objective of this study was to determine the Glycemic Index (GI) and Glycemic Load (GL) of commonly available and consumed Guava (Psidium guajava), Watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris), Gungo (Cajanus cajan), Papaya (Carica papaya) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in Jamaica. Methods: Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects (5 males, 5 females) with mean age 30 ± 2 years and mean BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2 were recruited to the study. Using a non-blind, crossover design trial, the subjects consumed 50 (or 25) grams of available carbohydrate portions of glucose (standard food) and test foods after an overnight fast and their serum glucose levels were determined at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the consumption of each test food. Glucose was tested on three separate occasions, and the test foods once. The GI value was calculated geometrically by expressing the Incremental Area Under the Blood Glucose Curve (IAUC) for the test foods as a percentage of each subject's average IAUC for the standard food. Results: The results indicated that the IAUC for Watermelon (95 ± 11) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of Tomato (37 ± 12), and Gungo (58 ± 13). The differences in IAUC of Watermelon (95 ± 11), Guava (83 ± 27) and Papaya (80 ± 7) were not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no significant difference in GI among the samples studied. Conclusion: Tomato, Gungo, Papaya Watermelon and Guava were shown to have low glycemic index and glycemic load values.

Sourdough fermentation as a tool for the manufacture of low-glycemic index white wheat bread enriched in dietary fibre

2009 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. De Angelis ◽  
N. Damiano ◽  
C. G. Rizzello ◽  
A. Cassone ◽  
R. Di Cagno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Dietary Fibre ◽  
Wheat Bread ◽  
White Wheat ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

New Insight into Diabetes Management: From Glycemic Index to Dietary Insulin Index

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Yari ◽  
Vahideh Behrouz ◽  
Hamid Zand ◽  
Katayoun Pourvali
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glycemic Load ◽  
Insulin Response ◽  
Diet Therapy ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Carbohydrate Counting ◽  
Insulin Requirements ◽  
Insight Into

Background: Despite efforts to control hyperglycemia, diabetes management is still challenging. This may be due to focusing on reducing hyperglycemia and neglecting the importance of hyperinsulinemia; while insulin resistance and resultant hyperinsulinemia preceded diabetes onset and may contribute to disease pathogenesis. Objective: The present narrative review attempts to provide a new insight into the management of diabetes by exploring different aspects of glycemic index and dietary insulin index. Results: The current data available on this topic is limited and heterogeneous. Conventional diet therapy for diabetes management is based on reducing postprandial glycemia through carbohydrate counting, choosing foods with low-glycemic index and low-glycemic load. Since these indicators are only reliant on the carbohydrate content of foods and do not consider the effects of protein and fat on the stimulation of insulin secretion, they cannot provide a comprehensive approach to determine the insulin requirements. Conclusion: Selecting foods based on carbohydrate counting, glycemic index or glycemic load are common guides to control glycemia in diabetic patients, but neglect the insulin response, thus leading to failure in diabetes management. Therefore, paying attention to insulinemic response along with glycemic response seems to be more effective in managing diabetes.

The clinical utility of the glycemic index and its application to mixed meals

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarie B. Hollenbeck ◽  
Ann M. Coulston
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Postprandial Glucose ◽  
Dependent Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Response ◽  
Glucose Response ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Carbohydrate Intolerance ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

A classification of carbohydrate-containing foods based on their glycemic response to 50-g carbohydrate portions has recently been developed. The relative glycemic potency of many of these carbohydrate-containing foods have been compared, and these data have been published in the form of a glycemic index. It has been suggested that meals containing low glycemic index foods will result in a lower postprandial glucose response than meals with a higher glycemic index. However, whether or not these data will lead to a clinically useful reduction in postprandial hyperglycemia in individuals with carbohydrate intolerance remains controversial. In this review, we will try to delineate why we believe that the glycemic index, as currently developed, may be a specious issue. In addition, we will briefly discuss a number of factors that may explain the apparent discrepancy in viewpoints on this issue.Key words: glycemic index, noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, glycemic response, dietary carbohydrate.

scholarly journals Low-Glycemic-Index Sugar in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Steciuk ◽  
Samia Mahmood Hafez Amir ◽  
Muzzammil Hosenally ◽  
Aroushini Goorapah
Keyword(s):  
Blood Sugar ◽  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic Patients ◽  
Sugar Levels ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

Abstract Background and Objectives: There is a need to re assess the value of low-GI food and its specific components. The effect of one of them, namely low-glycemic-index sugar, is unclear, as its impact is usually confounded when reported in the literature. This study attempts to breach this gap, shedding light on its effect in type 2 diabetic patients and evaluate if it could be considered as part of a dietary plan.Subjects and Methods: The blood sugar level of twenty (20) type 2 diabetics was monitored using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring system during two phases; firstly, an initial period of 5 days, whereby all the included patients were taking their usual dietary meals. Subjects were then randomized into two groups of equal size before embarking on a second phase; 10 subjects were instructed to eat prepared, portioned and delivered meals, the difference for the second group being that low-GI sugar was used for the preparation. Results: Compared to baseline (day 1), blood sugar dropped by 18% for the group with low-GI sugar and 13% for those who consumed sugar with a normal-GI. The variation in sugar levels was also more contained in the interventional group. A by-product of the study design shows that constant glucose monitoring could raise awareness, and may foster reduction in blood sugar levels. Portioned food was capable of reducing blood sugar levels, with elevated levels of compliance just after start. Conclusions: Even though the ultimate aim is to reduce sugar consumption by diabetic patients, the intake of a low-GI sugar seems to be less harmful than normal sugar. Compared to using normal sugar for the preparation of portioned foods, the use of a low-GI sugar is encouraged as part of a wider plan for the management of diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Value added Indian flat breads with Ashwagandha and its glycemic response among normal healthy subjects

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neelam Chaturvedi, Nishtha Raj and Ayush Borah
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Index ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Functional Foods ◽  
Glycemic Load ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Glycemic Response ◽  
Carbohydrate Quality ◽  
Improve Glucose Tolerance ◽  
Low Glycemic Index

The glycemic index (GI) provides an indication of carbohydrate quality whereas glycemic load (GL) provides carbohydrates quantity in a food and the insulin demand. Diet with low glycemic index and glycemic load have been shown to improve glucose tolerance on normal healthy subjects so there is a need for a more diversified range of foods with a low glycemic response. The objective of present work was to formulate ashwagandha based food products by utilizing their root powder as an ingredient and their glycemic responses on normal healthy subjects. The products (Chappati, Naan and Thepla) were developed by incorporation of 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% aswagandha root. The result showed that the products with 2% root powder were most acceptable by semi trained panels. Further, study was conducted on randomly selected 30 healthy subjects were fed most acceptable test recipe i.e. thepla and their glycemic response was anticipated. GI and GL values were 37.30 and 11.36 found to be lower 2% root incorporated in thepla while comparing with standard thepla. The data demonstrated that the test thepla belongs to low glycemic index and medium glycemic load. Thus, the inclusion of ashwagandha powder as a constituent can be used to achieve a wider range of low glycemic functional foods possessing sensory attributes that could be valuable for managing the diabetes mellitus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document