scholarly journals Public Health Implications of Solar UV Exposure during Extreme Cold and Hot Weather Episodes in 2018 in Chilton, South East England

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Rebecca Rendell ◽  
Michael Higlett ◽  
Marina Khazova ◽  
John O’Hagan

Consideration of the implications of solar UV exposure on public health during extreme temperature events is important due to their increasing frequency as a result of climate change. In this paper public health impacts of solar UV exposure, both positive and negative, during extreme hot and cold weather in England in 2018 were assessed by analysing environmental variations in UV and temperature. Consideration was given to people’s likely behaviour, the current alert system and public health advice. During a period of severe cold weather in February-March 2018 UV daily doses were around 25–50% lower than the long-term average (1991–2017); however, this would not impact on sunburn risk or the benefit of vitamin D production. In spring 2018 unseasonably high temperatures coincided with high UV daily doses (40–75% above long-term average) on significant days: the London Marathon (22 April) and UK May Day Bank Holiday weekend, which includes a public holiday on the Monday (5–7 May). People were likely to have intermittent excess solar UV exposure on unacclimatised skin, causing sunburn and potentially increasing the risk of skin cancers. No alerts were raised for these events since they occurred outside the alerting period. During a heat-wave in summer 2018 the environmental availability of UV was high—on average of 25% above the long-term average. The public health implications are complex and highly dependent on behaviour and sociodemographic variables such as skin colour. For all three periods Pearson’s correlation analysis showed a statistically significant (p<0.05) positive correlation between maximum daily temperature and erythema-effective UV daily dose. Public health advice may be improved by taking account of both temperature and UV and their implications for behaviour. A health impact-based alert system would be of benefit throughout the year, particularly in spring and summer.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T Levy ◽  
Jamie Tam ◽  
Luz Maria María Sanchez-Romero ◽  
Yameng Li ◽  
Zhe Yuan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nicotine vaping products (NVPs) are increasingly popular worldwide. They may provide public health benefits if used as a substitute for smoking, but may create public health harms if used as a gateway to smoking or to discourage smoking cessation. This paper presents the Smoking and Vaping Model (SAVM), which estimates the public health implications of NVPs in the US. Methods SAVM adopts a cohort-approach and is available on an Excel platform. We derive public health implications by comparing smoking- and NVP-attributable deaths under a No-NVP and an NVP Scenario. The No-NVP Scenario projects current, former and never smoking rates via smoking initiation and cessation rates, and incorporates excess risks of smoking. The NVP Scenario allows for NVP relative excess risks, switching from cigarette to NVP use, separate NVP and smoking initiation rates, and separate NVP and smoking cessation rates. The model is validated against recent US survey data on smoking and vaping prevalence. Results The SAVM projects that under current patterns of US NVP use and substitution, NVP use will translate into 5.8 million premature smoking- and vaping-attributable deaths avoided and 96.4 million life years gained between 2013 and 2100. Sensitivity analysis shows that parameters for NVP relative risks, NVP-related switching and smoking cessation are particularly influential in gauging public health impacts. Discussion The SAVM shows potential benefits of e-cigarette use over a wide range of parameters. However, there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding key parameters. Policymakers, researchers and other public health stakeholders can apply the SAVM to estimate the potential public health impact of NVPs in their country or region using their own data sources.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1596-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Hooke ◽  
M. P. Higlett ◽  
N. Hunter ◽  
J. B. O'Hagan

This publication presents an analysis of 25 years (1991–2015) of erythema effective UV radiant exposure data measured at Chilton, UK which is part of Public Health England's solar network.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Fouillet ◽  
Cecile Forgeot ◽  
Marie-Michele Thiam ◽  
Celine Caserio-Schonemann

ObjectiveThe presentation describes the results of the daily monitoring of health indicators conducted by the French public health agency during the major floods and the cold wave that occurred in January 2018 in France, in order to early identify potential impact of those climatic events on the population.IntroductionThe Seine River rises at the north-East of France and flows through Paris before emptying into the English Channel. On January 2018 (from 22th January to 11th February, Weeks 4 to 6), major floods occurred in the Basin of Seine River, after an important rainy period. This period was also marked by the occurrence on the same area of a first cold wave on Week 6 (from 5th to 7th February), including heavy snowfall and ice conditions from 9th to 10th February. A second similar cold wave occured from 28th February and 1st March.Floods of all magnitude are known to have potential health impacts on population [1], both at short, medium and long term both on physical (injuries, diarrhoeal disease, Carbon Monoxyde poisoning, vector-borne disease) and mental health. Extreme cold weather have also the potential to further impact on human health through direct exposure to lower temperatures, and associated adverse conditions, such as snow and ice [2]. Such situations may be particularly associated to direct impact like hypothermia, frostbite and selected bone/joint injuries).MethodsSince 2004, the French Public Health Agency (Santé publique France) set up a national syndromic surveillance system SurSaUD, enabling to ensure morbidity and mortality surveillance [3]. In 2018, morbidity data were daily collected from a network involving about 700 emergency departments (ED) and 58 emergency general practitioners’ associations SOS Médecins. 92% of the national ED attendances and 95% of national SOS Médecins visits are caught by the system.Both demographic (age and gender), administrative (date and location of consultation, transport) and medical information (chief complaint, medical diagnosis using ICD10 codes in ED and specific thesauri in SOS Médecins associations, severity, hospitalization after discharge) are recorded for each patient.The daily and weekly evolution of the number of all-cause ED attendances and SOS Médecins consultations during the flooding period were compared to the evolution on the two previous years. The number of hospitalisations after ED discharge was also monitored. The immediate health impact of floods and cold waves was assessed by monitoring eight syndromic indicators: gastroenteritis, carbon monoxide poisoning, burnt, stress, faintness, drowning, injuries and hypothermia.Analyses were performed by age group (<15 years, 15-64 years, more than 65 years) and at different geographical levels (national, Paris region and districts located in the Basin of Seine River).ResultsIn 2018, syndromic surveillance did not show any major impact on all-cause ED attendances and SOS Médecins consultations from week 4 to week 6, neither in Paris area nor in other areas along the Seine River. The recorded numbers were comparable to the two precedent years in all age groups.A decrease of the all-cause ED attendances was observed during the 1st day with ice conditions in Normandy and Paris, mainly in children and adults aged 15-64 years.During week 6 in Paris area, an increase of ED attendances was observed for injuries (+4% compared to the past weeks – figure 1) and to a lesser extent for hypothermia and frostbite (16 attendances compared to less than 9 for the past weeks). Similar increase in injuries were observed in Normandy during the second cold wave (Figure 1).ConclusionsDuring the flood episode, the rising water level was slow with foreseeable evolution, compared to other sudden flood events occurring in south of France in 2010 due to violent thunderstorms. This progressive evolution allows French authority to deploy wide specific organization in order to mitigate impact on concerned populations. That may explain the absence impact observed in ED at regional and national levels during the flood disaster. The evolution of injuries during 2018 episode is attributable to the cold wave that occurred simultaneously.As the French syndromic surveillance system is implemented on the whole territory and collects emergency data routinely since several years, it constitutes a reactive tool to assess the potential public health impact of both sudden and predictable disasters. It can either contribute to adapt management action or reassure decision makers if no major impact is observed.References[1] Ahern M, Kovats S. The health impacts of floods. In: Few R, Matthies F, eds. Flood hazards and health: responding to present and future risks. London, Earthscan, 2006:28–53.[2] Hughes H, Morbey R, Hughes T. et al. Using an Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance System to investigate the impact of extreme cold weather events Public Health. 2014 Jul;128(7):628-35.[3] Caserio-Schönemann C, Bousquet V, Fouillet A, Henry V. The French syndromic surveillance system SurSaUD (R). Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2014;3-4:38-44.


2021 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. e293-e294
Author(s):  
Cristina Ausín-García ◽  
Eva Cervilla-Muñoz ◽  
Jesús Millán-Nuñez-Cortés

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document