scholarly journals Hemodynamic-Based Evaluation on Thrombosis Risk of Fusiform Coronary Artery Aneurysms Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation Method

Complexity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Haoran Wang ◽  
Hitomi Anzai ◽  
Youjun Liu ◽  
Aike Qiao ◽  
Jinsheng Xie ◽  
...  

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) have been reported to associate with an increased risk for thrombosis. Distinct to the brain aneurysm, which can cause a rupture, CAA’s threat is more about its potential to induce thrombosis, leading to myocardial infarction. Case reports suggest that thrombosis risk varied with the different CAA diameters and hemodynamics effects (usually wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT)) may relate to the thrombosis risk. However, currently, due to the rareness of the disease, there is limited knowledge of the hemodynamics effects of CAA. The aim of the study was to estimate the relationship between hemodynamic effects and different diameters of CAAs. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides a noninvasive means of hemodynamic research. Four three-dimensional models were constructed, representing coronary arteries with a normal diameter (1x) and CAAs with diameters two (2x), three (3x), and five times (5x) that of the normal diameter. A lumped parameter model (LPM) which can capture the feature of coronary blood flow supplied the boundary conditions. WSS in the aneurysm decreased 97.7% apparently from 3.51 Pa (1x) to 0.08 Pa (5x). OSI and RRT in the aneurysm were increased apparently by two orders of magnitude from 0.01 (1x) to 0.30 (5x), and from 0.38 Pa−1 (1x) to 51.59 Pa−1 (5x), separately. Changes in the local volume of the CAA resulted in dramatic changes in local hemodynamic parameters. The findings demonstrated that thrombosis risk increased with increasing diameter and was strongly exacerbated at larger diameters of CAA. The 2x model exhibited the lowest thrombosis risk among the models, suggesting the low-damage (medication) treatment may work. High-damage (surgery) treatment may need to be considered when CAA diameter is 3 times or higher. This diameter classification method may be a good example for constructing a more complex hemodynamic-based risk stratification method and could support clinical decision-making in the assessment of CAA.

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1446
Author(s):  
Tanyaporn Pattarabanjird ◽  
Corban Cress ◽  
Anh Nguyen ◽  
Angela Taylor ◽  
Stefan Bekiranov ◽  
...  

Background: Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful approach for predicting outcomes based on patterns and inferences. Improving prediction of severe coronary artery disease (CAD) has the potential for personalizing prevention and treatment strategies and for identifying individuals that may benefit from cardiac catheterization. We developed a novel ML approach combining traditional cardiac risk factors (CRF) with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in a gene associated with human CAD (ID3 rs11574) to enhance prediction of CAD severity; Methods: ML models incorporating CRF along with ID3 genotype at rs11574 were evaluated. The most predictive model, a deep neural network, was used to classify patients into high (>32) and low level (≤32) Gensini severity score. This model was trained on 325 and validated on 82 patients. Prediction performance of the model was summarized by a confusion matrix and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC); and Results: Our neural network predicted severity score with 81% and 87% accuracy for the low and the high groups respectively with an ROC-AUC of 0.84 for 82 patients in the test group. The addition of ID3 rs11574 to CRF significantly enhanced prediction accuracy from 65% to 81% in the low group, and 72% to 84% in the high group. Age, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and systolic blood pressure were the top 3 contributors in predicting severity score; Conclusions: Our neural network including ID3 rs11574 improved prediction of CAD severity over use of Framingham score, which may potentially be helpful for clinical decision making in patients at increased risk of complications from coronary angiography.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S8-S9
Author(s):  
Nicholas E Larkey ◽  
Leslie J Donato ◽  
Allan S Jaffe ◽  
Jeffrey W Meeusen

Abstract Plasma concentrations of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are directly associated with risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Multisociety guidelines define LDL-C>160mg/dL as a risk factor for CAD and LDL-C>190mg/dL as an indication for lipid lowering medication, regardless of other clinical factors. Subfractionation of LDL according to size (LDL-s) enables differentiation between two LDL phenotypes: large-buoyant LDL and small-dense LDL. The small-dense LDL phenotype reportedly conveys increased risk for CAD. Major societies do not recommend LDL subfractions be used for clinical decision making and most payers do not cover LDL subfraction testing. Despite these restrictions, LDL subfraction is routinely requested by clinicians. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measures LDL-C and LDL-s. Following inquiries regarding interpretation of conflicting LDL-C and LDL-s results, we investigated associations between LDL-C and LDL-s measured by NMR in order to determine how often they provide contradicting or additive information. Verification of NMR LDL-C accuracy was confirmed by ß-quantification in a subset of patient samples (n=250). The average bias was -4.5mg/dL and the correlation coefficient was 0.92. High-risk was defined as LDL-C>160mg/dL or LDL-s<20.5 nm (small-dense LDL); and low-risk was defined as LDL-C<70mg/dL or LDL-s>20.5nm (large-buoyant LDL). In 26,710 clinical NMR analyses, the median LDL-C was 94.0mg/dL (range:5-436mg/dL) with median LDL-s of 20.8 nm (range:19.4–23.0nm). LDL-s moderately correlated with LDL-C (Ï#129;=0.51;p<0.01). Small-dense-LDL was identified in only 18% (407/2,191) of patients with elevated LDL-C (>160mg/dL) and was more common (73.2% of 6,093) in patients with low LDL-C (<70mg/dL;p<0.001). Associations with CAD were investigated among patients without cholesterol-lowering medication treatment referred for angiography (n=356). CAD (defined as stenosis >50% in one or more coronary artery) was diagnosed in 14% (1/7) of subjects with low LDL-C (<70mg/dL) compared to 59% (47/80) of subjects with elevated LDL-C (p=0.01). When stratifying by LDL-s, CAD was diagnosed in 50% (57/115) of subjects with small-dense LDL compared to 43% (104/241) of subjects with large-buoyant LDL (p=0.2). Small-dense LDL was identified in only 33% (26/80) of cases with elevated LDL-C. Limiting to subjects with elevated LDL-C, CAD was diagnosed in 50% (13/26) of subjects with concordant (high-risk) small-dense LDL compared to 61% (33/54) of subjects with discordant (low-risk) large-buoyant LDL (LDL-s>20.5nm) (p=0.3). Our data confirm that LDL-s subfraction measured by NMR is reported discordantly in most cases when LDL-C is unequivocally high or low. Furthermore, CAD diagnosis was significantly associated with LDL-C, but not with LDL-s. Our data also show that in discrepant samples, elevated LDL-C correlates better with disease state compared to LDL-s. Therefore, LDL-s should not be used to justify treatment decisions in patients with elevated LDL-C. Laboratories should consider carefully whether or not to report LDL-s when it is known that misleading and discordant values will be reported in a majority of cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Pankaj Jariwala ◽  
Edla Arjun Padmakumar ◽  
Adluri Rajeshwara Krishnaprasad

Medicina ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Rima Šileikienė ◽  
Jolanta Kudzytė ◽  
Antanas Jankauskas ◽  
Liutauras Labanauskas ◽  
Vilma Rakauskienė ◽  
...  

Kawasaki disease is an acute multisystemic vasculitis occurring predominantly in infants and young children and rarely in adolescents and adults. At elderly age, Kawasaki disease may remain unrecognized with a subsequent delay in appropriate therapy and an increased risk of coronary artery aneurysms. We report a case of intravenous immunoglobulin- and aspirin-resistant Kawasaki disease and severe cardiovascular damage in an adolescent boy. The article discusses major issues associated with the management of refractory Kawasaki disease.


Heart ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M Y Chia ◽  
K. H Tan ◽  
G. Jackson

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W McCrindle ◽  
Cedric Manlhiot ◽  
Kristen Sexson ◽  
Pei-Ni Jone ◽  
Mathew Mathew ◽  
...  

Background: One of the main impediments to conceiving and planning studies in children with coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) after Kawasaki disease (KD) is the lack of normative data regarding the prevalence of outcomes over time and risk factors. Methods: The North American Kawasaki Disease Registry was used to determine the prevalence of multiple clinically important outcomes of CAA after KD. All analyses were stratified by severity of CAA (small CAA with z-score = 2.5-5, medium with z-score = 5-10 and giant with z-score >10). All analyses were performed using non-parametric survival analysis. Results: n=621 patients submitted to the Registry had complete follow-up data and were included in the analysis (280 [45%] small CAA, 139 [22%] medium and 202 [33%] giant). Time-related freedom from multiple outcomes stratified by type of CAA are reported in the Table. Reduction in z-scores was strongly associated with the initial size of the lesion, with smaller lesions being more likely to decrease to a normal dimension over time. Thrombosis and stenosis were infrequent in patients without giant CAA. For those patients with giant CAA, the risk of thrombosis, myocardial infarction, angiographically-confirmed stenosis and revascularization was substantial and persisted up to 10 years after diagnosis. In addition to larger luminal diameter, other factors associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes included larger CAA longitudinal area and complex CAA (vs. isolated lesions). Conclusions: Only patients with giant CAA are at substantial risk of adverse clinical outcomes; future trials of pharmacological therapy targeting thrombosis and stenosis risk should focus on these patients.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Garcia-Dominguez ◽  
Luis M Garrido-Garcia

Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and aspirin is the standard initial therapy in the treatment of Kawasaki disease (KD), which is proven to decrease the incidence of coronary artery aneurysms from 25% to less than 5%. There is increasing evidence for steroid therapy as adjunctive primary therapy with IVIG especially in those patients who are at increased risk of coronary artery aneurysms and in patients with risk of IVIG resistance. However, clinical trials evaluating the use of corticosteroids plus IVIG have produced confusing results. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of steroids plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) combination therapy (IVIG+S) for the initial treatment of patients with KD to prevent coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) compared with the standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin plus aspirin (IVIG+A) in a Children’s Hospital in Mexico City. Material and Methods: An observational, comparative, retrospective and case-control study of all patients treated with IVIG for KD in our Institution from August 1995 to May 2014. The clinical presentation, laboratory results and coronary artery abnormalities in the IVIG+S and the IVIG+A groups were analyzed and compared. Results: We studied 295 patients with KD treated with IVIG, 136 (46.1%) received IVIG+A treatment and 159 (53.9%) received IVIG+S treatment. We didn’t found adverse reactions in the patients treated with steroids. The IVIG+S group were older 43.25 ± 43.04 than the non-steroid group 32.07 ± 24.51 (p < 0.008). Steroids were commonly use in incomplete cases (p < 0.059) and in patients with cardiac complications at diagnosis: pericardial effusion (p < 0.056) and pericarditis (p < 0.013). The steroid group has slightly more days of fever after the IVIG treatment 1.27 ± 1.51 days vs. 0.93 ± 0.924 days (p < 0.028). We found no difference in the development of CAA in both groups. (p = 0.221) Conclusions: There were no differences in the development of CAA with the use of steroids in the initial treatment of KD. Nevertheless steroids were used more commonly in incomplete forms of KD and in more severely affected patients, which could reflect the lack of difference in the development of CAA in both groups.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (08) ◽  
pp. 734-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Marie Münster ◽  
Jørgen Gram ◽  
Johannes Sidelmann ◽  
Simon Chang

AbstractAnabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) abuse surged during the 1980s and is seen in approximately 1 in 20 of all males today. A wide spectrum of AAS compounds and abuse regimens are applied and AAS abuse has been associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular profile. The aim of this review is to critique the collected data concerning effects of AAS abuse on thrombosis risk through presentation of condensed evidence from studies investigating AAS-induced changes in coagulation, fibrinolysis, and cardiovascular risk markers. AAS abuse inflicts a procoagulant distribution of cardiovascular risk markers including dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis proneness. AAS abuse overall stimulates synthesis of coagulation factors, inhibitors, and fibrinolytic proteins resulting in both increased global coagulation and stimulation of fibrinolysis. Overall, supported by many case reports and some epidemiological studies, AAS abuse is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. However, to provide clear evidence for a causal relationship between AAS abuse and thrombosis risk, future studies need to address a range of potential biases, insufficient methodology, and other shortcomings of the current literature as highlighted in this review.


VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-277
Author(s):  
Christopher Lowe ◽  
Oussama El Bakbachi ◽  
Damian Kelleher ◽  
Imran Asghar ◽  
Francesco Torella ◽  
...  

Abstract. The aim of this review was to investigate presentation, aetiology, management, and outcomes of bowel ischaemia following EVAR. We present a case report and searched electronic bibliographic databases to identify published reports of bowel ischaemia following elective infra-renal EVAR not involving hypogastric artery coverage or iliac branch devices. We conducted our review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. In total, five cohort studies and three case reports were included. These studies detailed some 6,184 infra-renal elective EVARs, without procedure-related occlusion of the hypogastric arteries, performed between 1996 and 2014. Bowel ischaemia in this setting is uncommon with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 2.8 % and includes a spectrum of severity from mucosal to transmural ischaemia. Due to varying reporting standards, an overall proportion of patients requiring bowel resection could not be ascertained. In the larger series, mortality ranged from 35 to 80 %. Atheroembolization, hypotension, and inferior mesenteric artery occlusion were reported as potential causative factors. Elderly patients and those undergoing prolonged procedures appear at higher risk. Bowel ischaemia is a rare but potentially devastating complication following elective infra-renal EVAR and can occur in the setting of patent mesenteric vessels and hypogastric arteries. Mortality ranges from 35 to 80 %. Further research is required to identify risk factors and establish prophylactic measures in patients that have an increased risk of developing bowel ischaemia after standard infra-renal EVAR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document