scholarly journals Analysis of Influencing Factors of Compliance with Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Correlation with the Severity of Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Li Zhu ◽  
Xiaodan Zhang ◽  
Jing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Clinical Supervision ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Increased Risk

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and thrombus, and anticoagulant therapy is a key link in the prevention of stroke. At present, the anticoagulation rate of atrial fibrillation in China is low, and there are many factors affecting the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation to anticoagulation. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are anticoagulant with high application value due to their high safety and low risk of intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, and death. However, the compliance of NOACs is poor, and the current situation of anticoagulants in China is not optimistic. In this study, a total of 156 patients with NVAF who received NOAC anticoagulation therapy in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The results showed that education background, place of residence, number of complications, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score were independent influencing factors for NOACS compliance of NVAF patients. Also, the Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a negative correlation (r = −0.465, P < 0.001 ) between NOAC compliance and severity of ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF. Therefore, clinical supervision and management of patients with NVAF after NOACs should be strengthened to improve the compliance of patients with NVAF after NOACs, reduce the damage of ischemic stroke, and improve their prognosis.

scholarly journals Bleeding and thromboembolism due to drug-drug interactions with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants—a Swedish, register-based cohort study in atrial fibrillation outpatients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Holm ◽  
Buster Mannheimer ◽  
Rickard E Malmström ◽  
Erik Eliasson ◽  
Jonatan D Lindh
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Drug Register ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Purpose To study the association between interacting drugs and bleeding or thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation outpatients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods Population-based cohort study of outpatients treated with NOACs in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Patients with atrial fibrillation and newly initiated NOAC treatment were identified in the Prescribed Drug Register. Comorbidities and outcome data were retrieved from the Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register. Cox-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoints any severe bleed and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/stroke unspecified during the first six months of treatment. Secondary endpoints were gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism. Results Increased risk of any severe bleed was found when NOAC treatment, and drugs with pharmacodynamic effect on bleeding were combined, compared to NOAC only. An increased risk with these combinations was evident for apixaban (hazard ratio (HR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.63), rivaroxaban (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.49–1.92), and dabigatran (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05–1.52). For apixaban, there was an increased risk of any severe bleed when combined with CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.5). The use of inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp was low in this cohort, and effects on ischemic stroke/TIA/stroke unspecified could not be established. Conclusion Increased risk of bleeding was seen for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions with NOACs. Prescribers need to be vigilant of the effect of interacting drugs on the risk profile of patients treated with NOACs.

Bleeding rates in patients older than 90 years of age on vitamin K antagonist therapy for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Tincani ◽  
Pietro Baldini ◽  
Mark A Crowther ◽  
Andrea Zanasi ◽  
Patrizia Ferrari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antagonist Therapy

HEMATURIA AND OTHER KINDS OF BLEEDINGS ON NON-VITAMIN K ANTAGONIST ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: AN UPDATED OVERVIEW ON OCCURRENCE, PATHOMECHANISMS AND MANAGEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2528-2534
Author(s):  
Dagmara Wojtowicz ◽  
Anna Tomaszuk-Kazberuk ◽  
Jolanta Małyszko ◽  
Marek Koziński
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Anticoagulant Activity ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Reversal Agents ◽  
Limited Availability ◽  
Increased Risk

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently recommended for oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In the setting, NOACs effectively prevent from stroke and systemic embolic events. In spite of the favorable safety profile of NOACs when compared with vitamin K antagonists, the use of any kind of anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, there is still a lack of direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety among NOACs. The results of indirect comparisons and meta-analyses suggest that the risk of various types of hemorrhagic complications differ among the particular NOACs. Management of bleeding in patients under NOAC therapy can be challenging because of limited availability of antidotes and the lack of routine laboratory test monitoring the NOAC anticoagulant effect. In case of life-threatening or critical site bleeding, reversal of NOAC anticoagulant activity is essential together with immediate implementation of causative treatment. Moreover, some patients on chronic NOAC therapy may require urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Specific reversal agents for NOACs have been developed, i.e. more widely available idarucizumab for the factor IIa inhibitor (dabigatran) and andexanet alfa for the factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with limited availability. This review summarizes the occurrence and management of NOAC-related bleeding complications with a particular emphasis on hematuria.

Abstract 12096: Temporal Trends in Ischemic Stroke and Anticoagulation Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries Having Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Diabetes Mellitus, 1992-2010

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam R Shroff ◽  
Craig A Solid ◽  
Charles A Herzog
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Similar Reduction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic stroke; but evidence regarding ischemic stroke and warfarin use in the literature is limited. We evaluated temporal trends in ischemic stroke and warfarin use among the US Medicare population with and without DM. Methods: One-year cohorts of patients with Medicare as primary payer, 1992-2010, were created using the Medicare 5% sample. ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify AF, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and comorbidities; ≤3 consecutive prothrombin-time claims were used to identify warfarin use. Results: Demographic characteristics between 1992 (n=40255) and 2010 (n=80314) respectively were (proportions): age 65-74 years (37%, 32%); age ≤ 85 years (20%, 25%); white (94%, 93%); hypertension (46%, 80%); DM (20%, 32%), chronic kidney disease (5%, 18%). Ischemic stroke rates among Medicare AF patients with DM decreased by 71% (1992, 2010) from 65 to 19 /1000 patient-years; warfarin utilization increased from 28% to 62% respectively (Figure 1A). Among Medicare AF patients without DM, ischemic stroke rates decreased by 68% from 44 to 14/ 1000 patient-years; warfarin use increased 26% to 59% respectively (Figure 1B). About 38% Medicare AF pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation in 2010. Conclusion: Medicare patients with and without DM had a similar reduction in ischemic stroke rates; and similar increase in warfarin utilization over the study period. A significant proportion of Medicare pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation with warfarin for AF in 2010; this population deserves future attention.

Abstract 15090: Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Vitamin K Antagonist in Atrial Fibrillation With Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud El Iskandarani ◽  
Islam Shatla ◽  
Muhammad Khalid ◽  
Bara El Kurdi ◽  
Timir Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Current guidelines recommend against the use of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of significant liver disease (LD) due to lack of evidence in safety and efficacy studies. However, recently studies have investigated the role of DOAC in comparison to Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in this category of patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach. Hypothesis: DOAC is safe and effective compared to VKA in AF with LD patients. Method: Unrestricted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases performed from inception until June 1, 2020 for studies comparing DOAC with VKA including more than 100 AF patients with LD. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. Result: A total of 5 studies (3 retrospective and 2 post hoc analysis) were included examining 39,064 patients with AF and LD (25,398 DOAC vs 13,669 VKA). DOAC is associated with lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKA with a HR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.98; I 2 =53%), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74;95% CI 0.59-0.94; I 2 =61%), and intracranial bleeding (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.40-0.58; I 2 =0). There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke risk (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.47-1.14; I 2 =72%) and gastrointestinal bleeding risk (0.96; 95% CI 0.61-1.51; I 2 =41%) between DOAC and VKA. Conclusion: DOAC is non-inferior to VKA regarding ischemic stroke prevention in AF patients with LD. Moreover, DOAC is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, intracranial bleeding and all-cause mortality. Further randomized trials are needed to validate our findings.

scholarly journals Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moon ◽  
Lee ◽  
Choi ◽  
Lee ◽  
Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Valvular Heart Diseases

Background: There are limited data for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) impact on outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart diseases (VHDs). Methods: We identified patients with AF and associated Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial (EHRA) type 2 VHDs, and who had been naïve from the oral anticoagulants in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2014 and 2016 (warfarin: n = 2671; NOAC: n = 3058). For analyzing the effect of NOAC on primary prevention, we excluded those with a previous history of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events. To balance covariates, we used the propensity score weighting method. Ischemic stroke, ICH, GI bleeding, major bleeding, all-cause death, and their composite outcome and fatal clinical events were evaluated. Results: During a follow-up with a mean duration of 1.4 years, NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR): 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53–0.96), GI bleeding (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35–0.72), fatal ICH (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.07–0.83), and major bleeding (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45–0.80) compared with warfarin. Overall, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58–0.80). Conclusions: In this nationwide Asian AF population with EHRA type 2 VHDs, NOAC use was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death, and the composite outcome compared to warfarin use.

scholarly journals The optimal drug adherence to maximize the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in real-world atrial fibrillation patients

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehoon Kim ◽  
Pil-Sung Yang ◽  
Eunsun Jang ◽  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Optimal Drug

Abstract Aims To investigate the association between adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and clinical outcomes and to determine the optimal cut-off level of NOAC adherence among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we identified 96 197 patients with non-valvular AF who initiated NOAC or warfarin in 2013–16. We compared clinical outcomes between adherent [proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80%] vs. non-adherent (PDC &lt;80%) NOAC users, and further with warfarin users. We assessed the outcomes according to different levels of adherence. The proportion of adherent NOAC users was 64.0%. Compared with non-adherent NOAC users, adherent NOAC users were at lower risks of ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.79], and myocardial infarction (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.93), whereas there was no significant risk alteration for major bleeding (aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91–1.11). Compared with warfarin, non-adherent NOAC use failed to have better efficacy against ischaemic stroke/SE (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93–1.05) and rather had increased risk of myocardial infarction (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.25). In NOAC users, the risks of adverse outcomes decreased according to gradual increase of adherence rates with the lowest risks in ≥90%, except for major bleeding in which there were no significant associations. Conclusions In an adherence level-dependent fashion, adherent use of NOAC showed better clinical outcomes without increasing bleeding risk. Maintaining ≥90% of adherence optimizes effectiveness of NOAC therapy without compromising its safety.

Factors associated with silent cerebral events during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the era of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Harada ◽  
Y Nomura ◽  
A Nishimura ◽  
Y Motoike ◽  
M Koshikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Factors Associated

Abstract Background A silent cerebral event (SCE), detected by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is defined as an acute new brain lesion without clinically apparent neurological deficit, and is frequently observed after catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Although the small number of SCEs does not cause neurocognitive dysfunction, the greater volume and/or larger number of SCE lesions are reportedly related to neuropsychological decline; SCE incidence may be a surrogate marker for the potential thromboembolic risk. Thus, strategies to reduce SCEs would be beneficial. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation strategy for peri-procedural period reportedly reduced the risk of SCEs, but the incidence hovers at 10% to 30%. We sought factors associated with SCEs during catheter ablation for AF in patients with peri-procedural uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy. Methods AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were eligible (n=255). All patients took non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for peri-procedural OAC (&gt;4 weeks) without interruption during the procedure. Brain MRI was performed within 2 days after the procedure to detect SCEs. Clinical characteristics and procedure-related parameters were compared between patients with and without SCEs. Results SCEs were detected in 59 patients (23%, SCE[+]) but not in 196 patients (77%, SCE[-]). Average age was higher in SCE[+] than SCE[-] (66±10 years vs. 62±12 years, p&lt;0.05). Persistent AF prevalence, CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and serum NT-ProBNP levels increased in SCE[+] vs. SCE[-]. In transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography, left-atrial dimension (LAD) was larger and AF rhythm/spontaneous echo contrast were more frequently observed in SCE[+] than SCE[-]. SCE[+] had lower initial activated clotting time (ACT) before unfractionated heparin (UFH) injection and longer time to reach optimal ACT (&gt;300 sec) before trans-septal puncture than SCE [-]. In multivariate analysis, LAD, initial ACT before UFH injection, and time to reach optimal ACT were predictors for SCEs. Conclusions LAD and intra-procedural ACT kinetics affect SCEs during the procedure in patients with uninterrupted OAC for AF ablation. Shortening time to achieve optimal ACT during the procedure may reduce the risk of SCEs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document