scholarly journals Scales to Assess Knowledge, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy for HIV PrEP in Colombian MSM: PrEP-COL Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Héctor F. Mueses-Marín ◽  
Beatriz Alvarado-Llano ◽  
Julián Torres-Isasiga ◽  
Pilar Camargo-Plazas ◽  
Maria C. Bolívar-Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Subjective Norms ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Willingness To Use ◽  
Knowledge Scale

Objective. We evaluated the construct validity Spanish version of knowledge, stigma, norms, and self-efficacy scales regarding PrEP in MSM. Methods. Sample of 287 MSM. Exploratory confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory were used to validate the constructs. Correlations and confidence interval-based estimation of relevance analyses were conducted to correlate the scales with willingness and intention to use PrEP. Results. Attitude, stigma, and descriptive and subjective norms scales showed good construct validity and were related to intention and willingness to use PrEP. However, the knowledge scale and self-efficacy scales require further refinement. Conclusions. The study provides useful information for assessing information, motivation, and self-efficacy related to PrEP use. Our results could be used to test the scales and the theoretical model in other contexts to confirm their usefulness.

Factor Structure of the K-ABC for Cantonese, English, and Punjabi Speaking Canadians

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Joanne M. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Structure ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analysis ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Assessment Battery ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity (internal structure) of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for use with Cantonese, English, and Punjabi speaking Canadians. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the sequential/simultaneous theoretical model was supported by the English and Punjabi data: however, the Cantonese data did not exhibit a good fit with this model. Similarly, the results of the exploratory factor analysis suggested that sequential and simultaneous factors could apply when describing the factor structure of the English and Punjabi data, but not for the Cantonese data. Implications of these findings are discussed.

scholarly journals The CSGU: A Measure of Controllability, Stability, Globality, and Universality Attributions

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 611-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pete Coffee ◽  
Tim Rees
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
And Performance

This article reports initial evidence of construct validity for a four-factor measure of attributions assessing the dimensions of controllability, stability, globality, and universality (the CSGU). In Study 1, using confirmatory factor analysis, factors were confirmed across least successful and most successful conditions. In Study 2, following less successful performances, correlations supported hypothesized relationships between subscales of the CSGU and subscales of the CDSII (McAuley, Duncan, & Russell, 1992). In Study 3, following less successful performances, moderated hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that individuals have higher subsequent self-efficacy when they perceive causes of performance as controllable, and/or specific, and/or universal. An interaction for controllability and stability demonstrated that if causes are perceived as likely to recur, it is important to perceive that causes are controllable. Researchers are encouraged to use the CSGU to examine main and interactive effects of controllability and generalizability attributions upon outcomes such as self-efficacy, emotions, and performance.

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy in Thai Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Multicenter Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monthida Sangruangake ◽  
Chananya Jirapornkul ◽  
Cameron Hurst
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Hba1c Control

Objective. The aims of this study were to translate and psychometrically evaluate the Thai version of diabetes management self-efficacy scale (T-DMSES) and to examine its association with HbA1c control in diabetic individuals. Methods. This study recruited patients from outpatient diabetes clinics of both community and university hospitals. The first phases of this study involved translation of the existing DMSES into Thai, and in the second phase, we evaluated its psychometric properties. The construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion validity of DMSES was subsequently evaluated by examining DMSES’s association with HbA1c control. Results. The T-DMSES contains 20 items across four factors. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated the construct validity of T-DMSES (χ2=645.142, df = 164, p<0.001, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.065, TLI = 0.977, and AGFI = 0.981). The T-DMSES was also shown to be criterion valid with most subscales highly associated with HbA1c control. Conclusion. The T-DMSES was shown to have good psychometric properties. It is likely to provide valuable insights into the epidemiology of diabetes management self-efficacy and may also prove useful in evaluating interventions for raising diabetes management self-efficacy, which in turn, improve both patient self-management and blood sugar control.

scholarly journals The psychometric properties of a Scale for Achievement Motive in Rehabilitation, and the effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty for community-dwelling elderly people using rehabilitation services

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Sano ◽  
Makoto Kyougoku
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Multidimensional Item Response Theory ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Multidimensional Item Response ◽  
Achievement Motive ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Item Responses

Background: Achievement motive is expected to prevent lack of self-efficacy and hope, which negatively impact rehabilitation support, health, and psychological well-being. It has been indicated that the factor structure of the Scale for Achievement Motive in Rehabilitation (SAMR), which was developed to evaluate the state of achievement motive in clients, is affected by gender, age, and type of disorder; however, the item responses for the SAMR have not been fully elucidated. Purpose: This study demonstrates the effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty. The secondary purpose was to test the psychometric properties for the robustness of factor analysis and the item responses for the SAMR. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess achievement motive, self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty in 581 community-dwelling elderly people. Data from a self-administered questionnaire were analyzed for structural relationship, using a structural equation modeling approach, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, and multidimensional item response theory. Results: For structural relationship, the modified model indicated an adequate model fit level {Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.914, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.906, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.062, 90% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.058, 0.066]}, with significant effects among achievement motive, self-efficacy, and hopelessness; i.e., the direct and indirect effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy and hopelessness were accepted. For multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, the SAMR factor structure displayed strong measurement invariance across the group for gender, care level, and age. For multidimensional item response theory, the results showed enough item discrimination and difficulty intensity for each SAMR item. Discussion: This study suggests that achievement motive is important to prevent clients from missing and giving up their goals and to execute support in rehabilitation smoothly. In addition, we suggest that SAMR is a structurally valid scale to measure two-factor structures across different groups, and the item characteristics and total score enable proper understanding of achievement motive.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of spirituality questionnaire by Parsian and Dunning in the Spanish version

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia ◽  
Alba Idaly Muñoz Sánchez ◽  
Divane de Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Young People ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Methodological Study ◽  
Reliability Score ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

The aim of this methodological study was to translate, culturally adapt and assess the internal consistency and validity of the Spanish version of the "Spirituality Questionnaire". The sample comprised 204 young people between 18 and 25 years of age from two universities in Bogotá. Cronbach's Alpha was used for reliability, while groups of experts and young people were used for construct validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity. The reliability score of the total instrument was 0.88. The overall index of content validity corresponded to 0.90. Exploratory factor analysis showed that four factors explain 52.60% of the variance. The originally proposed theoretical model was confirmed and, in two dimensions, a different structure was proposed. In conclusion, the instrument "Spirituality Questionnaire" by Parsian and Dunning is reliable and valid in the Spanish version.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale in Brazil and Portugal

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa B. R. Leme ◽  
Susana Coimbra ◽  
Jorge Gato ◽  
Anne Marie Fontaine ◽  
Zilda A. P. Del Prette
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Portuguese Adolescents ◽  
Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis

AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the construct validity, internal consistency and cross-cultural invariance of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale-Portuguese version (GSE) in a Brazilian and Portuguese sample. The GSE is composed of 10 items, designed to parsimoniously and comprehensively assess self-efficacy beliefs to deal with a wide range of stress-inducing situations. The construct validity (factorial, convergent and discriminant) and internal consistency of the instrument were established within a sample of 304 Portuguese adolescents (study 1) and a sample of 477 Brazilian adolescents (study 2). Then, the invariance of the GSE was tested in a sample of Brazilian adolescents (study 3), using Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA). In the first two studies, the construct validity of the GSE was demonstrated in its three components and the reliability of the scales was confirmed based on satisfactory levels of internal consistency. In the third study, the cross-cultural invariance of the instrument was established. This work adds to previous research on generalized self-efficacy instruments, with good psychometric qualities. Moreover, comparisons can now be made with confidence using this instrument among adolescent samples from Portugal and Brazil.

scholarly journals The psychometric properties of a Scale for Achievement Motive in Rehabilitation, and the effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty for community-dwelling elderly people using rehabilitation services

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Sano ◽  
Makoto Kyougoku
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Multidimensional Item Response Theory ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Multidimensional Item Response ◽  
Achievement Motive ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Item Responses

Background: Achievement motive is expected to prevent lack of self-efficacy and hope, which negatively impact rehabilitation support, health, and psychological well-being. It has been indicated that the factor structure of the Scale for Achievement Motive in Rehabilitation (SAMR), which was developed to evaluate the state of achievement motive in clients, is affected by gender, age, and type of disorder; however, the item responses for the SAMR have not been fully elucidated. Purpose: This study demonstrates the effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty. The secondary purpose was to test the psychometric properties for the robustness of factor analysis and the item responses for the SAMR. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess achievement motive, self-efficacy, hopelessness, and economic poverty in 581 community-dwelling elderly people. Data from a self-administered questionnaire were analyzed for structural relationship, using a structural equation modeling approach, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, and multidimensional item response theory. Results: For structural relationship, the modified model indicated an adequate model fit level {Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.914, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.906, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.062, 90% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.058, 0.066]}, with significant effects among achievement motive, self-efficacy, and hopelessness; i.e., the direct and indirect effects of achievement motive on self-efficacy and hopelessness were accepted. For multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, the SAMR factor structure displayed strong measurement invariance across the group for gender, care level, and age. For multidimensional item response theory, the results showed enough item discrimination and difficulty intensity for each SAMR item. Discussion: This study suggests that achievement motive is important to prevent clients from missing and giving up their goals and to execute support in rehabilitation smoothly. In addition, we suggest that SAMR is a structurally valid scale to measure two-factor structures across different groups, and the item characteristics and total score enable proper understanding of achievement motive.

Assessing Self-Efficacy in Presentation and Moderation Skills

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 564-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Ringeisen ◽  
Sonja Rohrmann ◽  
Anika Bürgermeister ◽  
Ana N. Tibubos
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Constructed Self ◽  
University Course ◽  
Correlated Factors ◽  
Report Measure

Abstract. By means of two studies, a self-report measure to assess self-efficacy in presentation and moderation skills, the SEPM scales, was validated. In study 1, factorial and construct validity were examined. A sample of 744 university students (41% females; more than 50% between 20 and 25 years) completed newly constructed self-efficacy items. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) substantiated two positively correlated factors, presentation (SEPM-P) and moderation self-efficacy (SEPM-M). Each factor consists of eight items. The correlation patterns between the two SEPM subscales and related constructs such as extraversion, the preference for cooperative learning, and conflict management indicated adequate construct validity. In study 2, criterion validity was determined by means of latent change modeling. One hundred sixty students ( Mage = 24.40, SD = 4.04; 61% females) took part in a university course to foster key competences and completed the SEPM scales at the beginning and the end of the semester. Presentation and moderation self-efficacy increased significantly over time of which the latter was positively associated with the performance in a practical moderation exam. Across both studies, reliability of the scales was high, ranging from McDonald’s ω .80 to .88.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document