scholarly journals Multibody Modeling Method for UHV Porcelain Arresters Equipped with Lead Alloy Isolation Device

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Xiaochao Su ◽  
Lei Hou ◽  
Zhubing Zhu ◽  
Yushu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Isolation ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Modeling Method ◽  
Lead Alloy ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Governing Equations ◽  
Multibody Modeling ◽  
Isolation Device

This paper presents a multibody modeling method for seismic analysis of UHV porcelain surge arresters equipped with a kind of seismic isolation device. An UHV arrester is modeled as a planar multibody system whose number of DOF is equal to the number of the arrester units. Joint coordinate method is adopted to construct the governing equations of motion. The seismic isolation device utilizing a number of lead alloy dampers as its core energy dissipation components is also investigated. An analytical model of this device is given by modeling each lead alloy damper as a hysteretic spring and reducing the entire device to a planar system consisting of a range of hysteretic springs. Its mechanical characteristic is derived theoretically, and the obtained moment-angle relationship is expressed as a system of differential algebraic equations. The initial rotational stiffness of the device is formulated in terms of the structural and mechanical parameters of the device. This analytic expression is used in estimating the fundamental frequency of the isolated equipment. By this modeling method, it is easy to construct the governing equations of motion for the isolated system. An UHV arrester specimen is analyzed by this proposed method. The effectiveness of the isolation device in terms of reducing the internal base moment is significant and the influence of system parameters on the effectiveness is also discussed. The proposed method shows its potential usefulness in optimal design of the isolation device.

Analytical Modelling of the Dynamics of the Four-Bar Mechanism: A Comparison of Some Methods

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Meijaard ◽  
V. van der Wijk
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Work ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Force Balance ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Principle Of Virtual Work ◽  
Principal Vector ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Principal Points

Some thoughts about different ways of formulating the equations of motion of a four-bar mechanism are communicated. Four analytic methods to derive the equations of motion are compared. In the first method, Lagrange’s equations in the traditional form are used, and in a second method, the principle of virtual work is used, which leads to equivalent equations. In the third method, the loop is opened, principal points and a principal vector linkage are introduced, and the equations are formulated in terms of these principal vectors, which leads, with the introduced reaction forces, to a system of differential-algebraic equations. In the fourth method, equivalent masses are introduced, which leads to a simpler system of principal points and principal vectors. By considering the links as pseudorigid bodies that can have a uniform planar dilatation, a compact form of the equations of motion is obtained. The conditions for dynamic force balance become almost trivial. Also the equations for the resulting reaction moment are considered for all four methods.

scholarly journals Assessment of Linearization Approaches for Multibody Dynamics Formulations

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco González ◽  
Pierangelo Masarati ◽  
Javier Cuadrado ◽  
Miguel A. Naya
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical System ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Linearization Methods ◽  
Highly Nonlinear ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Way

Formulating the dynamics equations of a mechanical system following a multibody dynamics approach often leads to a set of highly nonlinear differential-algebraic equations (DAEs). While this form of the equations of motion is suitable for a wide range of practical applications, in some cases it is necessary to have access to the linearized system dynamics. This is the case when stability and modal analyses are to be carried out; the definition of plant and system models for certain control algorithms and state estimators also requires a linear expression of the dynamics. A number of methods for the linearization of multibody dynamics can be found in the literature. They differ in both the approach that they follow to handle the equations of motion and the way in which they deliver their results, which in turn are determined by the selection of the generalized coordinates used to describe the mechanical system. This selection is closely related to the way in which the kinematic constraints of the system are treated. Three major approaches can be distinguished and used to categorize most of the linearization methods published so far. In this work, we demonstrate the properties of each approach in the linearization of systems in static equilibrium, illustrating them with the study of two representative examples.

Trajectory Tracking of Underactuated Multibody Systems

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Reichl ◽  
Wolfgang Steiner
Keyword(s):  
Trajectory Tracking ◽  
Multibody Systems ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Inverse Dynamics ◽  
Feedforward Control ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
State Variables ◽  
Algebraic Equations

This work presents three different approaches in inverse dynamics for the solution of trajectory tracking problems in underactuated multibody systems. Such systems are characterized by less control inputs than degrees of freedom. The first approach uses an extension of the equations of motion by geometric and control constraints. This results in index-five differential-algebraic equations. A projection method is used to reduce the systems index and the resulting equations are solved numerically. The second method is a flatness-based feedforward control design. Input and state variables can be parameterized by the flat outputs and their time derivatives up to a certain order. The third approach uses an optimal control algorithm which is based on the minimization of a cost functional including system outputs and desired trajectory. It has to be distinguished between direct and indirect methods. These specific methods are applied to an underactuated planar crane and a three-dimensional rotary crane.

scholarly journals Numerical solution for consistent initial conditions of constrained mechanical systems

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-185
Author(s):  
Dinh Van Phong
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Solution ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Mechanical Systems ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
System Of Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Flexible Approach ◽  
Constrained Mechanical Systems ◽  
Consistent Initial Values

The article deals with the problem of consistent initial values of the system of equations of motion which has the form of the system of differential-algebraic equations. Direct treating the equations of mechanical systems with particular properties enables to study the system of DAE in a more flexible approach. Algorithms and examples are shown in order to illustrate the considered technique.

Null Space Method of Differential Equation Type for Motion Analysis of Multibody Systems

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kamiya ◽  
Yusaku Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Lagrange Multipliers ◽  
Multibody Systems ◽  
Null Space ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Governing Equations ◽  
Accurate Analysis ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Space Matrix ◽  
Space Method

The governing equations of multibody systems are, in general, formulated in the form of differential algebraic equations (DAEs) involving the Lagrange multipliers. For efficient and accurate analysis, it is desirable to eliminate the Lagrange multipliers and dependent variables. Methods called null space method and Maggi’s method eliminate the Lagrange multipliers by using the null space matrix for the constraint Jacobian. In previous reports, one of the authors presented methods which use the null space matrix. In the procedure to obtain the null space matrix, the inverse of a matrix whose regularity may not be always guaranteed. In this report, a new method is proposed in which the null space matrix is obtained by solving differential equations that can be always defined by using the QR decomposition, even if the constraints are redundant. Examples of numerical analysis are shown to validate the proposed method.

Automating the Derivation of the Equations of Motion of a Multibody Dynamic System With Uncertainty Using Polynomial Chaos Theory and Variational Work

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Ryan ◽  
Sarah C. Baxter ◽  
Philip A. Voglewede
Keyword(s):  
Chaos Theory ◽  
Polynomial Chaos ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Multibody Dynamic ◽  
Mass Spring ◽  
Polynomial Chaos Theory ◽  
Multibody Dynamic System ◽  
Crank Mechanism

Abstract Understanding how variation impacts a multibody dynamic (MBD) system's response is important to ensure the robustness of a system. However, how the variation propagates into the MBD system is complicated because MBD systems are typically governed by a system of large differential algebraic equations. This paper presents a novel process, variational work, along with the polynomial chaos multibody dynamics (PCMBoD) automation process for utilizing polynomial chaos theory (PCT) in the analysis of uncertainties in an MBD system. Variational work allows the complexity of the traditional PCT approach to be reduced. With variational work and the constrained Lagrangian formulation, the equations of motion of an MBD PCT system can be constructed using the PCMBoD automated process. To demonstrate the PCMBoD process, two examples, a mass-spring-damper and a two link slider–crank mechanism, are shown.

Application of Scaling to Multibody Dynamics Simulations

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Step Size ◽  
Virtual Lab ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Multibody Dynamic ◽  
Dynamics Simulations ◽  
Stability Issues

This paper will examine the importance of applying scaling to the equations of motion for multibody dynamic systems when applied to industrial applications. If a Cartesian formulation is used to formulate the equations of motion of a multibody dynamic system the resulting equations are a set of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). The algebraic components of the DAEs arise from appending the joint equations used to model revolute, cylindrical, translational and other joints to the Newton-Euler dynamic equations of motion. Stability issues can arise in an ill-conditioned Jacobian matrix of the integration method this will result in poor convergence of the implicit integrator’s Newton method. The repeated failures of the Newton’s method will require a small step size and therefore simulations that require long run times to complete. Recent advances in rescaling the equations of motion have been proposed to address this problem. This paper will see if these methods or a variant addresses not only stability concerns, but also efficiency. The scaling techniques are applied to the Gear-Gupta-Leimkuhler (GGL) formulation for multibody problems by embedding them into the commercial multibody code (MBS) Virtual. Lab Motion and then use them to solve an industrial sized automotive example to see if performance is improved.

A Geometric Derivation of the Equations of Motion for Mechanical Systems With Scleronomic Constraints

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sotirios Natsiavas ◽  
Elias Paraskevopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Methods ◽  
Lagrange Multipliers ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Mechanical Systems ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Constraint Equation ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Motion Constraints ◽  
Stiffness Properties

A new set of equations of motion is presented for a class of mechanical systems subjected to equality motion constraints. Specifically, the systems examined satisfy a set of holonomic and/or nonholonomic scleronomic constraints. The main idea is to consider the equations describing the action of the constraints as an integral part of the overall process leading to the equations of motion. The constraints are incorporated one by one, in a process analogous to that used for setting up the equations of motion. This proves to be equivalent to assigning appropriate inertia, damping and stiffness properties to each constraint equation and leads to a system of second order ordinary differential equations for both the coordinates and the Lagrange multipliers associated to the motion constraints automatically. This brings considerable advantages, avoiding problems related to systems of differential-algebraic equations or penalty formulations. Apart from its theoretical value, this set of equations is well-suited for developing new robust and accurate numerical methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document